
![]() |

Random ideas for holy champions of various alignments;
LG - Paladin, Paragon
NG - Champion, Guardian, Hero, Defender
CG - Crusader, Vindicator, Avenger
LN - Arbiter, Stalwart
N - ?
CN - Libertine?
LE - Conqueror, Tyrant, Despot, Martinet
NE - Villain, Blackguard, Knave, Malefactor, Caitiff
CE - Reaver, Mauler
Neutral Paladin - The Watcher, Blade of the Concord, The Concordant Knight, That Nonpartisan Fellow in Armour
or how about The Swiss Guard ;P

![]() |

Neutral Paladin - The Watcher, Blade of the Concord, The Concordant Knight, That Nonpartisan Fellow in Armour
Watcher or Guardian works, if it's not being used by one of the others.
Concordant is neat, too.
Also,
Fence-Sitter
Waffler
Last Picked for Dodge Ball (neither team wanted him!)

Hu5tru |

Akiros Ismort, if my GM has his way.
I actually vote for it remaining as it is, for all its worth. Sure, there's all sorts of adjectives you can come up with for someone who would feel compelled to beat a pretty maiden's face in till all her teeth were decorating his gauntlet, and then make wee in the town well just for scuz, but that should be something earned in game and not by title alone.

![]() |

Funny you brought this up. My friend in our current game complains about the title all the time. He prefers Dark Knight. I don't like that cause it reminds me of Batman and the Anti-Paladin is not Bat Man. He says that theorectically he and a paladin should explode if they engaged in combat. I thought that would be sweet. He didn't see the humor.
I like Anti-Paladin but if you must change it consider the following.
Death Knight (Don't worry. You are CE. When you die Demogorgon or Orcus will bring you back as the real deal. :) )
Knight of Sorrow
Knight of Despair
Plague Bearer
Dread Knight
Dark Lord
Warlock ( the term warlock does mean oathbreaker. Perfect for the paladin gone bad.)
Blackguard (Pronounced Blaggard. It just means peasant but was used in an insulting way by members of the noble class to insult each other. I think it is still considered an offensive term in England.)

MicMan |

Years ago there has been an article in Dragon about Paladins of different alignments complete with names.
One of them was the Paramander which was extremely powerful.
I however are perfectly happy with the anti-paladin, but I would have made a go for anit-paladin, but only because that types easier ;)

Razal-Thule |

Random ideas for holy champions of various alignments;
LG - Paladin, Paragon
NG - Champion, Guardian, Hero, Defender
CG - Crusader, Vindicator, Avenger
LN - Arbiter, Stalwart
N - ?
CN - Libertine?
LE - Conqueror, Tyrant, Despot, Martinet
NE - Villain, Blackguard, Knave, Malefactor, Caitiff
CE - Reaver, Mauler
N - Own worst Enemy, or Sits on the side line eating popcorn watching the show cheering for both sides?

Yuki Covian |
Um my biggest problem is this
TECHNICALLY, the anti-paladin cannot exist.
The Code of conduct for this says they have to up hold tyranny and such, but that would be Lawful evil ,and they are chaotic evil. And, as chaotic evil beings, their first inclinations to following a code of coduct would to be to BREAK the very code xD. so they are impossible

Gilfalas |

I really think you're wrong about that. I don't remember the term 'antipaladin' in Fiend Folio. In fact, as memory serves, the githyanki were from the plane of Limbo, making a class which is inherently CE unlikely.
Actually he is right. It is there on page 43 where it breaks down their typical class makeup where it says:
'... and there is a form of anti-paladin class - the Knight'
He says that theorectically he and a paladin should explode if they engaged in combat. I thought that would be sweet. He didn't see the humor.
Don't they though? I mean each one is probably going to smite the other, that tends to get messy fast...

Arevashti |

1) Nice necro. As in, I'm glad someone necro'd it, or I'd have entirely missed the thread.
2) Githyanki knights had "all of the powers and abilities of a human paladin except these are turned towards evil." (That's an exact quote, complete with dubious punctuation.) In 3e, they were fighters with blackguard levels.
Also, githzerai were originally CN.
3) I like some of the alternate names suggested, especially abyssal champion, reaver, and warlock. As for blackguards, I'd just like to see the p-class adapted.
4) We're still missing the LE and CG "corners," as it were.

seekerofshadowlight |

seekerofshadowlight wrote:We have that class already. It is called a cleric.Except paladin is synonymous with knight and cleric is not.
They are Knights {or can be anyhow} but are not all warriors of a god, even if they are the code must come first and always. Clerics are the military arm of their faith. Paladins however are not.

seekerofshadowlight |

Meh. Clerics never inspired that knightly image to me.
Maybe not but that is the role clerics were created to fill. The get Med BAB, armor and weapon training, the class is built around the idea of not only will you be in combat, but you can hold your own.
They are the Knights Templar, the order of Hospitalizes given spells. The paladin was created to be a champion of good, the cleric was made to be a soldier for his god.

Kaiyanwang |

Kaiyanwang wrote:You clearly missed the part where I was teasing seeker. :)TriOmegaZero wrote:Meh. Clerics never inspired that knightly image to me.Depends from the cleric IMHO. Say, in Greyhawk, Hextor and Heironeus clerics, definitively.
Sadly, I don't always get it. Luckily, I've the excuse of the language :P

Eric Jarman |

Meh. Clerics never inspired that knightly image to me.
I think that depends on the cleric.

Hudax |

TriOmegaZero wrote:Meh. Clerics never inspired that knightly image to me.Maybe not but that is the role clerics were created to fill. The get Med BAB, armor and weapon training, the class is built around the idea of not only will you be in combat, but you can hold your own.
They are the Knights Templar, the order of Hospitalizes given spells. The paladin was created to be a champion of good, the cleric was made to be a soldier for his god.
By your logic, Lancelot was a cleric.

seekerofshadowlight |

By your logic, Lancelot was a cleric.
Not my logic, The Knights Templar and the order of Hospitalizes, were the inspirations behind the cleric class from day one. The class was always meant to be a "holy warrior" type.
The paladin on the other hand isn't just any old holy warrior of a God. He is meant to be the shinning example.

seekerofshadowlight |

seekerofshadowlight wrote:The paladin was created to be a champion of good, the cleric was made to be a soldier for his god.In D&D, Paladins were created as a class that virtually no one would ever get to play. What were the odds of rolling stats that high in exactly the right spots?
That was kinda the point, Paladins are rare, even now days they are not what you would call common. But clerics, well clerics are everywhere it seems.{something I do not really agree with, but eh}

see |

The Cleric described:
AD&D 1st Edition PHB — "This class of character bears a certain resemblance to religious orders of knighthood of medieval times."
AD&D 2nd Edition PHB — "The cleric class is similar to certain religious orders of knighthood of the Middle Ages: the Teutonic Knights, the Knights Templars, and Hospitalers. These orders combined military and religious training with a code of protection and service. Members were trained as knights and devoted themselves to the service of the church. These orders were frequently found on the outer edges of the Christian world, either on the fringe of the wilderness or in war-torn lands. Archbishop Turpin (of The Song of Roland) is an example of such a cleric. Similar orders can also be found in other lands, such as the sohei of Japan."

WPharolin |

I vote to subtract the 'anti' from the name and just call it a Paladin. Good Paladin's have class features that fit the archetype of being a champion of righteousness while evil paladin's have antithetical versions of those powers that fit being a champion of tyranny. We don't pretend that there is enough difference between the positive energy channeling clerics and the negative energy ones to call them different classes why should we do so for the anti-paladin. It isn't all that different.
On a side note, am I the only one who pictures General Kael from the movie 'Willow' when he thinks of this class? Sure, his class may have been fighter, but no character comes to mind who fits the theme as well as he does.

Frogboy |

On a side note, am I the only one who pictures General Kael from the movie 'Willow' when he thinks of this class? Sure, his class may have been fighter, but no character comes to mind who fits the theme as well as he does.
<- Angry at Netflix for not having the movie Willow. :@

![]() |

WPharolin wrote:On a side note, am I the only one who pictures General Kael from the movie 'Willow' when he thinks of this class? Sure, his class may have been fighter, but no character comes to mind who fits the theme as well as he does.<- Angry at Netflix for not having the movie Willow. :@
Kael wasnt too evil. He was loyal and disciplined. When I think of Anti Pallys, I think of Kurgen, Katana, Kane (Highlander movies).