doktorJung's page

How are you extracting them? Do you use Acrobat Pro? I have reader on my personal devices, which is why I ask.

Whoops, I believe I am using Acrobat and not Reader. So not a method that's easily reproducible by everyone.

doktorJung wrote:

secret door indicators are part of the image on those maps that have them.

this is so very, very annoying. I have to photoshop the maps every time.

Just was working on that myself, I was able to find sufficient wall sections to paste over the 'S' indicators but a clean version would be even better.

As another question, one that I don't think matters much - the description for B14 mentions five equidistant doors, four of which are on the map, and one of which opens into blank rock. I assume that door and the not-shown NW door were victims of cave-ins or flowstone accumulation, blocking them off from being traversable?

Is there a place to get HQ versions of the maps or extract them from the PDF?

I don't know if I have extra features on my copy of Adobe Acrobat Reader, but I'm able to extract the images (for example the combined outdoor maps at the end of the PDF) at at 2517 x 3273 resolution. They conveniently don't have overlaid text and things like trap markers, although I think secret door indicators are part of the image on those maps that have them. I can't extract images from the interactive maps PDF due to the overlay preventing me from clicking on the images, but the same maps are in the main PDF as far as I can tell.

Thanks for the update! I think I checked the tables a few hours before your announcement yesterday, it's been interesting to see how all these classes progress in their various proficiencies.

Is there a good way to end up with a mature mount that's still medium? Start with a small, ridable mount from a source that doesn't require it to be larger than you (like Animal Companion from Druid or Ranger, or Faithful Steed from Champion), and then advance it to medium when it matures? I think a wolf for a Goblin with Rough Rider may be one of the few small companions with the Mount ability.

24 hour immunity.

GOOD MORNING, WEAK AND PUNY PARTY MEMBERS!!! CARRY ON, AND TREMBLE NO MORE BEFORE ME THIS DAY AS WE ENGAGE IN GLORIOUS COMBAT! TOMORROW I SHALL ONCE AGAIN REMIND YOU OF MY GLORY.

This reminds me of my 1E party gathering around to huff my reincarnated Troglodyte so as to be immune to his Stench ability for the day.

I wouldn't normally suggest this but the rules are clearly broken. So rather than get bogged down in the technicality of the rules, I try to go with what I think is intended:

The best way forward is to
1) Ignore the undead trait details. Consider it just to be a marker. As the details are restated more specifically in basic undead benefits, in negative healing, and in the creature details themselves.

2) Ignore the targeting restrictions on living or undead wherever they occur. Instead choose the effect based off whether or not the target has Negative Healing. If they have Negative Healing treat them as Undead.

3) Do not allow any Positive Healing to work on creatures with Negative Healing. But allow unsigned Healing to work on all kinds of creatures.

So this means Soothe can heal undead, and you can cast Harm to heal Dhampirs and Revenants.

Constructs are another matter.

Seems pretty reasonable as a home patch to the rules, I may put this in from of my GM and group to see what they think!

Either way, there's nothing in it that suggests you don't have to deal with not benefiting from the Healing trait.

Fair enough, although now I'm wondering if there are any healing-tagged effects that can actually target undead? Soothe is living targets only, an Elixir of Life mentions the living in its text, etc.

I agree, it's not 'overwrite' as in replacing identically-named abilities, it's more like looking at the trait and then replacing with select parts from BUB that happen to talk about the same thing. It could definitely use some FAQ/errata entries!

Yeah, the line "These are somewhat different from the normal undead creature abilities to better fit player characters." from Basic Undead Benefits sounds like it overrides conflicting bits from the Undead trait, so that non-positive healing-trait effects are allowed by being omitted from the BUB Negative Healing section. It wouldn't need the Negative Healing section otherwise, as the Undead trait would cover the rules for that by themselves?

I suppose I can accept the 'just because' section in Book of the Dead, but I really wish the rules themselves supported it as opposed to it being a patch on top of everything. Thanks the replies!

Hi all! I know there are some older threads about healing undead, but I wanted to ask a few questions now that Basic Undead Benefits and the like exist. Here's a few things that I think I understand but may be wrong:

I'd recommend Gisher's Proficiency Tables for an interesting look at available proficiency bonuses for each class.

Paladin of Ababar multiclassing into ranger for crossbow feats?

Some feats seem worthwhile, whereas others interfere with the reloading cycle and being ready for a retributive strike.

I'm just beginning to try out a paladin of Abadar, and you do have to be very careful with your reloads. Ideally, a mid-battle round sequence would be reload/fire/reload, but that's only if you're already near the allies you want to protect with a reaction. I think I'd favor not firing during my turn in order to be ready to use retributive strike. Although I believe you can just use your reaction without firing, should the need arise?

Stunning Fists uses Class DC which uses Strength/Dex.

The only thing that uses Spell DC for monks is Quivering Palm and Ki Blast, IIRC.

prototype00

Thanks, that's how I understood it. So all of the maxed-out dex and strength monks shouldn't feel like they can't also stun people now and then!

One thing I noticed above that didn't seem to be touched on - isn't a monk's class DC based on whichever of strength or dexterity that they chose, and therefore Stunning Fist DCs would also be based on that? I understand that a monk's spell DC is Wisdom-based, but I believed Stunning Fist used class DC. Thanks!

Thanks, this is a great summary. I could see going Rogue/Thief and then picking up a number of assurance feats to prop up average or low strength and charisma scores, as you mention. I believe I can get athletics to expert at second level, with intimidate sometime later for demoralize.

Alternatively, I could go ruffian with a good strength score, medium armor with a little dex to round it out, and gain some extra demoralize uses from those feats. I'd like to be able to roll intimidate occasionally, but maybe it's best just to try assurance and save the stat points for strength, dex, or con. Anyway, plenty to think about!

Thanks! I'm still a tiny bit wary of dex-to-Athletics via a finesse weapon, just because I play in Society games and might encounter a strict ruling at a given table in the absence of a FAQ or errata. I'd still have options even if that wasn't allowed, however.

I'm halfway wondering about a thief rogue, multiclassing fighter just for snagging strike/combat grab to enable sneak attacks solo. Hmmmmm...

Hi, apologies for this not being a Fully Researched Thread, but I was looking into Snagging Strike and related grappling feats on fighter, and noticed that few or any of them seem to actually require Athletics checks to apply their conditions.

Would therefore a more dex-focused melee build work just as well with those sorts of feats, while avoiding the need for the heavier armors in order to keep oneself mobile? I could see it maybe mixed in with some of the dueling hand-free feats as well. Is having a strength-based Athletics score valuable for other combat reasons, such as actually having a chance at critically succeeding on a grapple check?

This generally all makes sense to me, but I'd be hesitant to base a Society character on any of it until an official non-playtest FAQ or errata is available. Might make a strength-based maneuver user in the meantime!

Hey, can anyone point me in the right direction for character generation rules for SFS? I did some preliminary poking around and couldn't find anything. I'll be playing The Commencement so level 1 characters(?)

Here's the guide, character creation is in an appendix towards the end I believe. (You'll still need the CRB too.)

http://paizo.com/products/btpy9vlp?Starfinder-Society-Roleplaying-Guild-Gui de

5) Mystics rock too. In combat healing is powerful and useful in this game.

From what little I saw of the 4th level Navasi pregen, Envoys healing SP in fights is nice too!

Flyby does seem to give an advantage to the low roll, but it can also be used by the high roll if the other ship is still in range of movement. I think that's the one case where low might have a potential advantage, but it's also one of the higher DCs to perform, so I see it as a chance for a pilot to redeem their earlier failure if they ordinarily have a high skill bonus.

Pilots going first due to being generally terrible are unlikely to be able to pull off a flyby anyways :D (At DC 24, it would be less than 50% for my own ace pilot operative to pull off against a T2 ship without assistance, for example!)

I think it's nice that they establish archetypes in the CRB, and provide a few as samples. I'm sure it'll be built more upon in later books!

Yeah, non-equipment sources of DR sound like a reasonable interpretation of 'natural', barring further rulings. Thanks!

I play PFS and SFS pretty much exclusively, so I'm way more concerned about RAW than homebrew or more free interpretations. Also:

Benefit: What the feat enables the character (“you” in the feat description) to do. A character cannot select a feat more than once unless it specifically says so. If a character somehow has the same feat more than once, the benefits of these feats do not stack unless indicated otherwise. Unless otherwise noted, the term “level” refers to character level.

And I was thinking more in terms of Dark Matter than Enhanced Resistance, although I still would like to know what counts as 'natural damage resistance' for terms of Dermal Plating either way.

Starting on an open source Starfinder toolset. Whether it will ever be as comprehensive as commercial tools remains to be seen.

Right now, the point-buy calculator can work out your first-level ability scores and starting HP/SP/RP.

Get it on GitHub. (Hit the Download Zip button under Clone or Download.)

You will need a Python interpreter if one does not come with your OS. You can get that at python.org

Looks nice! I noticed one typo (pyhsical science under Scholar), and 'pilot' isn't capitalized under Ace pilot. Handy calculator though!

I think, like PFS, a creature using a reach weapon does not threaten an adjacent square.

Agree that a FAQ maybe needed.

I don't read 'extends' as 'increases by a certain amount but then excludes the previous range.' If I didn't know Pathfinder at all, I see nothing that mentions that you can't attack adjacent?

Also, the 'reach' weapon quality:

Only melee weapons can have the reach special property.

Wielding a weapon with reach gives you 10 feet of reach for
attacks with that weapon. See Reach and Threatened Squares
on page 255 for more information.

The front page, under the table of contents.

I don't know if there's a way to find the tags if you don't own the scenario.

Aha, thanks! And yes, showing tags somewhere in the description here or in a combined document would be nice.

Just for starters the Enhanced Resistance feat provides natural damage reduction equal to the character's base attack bonus. ;)

So, are class and feat sources of DR considered 'natural' for purposes of Dermal Plating?

( I saw that feat, looks pretty solid! I'm kinda leaning towards using that for something like fire resistance (lasers!) and letting Dark Matter be my kinetic DR source. And I'd have cold resistance from gravitic attunement and Solarian armor also, if I go the armor route. )

So, Dermal Plating has rules about stacking with 'natural damage reduction' (the lesser of the natural DR or plating providing an additional +1,) but what counts as natural? Does an ability like the Solarian's Dark Matter count as a non-technological or 'natural' source? Thanks!

Yes, it is tagged as replayable.

I keep hearing about scenarios being tagged as this or that, but _where_ are these tags displayed?

I agree, a grapple is not a 'melee weapon with the operative special property'. ( Nor a small arm, but the melee comparison seems more apt :D )

Isn't it true that all NPCs and monsters die at zero, unless the GM decides to let them linger for three turns in the case where taking them alive matters?

Going later lets you know the enemy's position, so that you can position your weapons in-arc and avoid theirs etc.

Actually, this is possible at sniper range, just not with Trick damage.

Envoy + Hurry & Improved Hurry
Operative + Debilitating Sniper

You get the sniping 250+ft range, with flat-footed, debilitating trick - just not the trick attack damage.

Looking at the Hurry text, the move action can be used to "take a guarded step, move up to her speed, or draw or sheathe a weapon." I don't think it works for activating the Sniper ability, unfortunately! ( I hoped that it did too :D )

Edit: Separately, the last line of Trick Attack specifically disallows unwieldy weapons. I assume that Debilitating Sniper circumvents this?

The fact that you can't actually make your trick attack at the Sniper range (even without the bonus damage) is weird though, and my gut says it's unintentional. Like a sentence got cut out of Debilitating Sniper or something.

Yeah, it does seem odd. Using sniper rifles to apply debilitating conditions sounds neat to me (all damage considerations aside), but my mind immediately suggests an operative a thousand feet out making the precise shot to apply the condition. However, the rules only let you walk around near the enemy with a clumsy longer-than-longarm and try to firefight with it. You could still be concealed, and you don't have to move, but it doesn't fit what I'd expect the use to be.

Yours was in a weird data state which should be all fixed now.

Thanks! I didn't know if they were just sold out for everyone or what, appreciate the fix :D

Hi Sara, thanks for all the information. Is it correct that some subscribers won't be receiving the Starfield map, even if it was listed as part of their subscription when we signed up? I only see Terrain listed in my sub, and not Starfield currently. Thanks!

It's a class that adds spell-like mental powers, better access to some Psychic Power feats, and gives you some unique mental abilities.

Does it make your name a killing word? :D

Is Cunning a third-party feat? I'll look around some more to see if I can find it. And I could possibly just rebuild into this at 2nd level with one of my 3xp characters, so at least the extra investiture points would have a use if I pick up Divine Favor. Or perhaps if the rebuilding rules work the way that I think, I could retrain my 1st level feat into Peerless Courtier and augment my skills that way.

Thanks for the feedback!

Hi! Do you foresee an Invested Regent build being added to the guide? Or to thumbnail a build, what might a decent 25-point stat line be? I can come up with ability scores of Str 18 Dex 14 Con 14 Int 7 Wis 16 Cha 13 on a Dual-Talent Human, but that has one point left over that doesn't fit anywhere. So maybe:

Dual-Talent Human
Str 17
Dex 14
Con 14
Int 8
Wis 16
Cha 14

Feats / Invested Powers
1: Extra Investiture Points
2: Divine Favor (B)
3: Dragon Style
5: Dragon Ferocity
6: etc etc.
Traits:
Fate's Favored
???

I'd need to look more closely at the powers and feats available at 6+, but it could be a bonus feat and then Extra Power at 7th, or a power and Peerless Courtier.

I have an Aasimar available still, so could get Wis/Cha, Dex/Wis, or Str/Cha from that. Each of those has their own compromises with respect to ability scores, so I'd probably go with a freely-available PFS race.

This sorta looks alright for me, just wanted to put it in the thread for potential input! Thanks for reading.

There's a proud tradition of somewhat delusional PCs insisting that non-canonical things are true and still being an utter blast to have at the table. I know of a barbarian who believes only Jadwiga from Irrisen can cast magic, that all other spellcasting is elaborate smoke and mirrors, and that Jadwiga are angry trees that exhale bees whenever they talk.

I still remember a character from a table a few years back that insisted he belonged to the orthodox church of Sarenrae, and therefore used a mace like any good cleric should.

Oh gosh, this actually answered my question from the Campaign Clarifications thread regarding the Bookish Rogue feat and spellbooks! Thanks a bunch, that had been bothering me for a while now :D

And just now I see that Stag Horn and Stag Submission aren't PFS-legal. Nevermind, thread over! ( Unless I look at another grappling style :D )

Thanks for the feedback! Bloody-Knuckled Rowdy provides IUS, forgot to include that feat in the list. And it also grants Combat Style Master without need for prerequisites at 5th. Charging Stag isn't the best style tree, but I do like the free prone or damage when pinning offered by the Stag Submission, as well as the grapple-on-charge from Stag Horns.

One thing I did get wrong was thinking you could grapple with AoOs - that's why I took Combat Reflexes. Still, it's not terrible as-is with a 15' reach, but the feats from there up could use some further examination. I'll consider the other suggestions too!

Ok, so this is is silly but please consider the following (keeping it PFS-legal as far as I'm aware):

Human Bloodrager (Bloody-Knuckled Rowdy, Crossblooded Rager [Aberrant/Abyssal])
STR 15+2, DEX 14, CON 14, INT 8, WIS 10, CHA 14
1: Dodge (Human feat), Mobility, Claws (Abyssal bloodline)
2: Charging Stag Style (Combat Style Student feat)
3: Stag Horns
4: Demonic Bulk (Abyssal bloodline), STR +1
5: Stag Submission, Combat Style Master (Combat Style Student feat)
6: Improved Grapple (Aberrant feat)
7: Combat Reflexes
8: Abnormal Reach (Aberrant bloodline), STR +1
9: Vicious Stomp, Power Attack (Abyssal feat)
11: Greater Grapple
12: Iron Will (Aberrant feat), Abyssal Bloodrage (Abyssal bloodline), STR +1

I was looking through Secret Wizard's styles guide in YOU ARE ALREADY DEAD, and noted that Charging Stag style was listed as decent but lacking support. Charging Stag is also achievable by second level as a human, and being embarrassingly strong with a 15' reach seemed like it'd go with charging and grappling well enough.

The claws make up for not having flurry of blows from a Monk dip (to a certain extent), and the unarmed damage scales from BKR in situations where the claws are unavailable. I haven't calculated exact numbers, but I'd bet such a character's CMB would be good enough to deal with many foes. (Roughly, I believe raging at 4th level would give a +13 CMB before later increases from Improved and Greater Grapple.)

I'm thinking in terms of PFS, and I realize it's missing Bloodrager staples like Raging Vitality or Iron Will (until way later at least), but I wanted to type it out regardless. And it's a build that can actually make use of Power Attack as a bonus feat from the Abyssal bloodline, which is usually taken way earlier.

So get angry, get big, and push down some nerds. Could be fun, at least until your poor defenses get you killed :D Any thoughts?

I could see Jealousy working as a tank, with the abilities giving enemies a hard time when they choose to not attack the Rager. Also, Ragers advance HD faster than the related Phantom would, so the aura DCs would be a little more effective. Jealousy's skills and bonus Deceitful feat aren't nearly as nice as other phantoms, however.

Enough of that for this thread though. Thanks for the reply, and thanks to Rosc as well for maintaining the guide in its current state!

Brawler + Bloodrager added!

Not sure if I'll include Guide links, the idea is that players simply learn to analyze a class, stop optimizing so much and just build sensibly.

That being said, I did create an Id Rager monstrosity.

Just found this thread, great guide! Care to share a really short thumbnail on the Id Rager creation of yours? I imagine it might be like the Urban Raker except without a need for hands-free weapons, and could use the Hatred phantom for bonuses to hit and damage. (Or maybe Anger if you managed to get slams from somewhere?)

(Apologies for the necromancy!)

I've never really looked into that. I just assumed they'd have to buy the spellbook, then scribe spells into their spellbook from scrolls or something. But if they're using a class feature, it would make sense for them to get at least some starting spells in the spellbook for free, like a wizard.

I don't care about the 'for free' part, I just can't quite convince myself that rogues and other characters in this situation can actually have any spells scribed into a book they own. (Whereas wizards and other classes can explicitly write spells into their own books.)

And if a rogue can't scribe spells into their own books, I think that leaves them at the mercy of whatever other party members might or might not have a spellbook available for perusal during a session.