Charles Scholz
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Wayne Pygram maybe?
| thejeff |
If it is Tarkin, who do we have stepping into the iconic shoes of one of the few men in the Galaxy who treats Vader as an equal?
I just find it amusing how much plot and mystique spiralled out of that when it was really because Vader's place wasn't clearly defined at the time. Vader's place as second only to the Emperor didn't really solidify until Empire Strikes Back.
(And the whole Sith mythology didn't even appear until the prequels, but that's a different kettle of monkeys.)
Charles Scholz
|
Most people saw Vader more as a trouble shooter who came in when things go wrong.
As far as they are concerned, he is just a glorified stormtrooper leader.
His true status as the emperor's right hand was known only to a few.
This is what the emperor wanted people to think.
Also, the emperor may not have totally trusted Vader and placed him under the leadership of others.
That was why Vader was deferential to Tarkin.
That may also be why a lieutenant was questioning Vader's decision to take Leia prisoner instead of executing her.
baron arem heshvaun
|
NEWEST International Rogue One trailer!
That probably is a Kyber crystal Jyn is given.
Expect nerds all around the world to be gifting them to their loved ones.
| John Napier 698 |
NEWEST International Rogue One trailer!
That poor AT-ACT.
:(
That's what happens in Star Wars when you get too many parking tickets.
archmagi1
|
baron arem heshvaun wrote:NEWEST International Rogue One trailer!That probably is a Kyber crystal Jyn is given.
Expect nerds all around the world to be gifting them to their loved ones.
So presumably jyns dad is lightsaber scholar who is forced to engineer a death star sized light sabre gun.
| Werthead |
I thought Rogue Squadron was now written out of the official canon?
They definitely still exist in the new canon because they're in EMPIRE STRIKES BACK. However, their significance and all the things they did later on (like spearheading the conquest of Coruscant) is out of the window.
| Freehold DM |
Also, they would be "Red Squadron" in this movie. Luke's callsign was "Red Five." Red Squadron wouldn't become "Rogue Squadron" until shortly before Empire.
according to some books I read, it was Rogue for this mission, then returned to red so that the empire wouldn't know which part of the rebellion was attacking the death star to protect the families of the Rebels(Rogue squadron becoming quite famous for their move).
| Freehold DM |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Freehold DM wrote:There better be some y wings in this film.There are! In the scene in the trailer set at night with the X-wings flying over you can just see two Y-wings in the background. There's also some in the Rebel hanger and there's a crashed one on the jungle beach planet.
thank you. Here's hoping that they get to splash some enemy fighters.
| Voss |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
This looks like a much better film than force awakens- tighter plot, more interesting characters and at least some time on the nitty-gritty side of life and living in the SW universe, something that has been lacking for a long time now.
Seeing some of it taking place in actual settlements has me intrigued at the possibilities.
| Wei Ji the Learner |
I don't know what a bothan is but i better see a lot of dead ones
BNW:
Bothan *Political Figure Not Named Because Of Similarity To RL Politicians*
baron arem heshvaun
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I don't know what a bothan is but i better see a lot of dead ones
You are possibly thinking of the Death Star II and the events leading up to Return of the Jedi, but as a loyal Imperial, I always welcome the chance of seeing dead Bothans.
baron arem heshvaun
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Bothans are the ultimate political opportunists and back room politicos, they were always hedging their bets. They were not even loyal to themselves as a race.
If The Empire won out, "hey good thing we helped sell the trap with your plans to eradicate the Rebellion, high five Darth! Now how about you do something for us ... as you know, so many dead Bothans."
If the Rebellion won, "hey good thing we found out about the plans to eradicate the Rebellion, high five Leia! Now how about you do something for us ... as you know, so many dead Bothans."
BNW
How to paint a Bothan. (very well done)
The best kind of Bothan. A Bothan on his way.
baron arem heshvaun
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
To his credit, Timothy Zhan took the original idea of West End Games Bothans to such an extreme level - racially counterparts of real world politicians always acting in their self interest that you could not help but have your skin crawl when you thought of Bothans.
Bothan culture was guided by the overreaching philosophy and principles which placed the pursuit of political power and influence as paramount.
Individual Bothans put their own political and economic success above all other concerns, and as a species, Bothans put their own advancement ahead of any other intergalactic interests, though many did side with the Rebel Alliance during the Galactic Civil war, to undermine those of their own race that had grown powerful by serving The Empire.
The volume of backstabbing, subtle character assassination and political maneuvering in Bothan society was dizzying, and resulted in many species stereotyping Bothans as untrustworthy. In fact, most Bothans are habitually paranoid, believing that anyone who's not working with them, is working against them. There is no win-win scenario to a Bothan, it's I (always) win, you lose.
You would make better deals with a Hutt than a Bothan.
| Wei Ji the Learner |
To his credit, Timothy Zhan took the original idea of West End Games Bothans to such an extreme - real world politician always acting in their self interest levels that you could not help but have your skin crawl when you thought of Bothans.
Bothan culture was guided by the overreaching philosophy and principles which placed the pursuit of political power and influence as paramount.
Individual Bothans put their own political and economic success above all other concerns, and as a species, Bothans put their own advancement ahead of any other intergalactic interests, though many did side with the Rebel Alliance during the Galactic Civil war, to undermine those of their own race that had grown powerful by serving The Empire.
The volume of backstabbing, subtle character assassination and political maneuvering in Bothan society was dizzying, and resulted in many species stereotyping Bothans as untrustworthy. In fact, most Bothans are habitually paranoid, believing that anyone who's not working with them, is working against them.
You would make better deals with a Hutt than a Bothan.
In addition, that stereotype was SO prevalent that individuals who *didn't* engage in this 'politico' style behaviour were viewed as 'disloyal to Clan' at least and 'dangerously insane' at worst...
And we definitely won't talk about how speciesist they were.
| John Napier 698 |
Not a Bothan apologist, but they WERE loyal members of the Empire until some point around Empire.Sure, they were shady bureaucrats, but they were the EMPIRE's shady bureaucrats...
Palpatine feared them because they were also information brokers ( read: spies ). He wanted to completely control the flow of information, so if he could not do so, he would ensure that no-one else could. So he enlisted the aid of a Bothan Clan to lower the shields of Camaas, to allow its destruction. Then he used their involvement as Blackmail to ensure their "loyalty." So many Bothans entered the Rebellion to, well, rebel.
| Wei Ji the Learner |
Wow, where is all this info coming from? Older non canon books I'm assuming?
It's in a 'twilight zone' that is sort of Heisenberg's Uncertainty Canon at the moment, if memory serves?
It's not *not* Canon (well, except for the Y-V alien stuff, which definitely isn't) but some of it is still on really shaky six-degrees ground of connection...
| GreyWolfLord |
Not overly invested in the EU myself...but in regards to the bothan information...
In otherwords, it is from the now Non-Canon Star Wars books that Disney nullified...as with their new movie The Force Awakens it is basically shown that everything from Zahn's original trilogy onwards didn't happen unless they write it back into canon with some other books.
That said, I should read Zahn's other SW booksv(even if they are no longer canon, and perhaps his new canon book), he's far better than anyone I've seen writing for Disney's SW books recently, and perhaps the only EU type author I'd read (I DID give the new SW authors a try...tried to read Aftermath...after that...no way...I have FAR better things to do with my time).
Marc Radle
|
Got it. I'm not interested in all those old books either. I'm very much in the "the movies are all that really count" camp :)
Ok, so, as far as the actual movies go, we only have that one line about many Bothans died to get the plans, right? It will be very interesting to see how those Bothans are handled /addressed in the movie!
| Wei Ji the Learner |
| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Got it. I'm not interested in all those old books either. I'm very much in the "the movies are all that really count" camp :)
Ok, so, as far as the actual movies go, we only have that one line about many Bothans died to get the plans, right? It will be very interesting to see how those Bothans are handled /addressed in the movie!
*headdesk*
They grabbed the plans for the *second* try, prior to Jedi. Not the first one, which was a different run.
| Freehold DM |
Marc Radle wrote:Got it. I'm not interested in all those old books either. I'm very much in the "the movies are all that really count" camp :)
Ok, so, as far as the actual movies go, we only have that one line about many Bothans died to get the plans, right? It will be very interesting to see how those Bothans are handled /addressed in the movie!
*headdesk*
They grabbed the plans for the *second* try, prior to Jedi. Not the first one, which was a different run.
which we are about to find out the details of.
| John Napier 698 |
I have an interesting side point to consider. If Star Wars: Rebels is considered canon, in that it is owned by Disney, does that mean that Grand Admiral Thrawn is also canon? Being that Thrawn is a character in Rebels Season 3.
And if Thrawn is considered canon now, does that mean that any work that contains the Grand Admiral is also canon, at least until a decision is definitively made?
| thejeff |
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I have an interesting side point to consider. If Star Wars: Rebels is considered canon, in that it is owned by Disney, does that mean that Grand Admiral Thrawn is also canon? Being that Thrawn is a character in Rebels Season 3.
And if Thrawn is considered canon now, does that mean that any work that contains the Grand Admiral is also canon, at least until a decision is definitively made?
No.
Luke is Canon. Not every work that contains Luke is canon.
Thrawn's appearances in Rebels are canon. Appearances in non-canon works are not.
| Quark Blast |
John Napier 698 wrote:I have an interesting side point to consider. If Star Wars: Rebels is considered canon, in that it is owned by Disney, does that mean that Grand Admiral Thrawn is also canon? Being that Thrawn is a character in Rebels Season 3.
And if Thrawn is considered canon now, does that mean that any work that contains the Grand Admiral is also canon, at least until a decision is definitively made?
No.
Luke is Canon. Not every work that contains Luke is canon.
Thrawn's appearances in Rebels are canon. Appearances in non-canon works are not.
Non-canon works are considered legends however. And legends always start with a truth.
Edit
So saying something is "non-canon" is not that same thing as saying "it will never be canon".
| thejeff |
thejeff wrote:John Napier 698 wrote:I have an interesting side point to consider. If Star Wars: Rebels is considered canon, in that it is owned by Disney, does that mean that Grand Admiral Thrawn is also canon? Being that Thrawn is a character in Rebels Season 3.
And if Thrawn is considered canon now, does that mean that any work that contains the Grand Admiral is also canon, at least until a decision is definitively made?
No.
Luke is Canon. Not every work that contains Luke is canon.
Thrawn's appearances in Rebels are canon. Appearances in non-canon works are not.
Non-canon works are considered legends however. And legends always start with a truth.
Edit
So saying something is "non-canon" is not that same thing as saying "it will never be canon".
I suppose. They can do whatever they choose. I'd be surprised if they re-canonized any of the old stuff that's now non-canon. I don't recall the details of the Thrawn trilogy, but I doubt it fits with the new canon.
They're far more likely to take bits from the old EU and rework them to fit into the new reality. As they're doing with Thrawn.The principle of "this character is canon, therefore works that contain this character are also canon" is false on the face of it though. Pretty much everything would become canon again - except for works that don't use any established characters.
| Quark Blast |
Quark Blast wrote:thejeff wrote:John Napier 698 wrote:I have an interesting side point to consider. If Star Wars: Rebels is considered canon, in that it is owned by Disney, does that mean that Grand Admiral Thrawn is also canon? Being that Thrawn is a character in Rebels Season 3.
And if Thrawn is considered canon now, does that mean that any work that contains the Grand Admiral is also canon, at least until a decision is definitively made?
No.
Luke is Canon. Not every work that contains Luke is canon.
Thrawn's appearances in Rebels are canon. Appearances in non-canon works are not.
Non-canon works are considered legends however. And legends always start with a truth.
Edit
So saying something is "non-canon" is not that same thing as saying "it will never be canon".
I suppose. They can do whatever they choose. I'd be surprised if they re-canonized any of the old stuff that's now non-canon. I don't recall the details of the Thrawn trilogy, but I doubt it fits with the new canon.
They're far more likely to take bits from the old EU and rework them to fit into the new reality. As they're doing with Thrawn.The principle of "this character is canon, therefore works that contain this character are also canon" is false on the face of it though. Pretty much everything would become canon again - except for works that don't use any established characters.
The part I boldified is what I was aiming for.
Anything from the EU may become canonized in the new 'verse but it is now only "legends". And, as you say, re-canonization is unlikely to be a whole cloth affair.
| John Napier 698 |
Oh, hey, you mean that Thrawn might actually, y'know, be the complete bad-ass he was until he took ill of the Stupid Plot Device Syndrome?He was one of my few favorite Imperials until the plotonium poisoning got him in the EU.
Is Plotonium somewhere hear Unobtanium? Or is it near Transuranic Hydrogen?