As the DM of an AP, not to fluff your feathers or anything, but you're kinda the key ingredient. If you can't make it, then reschedule the game for when you can.
If your group wants to play in your absence, they could easily do a one-hot adventure with different characters.
+1 to Ioaba's post.
I would work with the other GM and produce one shots that fill in the backstory of the NPCs. Say a tavern keeper is a former adventurer - the PCs could play a one shot that describes that keeper and his friends banding together twenty years ago to save the town from a different threat. Changes in the alternate storyline propagate through to the setting of the AP in minor ways (e.g., a portrait of a fallen companion on the wall of the tavern).
You could use it as a great story telling device - a continuous plotline involving the adventure path broken up by poignant moments of a minor character's life which reinforce the them of the main story while allowing riskier elements (character deaths, failure in general).
In my group we have three people who can DM. The Kingmaker DM has created side quests for each character that he fits in throughout the AP. If the DM were away we could easily come up with a side quest to cover his absence.
It would not be too hard for one of your other group members who can DM to prepare similar side quests so that if you are away he can run the group through on of them. That way the core Runelords stuff only occurs when you are there but an absence does not mess the group around.
We don't award XP, but rather the DM levels us up at appropriate points through the AP.
As far as treasure goes, at the end of each side quest there is a major piece of treasure for the relevant player but other than that no huge quantities so we don't get unbalanced.
You could set the major reward for each player but only reveal the details to the nominated DM.
|
1)Make sure everybody knows gaming in a group asks for a certain commitment (of time). Sadly, it won't work otherwise. If somebody would rather shedule from day to day he won't be able to work within a group where other commitments (work, family etc.) make that impossible for some players.
2)Get a shift plan from those who work in shifts (and from other players with non-flexible shedules). Compare the plans, shedule the game around the possible dates as far ahead as possible.
If your group wants to game together, the other players will try (as far as possible) plan around those dates.
3)If the plan has too little gametime for your taste, look who could (or would) be playing on days 'blocked' by players workshifts. Make different characters for short games (pathfinder society scenarios, different RPGs, Boardgames etc.)
You will still get the occasional 'downtime' due to unforseen circumstances, but you should be able to get a consistent group together.
For starters I think that feytharn has a few good suggestions, I am currently running a game with 4 players plus my self and we try and run every sunday at a set time, to accomadate all of our schedules. We do miss a few weeks from time to time, but we do try to play on a reguler basis.
When writing any adventures I try not to make them require any paticuler charater or write in alternate ways to find the same clues/ items/ facts/ etc. Understand I rarely use pre made adventures for my games as it tends to need almost as much work for me as writing one from the start.
When you game with grown ups no-shows are common. They happen all the time in my group and I am the biggest problem with that. Sometimes I just have to work late and there is no way around it. Or I had to work late the last 3 nights and am just too darn tired to be pleasant gaming company. Similar things happen with the others though not as often.
They key unwritten rule is to let people know as soon as possible. If I findout I will be working late, I send a text to the host so they don't wait on me.
The way we handle it in game is to just put that character on hold and he contibutes nothing except necessary skills. Ex: my char is a wizard the only full caster in the group. So if I can't make it, the wiz is assumed to be following the group but doesn't contribute unless his skills are absolutely needed. If the group has to have a detect magic, item identified, or dispel magic cast; they assume the wiz did it but he doesn't contribute to (or get xps for) fights or social encounters. When the player running the rogue can't make it, the rogue is sort of half there. He isn't scouting or backstabing, but if we need a lock picked we roll that for his skill check. It helps if people will leave readable character sheets at the hosts house so others can look something up.
This works pretty well for us.
As far as the other GM is concerned. If he never gets a chance to practice, he will never get better. Let him try sometimes and tell him what went well. Don't put him down over the mistakes, he probably realizes them as well.
|
With that level of inconsistency, I'd say go PFS. It's the only way I can game regularly these days; it is made to handle the "life happens" stuff of adulthood. People can continually rotate GMs, and those that make it the most often can "slow track" (take half XP-gold) so as not to get too far ahead.