A glove of storing costs 10000 gp.
Putting an additional power into a magic item increases its value by 150% of the normal value of the less expensive item.
So if I want two gloves of storing, I can have them crafted for 25000 gp (by the book).
Then I can use them to snap, pop, reload, snap, pop, rotate, and TWF shoot a pair of pepperbox pistols.
Just making sure all of this is kosher with the rules.
Thanks!
|
I think you'll get disagreement on this, but here goes:
A "glove" of storing is a single glove, I think (from memory). So two gloves of storing would be 10,000 gp each and are two magic items. Just make sure when you buy them, the guy doesn't sell you two right-handed gloves!
Some might argue that the "glove" takes the hand slot, so you can't put another glove on the other hand, and I guess that makes sense RAW. But if I were your GM I'd let you get two Gloves of Storing (one left and one right) and use them both.
If the slot is an issue, then your solution sounds fine to me too.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
This is, quite specifically, disallowed.
A glove of storing uses up your entire hands slot. You may not use another item (even another glove of storing) that also uses the hands slot.
So your RAW answer is,"You may not do this."
In other words, you will need to speak with your GM if you want to do this. The most reasonable pricing of doing so is 25,000 gold pieces for a pair of gloves, where an item can be stored in both gloves. This is the simple half again rule.
This is quite a powerful item, as it opens up a lot of tactical weapon swapping, which is why it was limited to one glove. Two gloves allows for substantial abuse, by allowing you to make full melee and ranged attacks without any penalty for swapping with two powerful weapons (as opposed to the other alternative, which is making full attacks with both but being required to drop a weapon everytime you want to change over).
Quite powerful, as the weapon swapping allows for the bypassing of quite a few actions.
Meh, as long as he is paying the combined or slotless cost, I don't see what it could hurt.
You're not combining two different functions for +50% cost to one of them. You're trying to get double the yield out of an item in a magic item slot, and that costs *4.
Isn't there a blanket rule somewhere stating that your attacks must be made from highest base attack bonus to lowest? Wouldn't that mean you would be alternating between your primary hand and off-hand?
Isn't there a blanket rule somewhere stating that your attacks must be made from highest base attack bonus to lowest? Wouldn't that mean you would be alternating between your primary hand and off-hand?
Only highest to lowest for each hand. I think, but I can't find it. You can interchange or go all primary followed by all off-hand.
Isn't there a blanket rule somewhere stating that your attacks must be made from highest base attack bonus to lowest? Wouldn't that mean you would be alternating between your primary hand and off-hand?
Yes.
If you get multiple attacks because your base attack bonus is high enough, you must make the attacks in order from highest bonus to lowest. If you are using two weapons, you can strike with either weapon first. If you are using a double weapon, you can strike with either part of the weapon first.
You have to make all your attacks in order. Even if your fighting with two weapons.
If you have a BAB of +11 and the TWF feats your attack progression would look something like this: (+11/+11/+6/+6/+1/+1)
It doesn't matter if you attack (right, left, right, left, right, left) or (left, right, left, right, left, right) or even (right, left, left, right, right, left). You can strike either hand first, but the attacks must still be made in order.
A progression like this: (right, right, right, left, left, left) would be (+11/+6/+1/+11/+6/+1) Which is not in order from higher to lower. Eleven is definitely not lower than one.
If I recall correctly, a devloper stated that since the rule you quoted explictly states that multiple attacks from high base attack bonus specifically doesn't include attacks from two weapon fighting. As they are not granted by your BAB.
If I recall correctly, a devloper stated that since the rule you quoted explictly states that multiple attacks from high base attack bonus specifically doesn't include attacks from two weapon fighting. As they are not granted by your BAB.
I would very much like to see the source if you could link to it.
If I recall correctly, a devloper stated that since the rule you quoted explictly states that multiple attacks from high base attack bonus specifically doesn't include attacks from two weapon fighting. As they are not granted by your BAB.I would very much like to see the source if you could link to it.
I don't have a link. It's just something I remember reading some time on the board. I can try to look it up.
Please do.
On the Gloves: I'd put it as non-slot cost (20k) for the second glove. Glove of Storing is pretty specific about not allowing a second glove to work by default.
The PRD quote above is (I believe) the result of the FAQ on this topic. gnomersy is correct that the three sentences are all separate, and not meant to be taken as a whole. In other words, you can do (p-primary, o-offhand):
+6p/+1p, +6o/+1o OR
+6p/+6o/+1p/+1o
As a DM, I would forbid something like this:
+11p/+6p, +11o, +1p, +6o/+1o
Either do in order by hand, or order by bonus.
Please do.
I'm having trouble finding it. I can't really remember the exact wording. I could also be remembering incorrectly. I have the fined tuned memory of a rusty trap.
In any event, I think it resulted in people saying you could do all one hand in order, and then the other hand in order, or go between the two hands by attack bonus order. But those were pretty much your only options.