Backwards Compatibility's page

Although some would say the crossbow ended the Knight, because of the fact a peasant schlub could kill a trained warrior with expensive armor.

Exactly! Why the f#%& are these in Pathfinder???? They need to go!

This whole metalworking crap has no place here, really. sticks and stones all the way for me. You tech freaks sicken me!

I was not in bed with PFRPG! The pictures are fake!

No badgers? This is killing me!

And you know why!

We cannot have a max post length, because we couldn't look at older posts then!

The suspense is killing me.

Finally, somebody is talking about a real issue: forward compatibility.

If I hear another grognard whining about backward compatibility, I'm going to choke them to death on my shiny new d21s.

You Mouthy B*tch!

CATFIGHT! RIGHT NOW!

Can you point towards the main perpetrators?

Yes, your honour! It was *these* guys!

Points towards the consolidated skills, the new favoured class rules, the way cross-class skills work now and even towards humans and elves and their new ability modifiers

That guy points towards more skill points hardly did anything!

I'm okay with the new ruling. I'm not made of glass, you know. I'm prepared to put a little bit of work into this!

Slime wrote:

I don't know if it could wreck backward compatibility?

Backward compatability is easily fixed by folding the exotic name into the equivalent simple weapon description. The description for the sickle would indicate that this weapon includes the kama, etc.

People care about me. I'm so happy!

I'm not relevant here, but I still want Precise Shot to stay. It's a decent feat.

As an aside, I'm bemused that the user Backwards Compatability is registered as a Taldan.

One must cherish the Old Values, surely you agree.

Plus, you know...

changes to the bonus the feats grant don't do much with backwards compatibility.

No one holds me! :'(

Plus, it would so not be backwards compatible.

Why do you all hate me so? :'(