Running / converting Season 0 scenarios


GM Discussion

Grand Lodge 4/5 *

Searched the messageboards and can't seem to find an answer. Is there any stance or anything said about how to convert season 0 scenarios? Choosing monster A from the scenario with equivalent monster B in Bestiary X is easy and done. Encounters with core races/class/levels I can pull from the NPC Codex, again, easy and done. What about custom stat'd creatures that are advanced with class levels (e.g. zombies with fighter levels, ghosts with barbarian levels). Do I convert that to PFRPG myself without worrying about violating something I'm not aware of?

5/5 5/55/5 ** Venture-Captain, Germany—Hamburg

If there's a stat-block in the scenario, I usually go with the numbers presented there (unless there are some obvious parts that are handled completely differently in Pathfinder, in which case I use the Pathfinder rules for that ability/feat/etc. instead). If neccessary, I calculate the CMD for the creature/NPC.

4/5 ****

Let's see what the guide says:

Guide wrote:
Season 0 (Scenarios #1–#28): Season 0 scenarios were written under the 3.5 rules set of the world’s oldest roleplaying game, before the release of the Pathfinder Roleplaying Game. Scenarios are to be run with minimal changes by GMs, limited to adding CMB/CMD scores to NPCs and monsters and using newly combined skills such as Stealth and Perception instead of Move Silently and Spot. If a creature in the scenario also appears in the Pathfinder RPG Bestiary, Pathfinder RPG Bestiary 2, or Pathfinder RPG Bestiary 3 and maintains the same CR between both rules sets, you may use the Pathfinder RPG stats in place of the 3.5 stats. This is the only substitution allowed in these scenarios.

So, if the creature is in one of the Bestiaries, and has the same CR, you can use the newer version, otherwise use it as written.

Do not convert things, do not pull from the NPC codex. Just calculate CMB/CMD and don't worry that they may being doing something not fully supported with the current rules set.

Grand Lodge 4/5 *

Smart-aleck. Coulda just said it's in the Guide. I had limited my research to this PFS page.

Sczarni

Thanks

Sczarni

What if the encounter references a 3.5 monster Manuel for a creature's stats?

I am signed up to gm among the living in 5 weeks. What do I do if a level zero scenario refers to a 3.5 m.m. page # for a creature? I am currently at work so I am unable to look in the beastieries right now. I am not listing any of the creatures for spoiler reasons

5/5

search for d20prd.org it will have all the stats from the 3.5MM online.

Sczarni

Thanks. I have heard of the conversion thing but have never GMed an encounter before where I had to do it.

Grand Lodge 4/5

d20 v3.5 System Reference Document

I'd probably grab the ZIP file just in case it doesn't stay up forever. It's an editable format if you want to make versions with templates and the like.

4/5 *

Between being optimized for 4 players *and* the fact that 3.5 PCs are about 1 level less powerful than Pathfinder PCs (based on the CR), Season 0 scenarios are generally not combat challenges for the typical 6 Pathfinder PCs (although many have great stories). Add to that the power creep of new classes and feats, and you may as well not run some of the encounters except as RP.

What if we treated PCs as one level higher for calculating APL when playing a Season 0 scenario? This would push people into playing the higher tier more often, offering more of a challenge and potentially higher rewards. Many of the S0 subtiers just add more creatures rather than more powerful creatures - it is usually just the boss who actually gets significantly tougher. I will have to look to see if this would actually work for all of them, but it might offer a way to make S0 scenarios more compatible. right now the easiest way to beat the WBL curve is to just play S0 scenarios because there is very little risk for reward.

3/5

Doesn't season 0 also have less gp reward though? Looking through all of the tier 1-2 stuff I have for that the gp award is ~450-475, rather than the 500+ found in other scenarios.

Grand Lodge 4/5 **** Venture-Captain, California—Sacramento

I really don't recommend calculating parties as one APL higher. Most of the encounters in season 0-1 are trivial for pathfinders, but there are several that are unintentionally lethal because the writers were just learning their craft or because of some odd editorial decisions. Especially in the 1-7 scenarios, moving a party of 4 level 2 PCs up to APL 3 and into the 3-4 subtier is a recipe for TPK.

Just run them for the RP, and don't worry if the players slaughter the monsters.

4/5 *

Flite, I was saying I'd *do* that, merely wondering if there was a way to make Season 0 useful given today's more poweful PCs. Most of the really lethal Season 0's are retired, but it is a letdown for players to cakewalk these combats. I would like to see a better way of handling APL for Season 0 so we can keep them useful.

Scarab Sages 4/5 RPG Superstar 2015 Top 16

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Limit signups for season 0 scenarios to 4 players?

Liberty's Edge 2/5 *

Rusty: Which imo is the only way you can run them. Sadly however a LOT of event organisers run on the view 'more is better' so will likely try to cajole you into running with 5 or 6.

Im off the same with later seasons too until we hit the seasons where 6 is standard.

Scarab Sages 4/5 RPG Superstar 2015 Top 16

Matthew Pittard wrote:

Rusty: Which imo is the only way you can run them. Sadly however a LOT of event organisers run on the view 'more is better' so will likely try to cajole you into running with 5 or 6.

Guess I'm just lucky that I am the event organizer for my local store. =P

Grand Lodge 5/5 ****

GM Lamplighter

Season 0 can be fantastic for a group of new players, starting with level 1, and no previous Pathfinder experience.

Just ran a group of 6 through Prince of Augustana, 5 of these PreGen characters, one will be up to level 2 now. They had a GREAT time.

The same scenario with one or two min-maxed level 2 could be a disaster as nothing might challenge them.

4/5 *

Good point, Thod...

Liberty's Edge 2/5 *

Thats what I did locally. I wanted to put out a a lot of 1-5's for players to play so i concentrated on running Season 0's under the proviso

A) Nobody else was willingly to run them
B) Im not sure I wanted to play some of them

Sadly I did run some of these with more than 6 players and it was yes a walkthrough for some/all. But the stories Season 0 puts out are pretty darn good. I just wish some of the scenarios had not been retired.

4/5 *

Matthew Pittard wrote:

Rusty: Which imo is the only way you can run them. Sadly however a LOT of event organisers run on the view 'more is better' so will likely try to cajole you into running with 5 or 6.

Im off the same with later seasons too until we hit the seasons where 6 is standard.

My experience is more that we have too many people to have a table of only 4, but no space (or no extra GM, or not *enough* extra players) to expand to another table to accommodate the extra people. Most coordinators are loathe to turn players away if there is any way to seat them, so we end up with parties of 6 even when we know it's not optimal for play experience.

Liberty's Edge 2/5 *

Tony: Im not the VC here, Chris our VC gets to make the tough decisions and I respect those that he makes.

Im just of the view that having 6 players on a 4 player scenario will actually put people OFF PFS. They will start to think that its all far too easy, goes by too quickly and isnt for them.

Scarab Sages 4/5 RPG Superstar 2015 Top 16

Tony Lindman wrote:
Matthew Pittard wrote:

Rusty: Which imo is the only way you can run them. Sadly however a LOT of event organisers run on the view 'more is better' so will likely try to cajole you into running with 5 or 6.

Im off the same with later seasons too until we hit the seasons where 6 is standard.

My experience is more that we have too many people to have a table of only 4, but no space (or no extra GM, or not *enough* extra players) to expand to another table to accommodate the extra people. Most coordinators are loathe to turn players away if there is any way to seat them, so we end up with parties of 6 even when we know it's not optimal for play experience.

Agreed. It often happens even if it is not ideal.

Community / Forums / Organized Play / GM Discussion / Running / converting Season 0 scenarios All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in GM Discussion