Paizo Announces System-Neutral Open RPG License

Thursday, January 12, 2023


Open RPG logo over-layed over an image of pathfinder champion Seelah leading a battle


For the last several weeks, as rumors of Wizards of the Coast’s new version of the Open Game License began circulating among publishers and on social media, gamers across the world have been asking what Paizo plans to do in light of concerns regarding Wizards of the Coast’s rumored plan to de-authorize the existing OGL 1.0(a). We have been awaiting further information, hoping that Wizards would realize that, for more than 20 years, the OGL has been a mutually beneficial license which should not–and cannot–be revoked. While we continue to await an answer from Wizards, we strongly feel that Paizo can no longer delay making our own feelings about the importance of Open Gaming a part of the public discussion.

We believe that any interpretation that the OGL 1.0 or 1.0(a) were intended to be revocable or able to be deauthorized is incorrect, and with good reason.

We were there.

Paizo owner Lisa Stevens and Paizo president Jim Butler were leaders on the Dungeons & Dragons team at Wizards at the time. Brian Lewis, co-founder of Azora Law, the intellectual property law firm that Paizo uses, was the attorney at Wizards who came up with the legal framework for the OGL itself. Paizo has also worked very closely on OGL-related issues with Ryan Dancey, the visionary who conceived the OGL in the first place.

Paizo does not believe that the OGL 1.0a can be “deauthorized,” ever. While we are prepared to argue that point in a court of law if need be, we don’t want to have to do that, and we know that many of our fellow publishers are not in a position to do so.

We have no interest whatsoever in Wizards’ new OGL. Instead, we have a plan that we believe will irrevocably and unquestionably keep alive the spirit of the Open Game License.

As Paizo has evolved, the parts of the OGL that we ourselves value have changed. When we needed to quickly bring out Pathfinder First Edition to continue publishing our popular monthly adventures back in 2008, using Wizards’ language was important and expeditious. But in our non-RPG products, including our Pathfinder Tales novels, the Pathfinder Adventure Card Game, and others, we shifted our focus away from D&D tropes to lean harder into ideas from our own writers. By the time we went to work on Pathfinder Second Edition, Wizards of the Coast’s Open Game Content was significantly less important to us, and so our designers and developers wrote the new edition without using Wizards’ copyrighted expressions of any game mechanics. While we still published it under the OGL, the reason was no longer to allow Paizo to use Wizards’ expressions, but to allow other companies to use our expressions.

We believe, as we always have, that open gaming makes games better, improves profitability for all involved, and enriches the community of gamers who participate in this amazing hobby. And so we invite gamers from around the world to join us as we begin the next great chapter of open gaming with the release of a new open, perpetual, and irrevocable Open RPG Creative License (ORC).

The new Open RPG Creative License will be built system agnostic for independent game publishers under the legal guidance of Azora Law, an intellectual property law firm that represents Paizo and several other game publishers. Paizo will pay for this legal work. We invite game publishers worldwide to join us in support of this system-agnostic license that allows all games to provide their own unique open rules reference documents that open up their individual game systems to the world. To join the effort and provide feedback on the drafts of this license, please sign up by using this form.

In addition to Paizo, Kobold Press, Chaosium, Green Ronin, Legendary Games, Rogue Genius Games, and a growing list of publishers have already agreed to participate in the Open RPG Creative License, and in the coming days we hope and expect to add substantially to this group.

The ORC will not be owned by Paizo, nor will it be owned by any company who makes money publishing RPGs. Azora Law’s ownership of the process and stewardship should provide a safe harbor against any company being bought, sold, or changing management in the future and attempting to rescind rights or nullify sections of the license. Ultimately, we plan to find a nonprofit with a history of open source values to own this license (such as the Linux Foundation).

Of course, Paizo plans to continue publishing Pathfinder and Starfinder, even as we move away from the Open Gaming License. Since months’ worth of products are still at the printer, you’ll see the familiar OGL 1.0(a) in the back of our products for a while yet. While the Open RPG Creative License is being finalized, we’ll be printing Pathfinder and Starfinder products without any license, and we’ll add the finished license to those products when the new license is complete.

We hope that you will continue to support Paizo and other game publishers in this difficult time for the entire hobby. You can do your part by supporting the many companies that have provided content under the OGL. Support Pathfinder and Starfinder by visiting your local game store, subscribing to Pathfinder and Starfinder, or taking advantage of discount code OpenGaming during checkout for 25% off your purchase of the Core Rulebook, Core Rulebook Pocket Edition, or Pathfinder Beginner Box. Support Kobold Press, Green Ronin, Legendary Games, Roll for Combat, Rogue Genius Games, and other publishers working to preserve a prosperous future for Open Gaming that is both perpetual AND irrevocable.

We’ll be there at your side. You can count on us not to go back on our word.

Forever.

–Paizo Inc

More Paizo Blog.
Tags: Community Paizo Paizo Staff Pathfinder Pathfinder Roleplaying Game
401 to 421 of 421 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | next > last >>
Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
captain yesterday wrote:
Rysky wrote:
Richard Lowe wrote:
Dragon Nexus Games wrote:


If you make it the licensing "law" that no work under such license shall be offensive to anyone, then we're screwed. RPG games are in its nature offensive to these hyper neo-puritan like people that exists in this world, literally today.
Then... maybe tell WotC that? They're literally the only people in the room suggesting a morality clause.
WoTC doesn't have forums, people must come here and shout at Paizo instead.
No, they should not.

That was sarcasm.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Classy.

Anyway, does anyone have anything on topic to add? Or should this thread just be shut down at this point?


Let's not close this thread due to misplaced anger. This one is supposed to be about the creation of something new.


It may be appropriate to temporarily lock the thread until there is something new or more to add about the subject of the Open RPG Creative License from Paizo. Otherwise, we'll just be rehashing the same points and thought over and over to point of ad nauseum.


Dragon Nexus Games wrote:
It may be appropriate to temporarily lock the thread until there is something new or more to add about the subject of the Open RPG Creative License from Paizo. Otherwise, we'll just be rehashing the same points and thought over and over to point of ad nauseum.

That's one way of ensuring one gets the last word. :)

Shadow Lodge

5 people marked this as a favorite.

Or we could all just behave.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
TOZ wrote:
Or we could all just behave.

Don't be absurd.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
GM DarkLightHitomi wrote:
Dragon Nexus Games wrote:
It may be appropriate to temporarily lock the thread until there is something new or more to add about the subject of the Open RPG Creative License from Paizo. Otherwise, we'll just be rehashing the same points and thought over and over to point of ad nauseum.
That's one way of ensuring one gets the last word. :)

That would be the Paizo's moderators.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Cindy Robertson wrote:
After watching what a really horrible person is doing with Star Frontiers and the TSR name, I can completely understand why a company would want a morality clause. No one who wants a successful business wants to be associated with literal Nazis. That's what they are probably trying to address ahead of time.

But that's a matter of trademark ownership and branding, not of anything that would be covered by an OGL.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Cindy Robertson wrote:
After watching what a really horrible person is doing with Star Frontiers and the TSR name, I can completely understand why a company would want a morality clause. No one who wants a successful business wants to be associated with literal Nazis. That's what they are probably trying to address ahead of time.

I can support a morality clause as it pertains to a trademark licensing versus a general open license. For example, I can support morality clause as part of say... the Pathfinder Compatibility License or the Starfinder Compatibility license or similar licenses. That would be where such is appropriate.

Paizo Employee Community and Social Media Specialist

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Locked to deal with flags.

Paizo Employee Director of Marketing

4 people marked this as a favorite.

We welcome today’s news from Wizards of the Coast regarding their intention not to de-authorize OGL 1.0a. We still believe there is a powerful need for an irrevocable, perpetual independent system-neutral open license that will serve the tabletop community via nonprofit stewardship. Work on the ORC license will continue, with an expected first draft to release for comment to participating publishers in February.

401 to 421 of 421 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Paizo / General Discussion / Paizo Blog: Paizo Announces System-Neutral Open RPG License All Messageboards