but what if we don't want 1 new book for Tian???
oooooo yeah and here is book 3 just incase
3: Darklands of Tian Xia
anything else like tian creatures can go into a beastiary..... unless its a player option which it can go in either book.
and look at this way
and more art too.....
hehehehe I read Goka as Goku there....
well yes I agree with that. but that was more toward DGM's Foreign Hero if that is what we are calling it line.
Adventure in Tian Xia that starts and finishes there should star pcs from Tian Xia.( even if it starts in Tian Xia and ends in the Shackles.... it should still star PCs from Tian Xia)
I also think they should start adding incentives to do so too.( of course I'd have no idea as to waht that would be)
Oh and I should play as a Garundi just because the game at the table is being placed there? But what if I wanted to play an obnoxious dwarf that hails from Avistan. and who says that Avistanis are backwards and savage.
And who said that the Garundis were any more or any less savage or educated.
and I hate to tell you BUT at the time they were going at it with each other the countries of Nex and Geb were not being civilized but were busy committing acts of arcane based atrocities on each other. doesnt sound civilized to me...
and it is however my money.. and I can spend it on whatever I want to do so with it... just as long as its legal.
edit: was planning on getting the innersea guide and jumping ship. maybe the one on Tian if they do one.... arcadia not so much.
Forcing people to do what they don't want to do will send players away to another rule set Keftiu. Regardless of intent. Besides there is nothing wrong with wanting to play a chelish human who homeland is Andoran vacationing down in Nex that ends up being drawn into an adventure from unforeseen circumstances.
Nothing wrong with playing Locals either.
what is wrong is being forced to do so.
which is true. and when both can't see eye to eye enough to compromise it's time to find another table.( you do not even have to be a paladin player for this to be an issue though)
its getting a side bar in pf2 and that is what it is, unless it fails to make the cut between now and release.
because some of us, do not like multiclassingand its a RP thing too....
glad to see that I'm not the only one who thinks the champeon playtest was trash.
anyone who ever says " its not all that bad" is asking for it... not sure waht that it is though... might be a wining lotto ticket or a free doughnut... but not a free car from the price is right.
I dont see a reason to jump on PF2 either.
cant speak for anyone other than me on whether or not that if the dont purchase pf2 rulebook if they'll support PAizo on any of the pf2 series books like the pf2 setting book.
the last I forsee myself getting will be the campaign setting book and not much else.
on many game forums they say the same things
if PF2 floats your boat than I'm happy for you, jsut know that as it stands now it isnt floating mine. wait and see the end product.
the 3 variant paladins in the playtest are a good start. HOWEVER, I was hoping them more to be inline of the archons,angles and azatas ....
or at the least all of them have divine smite.
just my two zhents worth
archon: smite evil without mercy
but.. shall wait and see for the end product.
looks at empty seat in boat jsut in case
with what is currently in the play test a good deal of which could be used for any good.
even if paizo put in Hwalsh's smite and my divine grace.
they still could do any good without adding too much to the word count.
all alignment divine arse kicking versions and 4 corners( which I hate) would take up more word count than it could be worth at least in the core rule book.
I could imagine they would do the same for pf2 unless they said otherwise
item to think about.
the wing class feature for the paladin. how much wording would it need to go with each of the alignments, how much for the 4 corners( that I hate) and for good only.
and no its not overpowered either.
a paladin in pf1/dnd 3.x gets CHA to throws. so a paladin ( outside of talking with DM/GM about unique paladins with interesting bloodlines in its Backstory) with an average CHA of 16 or 18 at lvl 2. so that is a + 3 or +4 to saves both in the now and the later career of said paladin. In both cases said PF1/DnD 3.x paladins would more often than not make their throws without much fear of failing.
a constant half paladin lvls to saving throws over the career still offered the chance of failing a throw.
yes. but mind you that you have to be lvl 20 for it and by then most classes should be potent enough both what they can do both defensively and offensively, and if most modules dont go to lvl 20 anyway the +10 divine bonus to saves wont matter much. Not too mention at lvl 20 your character should be facing threats on both planar and planetary scale. Not too mention off world
even more so IF and only IF PF2 gets a book for lvls 21 up.
so yes constant half paladin lvls min 1 and cap it at 10.
and should we see said aforementioned book, we'll burn that bridge when we are standing on it.
Divine Grace should be constant yes and so it doesnt become to overpowered have it gotten at lvl 2 and do half paladin's class level ( min 1) to saves.
its either that or go back to constant cha to throws ( and a paladin of mine's back story could put her saves to overpoweredness)
What animal would make sense if you want to make another good aligned lycanthrope? I was thinking maybe werepeacock? and give them the ability to make people fascinated by displaying their tail feathers. Also for a good entomothrope I would go werebutterfly (they would follow Desna obviously).
there is a LG wereboar paladin.....
well as for other animals
Wereraptors ( IE Eagle and Hawk)
Smite evil and Dive Grace, and auras should be base class features and not reactionary...
unless you can get say Hwalsh's version to force a free reactionary move...
but I hate having to many reactionary abilities.
whether or not DG is restored to CHA to saves or not is irrelevent. I'd like it to be, but if it has to be stopped at +3 or +4 so be it
Hwalsh and I dont agree with mostly anything.
however there have been some things he's said that I agree with.
what he said in the locked thread some something is for everyone thread, I Agree with.
I also agree that Smite evil needs to return.
a lot of paladin players dont like to play baby sitter, which how your paladin is now in pf2pt is.
as I said else where, the paladin's auras were better at protecting both the paladin and the party members.
it is a shame to see the class as it is now....
I suffer from Asperger's syndrome.... it is a form of autism...
seeing me here behind my screen name is one thing.
meeting me in person.. well I try to hide it well enough even though I fail at times with it.
and because I do prefer my privacy , Im not likely to tell you face to face either.
and this itself may come from I Was placed into a mental hospital when I Was young and they made us all there tell why were there to people nightly when they had a new in house patient, and while it might help with some on that, it only lead to me getting madder at having to do it....
so yeah, you can claim safe space all you want, but what it cant do is take into consideration those who cant or wont tell you that you or a fellow gamer offended them or take into consideration those who get offended having to come out about it...
safe space..... it should have said friendly environment and leave it at that