
Lucendar |

If I'm going too fast or skipping rping, let me know and tell me to slow down. Don't want it to be all roll-playing but with 5 players, sometimes I don't know if, for example, after you posted your actions for the night, you were ready for the next day's events or if you wanted to rp dinner with Aroden. Cool?

Lord Aroden |

If I'm going too fast or skipping rping, let me know and tell me to slow down. Don't want it to be all roll-playing but with 5 players, sometimes I don't know if, for example, after you posted your actions for the night, you were ready for the next day's events or if you wanted to rp dinner with Aroden. Cool?
There will be MANY times to RP dinner with Aroden, as Im going to be casting that spell every night to keep the party fed. So we can certainly do it at another time.
AND! I will let you know that my food is not bland, its quite zesty and exciting. Iomedae was a great cook back when the God Aroden kept her in the Kitchen. (er.. no... really...).
So for combat do we all post our actions in spoiler tags, and then you tell us what happens in initiative order? If I already know what Im going to do, and its not an attack (ie cast a buff spell), do I do that?
Lastly, someone do an ID to figure out what were fighting, someone with Knowledge: Creatures or something.

Lucendar |

So for combat do we all post our actions in spoiler tags, and then you tell us what happens in initiative order? If I already know what Im going to do, and its not an attack (ie cast a buff spell), do I do that?
Yes, that works, although you may want to wait to let the enemies attack. May change your buff spell to a cure spell, depending on my rolls! ;-)

Bors Omanera |

If someone is interested in playing Lord Aroden, then I have no problem with that. (One of us or a new poster?)
Or, if we want to bring in a new cleric, clearing the fort and rescuing a passerby turned captive would be the opportune time.
Lastly, we can go Ironman and battle without a cleric, but the DM might need to adjust the treasure lists to pack a few extra curative items on in exchange for items geared towards a cleric's interests. I don't know how undead inclusive the AP is, but one or two encounters at this level onward could be dangerous, given the masterful minds of Paizo.
My vote, in final analysis, is to continue with a cleric. Perhaps one of us can double for Aroden until his return or proof of departure. If not, then let's bring in another player. Better safe than sorry, the more the merrier.

Lucendar |

You should decide as a group. Options are:
1. Someone play Aroden (see below)
2. Recruit a new cleric, phase Aroden out, perfect spot for new character to come in is now, assuming you win fight
3. Continue on with the 4 of you only (I can modify treasure)
One thing, though, if someone is going to play him, that Battle Priest character option is out. I knew I should not have allowed 3rd party stuff, because giving up 4 domain spells to get 4 free feats is overpowered!
Vote and let me know 1,2, or 3.

Augusto Mancha |

well, I think we def. need a cleric, the AOE healing they provide would have made this battle less deadly, as it stands now, we very well may not live. Some one, I can do it if needed, can play him untill the end of this combat, then we can recruit another, or if you feel that will take too long, i can roll up a 2nd character and play it too.

Lucendar |

well, I think we def. need a cleric, the AOE healing they provide would have made this battle less deadly, as it stands now, we very well may not live. Some one, I can do it if needed, can play him untill the end of this combat, then we can recruit another, or if you feel that will take too long, i can roll up a 2nd character and play it too.
Actually, I would like to see how this combat plays out with just the 4 of you.

Augusto Mancha |

Augusto Mancha wrote:well, I think we def. need a cleric, the AOE healing they provide would have made this battle less deadly, as it stands now, we very well may not live. Some one, I can do it if needed, can play him untill the end of this combat, then we can recruit another, or if you feel that will take too long, i can roll up a 2nd character and play it too.Actually, I would like to see how this combat plays out with just the 4 of you.
Aye aye cap :-)

Elisen Renard |

Here is Elisen. Like I said, any suggestions are appreciated.
Here are my 2nd through 8th level hit point rolls. I forget, Lucendar, do we re-roll ones or twos?
7d8 ⇒ (5, 8, 3, 3, 5, 6, 2) = 32

Elisen Renard |

I do not have a horse, but I do have 40' movement, lol. Actually I have spent almost all of my cash, so I might not be able to afford one for a bit.
I will do a reroll of that two as well.
1d8 ⇒ 3

Elisen Renard |

Traveling spell list:
DC 16 + spell level
DC 17 + spell level for enchantment
0-Create Water, Detect Magic, Light, Purify Food and Drink
1-Bane, Divine Favor, Endure Elements, Obscuring Mist, Prot. from Evil, Sanctuary, Longstrider*
2-Calm Emotions (DC 19), Enthrall (DC 19), Hold Person (DC 19), Spiritual Weapon, Aid*
3-Blindness/Deafness (DC 19), Dispel Magic, Searing Light, Stone Shape, Protection from Energy*
4-Air Walk, Restoration, Tongues, Freedom of Movement*
*domain spells from Luck, Travel domains

Bors Omanera |

Lucendar, just to confirm, when using the +2 defender, and transferring the entire 2 points to AC, does the blade still count as magical for attack and damage purposes? I ask, as once in a home game the DM ruled the weapon, if not focusing magic into the attack, was not magical for attack purposes. Thanks.

Bwana Unjunti |

Lucendar, just to confirm, when using the +2 defender, and transferring the entire 2 points to AC, does the blade still count as magical for attack and damage purposes? I ask, as once in a home game the DM ruled the weapon, if not focusing magic into the attack, was not magical for attack purposes. Thanks.
Huh. That seems a bit mad. I had it would.

Lucendar |

Lucendar, just to confirm, when using the +2 defender, and transferring the entire 2 points to AC, does the blade still count as magical for attack and damage purposes? I ask, as once in a home game the DM ruled the weapon, if not focusing magic into the attack, was not magical for attack purposes. Thanks.
Yes, of course.