
hogarth |

Erik Mona wrote:Beyond issues of pronunciation, the only time I've seen the name confused was at a magazine distributor conference, where everyone wanted to call us "Paizano," the company that apparently publishes Easy Rider.
I wonder if anyone nicknamed "Goggles" works there? :)
I also like The Flintstones!

![]() |

I - Love - This - Blog - Entry. :D
This just makes me so happy - it shows that fate always favored good judgment in trying times. I seriously love you guys. *leaping ninja tackle hugs* Thank you for being brave, devoted, and caring - I know it helps to inspire me to strive ever higher.
-will

![]() |

Beyond issues of pronunciation, the only time I've seen the name confused was at a magazine distributor conference, where everyone wanted to call us "Paizano," the company that apparently publishes Easy Rider.
Oh come on. I know there has been off and on discussion about the amount of skin that some of the iconics show, but that's not reason to make the mistake of ... ooooohhh you mean based of the name.

Wolf Munroe |

I loved this blog entry, I love reading about the beginnings of companies and seeing them evolve.
Anyone else wanting that copier to be kept safe after it stops, kinda like a humble beginnings memorial?
I think the copier should be bronzed when it finally goes, like how baby shoes are bronzed sometimes. It should be bronzed in an open position so it's obvious it's a copier, not just a big bronze rock. It can then be put outside in the office park (you guys have an office park, right?) as a piece of modern art, and appropriately named The Bronze Beast.

Wolf Munroe |

Did I kill this thread last time I posted? No responses since then? *sad face*
Anyway, I was looking at the screenshot of the old Paizo webpage and I noticed it only says Dungeons & Dragons and Dungeon Master are registered and copyright WotC. Dragon Magazine and Dungeon Magazine, at least according to that old screenshot, are trademarks of Paizo.
Uh.. So what happened that WotC got them back? Or was that an error on the page at the time?

![]() |

Did I kill this thread last time I posted? No responses since then? *sad face*
Anyway, I was looking at the screenshot of the old Paizo webpage and I noticed it only says Dungeons & Dragons and Dungeon Master are registered and copyright WotC. Dragon Magazine and Dungeon Magazine, at least according to that old screenshot, are trademarks of Paizo.
Uh.. So what happened that WotC got them back? Or was that an error on the page at the time?
That page had an error.

![]() |

the Haunted Jester wrote:Or Denmark! Maybe even England or Germany! Maybe all of the above!Lisa Stevens wrote:so your either in CA or Florida....hmmmm :)I wrote my blog last night and Vic added his thoughts to it. It is over to my peeps in Seattle. I'm off to Legoland!
Lisa
If England, I recommend the chicken in the castle part - it's the best of the hot food available in the park.

Morbus Iff |

Dotting. These retrospectives are *great*, and I'd pay for a physical
of them (similar to the also-excellent Designers and Dragons).

![]() |

I love this!! There is so much passion and energy written in this blog post it's hard not to read in awe. Especially since I remember when wizards announced that Dungeon and Dragon magazines were no longer going to be written by Paizo. I remember every month wondering what was going to write in the editor parts of Dungeon magazine. I never imagined the company starting their own RPG that they could mold and eventually make their own. It's been a great ride. I am more than excited to see how far Paizo has come over 10 years!!

bigmac |

golem101 wrote:It is admittedly on its very last legs right now, and probably won't survive to our actual tenth anniversary, but considering it wasn't brand-new when we got it, it has held up very, very well.The "$1 for everything" part reminded me of that weird spot in Robocop.
It has to be a helluva photocopier!
This is a great article, but I have to know what happened to that photocopier.

Liz Courts Community Manager |

Vic Wertz wrote:This is a great article, but I have to know what happened to that photocopier.golem101 wrote:It is admittedly on its very last legs right now, and probably won't survive to our actual tenth anniversary, but considering it wasn't brand-new when we got it, it has held up very, very well.The "$1 for everything" part reminded me of that weird spot in Robocop.
It has to be a helluva photocopier!
We gave it a Viking funeral last year.
...Or we all wanted to at any rate.