Dull thread that should just die a quiet death


Off-Topic Discussions

51 to 90 of 90 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

At least have the decency to untie Meg before you fall asleep, Quagmire.


Reality TV


Winnegan's fake. wrote:

At least have the decency to untie Meg before you fall asleep, Quagmire.

Meg?! OhGod!!!...Giggity...


The Threadkiller wrote:
I'm not just any contract thread killer, I am THE Threadkiller. That implies that I must excel at thread killing.
TheAntiElite wrote:
If I keep working my thread necromancy like this I may go up a level!

Weer n ur bords, necromancing ur ded threds!!!11111eleventy-one!!!


DEATH IS NO REFUGE!!!


Messageboard Necromancer wrote:
DEATH IS NO REFUGE!!!

See, that's what I'm talkin' 'bout!

Liberty's Edge Contributor, RPG Superstar 2012

O_o

This thread is still around?!

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm gong to go watch paint dry.


Using the words Straw-man in a post... Yes I realise the irony of me posting list or is it hypocrisy. I am not sure because I am not using straw-man as part of my argument, unless by denying the the use of the straw-man is creating a straw-man, I sure that is a probable logical fallacy. I could be making an ad homonym attack against my straw-man.


The 8th Dwarf wrote:
Using the words Straw-man in a post... Yes I realise the irony of me posting list or is it hypocrisy. I am not sure because I am not using straw-man as part of my argument, unless by denying the the use of the straw-man is creating a straw-man, I sure that is a probable logical fallacy. I could be making an ad homonym attack against my straw-man.

Looks ironic to me.


*Active-aggressive response to passive-aggressive thread*


KaeYoss wrote:
*Active-aggressive response to passive-aggressive thread*

I thought this thread was a passive-aggressive response to a passive aggressive thread where your response stating that this thread is an *Active-aggressive response to passive-aggressive thread* is an active aggressive response to the thread and on the whole a straw-man logical ad homonym fallacy.


Alanis Morrissette wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:
Using the words Straw-man in a post... Yes I realise the irony of me posting list or is it hypocrisy. I am not sure because I am not using straw-man as part of my argument, unless by denying the the use of the straw-man is creating a straw-man, I sure that is a probable logical fallacy. I could be making an ad homonym attack against my straw-man.
Looks ironic to me.

Thanks Alanis - liked you as God in Dogma! BTW rain on your wedding day is not ironic just inconvenient....


THERE MUST BE NOISE! THERE WILL BE NOISE! I DEMAND NOISE!!!!!!!!!


*Disparaging comment against dwarves with their short figure and ratty bards*

Spoiler:
Just kidding of course - dwarves can't be insulted, even the meanest things you could think of are a compliment to them.

RPG Superstar 2012

KaeYoss wrote:

*Disparaging comment against dwarves with their short figure and ratty bards*

** spoiler omitted **

Just don't call one beardless.


taig wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:

*Disparaging comment against dwarves with their short figure and ratty bards*

** spoiler omitted **

Just don't call one beardless.

That reminds me: You know what's real funny? Alchemist's fire to a dwarf's beard so it burns all away, followed by the quip "what an ugly gnome!"


Blah blah race X is so much better than race Y Blah Blah blah attempted offensive comment blah blah blah blah dribble dribble....

---- Also dull and clichéd

RPG Superstar 2012

KaeYoss wrote:
taig wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:

*Disparaging comment against dwarves with their short figure and ratty bards*

** spoiler omitted **

Just don't call one beardless.

That reminds me: You know what's real funny? Alchemist's fire to a dwarf's beard so it burns all away, followed by the quip "what an ugly gnome!"

Hee hee.

Well, it is funny until the warhammer crushes your skull.


taig wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
taig wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:

*Disparaging comment against dwarves with their short figure and ratty bards*

** spoiler omitted **

Just don't call one beardless.

That reminds me: You know what's real funny? Alchemist's fire to a dwarf's beard so it burns all away, followed by the quip "what an ugly gnome!"

Hee hee.

Well, it is funny until the warhammer crushes your skull.

I'll have wandered away long before that hammer gets all the way up to my skull.


The 8th Dwarf wrote:

Blah blah race X is so much better than race Y Blah Blah blah attempted offensive comment blah blah blah blah dribble dribble....

---- Also dull and clichéd

Isn't that the point? Didn't want to derail the thread.


taig wrote:

O_o

This thread is still around?!

Now, if you'll excuse me, I'm gong to go watch paint dry.

I prefer to watch concrete dry.

Dark Archive

thread necromacy for the win!


KaeYoss wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:

Blah blah race X is so much better than race Y Blah Blah blah attempted offensive comment blah blah blah blah dribble dribble....

---- Also dull and clichéd

Isn't that the point? Didn't want to derail the thread.

Glad to know that you are contributing to the threads demise...


I prefer to watch paint fade, watching it dry is for n00bs.


Winnegan's fake. wrote:
I prefer to watch paint fade, watching it dry is for n00bs.

So? I watch mountains erode. I follow the movement of tectonic plates with interest.


KaeYoss wrote:
Winnegan's fake. wrote:
I prefer to watch paint fade, watching it dry is for n00bs.
So? I watch mountains erode. I follow the movement of tectonic plates with interest.

So Japan must be the hottest thing ever for you right now!


I was hot once.....


Hillary wrote:
I was hot once.....

Swank or Clinton? because I will dispute both.


TheAntiElite wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
Winnegan's fake. wrote:
I prefer to watch paint fade, watching it dry is for n00bs.
So? I watch mountains erode. I follow the movement of tectonic plates with interest.
So Japan must be the hottest thing ever for you right now!

Earthquakes are for tectonoobs. The real aficionados aren't in for that flashy stuff.


The 8th Dwarf wrote:
Hillary wrote:
I was hot once.....
Swank or Clinton? because I will dispute both.

How dare you compare me to that slutty little Hollywood actress!


The 8th Dwarf wrote:
Hillary wrote:
I was hot once.....
Swank or Clinton? because I will dispute both.

Tuck.


Hillary wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:
Hillary wrote:
I was hot once.....
Swank or Clinton? because I will dispute both.
How dare you compare me to that slutty little Hollywood actress!

Swank's a woman?

;-)


Hillary wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:
Hillary wrote:
I was hot once.....
Swank or Clinton? because I will dispute both.
How dare you compare me to that slutty little Hollywood actress!

Like I said I will dispute that either were hot at any time...


KaeYoss wrote:
Hillary wrote:
The 8th Dwarf wrote:
Hillary wrote:
I was hot once.....
Swank or Clinton? because I will dispute both.
How dare you compare me to that slutty little Hollywood actress!

Swank's a woman?

;-)

Actually, I can neither confirm nor deny that....


I'm reminded abruptly of the Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton/Joe Biden meets the Prime Minister of Japan hentai I'd seen...along with the fact that there was a President Obama sex toy within days of winning the election.

Rule 34. NO FREAKIN' EXCEPTIONS.


TheAntiElite wrote:

I'm reminded abruptly of the Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton/Joe Biden meets the Prime Minister of Japan hentai I'd seen...along with the fact that there was a President Obama sex toy within days of winning the election.

Rule 34. NO FREAKIN' EXCEPTIONS.

*looks for Cheney-porn*

The Exchange

Dick Cheney wrote:
TheAntiElite wrote:

I'm reminded abruptly of the Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton/Joe Biden meets the Prime Minister of Japan hentai I'd seen...along with the fact that there was a President Obama sex toy within days of winning the election.

Rule 34. NO FREAKIN' EXCEPTIONS.

*looks for Cheney-porn*

~Hangs head in shame~


Dick Cheney wrote:
TheAntiElite wrote:

I'm reminded abruptly of the Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton/Joe Biden meets the Prime Minister of Japan hentai I'd seen...along with the fact that there was a President Obama sex toy within days of winning the election.

Rule 34. NO FREAKIN' EXCEPTIONS.

*looks for Cheney-porn*

You'll find a lot if you look for the first name only.

Spoiler:
Lots of naughty Richards it seems.


Rule 34 is wrong!

Even if it doesn't exist you can still find porn of it on the internet.


Winnegan's fake. wrote:

Rule 34 is wrong!

Even if it doesn't exist you can still find porn of it on the internet.

Logical fallacy!

"If it exists, there is porn about it."

If A, then B.

If A is true, then B is also true.
If A is false, then B may be either true or false.
If B is true, then A may be either true or false.
If B is false, then A is false.

Ergo, in the example you cite, just because something does not exist (A is false) does not mean there is no porn about it. In fact, there may or may not be porn about it. Rule 34 makes no claim either way on things that do not exist.

QED.

51 to 90 of 90 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Gamer Life / Off-Topic Discussions / Dull thread that should just die a quiet death All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Off-Topic Discussions