Stuff That You Wish Paizo Had Done For Pathfinder 1E?

[TriOmegaZero]

I wish Steadfast Determination had made the jump from 3.5 to PF in some way.

[Dragon78]

TriOmegaZero, remind me what that did again?

[TriOmegaZero]

Con to Will saves and you did not fail Fort saves on a nat 1.

[Toshy]

TriOmegaZero wrote:

Con to Will saves and you did not fail Fort saves on a nat 1.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC the only thing that auto-fails on a Nat-1 are attack rolls?

So even if you roll a Nat-1 on a fort-save (or any other save), if your total is high enough you still succeed.

[Arkat]

Toshy wrote:

TriOmegaZero wrote:

Con to Will saves and you did not fail Fort saves on a nat 1.

Correct me if I'm wrong, but IIRC the only thing that auto-fails on a Nat-1 are attack rolls?

So even if you roll a Nat-1 on a fort-save (or any other save), if your total is high enough you still succeed.

Saving throws also fail on a natural 1.

At least they do in PF1 and D&D 3.5 and earlier.

[Toshy]

Huh, seems you always learn something new...

IIRC we never had a situation where this would have mattered, but I thought only attack rolls would automatically fail/succeed on a natural 1/20.

Good to know, I guess.