Helaman |
From the Shattered Star Players Guide:
Fame 5, 1 PP: Exchange one character trait taken at character creation for a new Pathfinder Society trait (see page 5). The character must still obey the normal trait system rules (such as not having more than one trait from the same category); however, the new trait does not need
to be from the same category as the trait it replaces.Will this be making an addition to PFS play?
Any word on this? This isn't half bad.
Chris Lambertz Digital Products Assistant |
kinevon |
Minor correction needed:
Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Inner Sea World Guide
Feats: all feats on pages 284–289 except Cypher Magic, Cypher Script, Eye of the Arclord, Fortune Teller, Hamatulatsu, Harrowed, and Shade of the Uskwood. For the Cypher Magic feat, replace the Scribe Scroll prerequisite with Spell Focus;
I think Cypher Magic should be deleted from the area I have bolded it, so as to reduce confusion.
Edit: Wasn't Hamatulatsu discussed and legalized, or is that Marty being confused?
Patrick Harris @ SD |
I agree with kinevon re: Cypher Magic.
Also Cypher Script; Mike said he was going to make that legal.
http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2owlm?Conflict-in-Additional-Resources#7
Chris Mortika RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16 |
Michael Brock Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator |
Will the aforementioned corrections need to wait until next month? I just need to know if I should hang on to my printout of the thread. :)
SIgh. Yes. Sorry, changes didn't get saved when I made them. I am doing it right now so they will be listed in November Additional Resources.
Chris Lambertz Digital Products Assistant |
Michael Brock Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator |
Minor correction needed:
Quote:Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Inner Sea World Guide
Feats: all feats on pages 284–289 except Cypher Magic, Cypher Script, Eye of the Arclord, Fortune Teller, Hamatulatsu, Harrowed, and Shade of the Uskwood. For the Cypher Magic feat, replace the Scribe Scroll prerequisite with Spell Focus;I think Cypher Magic should be deleted from the area I have bolded it, so as to reduce confusion.
This has been fixed now.
Michael Brock Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator |
I agree with kinevon re: Cypher Magic.
Also Cypher Script; Mike said he was going to make that legal.
http://paizo.com/threads/rzs2owlm?Conflict-in-Additional-Resources#7
This has been fixed now.
Victor Zajic |
Minor correction needed:
Quote:Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Inner Sea World Guide
Feats: all feats on pages 284–289 except Cypher Magic, Cypher Script, Eye of the Arclord, Fortune Teller, Hamatulatsu, Harrowed, and Shade of the Uskwood. For the Cypher Magic feat, replace the Scribe Scroll prerequisite with Spell Focus;I think Cypher Magic should be deleted from the area I have bolded it, so as to reduce confusion.
Edit: Wasn't Hamatulatsu discussed and legalized, or is that Marty being confused?
I made a post about Hamtulatsu, but there wasn't any discussion generated.
Dragnmoon |
If he is authorizing 12 level pregens for play, I will volunteer to run group of all level 12 pregens in Eyes of the Ten for a brave group of players...;)
Michael Brock Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Mike do you mean to authorize the 12 level pregens from the NPC Codex? If not, additional resources are not clear on that.
No, level 12s are not authorized. I will update the Additional Resources when I return to work but probably won't show up until December's update. Thanks for the heads up.
Mark Moreland Developer |
6 people marked this as a favorite. |
There has never been a restriction on printing out content from legally-obtained digital copies of our books for personal use. In this case, using one such printout so that someone can play at your table would count as personal use in the same way printing and distributing Chronicle sheets is permitted.
Michael Brock Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator |
thaX Venture-Lieutenant, Indiana—Martinsville |
Odea |
And not that this has anything to do with my question, but as I was looking at my copy of that document (the one dated Wednesday, November 28th, 2012), I noticed that in the introductory paragraphs it lists the core assumption as including the CRB and Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Seekers of Secrets. That's actually changed to the Pathfinder Society Field Guide now, hasn't it?
Maybe he means the "download a PDF of this document" link from additional resources?
And since it was only a few mouse clicks, I did the work for you; he DOES mean that document:
(If you’re bringing a printout of the pages, it must be from the actual Paizo PDF and not text copied and pasted into a blank word processing document). Since the core assumption for Pathfinder Society Organized Play is the Pathfinder RPG Core Rulebook, Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Seekers of Secrets, and the Pathfinder RPG Bestiary, we cannot assume that every Game Master will have the products listed below.
Emphasis mine.
See this download dated 2012-11-28 to see what he's talking about.EDIT: Copy/pasting this post to the "additional resources updates" sticky in the hope that it will be seen there by the powers that be.
Chris Lambertz Digital Products Assistant |
Christopher Rowe Contributor |
In the introductory paragraphs of the .pdf version of the Additional Resources document, this sentence appears (paragraph two, second column, second to last sentence):
Since the core assumption for Pathfinder Society Organized Play is the Pathfinder RPG Core Rulebook, Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Seekers of Secrets, and the Pathfinder RPG Bestiary, we cannot assume that every Game Master will have the products listed below.
Seekers of Secrets has been replaced in the core assumption by Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Pathfinder Society Field Guide, as is made clear by both the Field Guide entry in the Additional Resources document and the text describing the core assumption at p. 5 of the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play.
Speaking of which, isn't the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play itself part of the core assumption, and so should perhaps be mentioned in those introductory paragraphs if the other included items are going to be listed?
Michael Brock Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
In the introductory paragraphs of the .pdf version of the Additional Resources document, this sentence appears (paragraph two, second column, second to last sentence):
Additional Resources .pdf said wrote:Since the core assumption for Pathfinder Society Organized Play is the Pathfinder RPG Core Rulebook, Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Seekers of Secrets, and the Pathfinder RPG Bestiary, we cannot assume that every Game Master will have the products listed below.Seekers of Secrets has been replaced in the core assumption by Pathfinder Campaign Setting: Pathfinder Society Field Guide, as is made clear by both the Field Guide entry in the Additional Resources document and the text describing the core assumption at p. 5 of the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play.
Speaking of which, isn't the Guide to Pathfinder Society Organized Play itself part of the core assumption, and so should perhaps be mentioned in those introductory paragraphs if the other included items are going to be listed?
Thanks! I will get Seeker of Secrets replaced.
Chris Lambertz Digital Products Assistant |
WalterGM RPG Superstar Season 9 Top 8 |
2 people marked this as FAQ candidate. 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Noticed something interesting. As per the current additional resources, Knights of the Inner Sea is legal to an extent. Specifically, " Equipment: all equipment on pages 28–29 are legal for play except war lance." Equipment is listed in the book between pages 30-31, not 28-29. So, as written ATM, no equipment is legal from that book ;)
Second point of interest. We all know about the "what can my animal companion wear" incident, and the excellent, no nonsense FAQ that followed. The core of which is: "For the sake of PFS, animal companions can wear barding and neck-slot items. All other slots aren't really appropriate for animals (or even magical beasts)." However, in Knights of the Inner Sea there are a couple of wondrous items that are intended for mounts. Namely, the Bridle of Tricks and the War Saddle, that take up the neck and waist slots respectively. Per current PFS rules, these cannot be used on on mounts (but ironically, can be worn by PCs). Was this intentional?
Thanks!
teribithia9 |
Question on the new additional resources pdf: for Pathfinder Adventure Path #65: "Into the Nightmare Rift", it just says to reference the downloadable chronicle. Does this mean items on the chronicle are legal for general pfs play, or does it mean nothing from this adventure path is legal for play unless you play the sanctioned section?
—
Patrick Harris @ SD |
Question on the new additional resources pdf: for Pathfinder Adventure Path #65: "Into the Nightmare Rift", it just says to reference the downloadable chronicle. Does this mean items on the chronicle are legal for general pfs play, or does it mean nothing from this adventure path is legal for play unless you play the sanctioned section?
—
The latter, I would assume.
Michael Brock Pathfinder Society Campaign Coordinator |
Question on the new additional resources pdf: for Pathfinder Adventure Path #65: "Into the Nightmare Rift", it just says to reference the downloadable chronicle. Does this mean items on the chronicle are legal for general pfs play, or does it mean nothing from this adventure path is legal for play unless you play the sanctioned section?
—
Nothing from this chapter of the AP is legal unless you play the sanctioned section.
teribithia9 |
teribithia9 wrote:Nothing from this chapter of the AP is legal unless you play the sanctioned section.Question on the new additional resources pdf: for Pathfinder Adventure Path #65: "Into the Nightmare Rift", it just says to reference the downloadable chronicle. Does this mean items on the chronicle are legal for general pfs play, or does it mean nothing from this adventure path is legal for play unless you play the sanctioned section?
—
Thanks-wanted to make sure!
jjaamm |
However, in Knights of the Inner Sea there are a couple of wondrous items that are intended for mounts. Namely, the Bridle of Tricks and the War Saddle, that take up the neck and waist slots respectively. Per current PFS rules, these cannot be used on on mounts (but ironically, can be worn by PCs). Was this intentional?
Thanks!
LOLOLOLOLOL thank you for a good laugh to start this day
teribithia9 |
Noticed something interesting. As per the current additional resources, Knights of the Inner Sea is legal to an extent. Specifically, " Equipment: all equipment on pages 28–29 are legal for play except war lance." Equipment is listed in the book between pages 30-31, not 28-29. So, as written ATM, no equipment is legal from that book ;)
Second point of interest. We all know about the "what can my animal companion wear" incident, and the excellent, no nonsense FAQ that followed. The core of which is: "For the sake of PFS, animal companions can wear barding and neck-slot items. All other slots aren't really appropriate for animals (or even magical beasts)." However, in Knights of the Inner Sea there are a couple of wondrous items that are intended for mounts. Namely, the Bridle of Tricks and the War Saddle, that take up the neck and waist slots respectively. Per current PFS rules, these cannot be used on on mounts (but ironically, can be worn by PCs). Was this intentional?
Thanks!
I brought this up when the faq first came out, as it also precludes horses from wearing horseshoes of the zephyr or horseshoes of speed, etc. Mike pretty much replied that he expects people to use a little common sense. :)
Patrick Harris @ SD |
I brought this up when the faq first came out, as it also precludes horses from wearing horseshoes of the zephyr or horseshoes of speed, etc. Mike pretty much replied that he expects people to use a little common sense. :)
Do you have a link? As it stands, people are not doing so, and it would be nice to have a clarification to point them towards.