Item lookouts

[Garrett Guillotte]

If anybody wants to check if I've seen an item, pre- or post-cull, just send me a PM.

DO NOT REPLY IN THIS THREAD WITH ANY IDENTIFYING INFORMATION ABOUT YOUR ITEM. THAT'LL DISQUALIFY YOU. Just send me a PM!

If you don't have the item title, just send me a keyword or some details you remember. If I haven't seen it, I'll put it on my watchlist and let you know if I do.

I'm not reviewing items until the critique threads are posted to the boards after voting. This is purely an offer to notify folks wanting to confirm whether an item has shown up.

[Tripp Elliott]

Is it just me, or does this seem like a quick way to get DQ'd?

[Samuel Stone]

Quote:

During public voting rounds, contestants are prohibited from any public discussion that could be considered as adding to, expanding upon, or clarifying the content of their current submissions. This applies to (but is not limited to) interviews, personal blogs, and messageboard posts on paizo.com or elsewhere, including the paizo.com discussion thread for the entry itself. Any such discussion may result in disqualification, in the sole discretion of the judges and/or Paizo Publishing.

PMs are fine.

[Scarletrose]

last year someone opened a topic with a list of all the items he encountered after the cull.
No indication on which items were good and which were bad, nor indications about who wrote which item.
I think it is fine to do that... even if it would be a huge list.