
MeanMutton |

Gisher |

CorvusMask wrote:Soo yeah, can you cast spell that has only verbal component with Silent Spell? Figured I should check this out just in caseYes, you can. There is still significant debate if doing so means that the spell is detectable or not.
That debate was before this FAQ settled the issue of detectability. Every spell is detectable.

Fuzzy-Wuzzy |

Dukai wrote:What about Command? Is the command then given mentally?Like Bardic spells, and ALL language-dependent spells, Command is essentially a spell that can not be cast silently.
While all bardic spells have a verbal component, I was not aware that it can't be suppressed. Can you point me to the rules on this?

![]() |

Drahliana Moonrunner wrote:While all bardic spells have a verbal component, I was not aware that it can't be suppressed. Can you point me to the rules on this?Dukai wrote:What about Command? Is the command then given mentally?Like Bardic spells, and ALL language-dependent spells, Command is essentially a spell that can not be cast silently.
Silent Spell (Metamagic)
You can cast your spells without making any sound.Benefit: A silent spell can be cast with no verbal components. Spells without verbal components are not affected. A silent spell uses up a spell slot one level higher than the spell's actual level.
Special: Bard spells cannot be enhanced by this feat.

Drahliana Moonrunner |

Drahliana Moonrunner wrote:While all bardic spells have a verbal component, I was not aware that it can't be suppressed. Can you point me to the rules on this?Dukai wrote:What about Command? Is the command then given mentally?Like Bardic spells, and ALL language-dependent spells, Command is essentially a spell that can not be cast silently.
Every bard spell has a verbal component (singing, reciting, or music).

Fuzzy-Wuzzy |

Fuzzy-Wuzzy wrote:Drahliana Moonrunner wrote:While all bardic spells have a verbal component, I was not aware that it can't be suppressed. Can you point me to the rules on this?Dukai wrote:What about Command? Is the command then given mentally?Like Bardic spells, and ALL language-dependent spells, Command is essentially a spell that can not be cast silently.Quote:Silent Spell (Metamagic)
You can cast your spells without making any sound.Benefit: A silent spell can be cast with no verbal components. Spells without verbal components are not affected. A silent spell uses up a spell slot one level higher than the spell's actual level.
Special: Bard spells cannot be enhanced by this feat.
Thanks! Totally didn't occur to me to look there, just in the bard class.

Azothath |
as Gisher stated and pointed to the FAQ, spellcasting/SLAs/channelling etc are detectable (unless there are specific steps/rules taken to cover/misdirect it). Just eliminating components or using a skill (such as Stealth) isn't enough. You need a class ability, feat, another spellcasting etc.
There are several things involved; the caster, the casting, the target, and the spell area of effect (if any). You can probably hide the caster behind a Obscuring Mist but the Lightning Bolt coming out of the mist might be a tad obvious. So it depends on what part of the process/act you are trying to hide/conceal.
So the Rod of Metamagic Silent Spell will work except in the case of the Bard. The caster still has to have the Rod and concentrate for a sec using the regular casting time. The spell is still detectable via normal methods.
For Command, the command itself must still be communicated in some fashion (note the limited commands){I'd assume you now have a choice of spoken, pantomimed, hand signals etc}. The spell is School enchantment (compulsion) [language-dependent, mind-affecting] and those descriptors don't go away. I would not assume Telepathy.

Drahliana Moonrunner |

For Command, the command itself must still be communicated in some fashion (note the limited commands){I'd assume you now have a choice of spoken, pantomimed, hand signals etc}. The spell is School enchantment (compulsion) [language-dependent, mind-affecting] and those descriptors don't go away. I would not assume Telepathy.
The commands were limited to minimise rules tension over certain verbs that didn't make sense, such as commands to "Orgasm!".

Quandary |

Language dependent spells still require a language...
Only way that will be silent is if you (and target) know a non-auditory langauge, i.e. sign language.
(invoking language rules, means you can not just make a gesture that anybody can understand, it is actual language)
The real issue for me is non-language dependent spells, but which explicitly state/imply usage of spoken language...
Namely, the Power Word spells...
"You utter a single word of power that instantly kills one creature of your choice, whether the creature can hear the word or not."
Now, target being in Silenced zone is OK, they don't need to hear it...
But you need to "utter" the word of power, which doesn't seem compatable with removing Verbal components.

Azothath |
The exact details of what's going on are left to the GM and players, the game is purposely vague as it IS a roleplaying game.
Casters of Silent Spell Command can use Bluff to convey a secret message option (DC15) where the receiver automatically understands you. How exactly that happens is up to the GM & players.
I think many assume that Silent Spell requires you to be silent, and it does not. It only covers the component part of the casting, not the command. One assumes that the verbal components are some weird draconic words or what not (again, the game is purposefully non specific on this)... then the command. Just like Hypnotism or Suggestion the command/request/suggestion is not part of the components. How do I know? The command/request/suggestion part of the spell changes all the time and the game assumes that for a specific caster the act of casting a specific spell is a static formula (scribing in spellbooks, alchemical formulas, sorcerers only knowing specific spells...).
Words of Power have always been problematic. It's up to your GM to clear up any gray areas (as usual).

MeanMutton |

MeanMutton wrote:That debate was before this FAQ settled the issue of detectability. Every spell is detectable.CorvusMask wrote:Soo yeah, can you cast spell that has only verbal component with Silent Spell? Figured I should check this out just in caseYes, you can. There is still significant debate if doing so means that the spell is detectable or not.
I hadn't seen that! Awesome, thanks!

MeanMutton |

CorvusMask wrote:Soo yeah, can you cast spell that has only verbal component with Silent Spell? Figured I should check this out just in caseYes, you can. There is still significant debate if doing so means that the spell is detectable or not.
After reading that - I really need to get the new Ultimate Intrigue because now I have absolutely no idea how Charm Person should work.