
GreyWolfLord |

STR 13
INT 13 (17 if you do the IQ thing instead)
WIS 14
DEX 16
CONS 12
CHA 10
Fun little test, not sure how accurate it is though. Did college athletics...so I'm pretty certain some of my stats are probably higher in some areas than 99% of the rest of the nation...maybe 99.9% of the nation...
Then again, most of the test was put together as someone's opinion of how it works, sooooo....
Fun little way to compare things though.
PS: If anyone actually pops a leatherball that's properly put together and is new by kicking it (NOT an old, decaying one), I'm impressed. I've also never seen that, even by some of the largest football and rugby players I've ever met (University).

Crayon |
Crayon wrote:
Anyway, it was kinda fun, but I did find some of the question choices to be weird...I agree. It was odd getting Strength credit for having broken a board in front of others.
Self-defense was a fun elective class though.
In my case, having my Constitution reduced for abstaining from alcohol was the strangest part. I'd have thought, if anything, the reverse would be true...

Scythia |

Scythia wrote:In my case, having my Constitution reduced for abstaining from alcohol was the strangest part. I'd have thought, if anything, the reverse would be true...Crayon wrote:
Anyway, it was kinda fun, but I did find some of the question choices to be weird...I agree. It was odd getting Strength credit for having broken a board in front of others.
Self-defense was a fun elective class though.
I rarely drink myself, but I have in such quantities (without any reaction) to be able to check the "no effect from large amounts of alcohol" option, which I'm sure boosted mine. Since alcohol is a poison, I can see the logic in using it as part of a baseline. Especially since there aren't many other poisons that large numbers of people recreationally ingest.

![]() |

STR 13
INT 13 (17 if you do the IQ thing instead)
WIS 14
DEX 16
CONS 12
CHA 10Fun little test, not sure how accurate it is though. Did college athletics...so I'm pretty certain some of my stats are probably higher in some areas than 99% of the rest of the nation...maybe 99.9% of the nation...
Then again, most of the test was put together as someone's opinion of how it works, sooooo....
Fun little way to compare things though.
PS: If anyone actually pops a leatherball that's properly put together and is new by kicking it (NOT an old, decaying one), I'm impressed. I've also never seen that, even by some of the largest football and rugby players I've ever met (University).
Oh that's easy, Kick it at barbed wire ;)

Electric Wizard |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Electric Wizard wrote:Lied huh?STR: 9
INT: 17
WIS: 11
DEX: 18
CON: 10
CHR: 15
.
heh. It's obvious to see, since I posted first and, at that point, you only had
your own test results to compare against mine, my scores dominate your
scores. Now, you think me lying can be the only explanation of your inferiority.
But, with more data we see everyone's scores are pretty close to each other,
and your scores are low because that's just you.
.

Oceanshieldwolf |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Apprently i'm a neutral good 6th level human ranger withthe following array:
Ability Scores:
Strength- 14
Dexterity- 17
Constitution- 12
Intelligence- 14
Wisdom- 16
Charisma- 14
It was easily the most flawtardinated survey I have ever had the misfortune of undertaking. The questions are stupid, the assumptions asinine and the loaded factor appalling. Fairly sure it's an NSA front. Luckily I didn't so much lie as take the least stupid option a bunch of times. Plenty of questions did not provide an option that applied to me, and the usefulness of asking what I think of opposed ideations/concepts is incredibly suspect. How were my responses to subjective questions "graded"? For Wisdom? By what criteria.
Utterly stupid. I shoot an arrow in its head.

![]() |

yellowdingo wrote:Electric Wizard wrote:Lied huh?STR: 9
INT: 17
WIS: 11
DEX: 18
CON: 10
CHR: 15
.
heh. It's obvious to see, since I posted first and, at that point, you only had
your own test results to compare against mine, my scores dominate your
scores. Now, you think me lying can be the only explanation of your inferiority.
But, with more data we see everyone's scores are pretty close to each other,
and your scores are low because that's just you..
Or everybody lies on these. *shrugs*
Anyhow, playing along:
STR:13
INT:17
WIS:9
DEX:8
CON:12
CHR:9
Which amuses me, because they're pretty close to the stats I chose for myself for the Character Sheet part of the Paizo profile page.

UnArcaneElection |

STR:9 (1 point higher than what I put when I created my profile)
DEX:8 (matches what I put when I created my profile)
CON:9 (matches what I put when I created my profile, even though the dependence of the test on alcohol is just bad -- I do not consume alcohol or any other psychoactive drug, legal or illegal)
INT:15 (the only major mismatch -- gives me 3 more points than what I put when I created my profile -- if I'm that smart and decently wise as noted below, why am I not doing better?)
WIS:13 (1 point higher than what I put when I created my profile)
CHR:9 (1 point lower than what I put when I created my profile)
So I guess I would have to be a seriously suboptimal Wizard or Arcanist (with anti-optimization including both low Hit Points and lousy Initiative).
Also did the more comprehensive test linked from that page a while ago and it said I was a seriously suboptimal Chaotic Neutral Sorcerer (I could see myself as being non-Good, but NOT Chaotic). Go figure . . . .

Malwing |

Str: 8
Dex: 7
Con: 11
Int: 13
Wis: 13
Cha: 12 (edit: missed something. Cha's at 15)
Great. I'm a 3 point buy. I don't think I'm very playable.
Edit: at 15 Charisma I can probably go Bard if I put my 4th level bonus into Cha. Been going to the gym lately so I'm probably putting that into Str or Con instead.