|
Thea Peters's page
Goblin Squad Member. Organized Play Member. 1,336 posts (3,333 including aliases). 3 reviews. No lists. 2 wishlists. 23 Organized Play characters. 1 alias.
|
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Tallow wrote: Kyle ran Eyes of the Ten for Ryan Bolduan, Aaron Koelman, myself, my wife, Chris Mortika, and Thea Peters. That was an epic weekend lol ...
Monkey Bread
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
rknop wrote: I dunno; I saw "catfolk" and pretty much said "KITTY!" Lol ... got home and the sister-wife threw pillows at me because I didn't bring the kitty home for her
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Kevin Willis wrote: Generic ticket lines:
I know GenCon doesn't allow us to do this in the hallway but could we put some of those retractable queue rope things near the muster stations? It would only take a couple to keep the front of the line obvious and orderly, after which it becomes somewhat self-policing as people say "the line starts back there."
I think the problem is, juggling the space we want inside for gaming tables vs. the hall space gencon will let us use before they say something ... with the current configuration; putting anything more in the marshal area would (in my opinion) create more of a hazard as then you have something solid to have to navigate around vs soft gamers to bump into

2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Sin of Asmodeus wrote: Need more prepared GMs. Having to explain what energy drain is to two different GMs, and explain how abilities of monsters work is sort of frustrating.
Otherwise, retool the special wording, because not being allowed to have one og the people I came with use a 7 pregen in the special when three of us had 11's really was a bummer.
Sin,
If I remember correctly, a few years ago at a special table of mine you played a character with a animal companion with a shadow drain ability, I eventually handed you a copy of the stat block and had you make the changes each round. A GM in the middle of a session can have a hard time managing stat block changes (all the little minutiae that comes with changing stats every round) and managing the actions of 5 other players and the NPCs that they are personally running while in the middle of a timed event.
Even a 5 star GM is going to have issues managing something like that when they are fatigued and probably hungry and more than a little stressed.
So in that instance, my suggestions would be to have a card to hand to the GM with a brief (1 to 2 or so line) description of the ability and what the stat changes are so that they can reference that. Alternatively, if you don't want to have to explain something like that to the GM perhaps (and no I'm not telling not to play what you want to play) a consideration to a different character while playing in a timed event might be a possibility.
A level 7 should never be allowed in a tier 10-11 special event. I would have suggested that you and your friends join him in the level 7 tier so that he would be able to play.
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Gary Bush wrote: Just as I expected, my confirmation came as soon as I left work.
Came at 5:25pm and Confirmed for Tier 1.
Just wondering what adjustments are made for Venture Captains.
Now to decide if I am going to fly or drive.
I will see you all there. I will be wearing a purple shirt. lololol
You only find out about the VC bump when you drink the kool-aid and join us
hops away chanting one of us, one of us, one of us
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
ChaosTicket wrote: Quentin Coldwater wrote: ChaosTicket, dude, just accept that PFS might not be for you and move on. Well if I dont play the Pathfinder society Campaign I cannot play Pathfinder at all, and RPG groups are slim around where I live. When I said earlier this is what I can get, I meant it. But I have to face it that the only RPG available to me is too inflexible. It really is disappointing as I mentioned earlier when I joined the group I asked alot of questions about things I would be allowed to do, but havent been allowed to do so. Were they lying or was the context not about Pathfinder Society but Pathfinder as a whole? John asked you a bunch of questions to try and help clarify things and help you with your answers. You might try answering his questions so he can help you with this.
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
EricMcG wrote:
A downside is that newish players look to me as an experienced player and often ask "How does <weird ability> work with <new class and/or archetype>?" resulting in a "I have no idea." response. I am not particularly apologetic about it, GMs are not responsible to buy every bit of paper Paizo sells.
Instead of simply saying you don't know. Ask the player if the have the reference for said "fluffy item". If they don't suggest they email the local coordinator with their question. If they do have the reference read over it quick, give a "this is my interpretation but you may want to ask Local VO for clarification" comment. Makes for better community relations between GM and players.
It is true that GMs are not required to buy every piece of Paizo paper available, as GMs we are looked at as someone that is able to interpret what is written on the pieces of Paizo paper.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
I try to tailor that aspect to the group at the table. If everyone is chatting freely and having a good time then I'll go the extra mile and as the bard what the words to his Inspire Courage or Fascinate song are ... or I'll have them give me the whole diplo speech for the NPC and there may be a small bonus if they give a good rousing speech.
Or they are a table of new comers and already self conscious about doing anything and I'll take more of a teacher approach and work with them to build their confidence so that they can get to where they are the great orator of the party or whatnot.
There should never be a punish aspect; Gaming (at least to me) is more about reward -- that reward may take on different shapes; such as from the GM side seeing the new person half way through the scenario break out with the awesomesauce diplo speech or the bard standing up and belting out his song (I've seen players with bards have whole songs written out in the character binder).
Some people are just non comfortable public speakers and should not be punished for that -- people don't believe me, but I used to be horribly painfully shy; to the point I was in tears giving a speech in class. I think as people are given the opportunity to exceed and given the reward for exceeding they gain more confidence and become the awesome role players vs roll players. But they have to be given that confidence and "punishing" them for not having it only means that they are going to be quieter and quieter and then simply not be there anymore.
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
One thing; drinking is HUGE at Gencon -- and I'm sure I'll be contributing my share of the money, however, I do caution to pace yourself -- Doing anything (GMing, HQing etc) at Gencon while still hungover sucks.. I've done it (and like the ones that suggest not GMing ever slot) I don't recommend it lol
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Michael Eshleman wrote: Last year I volunteered for all 10 slots (including all 4 specials). I was released from three of those slots, but in two of them I stepped in to run tables in need of a GM. One of them was Scions of the Sky Key Part 1; the other was during Serpent's Rise when I ran various Phantom Phenomena quests cold.
I believe that I used my other released slot to take a nap! :)
There is still a large core of GMs that do what needs to be done to get the Con to go off -- I remember my early days of conventioning and stepping up to make sure it happened.
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Bob Jonquet wrote: Dan Luckett wrote: You guys gave a VC-ship to a rabbit ...and a purple one that throws around waaay too glitter at that ;-) PFFT
covers the thread in purple glitter
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Venture Officers can have private home/store games just the same as any other player can have private home/store games. They can also play PFS scenarios during these private events as well.
The problem with this would come in if they were doing the private invite-only games in lieu of public games. As long as they are still supporting public games there should be no problems.

1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
gatherer818 wrote: I haven't read all the previous threads on this topic, but I've read this one and was surprised not to see something mentioned: a per-character replay option. Not "unlimited replay", which sounds a bit much, but also making it where you never have a situation where you can't level a character up because they've played everything they can reach.
Or perhaps an option to replay a scenario you played at the lower subtier, but you have to play at the higher subtier and you only get the difference between the two - ST 6-7 gold MINUS the ST 3-4 gold, plus you get the 6-7 items but you don't get a second of each "limit 1" from the 3-4, and you can't claim the same boons again but if you complete a different boon you can get it.
I know as a bit of a "completionist" myself I'm already wary about running in the lower subtier because I'm permanently locking off rewards from all my characters every time I do. My highest level character only has three Chronicle Sheets and I'm already worried about it, even though I plan to also GM, so that helps mitigate it a little. A per-character replay would also allow those items that fit perfectly into certain builds to be discovered and then obtained, so there's a lot less guesswork in trying to pick the right character to get the right rewards.
I imagine this has probably been advanced as a theory before, but not having seen it yet myself, I might as well throw it in the ring.
PS: It might be better imagined as something like 3 or 5 runs of the same scenario, but none of them on the same character. This would be more complicated (you'd have to check more than just the one character's Chronicle Sheets), but also prevent "unlimited replay" by virtue of making 20+ characters.
Originally (waaaaayyyyy back in the day) you could replay each scenario once per faction -- so 5 times with a different character of a different faction. That, quite honestly, created tons of problems (personally I'm happy to retire the two characters that have cross-over chronicles it was confusing).
The biggest problem with doing this was that by the third time you played a scenario it was hold hat.. you knew what was going to happen, you knew how to prepare your character and the only thing different was the faction mission; which wasn't all the interesting.
I was happy when the replay rules were changed and don't see a reason to change them. My opinion is that, while everyone gives back in their own way to their community, stepping up to GM if you've played 6.5 seasons of scenarios might be a good idea.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Nefreet wrote: Nefreet wrote: Andrew Christian wrote: You do NOT! Have the right to turn someone away using Hero Labs. I do, I have, and I will continue to do so. Well, this blew up over night. I'm at work and haven't read the 124 posts since I made this one, but I wanted to expand on it before the thread gets locked.
I don't work for HeroLab. I *volunteer* for Paizo. I have volunteered thousands of hours for them thus far. I have -zero- obligation to promote, endorse, or support -any- third party product, including HeroLab.
And I have every right to speak out against it. But what gives you the right to refuse a player a seat based on their use of the program? I.e. what post or rule are you basing this on. If it's your personal preference than that goes against the spirit PFS in my opinion

2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Ok .. so Mike said that physical sheets are required.
No where in that thread does he say that physical sheets are the only legal character sheet.
No where in that thread does he say that you cannot use an electronic character sheet
No where in that thread does he give permission for GMs to refuse a player a seat because they do not have a paper copy
what he does say
Quote: Mike Brock
While we require that players have physical chronicle and character sheets, we want it to be as easy as possible for anyone to come to a PFS game and play Pathfinder! So if someone comes to your table without a printed character sheet, we strongly encourage you to find a way to include them in the game and then advise them of the rules for future games. We want everyone to feel welcome in our PFS community.
Which to me means figure out a way to make it work and let the player know that they need to have a paper copy in the future. To me this does NOT mean that I have the right to refuse the player a seat at the table nor does it give me the right to say that they cannot use their electronic character sheet.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
trollbill wrote: BigNorseWolf wrote: Trollbill
The Dm CAN require a paper character sheet. They do not have to insist on a paper character sheet: they can and probably will be ok with an electronic one. IE neither the DM nor the player are breaking any rules when they use an electronic sheet I agree. What I mean by 'legal' is: MUST be accepted by the GM versus MAY be accepted by the GM. A GM MUST accept a printed character sheet as a valid character sheet. They MAY accept a non-printed character as a valid character sheet. Please provide a link to the source post where you are garnering your interpretation ... that would be helpful

2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
trollbill wrote: godsDMit wrote: trollbill wrote: godsDMit wrote: trollbill wrote: godsDMit wrote: trollbill wrote: What those two statements DON'T mean together is that:
1) A Hero Lab character sheet on a electronic device is legal (it is already accepted that GMs are not required to accept non-printed character sheets).
2) Using Hero Lab to keep track of your buffs, conditional modifiers, HP, etc. is legal.
Im in complete disagreement with you here.
If Mike meant you could print out HeroLab sheets and use those he would have specified it. Since he didn't, that means (unless Tonya wants to clarify otherwise) that running from the program on your laptop or tablet is fine, so long as you have a paper copy for backup in case the power dies or the GM wants to see the paper copy. Mike said you MUST be able to supply a printed character sheet. He did not say you must be able to supply a printed character sheet UNLESS you are using Hero Lab. Can you link to the post you are using as a reference?
Yes, and that was for the express purpose of making sure that you could pass it to the GM for their perusal if they wanted access to your sheet and not wanting to take the risk of dropping your laptop or tablet. Nowhere did he say you MUST use the paper copy.
You are correct, he did not say you must USE a paper copy. He said only a paper copy was a legal character sheet. Thus a GM may, if they so choose, refuse to accept someone using a different format other than the printed form. Now as far as I am aware of, Nefreet is the only one to actually make use of that right. But since he does GM at major conventions like GenCon then him having that right is relevant.
Personally, I would not do such a thing and think GMs should allow them, but again, that doesn't mean Nefreet doesn't have the right to refuse them. If was, after all, Nefreet's refusal that forced the ruling in the first place. Please link to the statement by Mike that only paper copies are legal character sheets. He did not use those... can you provide a link to the reference you are using?

2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Michael Hallet wrote: Keith Apperson wrote: Technically, by Brock, it is not if the GM would like to look at your sheet. They could accept it (many will), but they are perfectly valid in saying 'I do not want to handle your $200-$1200 electronic device, please hand me a piece of paper'. While I agree, here is what still confuses me about that position. I hand the GM my paper character sheet. Upon looking it over, they see something that they are not familiar with and ask to see a copy of the rule.
Guess what I'm going to hand them? My tablet. Because there is currently no requirement that I have to print out copies of the pages from my PDFs. (I don't own hard copies of any of the books.) So you haven't really solved the problem the ruling claims to solve.
Maybe someone who is a lawyer can do some quick pro bono work for his fellow gamers and draft a waiver of liability that GMs could hand to players to sign that would absolve the GM from any incidental or accidental damages that may occur as a result of the GM needing to handle the players electronic equipment. (Of course laws could be different enough in different jurisdictions, especially international, that who knows how feasible this would actually be.)
At that point, if you were on my table, I'd hike my butt up out of my chair .. walk around and leaving the tablet on the table look at the reference.
I am in the camp of not wanting to handle someone else's expensive electronics ... but if there is a way I can avoid the potential of dropping said electronic and still review the reference I'll take it upon myself to do so.
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Keith Apperson wrote: Thea Peters wrote: That is on the GM and the player at that point, that still doesn't give a GM the right to refuse to sit a player that is using HeroLab It depends on which part you're talking about. If they do not have physical copies of their character sheet? Yes, they could. Brock STRONGLY ENCOURAGES people to work the player, but they are not meeting the requirements and could be handed a pregen or asked to leave.
If they do meet the first requirement and are additionally using HeroLab, the GM has no leg to stand on (As The Fox states).
Working with the player -- leaving the tablet on the table and scrolling through it instead of picking it up
Being a jerk -- saying you can't sit at the table because you use Herolab ...
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
I'd be interested in seeing the citation that allows a GM to not sit a player for using HeroLab.
As far as I'm aware (and other posters have stated) HeroLab is a legal form of character sheet -- just not a legal source document for providing references
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Bad breath is easy .. *pulls out pack of gum* anyone want some?
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
sets out cough drops and masks and sneaks away
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Hey all,
We are having the 2nd annual Purplebunnycon in Feb in Tennesse.
we have lots of fun games, including the 4 and 5 star exclusives as well as a give away prize for those that play a trio of scenarios on Friday.
Check out the website and warhorn :)
PurpleBunnycon.com
PBC Warhorn
Hope to see you there!!! and remember your ears!!!!
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Congratulations all of you!!!
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Kalindlara wrote: There are many reasons why specific mechanics are banned for PFS.
Some require GM adjudication.
Some involve crafting.
Some are meant for evil characters.
Some are restricted for storyline reasons.
Some are attached to races that aren't legal for all players.
Some are meant to be unlocked through play.
Some are considered unbalanced for Society play.
Some rotate in and out of legality.
I may have missed a few other reasons.
Harrowed, this is the most complete list of reasons to your question. I doubt that you are going to get much more of a complex answer from a dev. I understand the frustration, however, these are the main reasons decision are made for the overall benefit of the campaign
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Incendiaeternus wrote: Paz wrote: E-mail the PFS coordinator of the convention and explain the situation, giving your email address and postal address. I would hope that most would make sure that their GMs got the rewards they were due. Actually most just say I'm sorry there's nothing that we can do. Thus why this comes up on occasion. Sorry, but that's asinine. The PFS coordinator should be able to provide you with the GM reward. They are sent the boons in a pdf format and can easily print one out for you.
Is this a VO coordinator or a private convention coordinator?
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Grats
5 star island is now a series of islands intereconnected by land and air bridges
2 people marked this as a favorite.
|
Another important thing ... as a new GM ... is don't be afraid to ask questions ... Most often your players will know the mechanic for the oddball thing they want to do... have them show it to you in the book so you can reference it .. but don't be afraid to look at the player and be like ... splain it to me like I'm 2 ... best way to learn oddball mechanics imo
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
knightnday wrote: Also, one could bring a microSD card instead of a flash drive -- assuming anyone let you plug it into anything. Mine at least come with adapters and work on my tablet, or a phone, or a laptop. My opinion is, that if you are going to bring all your pdfs on something, then you'd better be able to bring the thing to plug it into. My tablet is for my use, not for use of those at the table. So when you bring your sd card, or you flash drive, and you ask to borrow my electronics, the answer will be no...
Keep that in mind; Most people are not going to share their electronics as they are expensive and there is the chance that those with grubby paws will drop and break them.
3 people marked this as a favorite.
|
places the dead horse sign and skips out spraying glitter behind her
|