![]()
![]()
![]() Kobold Cleaver wrote: Actually, there have been a significant number of Johnsonites taken from Clinton's camp. A lot of it is from Bernie-Or-Busters who were really just in the game because they didn't want a woman to be president.Sorry, dude, but I just gotta say WTF? They're real liberals, rather than third way blue dogs (like Clinton), but their objection to her is that she's a woman? I don't know what you're smoking but it's some really good ****! ![]()
![]() meatrace wrote:
I don't think she's down with his views on women. ![]()
![]()
![]() Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
I never expected much "hope and change" from Obama. He made that clear with his cabinet appointments and his inaction on things like Wisconsin and the Florida voter purge, and a host of other things. Mostly, though, he just doesn't try very hard to please the "left" because he doesn't have to. Who will they vote for? Romney? Rosanne Barr? I think he wants to lose. ![]()
![]() FallofCamelot wrote:
All true. A chance at doing some damage is a fair trade for probably wasting a crossbow bolt. Or, hitting, then rolling 2 damage after all that effort. Also, at low levels (any level, really), 1-3 damage may be all you need to finish off an injured enemy, letting your melee guy move on to the next one. Why burn a spell slot? I remember playing a high level sorcerer who used it once to injure, but not kill a guy who pi$$ed him off. There's some psychological comfort in knowing you can at least do a little damage at will. ![]()
![]() Shem wrote:
Yes, it all depends on interest, measured in sales. A 64 pg. booklet is the bare-bones outline of such a vast playground. There have been questions about so many settings within Golarion, they'll be developing it for decades. The Guide to Absalom is a good example. It's a general outline with a small map. The details of the city are quite general, and it's up to the GM to fill them in as he likes. I imagine that someday there will be a bigger book with a big map, more details, etc. And that's just one location of thousands. If this goes well, there will eventually be more. ![]()
![]() sveden wrote:
Bran's answer is what I'd do. He can use his ride skill, or his CMD. ![]()
![]() Apostle of Gygax wrote:
I remember at least one bad guy insulting his girth. Polite people just don't do that, and there are so many fat people these days, they're barely noticed. JMO, but I don't think he's so much a genius as an expert on Alcatraz and comic books. You have to be smart to get a PhD, but it's a function of going to school long enough, more than being a genius. He has a great memory for all things Alcatraz, but he's no MacGuyver. He's believably out of his element at grisly crime scenes or when he's in danger. You can tell he'd rather be at home curled up with a stack of comics and a box of Krispy Kremes. ![]()
![]() I don't know what she's read, but you mentioned historical biographies and such. I think the stories of influential women would be good for a girl. Eleanor Roosevelt, Queen Elizabeth, Simone de Beauvoir, Joan of Arc, Madame Curie, Rosa Parks, and many other female scientists, politicians, activist, rulers and such would be inspiring to a young girl who can read and understand how women have affected history. Eleanor, for sure. We'll leave Messalina alone until she's older, but there are some truly inspiring women she can look up to, and see that even in times and places where women were not considered "equal," they really were. ![]()
![]() Zoe Oakeshott wrote: ...out of a Paladin and a Sorcerer, without having a build that pales in comparison to a Magus? How would it be done? Focus on spellcasting more than fighting. Cast first, then fight only if you have to. It depends on your party's makeup, but spamming useful buffs on your party first, then yourself, can work. The nice thing is that your main stat helps a little on the pally side, and you don't need UMD to use wands of pally spells. The EK is a better spellcaster than the magus at high levels. You won't get that until mid levels. ![]()
![]() Comrade Anklebiter wrote:
How DARE you bring up the effects of depleted uranium! That just makes Americans feel bad, and messes up tons of babies, as well as adults, for centuries to come... Surely you've heard that nuclear leftovers have no proven effect on anyone! ![]()
![]() JollyRoger wrote:
+1. DQ has been there and done that. GMed 17+ level campaigns, and lived to tell about it. Here. Also, always polite and well-reasoned and well-spoken. This is the kind of GM I aspire to be. ![]()
![]() Irontruth wrote:
War is a tool for countries to get what they want. "Defending freedom" by attacking countries on the other side of the world that are no threat to the US is not a defensive stance, it's an excuse. One can argue that there are things being defended, but they're not the lives of Americans, or the well-being of the middle class. When Dick Cheney met with oil executives in a closed-door meeting to discuss energy policy, they didn't focus on renewables. ![]()
![]() Crimson Sword wrote:
Let him play. In areas of bright light, you shut down his hide ability. With nowhere to run and hide, the assassin abilities will be next to useless. A desert-dwelling dragon can chase him down across the burning sands... Break my game? Don't get too attached to your character... ![]()
![]() Smarnil le couard wrote: Well, who is being inflammatory? Weren't you the one to imply that I was probably suffering from a mental disorder ? The "liberalism is a mental disease" meme is a common one on far-right websites, like Newsmax and American Thinker, among others. It's also common on right-wing talk radio, which permeates the AM (MW) bands all over the US. Aretas refers to such sources as though they were impartial purveyors of "real" news. ![]()
![]() tevish wrote:
The bolded text is the only part of it you need to know. It not only acts as a single magic missile, but is a SLA, so you don't have to speak or wave your arms. A 20th level evoker can do it at 300' for 1d4+10 damage. Of course, by that time, he'd have little reason to use it, unless he wanted to kill a commoner or something. It does make a crossbow redundant, so that's less gear to carry. If your GM allows content from the APG, drop it and take the admixture school, instead. ![]()
![]() For skills, you started fine. At 2/level, you don't have many to throw around. If you have any PCs who can take up the knowledge slack, good. If not, religion should get a point in a level or 2. I'm a fan of putting at least a point into most of your skills as you progress. I'd keep putting points in heal for 3-5 levels (it comes in handy, especially in a low-magic setting), and adding a point in a new skill each level. You never know what may come up, and the guy with a +12 to sense motive can still fail his roll while you make it with a +4. ![]()
![]() SirGeshko wrote:
and funny. ![]()
![]() pres man wrote:
I didn't suggest it, but now that you mention it, I can take your "Asians" argument and use that construct to say that's true. I would, however, be making the same fallacious argument you did, so I won't. I think your arguments so far stem from a number of misconceptions, but it doesn't surprise me. ![]()
![]() pres man wrote:
Here, again, we see a non-factual statement regarding race that pres man expects us to accept as factual. The "look at how well Asians do in school" ploy is evidence, again, of a perspective that ignores other factors. Just to get you started, let's look at the economic status of those Asians who legally emigrate here vs. the Asians who have no chance of buying plane tickets. Mexicans who emigrate here usually do so on foot, and illegally. If they were rich Mexicans, they wouldn't do that. Mexico is a great place to live if you have money. Horribly dangerous and desperate if you don't. The extremes of rich and poor there are more dire than here, at least for now, and being on the poor end of the scale makes the worst jobs in this country desirable to people who have no way to better their lot in life in Mexico, regardless of their "gumption." ![]()
![]() malebranche wrote: Because he'd been acting like a paladin before, all righteous and zealot-like, I felt like removing divine intervention from the picture was sort of like taking away his paladin powers when he freaked out and started treating another character like crap. This. His zealotry exceeded the will of his god, and the "divine guidance" was withdrawn. He was left alone to commit, then realize his error. You handled it right, and it sounds like the new character will be better for the group, anyway. No harm, no foul. ![]()
![]() Brogue The Rogue wrote:
Not only that, it will be useful to you at ANY level, and you can choose the caster level of any scroll you make. A handy haversack full of situational scrolls can make quick work of some encounters. Not only that, but you can give them to other PCs with UMD for certain plans or contingencies. If you don't take it now, take it later. ![]()
![]() Aretas wrote: I agree pres man. Its anti American propaganda aimed at teaching people a revisionist history of an America that was built on the blood, sweat and tears of non Whites. Anti-American propaganda? Revisionist history? You might want to turn off the Glenn Beck and do some fact-checking. Facts are neither pro nor anti-anything, and can't be called propaganda. ![]()
![]() Aberzombie wrote:
How did they differ from dwarves? I don't remember. Found a neat pic, though. ![]()
![]() The Saltmarsh 6 wrote:
I had a friend whose GF played a session with us. She thought it was okay, but wasn't into it like we were, and didn't play anymore. I think she was just curious how it was played. I thought she was a good sport for giving it a try. They're married, now. He still likes to play, and she doesn't mind a bit. ![]()
![]() Comrade Anklebiter wrote: Blame America First, A Musical Interlude Winner! What a voice. End of thread... ![]()
![]() Kantrip wrote:
Excellent! I'd roll with that. Sweet and simple. If she doesn't end up needing a potion or two for herself, she could find the farmer just barely alive and give one to him. Then, she returns a hero, and the farmer can perhaps make her a MW item or give her a horse or something to show his gratitude. ![]()
![]() Aretas wrote: So many people on these boards loathe the country they live in. You all have it so good you don't even know it. Its a savage world and the US has kept its hegemony without losing its soul. Thank God your in this country, you are blessed. Yes, that's the sanitized version. All you have to do to believe that is to ignore lots and lots of facts. Acknowledging those facts doesn't mean you hate America. It just means you're being honest. ![]()
![]() Aretas wrote: Its good to be the toughest kid in a neighborhood full of maniacs, totalitarians and blood thirsty killers. By being even more so? Quote: I'm sure you would greatly miss America and our freedoms if we lost our/its hegemony. No. I'm not from the class that benefits from it. I'm from the class that dies in their wars. Quote: Would your model nation be China? Syria? Uganda? There are almost 200 countries. Could we maybe look at some others? Those three are particularly sad. Perhaps we should look at the 1st world. Problem is, we're so economically dependent on our war machine, it would be a lot of work to dismantle it much and still stay employed. Keeping it up is costing us, too, in equally sad ways. ![]()
![]() BigNorseWolf wrote:
Well said. This is exactly why the whole notion that "teaching kids the truth will make them hate America" is so bogus. Again, we see a politically-motivated guy meddling in a curriculum, and picking and choosing what kids can learn and read because of what he (or his political party) decides what is okay to learn and not learn. I'm thinking Mr. Tindall learned this "cherry-picked" version of US history, and is encountering some cognitive dissonance at the very real fact that the US is not always the "good guy." It moves and acts like an empire, and has for over a century. Name any other country that has military bases all over the world, two wars in countries on a foreign continent, and surrogate wars going on at all times on most of the other continents. Am I "blaming America first," or stating facts? ![]()
![]() Kelsey MacAilbert wrote: I like Dwarves. I don't play them often, but when I do I like to tone down on the drinking and accent just a tad and play them in a less cliched manner. Not me! I like to play a hard-drinkin', axe-swingin' grumpus with a heart of gold and an accent so thick and awful, a real Scot would either laugh himself silly or punch me in the face. That's my dwarves, and I love them that way. :) ![]()
![]() Steven Tindall wrote:
Again, you're not entitled to your own set of facts. One of you was demonstrably wrong. ![]()
![]() K.I.S.S. A 4-room cave with 2 kobolds, a wimpy spider, and culminating in a ferocious single orc will do the trick. Help her make a fighter or a rogue (her choice), and walk her through perception, movement and attacks. Let her have a potion or 2 of CLW, and for more fun, a potion of vanish. Make it so she gets a chance to understand movement economy, and ranged and melee attacks. If she has fun with that, maybe she'll enjoy "actual" roleplaying sometime with your friends. Let her try it as a "guest" player, and if she likes that, maybe she'll want to join in again. Keep it light, fun, an if it isn't her thing, let her know that's fine. I know it's hard to believe, but some people just don't like the game as much as we do.
|