Today's Art Filled Blog


Lost Omens Campaign Setting General Discussion

51 to 100 of 202 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Dark Archive

taig wrote:
yoda8myhead wrote:
Badgers are just fat weasels anyway. Just add the obese template to it and there you go.
And where would I find the obese template? Is that in the SRD somewhere?

Spoiler alert.

Try here.

RPG Superstar 2012

baron arem heshvaun wrote:
taig wrote:
yoda8myhead wrote:
Badgers are just fat weasels anyway. Just add the obese template to it and there you go.
And where would I find the obese template? Is that in the SRD somewhere?

Spoiler alert.

Try here.

Too much fluff, not enough crunch.


I have to say I like the "traditional" medusa look, and not the "I'm a refugee from the yuan-ti" variation that came about during 3rd edition.


James Jacobs wrote:


As for the badger... Faith Healer's right: we don't need no stinkin' badgers!

What you say?

This is insane. Badgers are critical. Get rid of dwarves if you need the space. Those weirdos suck, anyway.

Dark Archive

KaeYoss wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:


As for the badger... Faith Healer's right: we don't need no stinkin' badgers!

What you say?

This is insane. Badgers are critical. Get rid of dwarves if you need the space. Those weirdos suck, anyway.

HEY! Loyal Chelaxians dwarves don't suck!


Asgetrion wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:


As for the badger... Faith Healer's right: we don't need no stinkin' badgers!

What you say?

This is insane. Badgers are critical. Get rid of dwarves if you need the space. Those weirdos suck, anyway.

HEY! Loyal Chelaxians dwarves don't suck!

They're dwarves, i.e. "demi-humans", and as such second class citicens behind real humans.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

Asgetrion wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:


As for the badger... Faith Healer's right: we don't need no stinkin' badgers!

What you say?

This is insane. Badgers are critical. Get rid of dwarves if you need the space. Those weirdos suck, anyway.

HEY! Loyal Chelaxians dwarves don't suck!

True, Elves suck.

Spoiler:
Dwarves blow.

;-)

RPG Superstar 2012

As long as you keep gnomes around, I don't care what happens to the dwarves.

Sovereign Court

taig wrote:
As long as you keep gnomes around, I don't care what happens to the dwarves.

Of course you need Gnomes! What else would you decorate your lawn with?

RPG Superstar 2013 Top 8

Gotta say, not a fan of the basidrond art. It's a perfectly acceptable bizzaro carnivorous plant...

But the creature's supposed to be a fungus. They may share a creature type in D&D, but they're not the same thing.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Demiurge 1138 wrote:

Gotta say, not a fan of the basidrond art. It's a perfectly acceptable bizzaro carnivorous plant...

But the creature's supposed to be a fungus. They may share a creature type in D&D, but they're not the same thing.

It's still a fungus. A green fungus, but still a fungus.

Silver Crusade

James Jacobs wrote:

In cases where there's not really a clear or obvious real-world primeval critter (such as the case with the dire bat) we generally just call it a dire bat. There might be a few exceptions, but none come to mind.

As for the badger... Faith Healer's right: we don't need no stinkin' badgers!

NOTE: Just because an animal doesn't show up in the Bestiary doesn't mean it can't be an animal companion supported by the Core Rulebook... the animal companion rules are actually pretty awesome that way!

Does this mean that Badger and Dire Badger have been pulled off of the Summon Lists?


Callous Jack wrote:
taig wrote:
As long as you keep gnomes around, I don't care what happens to the dwarves.
Of course you need Gnomes! What else would you decorate your lawn with?

Only the gnomes do that. They decorate your lawn. With pitfalls and booby traps and sharpened spikes coated with poison. And vorpal rakes for you to step on.

How are they laughing at your misfortune!


sowhereaminow wrote:


Does this mean that Badger and Dire Badger have been pulled off of the Summon Lists?

Nope, it just means there aren't any stats for them once you summon them . . . ;)

Sovereign Court

Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
For most of the dire animals, while they're still listed as "dire" animals for compatibility issues, we are presenting them with their real-world megafauna prehistoric analogies as well. And in most cases, the art is going to reflect that.

Yay! Yay! And yay!

I was really hoping for this and I thought there were hints, but this spoiler makes my day. Well, okay, after the preview pics...it gives the afternoon a boost!

This preview made my day as well. Especially after sanding one of my bedrooms in preparation for tomorrow's priming and painting, followed by scooping rotting leaves and "growing" plants out of my gutters with MY BARE HANDS... [shudders at how much gutters can smell like sewers...]

RPG Superstar 2013 Top 8

James Jacobs wrote:
Demiurge 1138 wrote:

Gotta say, not a fan of the basidrond art. It's a perfectly acceptable bizzaro carnivorous plant...

But the creature's supposed to be a fungus. They may share a creature type in D&D, but they're not the same thing.

It's still a fungus. A green fungus, but still a fungus.

The art screams "plant", is what I'm saying. The fleshiness of the "mouth" resembles a venus fly trap, and the tentacles and feet are more like roots and vines than hyphae. I'm glad the basidrond is in the book... but the art is not my favorite.

Liberty's Edge

KaeYoss wrote:
Callous Jack wrote:
taig wrote:
As long as you keep gnomes around, I don't care what happens to the dwarves.
Of course you need Gnomes! What else would you decorate your lawn with?

Only the gnomes do that. They decorate your lawn. With pitfalls and booby traps and sharpened spikes coated with poison. And vorpal rakes for you to step on.

How are they laughing at your misfortune!

weren't those the kobolds?

Dark Archive

The medusa art looks great. I'd love to see a split stat block in the bestiary for the medusa with distinct scaly and sexy variations.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

sowhereaminow wrote:
Does this mean that Badger and Dire Badger have been pulled off of the Summon Lists?

It probably does.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

Demiurge 1138 wrote:
The art screams "plant", is what I'm saying. The fleshiness of the "mouth" resembles a venus fly trap, and the tentacles and feet are more like roots and vines than hyphae. I'm glad the basidrond is in the book... but the art is not my favorite.

Well... there's nearly 300 pieces of art in the book by dozens of artists. Chances are good for everyone that there'll be some art that doesn't appeal, so in that regard, I suppose the first art preview is accurate.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

James Jacobs wrote:
Demiurge 1138 wrote:
The art screams "plant", is what I'm saying. The fleshiness of the "mouth" resembles a venus fly trap, and the tentacles and feet are more like roots and vines than hyphae. I'm glad the basidrond is in the book... but the art is not my favorite.

Well... there's nearly 300 pieces of art in the book by dozens of artists. Chances are good for everyone that there'll be some art that doesn't appeal, so in that regard, I suppose the first art preview is accurate.

Hopefully the Dire Boar art will show it chasing kittens, for fairness sake ;-)

Sovereign Court

Matthew Morris wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
Demiurge 1138 wrote:
The art screams "plant", is what I'm saying. The fleshiness of the "mouth" resembles a venus fly trap, and the tentacles and feet are more like roots and vines than hyphae. I'm glad the basidrond is in the book... but the art is not my favorite.

Well... there's nearly 300 pieces of art in the book by dozens of artists. Chances are good for everyone that there'll be some art that doesn't appeal, so in that regard, I suppose the first art preview is accurate.

Hopefully the Dire Boar art will show it chasing kittens, for fairness sake ;-)

Or maybe chasing Asterix and Obelix!

Silver Crusade

James Jacobs wrote:
sowhereaminow wrote:
Does this mean that Badger and Dire Badger have been pulled off of the Summon Lists?
It probably does.

Thanks for the reply. Might I inquire as to the reason they were dropped? Was it a space consideration?

I'm curious to their absence, since they pop up as summoned creatures pretty regularly at my table, as well as the rare times I get to I run a wizard.

This could also lead to the loss of stinkin' badger jokes at the table as well, which is nearly as great a loss.

Paizo Employee Director of Games

sowhereaminow wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:
sowhereaminow wrote:
Does this mean that Badger and Dire Badger have been pulled off of the Summon Lists?
It probably does.

Thanks for the reply. Might I inquire as to the reason they were dropped? Was it a space consideration?

I'm curious to their absence, since they pop up as summoned creatures pretty regularly at my table, as well as the rare times I get to I run a wizard.

This could also lead to the loss of stinkin' badger jokes at the table as well, which is nearly as great a loss.

It was because of space issues.. and it came down to the badger or the wolverine...

Being from Wisconsin.. I wanted the badger, but got vetoed by my boss, from Minnesota.

Grr...

Jason


FOUL!

It's all a conspiracy, I say, to get us badger fans to buy Bestiary II!

Spoiler:
...as if a conspiracy was needed...

Silver Crusade

Jason Bulmahn wrote:


It was because of space issues.. and it came down to the badger or the wolverine...

Being from Wisconsin.. I wanted the badger, but got vetoed by my boss, from Minnesota.

Grr...

Jason

Thanks. I suppose we'll have to make do by upgrading the wolverine's stats a bit to make it badger level standards.

On a side note, I bleed purple and gold myself, but always had a soft spot for the Badgers.

Paizo Employee Creative Director

PFRPG gnomes can speak with any animal now, not just burrowing mammals, so there's no real need for a specific niche creature at low level to make gnome players happy. Any animal works for them.

Also, as Jason said, it's a space issue; wolverines are more fun to fight than badgers, and badgers are probably too tough to be familiars, so they fell into a weird dead zone there.

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

So, we are looking at a Badger Dead Zone demiplane with the Celestial Dire Badger Palace ? Somebody call Todd Stewart !


Montalve wrote:


weren't those the kobolds?

Nope. Those dig up your cellar. They're too afraid of the light.

Sovereign Court

No badgers? This is killing me!

And you know why!

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

sowhereaminow wrote:
Jason Bulmahn wrote:


It was because of space issues.. and it came down to the badger or the wolverine...

Being from Wisconsin.. I wanted the badger, but got vetoed by my boss, from Minnesota.

Grr...

Jason

Thanks. I suppose we'll have to make do by upgrading the wolverine's stats a bit to make it badger level standards.

On a side note, I bleed purple and gold myself, but always had a soft spot for the Badgers.

Just use the aurumvorax. :-)

Silver Crusade

James Jacobs wrote:
wolverines are more fun to fight than badgers, and badgers are probably too tough

As Chairbadger of the Badger's Ancient Brotherhood (BAB), I was disappointed to hear badgers would not be represented in the upcoming Pathfinder Bestiary. However, I am heartened to hear your compliment that badgers are simply too tough to be a part of the Pathfinder RPG. With this goodwill in mind, we will simply be content to wait for a future Epic level supplement, where badgers can be properly stated to challenge even the most ridiculously overpowered adventurer.

Thanks,

Sowhereaminow

P.S. We also enjoy smacking around wolverines, and agree it is a lot of fun doing so, particularly when they whine about being misrepresented in some movie from May 2009...

Spoiler:
Sorry, poor humor attempt. And this is your brain on too much work. Any questions? Do not taunt happy fun ball.

RPG Superstar 2012

My avatar change was a prediction of the future!

I am sorry to see the badger go, but the 3.5 rules should be sufficient to bring the little guy back, if one wanted to do that.

RPG Superstar 2013 Top 8

Matthew Morris wrote:


Hopefully the Dire Boar art will show it chasing kittens, for fairness sake ;-)

I approve of this message.

Paizo Employee Director of Brand Strategy

taig wrote:

My avatar change was a prediction of the future!

I am sorry to see the badger go, but the 3.5 rules should be sufficient to bring the little guy back, if one wanted to do that.

Are you implying this rubbish I keep hearing bandied about that PFRPG will be backwards compatible? They got rid of "cure minor wounds" and replaced it with "stabilize"! How can it ever be BC enough to handle a 3.5 badger!?


sowhereaminow wrote:
On a side note, I bleed purple and gold myself, but always had a soft spot for the Badgers.

A celestial badger after my own heart.

Silver Crusade

Thraxus wrote:
sowhereaminow wrote:
On a side note, I bleed purple and gold myself, but always had a soft spot for the Badgers.
A celestial badger after my own heart.

Good to see a fellow Tiger fan here. Do you have a regular group in town? Always looking for a new game or a new player.

Dark Archive

KaeYoss wrote:
Asgetrion wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
James Jacobs wrote:


As for the badger... Faith Healer's right: we don't need no stinkin' badgers!

What you say?

This is insane. Badgers are critical. Get rid of dwarves if you need the space. Those weirdos suck, anyway.

HEY! Loyal Chelaxians dwarves don't suck!
They're dwarves, i.e. "demi-humans", and as such second class citicens behind real humans.

Oh, you shameless speciesist! That... that is not true... we're all equal under the Weighty Gaze of the Almighty Asmodeus!


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Maps, Starfinder Adventure Path Subscriber
Jason Bulmahn wrote:
Being from Wisconsin.. I wanted the badger, but got vetoed by my boss, from Minnesota.

At least he didn't (he didn't did he?) insert a gopher instead. That'd be worse than a badger.

-Dhampir984
from ND


sowhereaminow wrote:
Thraxus wrote:
sowhereaminow wrote:
On a side note, I bleed purple and gold myself, but always had a soft spot for the Badgers.
A celestial badger after my own heart.
Good to see a fellow Tiger fan here. Do you have a regular group in town? Always looking for a new game or a new player.

/Threadjack

There are a handful of regular gamers that I game with. I am currently running a d20 modern homebrew and Curse of the Crimson Throne (converted to Iron Heroes). A couple of the others run their own house games - everything from Amber to Marvel Saga to Shadowrun to heavily house ruled d20 settings.

Unfortunately, real life has been getting in the way. Games are increasingly becoming ever other week games instead of weekly games. Still, you game when you can.
/Threadjack

Silver Crusade

Thraxus wrote:
sowhereaminow wrote:
Thraxus wrote:
sowhereaminow wrote:
On a side note, I bleed purple and gold myself, but always had a soft spot for the Badgers.
A celestial badger after my own heart.
Good to see a fellow Tiger fan here. Do you have a regular group in town? Always looking for a new game or a new player.

/Threadjack

There are a handful of regular gamers that I game with. I am currently running a d20 modern homebrew and Curse of the Crimson Throne (converted to Iron Heroes). A couple of the others run their own house games - everything from Amber to Marvel Saga to Shadowrun to heavily house ruled d20 settings.

Unfortunately, real life has been getting in the way. Games are increasingly becoming ever other week games instead of weekly games. Still, you game when you can.
/Threadjack

/Threadjack continued:

Running a Pathfinder Beta Rise of the Rune Lords game myself - and real life has made it hard to get together regularly. As in May was the last session.

Been thinking about organizing some Society games, but wasn't sure if there were enough Pathfinder players here in town. Either that, or a finding a second group to join as a player - no one else in my core group has the time to DM.

Going to start a Baton Rouge Pathfinder Thread in the Gamer Connection section of the Message Boards. Please join me there.

/Threadjack end


Asgetrion wrote:

Oh, you shameless speciesist!

One of LE's cornerstones, speciesism.


KaeYoss wrote:
Asgetrion wrote:

Oh, you shameless speciesist!

One of LE's cornerstones, speciesism.

And paprika, that LE right?


vagrant-poet wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
Asgetrion wrote:

Oh, you shameless speciesist!

One of LE's cornerstones, speciesism.
And paprika, that LE right?

I think so. Onions certainly. Main reason I'm chaotic.


Culinary Distinctions, Alingment made easy!

If you like onion your LE, I ate a whole onion once, does that mean I'm practically infernal???


vagrant-poet wrote:

Culinary Distinctions, Alingment made easy!

If you like onion your LE, I ate a whole onion once, does that mean I'm practically infernal???

It means that my poultryvorous Proteans need to hunt you down and kill you stone dead.


I'm really hoping the monsters used for the PFS scenarios make it into the Bestiary (like Hou's Medusa did!). I'm especially hopeful that Tyler Walpole's Xill & Bone Devil are in there. And anything else he might have contributed.

And if the karma gods are good to me, Andrew Hou illustrated the new Nymph ;-)

Always good to see Kieran Yanner, too. I'm only familiar w/ his b/w artwork, mainly from Malhavoc Press.

This could be the best illustrated bestiary D&D has ever had (crosses fingers).


BenS wrote:


And if the karma gods are good to me, Andrew Hou illustrated the new Nymph ;-)

I still hope for a photo shooting with Morena Baccarin as the nymph.

RPG Superstar 2012

KaeYoss wrote:
BenS wrote:


And if the karma gods are good to me, Andrew Hou illustrated the new Nymph ;-)
I still hope for a photo shooting with Morena Baccarin as the nymph.

+1000

51 to 100 of 202 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Lost Omens Campaign Setting / General Discussion / Today's Art Filled Blog All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.