Cleric-only spells - looking for clarification


Rules Questions


So, basically, there's a pile of spells that LOOK like they should be just fine with an Oracle, and which are listed in the Cleric/Oracle spell list with no indication that an Oracle can't cast them... but which aren't marked as Cleric Only... but don't tag to the Oracle Spell list.

Given that most of these spells also don't show up on the official Paizo site, would it be a safe guess that they are third party spells that likely never got linked properly?


Where do you see these spells? Can you provide a link or provide examples?

Unless stated otherwise, all cleric spells are on the oracle's spell list.

Shadow Lodge

1 person marked this as a favorite.

There are a group of 'Meditative' spells introduced in the Divine Anthology that are available to clerics but not Oracles:

Divine Anthology page 12 wrote:

Meditative Spells

...
Though some of these spells are on the cleric spell list, they can’t be part of an oracle’s list of spells known. Spontaneous casters such as oracles or sorcerers cannot benefit from the effects of a meditative spell, nor can characters who use such magic without preparation via Use Magic Device and a magic item, since part of the process of casting and maintaining the effects of a meditative spell involves tying the act of weaving the magic into the very process of meditation and study that a prepared spellcaster (such as a cleric or wizard) undergoes at the start of every day.
Spells listed are:
  • ENLIGHTENED STEP
  • FIREWALKER’S MEDITATION
  • RITE OF BODILY PURITY
  • RITE OF CENTERED MIND
  • SEE BEYOND
  • SPIRIT BONDS
  • VISUALIZATION OF THE BODY
  • VISUALIZATION OF THE MIND


Several of the spells here (it's only the official Paizo lists):

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/magic/spell-lists-and-domains/spell-lists---cleric

Which, reading further, have something in common... The ones that aren't listed as (Cleric Only) that aren't actually tagged in the oracle list are all side-book released ones that were released AFTER the Oracle class - such as the (Un)Holy Ice Blade spell.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

d20pfsrd is not an official source.

I think you are operating under a misconception. Oracle spells are generally not stated as such in the books. Even the book Oracles were introduced in, the APG, does not have oracles in the list of classes able to cast the spell unless it is an 'Oracle only' spell.

Any spell that states "Cleric" is able to be cast by an Oracle unless stated otherwise.

APG p42 wrote:
Spells: An oracle casts divine spells drawn from the cleric spell lists (see pages 226–229 of the Pathfinder RPG Core Rulebook).

Here is an example of a "Cleric 7" spell that does not state "Oracle 7". In that spell is a reference to Oracles using it.

Shadow Lodge

Zarius wrote:

Several of the spells here (it's only the official Paizo lists):

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/magic/spell-lists-and-domains/spell-lists---cleric

Which, reading further, have something in common... The ones that aren't listed as (Cleric Only) that aren't actually tagged in the oracle list are all side-book released ones that were released AFTER the Oracle class - such as the (Un)Holy Ice Blade spell.

Okay, looked up 'Holy Ice Weapon' and found it came from the Advanced Class Guide. I then opened up my PDF of the 'spells' chapter for that book and searched for 'oracle' and found 0 matches.

Going back to the Advanced Player's Guide, the rules for Oracles state 'An oracle casts divine spells drawn from the cleric spell lists' so technically speaking, there is no separate 'spell list' for Oracles: If a spell is available to clerics, it's available to Oracles as well (with the specific exception of 'meditative' spells from the Divine Anthology).

D20PFSRD, by the way, is NOT an official Pazio site: It belongs to a third party and may or may not be accurate.


Taja the Barbarian wrote:
Zarius wrote:

Several of the spells here (it's only the official Paizo lists):

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/magic/spell-lists-and-domains/spell-lists---cleric

Which, reading further, have something in common... The ones that aren't listed as (Cleric Only) that aren't actually tagged in the oracle list are all side-book released ones that were released AFTER the Oracle class - such as the (Un)Holy Ice Blade spell.

Okay, looked up 'Holy Ice Weapon' and found it came from the Advanced Class Guide. I then opened up my PDF of the 'spells' chapter for that book and searched for 'oracle' and found 0 matches.

Going back to the Advanced Player's Guide, the rules for Oracles state 'An oracle casts divine spells drawn from the cleric spell lists' so technically speaking, there is no separate 'spell list' for Oracles: If a spell is available to clerics, it's available to Oracles as well (with the specific exception of 'meditative' spells from the Divine Anthology).

D20PFSRD, by the way, is NOT an official Pazio site: It belongs to a third party and may or may not be accurate.

It tends to in fact be more accurate. Especially when you realize the PRD still has not updated the Ultimate Equipment Errata.


Taja, I think I missed that part completely. So, thank you very much. And thank you to everyone else that answered.

Anzyr, that's why I generally use it for lists and such. Plus, it's 3rd party listings are useful for badgering my DM for fun stuff :D

Shadow Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
Taja the Barbarian wrote:


...
D20PFSRD, by the way, is NOT an official Pazio site: It belongs to a third party and may or may not be accurate.
It tends to in fact be more accurate. Especially when you realize the PRD still has not updated the Ultimate Equipment Errata.

Well, in this specific case, it's incorrectly indicating that Oracles can't learn several Cleric spells...

Personally, I dislike that site for it's inclusion of 3rd party material and it's changing of names to avoid infringing on Pazio's IP (both of which are annoying from a PFS perspective) but I can see the overall appeal (I generally prefer http://www.archivesofnethys.com/Default.aspx)


Taja the Barbarian wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
Taja the Barbarian wrote:


...
D20PFSRD, by the way, is NOT an official Pazio site: It belongs to a third party and may or may not be accurate.
It tends to in fact be more accurate. Especially when you realize the PRD still has not updated the Ultimate Equipment Errata.

Well, in this specific case, it's incorrectly indicating that Oracles can't learn several Cleric spells...

Personally, I dislike that site for it's inclusion of 3rd party material and it's changing of names to avoid infringing on Pazio's IP (both of which are annoying from a PFS perspective) but I can see the overall appeal (I generally prefer http://www.archivesofnethys.com/Default.aspx)

What spell is that? If you mean spells that are only tagged as "Cleric 7" that is how they are actually tagged and PFSRD is correctly reproducing that. Not knowing that these spells are also Oracle Spells is a player error that would be made regardless of what source was consulted whether it be book, prd or pfsrd.


Taja the Barbarian wrote:
Anzyr wrote:
Taja the Barbarian wrote:


...
D20PFSRD, by the way, is NOT an official Pazio site: It belongs to a third party and may or may not be accurate.
It tends to in fact be more accurate. Especially when you realize the PRD still has not updated the Ultimate Equipment Errata.

Well, in this specific case, it's incorrectly indicating that Oracles can't learn several Cleric spells...

Personally, I dislike that site for it's inclusion of 3rd party material and it's changing of names to avoid infringing on Pazio's IP (both of which are annoying from a PFS perspective) but I can see the overall appeal (I generally prefer http://www.archivesofnethys.com/Default.aspx)

They might include it, but as near as I can tell, all of the actual third party stuff is actually on a separate set of pages. I,personally, don't see an issue with it, as long it's separated. Especially since Paizo doesn't bother updating their own stuff.

Sczarni

2 people marked this as a favorite.

If you need to use a third party site, use archivesofnethys.

Easier to search, no third party content, no copyright infringement, and no name-changing.

About the only downside is that the site owner isn't the quickest at updating new content.


2 people marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
Taja the Barbarian wrote:
Zarius wrote:

Several of the spells here (it's only the official Paizo lists):

http://www.d20pfsrd.com/magic/spell-lists-and-domains/spell-lists---cleric

Which, reading further, have something in common... The ones that aren't listed as (Cleric Only) that aren't actually tagged in the oracle list are all side-book released ones that were released AFTER the Oracle class - such as the (Un)Holy Ice Blade spell.

Okay, looked up 'Holy Ice Weapon' and found it came from the Advanced Class Guide. I then opened up my PDF of the 'spells' chapter for that book and searched for 'oracle' and found 0 matches.

Going back to the Advanced Player's Guide, the rules for Oracles state 'An oracle casts divine spells drawn from the cleric spell lists' so technically speaking, there is no separate 'spell list' for Oracles: If a spell is available to clerics, it's available to Oracles as well (with the specific exception of 'meditative' spells from the Divine Anthology).

D20PFSRD, by the way, is NOT an official Pazio site: It belongs to a third party and may or may not be accurate.

It tends to in fact be more accurate. Especially when you realize the PRD still has not updated the Ultimate Equipment Errata.

They were saying it is less accurate with regard to how it reproduces the rules. They often take liberties with how they word or format the rules.


Actually, Wraith, funny enough... the Paizo page doesn't even HAVE Holy Ice Weapon on it's listing, so I'd say that the PFSRD having it, but not tagged right, is still more accurate than the Paizo page, liberties or not. They also usually only adjust wording when there's errata which adjusts the rules or an FAQ which clarifies a point of contention. Usually.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Zarius wrote:
Actually, Wraith, funny enough... the Paizo page doesn't even HAVE Holy Ice Weapon on it's listing, so I'd say that the PFSRD having it, but not tagged right, is still more accurate than the Paizo page, liberties or not. They also usually only adjust wording when there's errata which adjusts the rules or an FAQ which clarifies a point of contention. Usually.

PRD: Holy Ice Weapon


Interesting. I looked all over the bloody thing, couldn't find it. Welp, empirical evidence proves ME wrong.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

So you might say you're looking for... Clericfication?

The Exchange Owner - D20 Hobbies

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Anzyr wrote:
It tends to in fact be more accurate. Especially when you realize the PRD still has not updated the Ultimate Equipment Errata.

More accurate in some ways, way less accurate in others as there are many situations where the site edits the text to be "more clear" when in fact making it less clear.

I recommend using the pdf books/errata, or archiveofnethsys in that order.


If the spells in question are used as part of a cleric's spell preparation process, than oracles can't use them as they do not prepare spells.


Kazaan wrote:
So you might say you're looking for... Clericfication?

*coughs* Well played, good sir. Well played.

The Exchange

For those particular spells you will need to read the actual book to understand why they are not available to oracles. The introductory text for the spells section discusses how to use them and specifies that you must prepare spells to cast them.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Cleric-only spells - looking for clarification All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in Rules Questions
Limitations of Disguise Self
Bluffing against Confess spell