
The 8th Dwarf |

Using the words Straw-man in a post... Yes I realise the irony of me posting list or is it hypocrisy. I am not sure because I am not using straw-man as part of my argument, unless by denying the the use of the straw-man is creating a straw-man, I sure that is a probable logical fallacy. I could be making an ad homonym attack against my straw-man.

Alanis Morrissette |

Using the words Straw-man in a post... Yes I realise the irony of me posting list or is it hypocrisy. I am not sure because I am not using straw-man as part of my argument, unless by denying the the use of the straw-man is creating a straw-man, I sure that is a probable logical fallacy. I could be making an ad homonym attack against my straw-man.
Looks ironic to me.

The 8th Dwarf |

*Active-aggressive response to passive-aggressive thread*
I thought this thread was a passive-aggressive response to a passive aggressive thread where your response stating that this thread is an *Active-aggressive response to passive-aggressive thread* is an active aggressive response to the thread and on the whole a straw-man logical ad homonym fallacy.

The 8th Dwarf |

The 8th Dwarf wrote:Using the words Straw-man in a post... Yes I realise the irony of me posting list or is it hypocrisy. I am not sure because I am not using straw-man as part of my argument, unless by denying the the use of the straw-man is creating a straw-man, I sure that is a probable logical fallacy. I could be making an ad homonym attack against my straw-man.Looks ironic to me.
Thanks Alanis - liked you as God in Dogma! BTW rain on your wedding day is not ironic just inconvenient....

KaeYoss |

KaeYoss wrote:*Disparaging comment against dwarves with their short figure and ratty bards*
** spoiler omitted **
Just don't call one beardless.
That reminds me: You know what's real funny? Alchemist's fire to a dwarf's beard so it burns all away, followed by the quip "what an ugly gnome!"

taig RPG Superstar 2012 |

taig wrote:KaeYoss wrote:*Disparaging comment against dwarves with their short figure and ratty bards*
** spoiler omitted **
Just don't call one beardless.
That reminds me: You know what's real funny? Alchemist's fire to a dwarf's beard so it burns all away, followed by the quip "what an ugly gnome!"
Hee hee.
Well, it is funny until the warhammer crushes your skull.

KaeYoss |

KaeYoss wrote:taig wrote:KaeYoss wrote:*Disparaging comment against dwarves with their short figure and ratty bards*
** spoiler omitted **
Just don't call one beardless.
That reminds me: You know what's real funny? Alchemist's fire to a dwarf's beard so it burns all away, followed by the quip "what an ugly gnome!"
Hee hee.
Well, it is funny until the warhammer crushes your skull.
I'll have wandered away long before that hammer gets all the way up to my skull.

The 8th Dwarf |

The 8th Dwarf wrote:Isn't that the point? Didn't want to derail the thread.Blah blah race X is so much better than race Y Blah Blah blah attempted offensive comment blah blah blah blah dribble dribble....
---- Also dull and clichéd
Glad to know that you are contributing to the threads demise...

KaeYoss |

KaeYoss wrote:So Japan must be the hottest thing ever for you right now!Winnegan's fake. wrote:I prefer to watch paint fade, watching it dry is for n00bs.So? I watch mountains erode. I follow the movement of tectonic plates with interest.
Earthquakes are for tectonoobs. The real aficionados aren't in for that flashy stuff.

![]() |

TheAntiElite wrote:*looks for Cheney-porn*I'm reminded abruptly of the Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton/Joe Biden meets the Prime Minister of Japan hentai I'd seen...along with the fact that there was a President Obama sex toy within days of winning the election.
Rule 34. NO FREAKIN' EXCEPTIONS.
~Hangs head in shame~

KaeYoss |

TheAntiElite wrote:*looks for Cheney-porn*I'm reminded abruptly of the Barack Obama/Hillary Clinton/Joe Biden meets the Prime Minister of Japan hentai I'd seen...along with the fact that there was a President Obama sex toy within days of winning the election.
Rule 34. NO FREAKIN' EXCEPTIONS.
You'll find a lot if you look for the first name only.

Messageboard Troll |

Rule 34 is wrong!
Even if it doesn't exist you can still find porn of it on the internet.
Logical fallacy!
"If it exists, there is porn about it."
If A, then B.
If A is true, then B is also true.
If A is false, then B may be either true or false.
If B is true, then A may be either true or false.
If B is false, then A is false.
Ergo, in the example you cite, just because something does not exist (A is false) does not mean there is no porn about it. In fact, there may or may not be porn about it. Rule 34 makes no claim either way on things that do not exist.
QED.