Matthew Morris RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8 |
Chris Mortika RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16 |
Jeff Merola |
blackbloodtroll wrote:I agree the political commentary was u n warranted, but commenting on somethings legality in PFS isn't the right forum? Whaaaa?Wrong forum.
Also, don't drop political flame-bait in your rules question post.
Serious dick move buddy. Don't do it.
He's not questioning its legality, though. He's questioning the mechanics behind a legal option.
Mark Stratton |
Andrew Christian wrote:He's not questioning its legality, though. He's questioning the mechanics behind a legal option.blackbloodtroll wrote:I agree the political commentary was u n warranted, but commenting on somethings legality in PFS isn't the right forum? Whaaaa?Wrong forum.
Also, don't drop political flame-bait in your rules question post.
Serious dick move buddy. Don't do it.
He's asking if it should replace something else.
Jeff Merola |
Jeff Merola wrote:He's asking if it should replace something else.Andrew Christian wrote:He's not questioning its legality, though. He's questioning the mechanics behind a legal option.blackbloodtroll wrote:I agree the political commentary was u n warranted, but commenting on somethings legality in PFS isn't the right forum? Whaaaa?Wrong forum.
Also, don't drop political flame-bait in your rules question post.
Serious dick move buddy. Don't do it.
That's a mechanics question, though, not a PFS question. There's nothing PFS specific about his question.
blackbloodtroll |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Mark Stratton wrote:That's a mechanics question, though, not a PFS question. There's nothing PFS specific about his question.Jeff Merola wrote:He's asking if it should replace something else.Andrew Christian wrote:He's not questioning its legality, though. He's questioning the mechanics behind a legal option.blackbloodtroll wrote:I agree the political commentary was u n warranted, but commenting on somethings legality in PFS isn't the right forum? Whaaaa?Wrong forum.
Also, don't drop political flame-bait in your rules question post.
Serious dick move buddy. Don't do it.
That's exactly what I said.
Andrew Christian |
Mark Stratton wrote:That's a mechanics question, though, not a PFS question. There's nothing PFS specific about his question.Jeff Merola wrote:He's asking if it should replace something else.Andrew Christian wrote:He's not questioning its legality, though. He's questioning the mechanics behind a legal option.blackbloodtroll wrote:I agree the political commentary was u n warranted, but commenting on somethings legality in PFS isn't the right forum? Whaaaa?Wrong forum.
Also, don't drop political flame-bait in your rules question post.
Serious dick move buddy. Don't do it.
Can someone point me to what the heck he's talking about? Cause without actually reading it, I'm in the dark.
Eric Clingenpeel Venture-Captain, Michigan—Mt. Pleasant |
Chris Mortika RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16 |
SCPRedMage |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |
For context:
Inspire Imitation: Whenever a half-elf succeeds at a skill check, she can inspire imitators as a swift action. Any ally within 30 feet who witnesses the successful check and attempts the same check within the next minute gains a +2 bonus on the check as if from the aid another action. This racial trait replaces skilled.
I happen to own a physical copy of this book, and even I didn't realize what the OP was talking about until someone mentioned where it was from.
Chris Lambertz Community & Digital Content Director |