mechaPoet RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 32 |
1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. |
Here's the ability for reference, with the most relevant text bolded:
At 6th level, a kineticist's study of her body and the elemental forces that course through it allow her to form an internal buffer to store extra energy.
The buffer starts empty and doesn't replenish each day, but the kineticist can accept 1 point of burn to add 1 point to the buffer as a full-round action, to a maximum of 1 point total. This maximum increases to 2 points at 11th level and to 3 points at 16th level. Once the kineticist adds points to her buffer, they remain indefinitely until she spends them.
When she would otherwise accept burn, a kineticist can spend 1 point from her buffer to avoid accepting 1 point of burn. She cannot spend more than 1 point from her buffer in this way for a single wild talent. Points spent from the internal buffer don't activate elemental overflow or add to its effects. Similarly, this buffer can be used to exceed the limit on the number of points of burn the kineticist can accept in a single turn.
Is it reasonable to assume that a kineticist with this ability can build up burn in their internal buffer in the undefined downtime between scenarios? I.e. start a scenario with a full buffer and no burn, assuming that they filled the buffer when a character could be doing their day job roll actions?
My gut says yes, that's fine, and I don't think there would be too much table variation on this. But it would be nice to get an official ruling, or to have some similar situation ruling for precedent.
mechaPoet RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 32 |
Sebastian Hirsch Venture-Captain, Germany—Bavaria |
Eric Clingenpeel Venture-Captain, Michigan—Mt. Pleasant |
Ryzoken |
Are people just playing assuming it starts full?
Yes. Or, more accurately: we assume the Kineticist fills it before he goes to sleep the night before, since it's exceptionally rare that a Kineticist ends a day burned out and thus can usually afford the 1-2 burn to fill said buffer.
Frankly, it isn't really that unreasonable an assumption.