While I'd agree for long distances, an enemy who's a few dozen feet away from you can be targetted at range. Anyway, if the enemy makes sound (as in doesn't use Stealth and is relatively close to you) you pinpoint it and can shoot at it. For a spellcaster there's also always the choice of AoE effects.
Also, this is a fantasy game, it's by nature unreasonable.
A blinded character can also cast spells that affect them personally or that are emanations and/or use items that don't require targeting (for example, an alchemist can use a versatile vial to create an elixir or mutagen and drink it).
| 3 people marked this as a favorite. |
https://2e.aonprd.com/Conditions.aspx?ID=59
If you're a melee attacker, then you could hobble at half speed to the sound of combat and attack in a square if you think an enemy is there with a 50% miss chance (plus you're off-guard).
A ranged attacker trying to shoot from a distance seems unlikely to be reasonable.
A spellcaster targeting any spells from a distance seems unlikely to be reasonable.
Why do you consider those cases unreasonable? If a melee character can figure out what distance and direction to travel in to get to the right square to swing a sword from, then why can't a ranged character make the same distinction to figure out where approximately to aim?
Honest question. I don't view the distinction here as being overly severe, so I don't make it in my games. Blind character can make a Perception to try to figure out approximate direction/distance using another sense (like Hearing) and work off that.
Now if they're trying to hear someone specifically that is 100' away and there's seven other things in combat between them? I'll impose Circumstance penalties on the check because they're trying to hear something specific over a lot of noise and that's more difficult than "there's a large creature thudding around nearby."
Likewise if an ally tells them "3 o'clock at 15'", then the player can attempt to use that information to help make it easier to have some idea of what to do.
Ideally I'd like the Blinded player to feel like they still have a chance to do something on their turn, without devaluing the condition. Making it effectively crippling to non-melee characters just takes the player out of the combat so long as it lasts, and I want to avoid that outcome.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
I think once we get to higher levels we have to refer more to genre than physiology, as in it's likely some of the PCs have Legendary Perception so should be able to do (or at least try) some fantastic achievements. Think of if Hawkeye or Green Arrow were temporarily blinded; they'd pull back their arrows, cock their heads to zero in on their target, and make a decent attempt at it, enough to scare the target at least. Or take it up a notch and think Legolas who breaks the laws of physics as a norm (and in the books too), and LotR's the basis for the modern epic fantasy genre that spawned RPGs. Samurais on a blood vendetta, martial artists in death tournaments, and many more fictional warriors fight quite well blinded.
Now an at-level threat trying to Sneak might elude a legendary hero at times, but a rambunctious butterfly would be skewered.
In this case it was more like "A PC (enemy) is in melee with two NPCs (allies) about 100 feet away."
That's definitely a case where hearing starts to fail. At that distance, I'd tell the player he just hears the noise of combat (as an Imprecise Sense).
The PC can get closer to the source of noise so they'll be able to make sense of what's happening. But at 100 feet, it's too far for me, too.
A spellcaster targeting any spells from a distance seems unlikely to be reasonable.
For some area spells you are still Ok as long as the GM agrees that you know which area to position the effect in. Typically an imprecise sense is enough for that.
The rule is A spell that has an area but no targets listed usually affects all creatures in the area indiscriminately.
Example Fireball can be used to effect targets you can't see.
A GM may well put some reasonable limits on your secondary senses as an extra restriction.
Vague sense you mean. Imprecise is enough to target (would be hidden).
Yep, I made a mistake.