|
Cannot seem to find answer, correct my assumptions:
Question 1: Player plays 3 parts, then other 2 at later date gets full credit if they did not play anything else with character between, correct?
Question 2: GM gets full credit for running 5 parts; GM can get full credit even by running the same part 5 times, correct?
Question 3: Weird example that came up; Player (701) played first 2 parts but didn't finish. Made new character (702) and played several times now. They want to GM Quest now. GM wants to know if they can apply their credit to finish the original (701) characters Chronicle by running 5 parts.
Advise / clarification welcome!
|
|
If he can continue playing the quest pack on the previous chronicle (the GM didn't sign the sheet or apply rewards and character 701 hasn't played or applied credit for anything since) then I think he can fill the remaining 3 with GM credits and complete the chronicle as GM. I think he can then (because a player could) start a new chronicle with 2 quests complete. This second 2/5 chronicle must be applied to a different character as you say.
|
Essentially, he's voiding the 2/5 incomplete Chronicle and replacing it with a 5/5 GM Chronicle, which I'm not sure is legal, but I'll keep an eye on this thread to find out.
He can't have both a 2/5 and a 5/5 of the same quest on one character, that I know.
As a GM he would just complete the original Chronicle, and add a handwritten line at the bottom for the second set of event codes, dates and such.
I have two PFS characters that experienced similar situations.
Whenever I can't complete a quest series as a player, I usually make a point to GM that same quest soonish.