The LGBT Gamer Community Thread.


Gamer Life General Discussion

6,101 to 6,150 of 19,058 << first < prev | 118 | 119 | 120 | 121 | 122 | 123 | 124 | 125 | 126 | 127 | 128 | next > last >>

Maybe I start donating blood this year... Assuming they will want it in the first place.

Are you suffering from...? No idea, never bothered with checking.
Do you have pressure? No idea, no one measured it since I was kid.
What is your blood type? No idea, hoped you will tell me.
Do you had sex with...? Haven't sex with anyone in ages.

I wonder if they still give you a tin can and chocolate after donation?


Drejk wrote:

Maybe I start donating blood this year... Assuming they will want it in the first place.

Are you suffering from...? No idea, never bothered with checking.
Do you have pressure? No idea, no one measured it since I was kid.
What is your blood type? No idea, hoped you will tell me.
Do you had sex with...? Haven't sex with anyone in ages.

I wonder if they still give you a tin can and chocolate after donation?

I haven't seen a tin can, but most places give you some kind of snack and juice or water. What you get generally depends on who's organizing the drive. Some of the church ones put on a pretty good spread. :)

They'll take your blood pressure and test your iron levels. They'll ask you about a whole bunch of diseases and drugs you've never heard of. It's generally a safe assumption that if you don't recognize it, it's not relevant to you. Some questions about travel. A bunch about sex.
Lately they've passed the laptop to me and had me go through and answer the questions on it, rather than doing it all verbally.


Different continent, different country, different rules.

For a long time blood donors here in Poland received a tablet of chocolate (or multiple tablets), "regenerative meal", and some other things. The exact composition of what blood donor got was and is changing.


Anyway I won't be able to give blood for at least next two weeks - I have dentist appointment for next week.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Drejk wrote:

Different continent, different country, different rules.

For a long time blood donors here in Poland received a tablet of chocolate (or multiple tablets), "regenerative meal", and some other things. The exact composition of what blood donor got was and is changing.

Ah. Wasn't thinking. That's that American privilege kicking in again.:)

Usually just assuming we're talking about the US doesn't leave me looking stupid.


I found the questionnaire for blood donors. Starts with the first page warning not to give blood after recent 'risky' behavior listing:

1. Taking illegal drugs in form of injections.
2. Sexual contacts with partners that take illegal drugs in form of injections.
3. Sexual contacts with multiple partners.
4. Sexual contacts for money (prostitution is legal but not regulated in Poland).
5. Sexual contacts with partner met recently.
6. Sexual contact with partners who had positive results for syphilis, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B/C.

No word about homosexual contacts. Yay, despite homophobia being quite common here.

The only actual question regarding sexuality on the questionnaire is asking if your partner had hepatitis in the last 6 months.


The page is not clear about the meal - it says high caloric meal 4500 kcal (8 chocolates). So they might give chocolates instead of actual meal.


Is the ban (or 'deferment' as they call it) on donating after doing those things permanent or for a certain term?


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Drejk wrote:
With common sue-happy mentality in USA I wouldn't be surprised that they are more afraid of people suing them: "You gave me gay blood?! noo! Wargh! Give me ten zillion dollars because you made me a sinner! My right to be bigot was violated by proving that gays have the same blood as righteous folk! No! It can't be! Waaarrghhh!"

At which point, any moderately-competent lawyer will suggest that the client shut up, sit down, and watch this episode of M*A*S*H.

Silver Crusade

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Drejk wrote:

I found the questionnaire for blood donors. Starts with the first page warning not to give blood after recent 'rysky' behavior listing:

1. Taking illegal drugs in form of injections.
2. Sexual contacts with partners that take illegal drugs in form of injections.
3. Sexual contacts with multiple partners.
4. Sexual contacts for money (prostitution is legal but not regulated in Poland).
5. Sexual contacts with partner met recently.
6. Sexual contact with partners who had positive results for syphilis, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B/C.

No word about homosexual contacts. Yay, despite homophobia being quite common here.

The only actual question regarding sexuality on the questionnaire is asking if your partner had hepatitis in the last 6 months.

You go to ONE orgy and you're labeled for life. Sheesh.


Paladin of Baha-who? wrote:

Ugh, the blood donation thing. This is a sore spot for me. I just got back from the hospital, actually, and, well, it was kinda harrowing.

** spoiler omitted **

TL;DR: I went to the hospital and needed 13 pints of blood.

Frustrations aside, good to hear you're okay.


Rysky wrote:
Drejk wrote:

I found the questionnaire for blood donors. Starts with the first page warning not to give blood after recent 'rysky' behavior listing:

1. Taking illegal drugs in form of injections.
2. Sexual contacts with partners that take illegal drugs in form of injections.
3. Sexual contacts with multiple partners.
4. Sexual contacts for money (prostitution is legal but not regulated in Poland).
5. Sexual contacts with partner met recently.
6. Sexual contact with partners who had positive results for syphilis, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B/C.

No word about homosexual contacts. Yay, despite homophobia being quite common here.

The only actual question regarding sexuality on the questionnaire is asking if your partner had hepatitis in the last 6 months.

You go to ONE orgy and you're labeled for life. Sheesh.

Those didn't seem to be permanent bans, instead, that was part of warning that there is a period after potential infection during which tests are negative even when infected and thus one should not donate when one of those activities was taken recently. There was no specification about the timeframe, though, implying that you have to consult if you are unsure.


KSF wrote:

Frustrations aside, good to hear you're okay.

Thank you.


Rysky wrote:
Drejk wrote:

I found the questionnaire for blood donors. Starts with the first page warning not to give blood after recent 'rysky' behavior listing:

1. Taking illegal drugs in form of injections.
2. Sexual contacts with partners that take illegal drugs in form of injections.
3. Sexual contacts with multiple partners.
4. Sexual contacts for money (prostitution is legal but not regulated in Poland).
5. Sexual contacts with partner met recently.
6. Sexual contact with partners who had positive results for syphilis, HIV/AIDS, Hepatitis B/C.

No word about homosexual contacts. Yay, despite homophobia being quite common here.

The only actual question regarding sexuality on the questionnaire is asking if your partner had hepatitis in the last 6 months.

You go to ONE orgy and you're labeled for life. Sheesh.

I wanna go...


Same here.

Shadow Lodge

I'm in. Do we have to bring a copy of our last blood screening?


20 people marked this as a favorite.

Went to court this morning. My name change is now official. It's a good feeling.

Now on to the DMV to get my name and gender marker changed on my license.

Silver Crusade

3 people marked this as a favorite.
Usual Suspect wrote:
I'm in. Do we have to bring a copy of our last blood screening?

No, just bring a printout of the 'Succubus in a grapple' thread and you're good to go!

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Malachi Silverclaw wrote:
Usual Suspect wrote:
I'm in. Do we have to bring a copy of our last blood screening?
No, just bring a printout of the 'Succubus in a grapple' thread and you're good to go!

I will have to look that up; but I might be too young to read it at 49.

And CONGRATS to KSF. We're thrilled that you get to finally live your life and not the one society was trying to impose for simplicity. Best wishes going forward too.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Usual Suspect wrote:
Malachi Silverclaw wrote:
Usual Suspect wrote:
I'm in. Do we have to bring a copy of our last blood screening?
No, just bring a printout of the 'Succubus in a grapple' thread and you're good to go!

I will have to look that up; but I might be too young to read it at 49.

And CONGRATS to KSF. We're thrilled that you get to finally live your life and not the one society was trying to impose for simplicity. Best wishes going forward too.

Seconded, though I'm mildly surprised that they allow 'KSF' as a name....


1 person marked this as a favorite.
KSF wrote:

Went to court this morning. My name change is now official. It's a good feeling.

Now on to the DMV to get my name and gender marker changed on my license.

This news makes me insanely happy! Wheeeeeeeeeee! :D

Well, OK, reaching insanity is usually just a brisk stroll on most slaadi days, but still. Wheeeeee!

Well, OK, not the waiting at the DMV part, but everything else!


2 people marked this as a favorite.

Thanks for the well-wishes everyone.

How I'm feeling today.


2 people marked this as a favorite.

I’m late as usual, but I would like to add my congratulations to the others’, and all the best with next steps at the DMV and beyond.

Wonderfully cute video clip, by the way. Though now I want to watch Blackadder again for the episodes with Flashheart, because that's what popped into my head from Flash-. :)


Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
Drejk wrote:
With common sue-happy mentality in USA I wouldn't be surprised that they are more afraid of people suing them: "You gave me gay blood?! noo! Wargh! Give me ten zillion dollars because you made me a sinner! My right to be bigot was violated by proving that gays have the same blood as righteous folk! No! It can't be! Waaarrghhh!"
At which point, any moderately-competent lawyer will suggest that the client shut up, sit down, and watch this episode of M*A*S*H.

Or that one episode of Family Guy where it was revealed that homosexuals have acid for blood (ergo, the blood they were given couldn't have *really* been from a homosexual, or they would be dead).


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Musical interlude

Shadow Lodge

Okay, I really need to find a LGBT game group in the Dayton Ohio area to play Pathfinder with. Gaming is awesome, but there are limits on just how open I can be without making people uncomfortable. Anybody know of any groups in my area?

Liberty's Edge Contributor

5 people marked this as a favorite.
KSF wrote:

Went to court this morning. My name change is now official. It's a good feeling.

Now on to the DMV to get my name and gender marker changed on my license.

Congratulations!

And seriously, take a camera. The look at the DMV is invariably hilarious


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Crystal Frasier wrote:
KSF wrote:

Went to court this morning. My name change is now official. It's a good feeling.

Now on to the DMV to get my name and gender marker changed on my license.

Congratulations!

And seriously, take a camera. The look at the DMV is invariably hilarious

Thanks!

And actually, they were really cool about it, like it was just another thing you get changed on the license. Without missing a beat, he said, "Okay, great. Fill out this form, go get your picture taken over there." Maybe because it's Madison?

When I was at the final window (after check-in, and getting the picture taken), we were going through the form and stuff (I had everything I needed - court order for the name, doctor's letter for the gender, which is what you need in Wisconsin), and the guy asked if I'd changed my social security yet.

I said, "No, I was planning on doing that after getting the new license." He said, "Okay, so a flag's popping up because the records aren't matching up." "You mean like gender?" "Yeah. I can override it. But you can only get one override every 8 years." And I was like, "Well, I'm not planning on changing back!" Which he laughed at.

So, it went really well. Just have to wait for it to arrive in the mail now. Then I can get my SS card taken care of, and I should be all set.


Maybe you ended with clerks that are already experienced with legal gender change?


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Drejk wrote:
Maybe you ended with clerks that are already experienced with legal gender change?

Possibly. But Madison's also is a very progressive city, for the most part, particularly with regards to LGBT issues. (One of the reasons I made sure to stay here after leaving grad school, so I'd have a good place to transition.)

Project Manager

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Madison is the best and I miss it so much. <3


1 person marked this as a favorite.

My only knowledge of Madison before KSF was ordering from Westfield Comics many years ago. Since Westfield was awesome, it made be forever associate Madison=awesome.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Madison is a pretty cool place. I'd originally wanted to go to grad school in Chicago (I was coming from Pittsburgh), but I'm so glad I wound up here instead.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
My only knowledge of Madison before KSF was ordering from Westfield Comics many years ago. Since Westfield was awesome, it made be forever associate Madison=awesome.

Westfield is still awesome.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

I wrote a report on Wisconsin in elementary school...

One of my earliest memories was of meeting my very first white male person at my mom's job. His name was Phil and he was from Wisconsin. I remember something being weird about Phil..there is a chance he was the first gay person I knowingly met as well.


thejeff wrote:
Ambrosia Slaad wrote:
My only knowledge of Madison before KSF was ordering from Westfield Comics many years ago. Since Westfield was awesome, it made be forever associate Madison=awesome.
Westfield is still awesome.

Their stores are pretty good, as are the people behind the counter. I used to have a pull list years ago, but had to stop. I went back in a year after I'd stopped my pull list, and one of the clerks/managers remembered me.

I haven't been to the newer one on Willy St. yet, but I still pop into the other one in town from time to time. Good selection of trades, and lots of cool comics/sci-fi sundries.


This could be it.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the decisions of Federal Courts in Ohio, Michigan, Tennessee, and Kentucky, meaning that in those states, same-sex marriage bans ARE legal.

So what do ya'll think happens next?

Does the Supreme Court swoop in and take the case this session, guaranteeing us a final resolution by June 2015?

Or do they punt it to next session, thus delaying the inevitable?

When SCOTUS finally does take the case, will they rule for equality in all 50 states, or will the LGBT community suffer the greatest loss of civil rights in a very long time?

It's also possible that challengers can ask the Sixth to reconsider their decision (an en banc court).

Except for that last option, one way or another things will be coming to a head.


I hope they legalize it here in Nebraska. If anything comes up on the ballot, I'll vote for it!


Kryzbyn wrote:
I hope they legalize it here in Nebraska. If anything comes up on the ballot, I'll vote for it!

I definitely appreciate the thought, but we're nearing a point where voting may no longer be possible. If the Supreme Court rules the way Anthony Kennedy did on the DOMA case, same-sex marriage will be legal in all 50 states.

If they rule against it, than all those states where judges struck it down, will once more treat the LGBT community as second-class citizens. In that event then yes, unfortunately voting will be necessary for every single state that passed gay marriage bans. In that event, we will lose pretty much everything.


3 people marked this as a favorite.
Generic Villain wrote:

This could be it.

The Sixth Circuit Court of Appeals overturned the decisions of Federal Courts in Ohio, Michigan, Tennessee, and Kentucky, meaning that in those states, same-sex marriage bans ARE legal.

So what do ya'll think happens next?

Does the Supreme Court swoop in and take the case this session, guaranteeing us a final resolution by June 2015?

Or do they punt it to next session, thus delaying the inevitable?

When SCOTUS finally does take the case, will they rule for equality in all 50 states, or will the LGBT community suffer the greatest loss of civil rights in a very long time?

It's also possible that challengers can ask the Sixth to reconsider their decision (an en banc court).

Except for that last option, one way or another things will be coming to a head.

I need to stop reading those articles. Every time they quote a conservative judge or politician, the stuff they say always makes me so angry.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
KSF wrote:


I need to stop reading those articles. Every time they quote a conservative judge or politician, the stuff they say always makes me so angry.

There is an out-there possibility. One author suggested that the Sixth Circuit ruled as they did specifically to force the Supreme Court to do their damn job. The SC has put this off and put this off, and now, because of the Sixth Circuit, they are all-but required to put this to rest once and for all.

I was initially pissed when I read this decision, but after some consideration, I'm downright elated. There's a very good chance that we'll win this. The only downside - and I'm being Machiavellian here - is that if the Supremes grant us equality now, it won't be an issue to galvanize voters in 2016.


7 people marked this as a favorite.

So Wednesday has marked a year since my girlfriend and I have been dating. Went to an Italian place that's between where we live and Wilton Manors, which is a huge LGBT city down here in Florida.

Silver Crusade

Congrats on your anniversary Demon Lord ^w^


4 people marked this as a favorite.

Many thanks. Once marriage equality is allowed here and things progress on the trans* front for legal documents and such, we plan on tying the knot. Just gotta defeat Voldemort Rick Scott and his neverending quest to oppress the LGBT community.

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
KSF wrote:
Generic Villain wrote:

This could be it.

I need to stop reading those articles. Every time they quote a conservative judge or politician, the stuff they say always makes me so angry.

Don't quit reading, KSF. I know it's frustrating and aggravating, but we need the world to see our anger and frustration at being treated as second class citizens in order to push this over the top. As frustrating as it is for all of my friends here in Ohio this is a good thing. The Supreme Court needs to rule now before any possible shift in the court's makeup. The one thing that makes Roberts and Alito tolerable is that they will stand behind precedence. So this ruling needs to come while Kennedy and Ginsburg are still on the court.

The time is coming. We just can't sit back passively waiting with patience or we'll wind up waiting another 50 years.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Usual Suspect Speaks Truth.

Film At 11.

Shadow Lodge

Freehold DM wrote:

Usual Suspect Speaks Truth.

Film At 11.

It happens from time to time. I'm terribly sorry; I'll try not to do that anymore. :)

Contributor

I would expect a majority decision in favor of equality for gay marriage. Probably 7-2 given the court membership at the moment.

Silver Crusade

7-2? I doubt it, given that Windsor was only 5-4.

Roberts might flip, citing the Windsor precedent (despite his dissent on that decision), but I don't think there is any reason to think Alito will.


Todd Stewart wrote:
I would expect a majority decision in favor of equality for gay marriage. Probably 7-2 given the court membership at the moment.

Considering how SCOTUS ruled on the DOMA case, that's optimistic. Pope Scalia, Thomas, Roberts, and Alito were all pro-discrimination last time. If/when the case comes before them again, I'd be surprised if any of them budged.

Useless Speculation:
On the other hand, actually ruling in favor of same-sex marriage bans would, at this juncture, be such an obvious and blatant step in the wrong direction. It would also be a huge mess because of all the people that have gotten married since 10/6. Maybe those four Justices realized the case was lost after DOMA was struck down, and are ready to throw their hands up in defeat. That could be why they chose not to take any of the appeals from Circuit Courts that had previously ruled against same-sex marriage bans.

*Edit: Ninja'd by Celestial Healer.

1 to 50 of 19,058 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / General Discussion / The LGBT Gamer Community Thread. All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.