
Jhaeman |

I've grown increasingly skeptical of d20pfsrd, because they've started integrating 3PP stuff into official material with nothing more than an easily unnoticed disclaimer at the top. That's led to players quoting me "rules" in the middle of a session that simply do not exist. I've told my players to rely on Archives of Nethys as a consequence. . .

Jhaeman |

A good example is how d20pfsrd treats the Perception skill: http://www.d20pfsrd.com/skills/perception/
The *first* listing is unofficial third-party expansions (not even set aside with a bold or underlined header) and then it gets to the official skill description and then it slips into Unchained and then it slips into stuff from FAQs and message boards. I appreciate that they're trying to be comprehensive, but it just causes too much confusion for many players (and some GMs) who don't read carefully enough . . .

Lady-J |
A good example is how d20pfsrd treats the Perception skill: http://www.d20pfsrd.com/skills/perception/
The *first* listing is unofficial third-party expansions (not even set aside with a bold or underlined header) and then it gets to the official skill description and then it slips into Unchained and then it slips into stuff from FAQs and message boards. I appreciate that they're trying to be comprehensive, but it just causes too much confusion for many players (and some GMs) who don't read carefully enough . . .
i still find d20 a significantly better source than nethys as d20 is far more strat forward and all the info i need is easy to acess while i find nethys a laberenth to manuver through just to get a single small peice of info im looking for as well as being outdated a majority of the time if i had a gm say i could only use nethys to make my characters i would quit their game as it is far to much of a hassle to deal with and find everything i need to make my character