Can paladins accept money and bounties?


Lost Omens Campaign Setting General Discussion


If paladins are suppose to be super good guys and act as paragons of the lawful and good gods, can they accept tribute, bounties, rewards of any sort? Or do they just have to smile and say all in a days work.

On top of this can they have any affiliation with Evil other than killing them? can they team up with them or make peace with them in anyway?


I think it would be logical for them to atleast be paid for their troubles/time/resources, but arguably that comes from loot.

Personally I woe say why not, but probably their would be SOME circumstances where the paladin (or other character) would do a job no matter what (out of emotion, self interest, old grudge, long-owed debt, etc...).


Schiffer wrote:
On top of this can they have any affiliation with Evil other than killing them? can they team up with them or make peace with them in anyway?

When they face a greater evil or otherwise believe that they can redeem the evil ally, I believe many gods will allow working together with someone who is evil.

Silver Crusade

Schiffer wrote:
On top of this can they have any affiliation with Evil other than killing them? can they team up with them or make peace with them in anyway?

They absolutely can. Otherwise, redemption is a thing paladins could never take part in, and that just isn't right. (hell, the Redeemer archetype flat out disproves the idea that paladins can't deal with evil non-violently).

There's also the matter of evil people not necessarily needing killing at all. There are lesser evils and greater evils, and part of being a paladin is figuring out how to properly deal with each kind as it comes along. And a fundamental part of being able to win the hearts of others and pull them over to the side of good is to not murder them. ;) After all, there are paladins getting by in Cheliax.

Note that angels are working alongside demons and devils to protect dead souls from daemons on a daily basis. And Sarenrae and Asmodeus did team up along with almost every other god to take down Rovagug. And Miss Paladin herself, Iomedae, does listen to Asmodeus' advice at times.(but fat chance that she isn't taking it with ALL the grains of salt in the universe)


I don't see why a paladin couldn't accept a reward or a bounty for their hard work.

It would, of course, also depend on the reward and where it comes from. I don't see very many paladins agreeing to accept a monetary reward from a slave merchant, for example - the whole "dirty money" thing.

They also might turn down a reward. If a town offers a reward for the death of a dragon that happens to be terrorising the countryside and ruining the farms (etc.), the paladin might refuse the reward simply because that money could be put to better use helping get the town back on its feet again. Or they might take it in non-monetary favours (free room and board at an inn, information when he needs it, or what-have-you).

Silver Crusade

Alleran wrote:
They also might turn down a reward. If a town offers a reward for the death of a dragon that happens to be terrorising the countryside and ruining the farms (etc.), the paladin might refuse the reward simply because that money could be put to better use helping get the town back on its feet again. Or they might take it in non-monetary favours (free room and board at an inn, information when he needs it, or what-have-you).

What Would The Three Amigos Do? :)

Radiant Oath

Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber

Been reading The Complete Paladin's Handbook for 2E AD&D, and it offers some insight into mercenary work. In times of peace, if there's no clear evil to fight, a paladin CAN offer their services as a mercenary for Lawful Good governments or organizations. They just don't gain anything special for it other than what's laid out in their contract, and when that contract expires, they're on the road again lookin' for evil to smite. Also, if the paladin's asked to do anything that violates code, the contract's void, and profits from the contract strictly go towards one of two things: the paladin's self-support and sustainability, and any extra must be tithed to the paladin's church or a charitable cause of his/her choice.

Granted, AD&D assumes a setting more like historical medieval Europe than what Pathfinder is, but those guys sure did their homework!


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Mikaze wrote:
Alleran wrote:
They also might turn down a reward. If a town offers a reward for the death of a dragon that happens to be terrorising the countryside and ruining the farms (etc.), the paladin might refuse the reward simply because that money could be put to better use helping get the town back on its feet again. Or they might take it in non-monetary favours (free room and board at an inn, information when he needs it, or what-have-you).
What Would The Three Amigos Do? :)

So we're saying paladins should ride off on the women and prune the hedges of many small villages?

And what do the horses have to say about it?

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I, as usually would respond with "Why not"? Its not like most paladin codes feature a poverty clause.

They should, of course be mindful that their actions reflect their status (that is, go towards the good of their community), but I'd be hard-pressed to explain why a paladin of Sheylin shouldn't have a private collection of paintings, even if they are worth a lot of money. Now, a certain amount of charity is probably going to be expected from someone who's really committed to good, but that charity need not be to the point of self-denial.

Same goes for your second question. My canonical example is the inn with the LE inkeep who gauges prices. A paladin won't like that guy one bit, but he should neither smite the man dead, nor be forced to sleep in the snow instead of renting a room.


everyone said yes so thats good

but what if its a paladin or Old Dead Eye? does that change anything that you've all already said?


I wouldn't expect a paladin of Old Dead Eye to be a wandering mercenary. Yet I could see one taking a job to support the folks back home.

I'd expect the paladin of Erastil to take the approach he thinks is best for the people around him or the people back home, as appropriate.

Heh. in Terra's example above, I could see such a paladin calling out the innkeeper for price gouging and then going and making himself a camp outside. (Then again, if I was a paladin of Erastil I'd definitely put points in survival.)

Grand Lodge

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Schiffer wrote:

everyone said yes so thats good

but what if its a paladin or Old Dead Eye? does that change anything that you've all already said?

I expect that a paladin of Old Dead Eye would look at it something along the lines of:

"Nothing wrong with an honest wage for honest work. No need for for a fancy contract, just tell me the job and we'll shake on it."

I imagine they'd be choosy in who they go after, and depending on what the target did they'd probably do it anyway even if they weren't being paid.


1.No problems with paladin taking money or other rewards after helping someone.
2.Taking reward if he himself did not contribute to the task would be on the other hand wrong. Example: Pete the paladin is hired to kill the evil lich. Pete goes to the tower lich is living in, but alas, the storm yesterday brought the tower crumbling down and lich is already dead.
3.Depends how he spends the money, taking money, even in form of justly earned reward and blowing it all in tavern...


okay then last question: Would it make sense in the Kingmaker campaign to play a paladin of Erastil that came from the rostlands? Is that the right location or should i pick a different one? also what excuse can i give for a Erastil paladin exploring and settling the greenbelt?


Archpaladin Zousha wrote:
Been reading The Complete Paladin's Handbook for 2E AD&D, and it offers some insight into mercenary work.

And I must say it is still one of the best go-to sources of info on paladins, despite the edition change.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Erastil is one of the major dieties in the inner sea region, and worshippers can come from pretty much anywhere. Rural Rostland is as good a place to start as any.

The greenbelt is full of bandits, that alone is probably very good reason for a follower of Erastil to go there. In addition carving a kingdom out of chaos means a lot of rural, down-to-earth frontier life. That's what Erastil is made for. Under these circumstances, a more sophisticated diety would probably be harder to justify than Old Deadeye.

I can not in good conscience recommend 2nd editions Paladin Handbook. It feels overly constrained and enamored with a notion of goodness that is more about what the character doesn't do ("I refrain from...") rather than what she does. However, as countless threads on this board attest, opinions about paladins are all over the place - so you've probably got to pick and choose an interpretation anyway. :)


I find the concept of understanding what they refrain from far better than having a limited set of things they 'can' do. Once you have the 'thou shalt not' down, the rest sorts itself.

What it also has is a lot of detail on the lifestyle and other considerations on what a Paladin might find themselves doing, which is far better than trying to make sense of the Hurr Durr Pally-Fall stuff we keep seeing - unfortunately.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32

Don't get me started on negative vs. positive morality. ;) I find it very much add odds with my personal morality that you can be a good person by just not doing anything. But that's a topic for another time, and possibly another place as well.

That said, if paladins were to fall even nearly as frequently as some posters seem to imply - there would not be any.


The Lawful aspect would be expressed in the fact that there are bounties, a system offering an incentive to bring a criminal to justice. Where it may be conflicted (not absolutely clear cut) is in the case of someone who committed a crime for Good reasons and that by serving the Law an injustice may be perpetrated.

Mercenary work has a contractual element yes, but there is far greater scope for a Paladin to be asked to commit an Evil act during this. I would suggest that a Paladin would only sign up for a known Lawful and Good cause and with a clear goal that combatted Evil or defended the innocent.

Note the capitalisation, these are big obvious concepts we are dealing with here, not the nuanced stuff.

The other aspect of this is a Paladin's relationship with their Church/Order, if the Paladin offers service for equipment and support then it is entirely right that they give a significant amount of their money to them. This was assumed in the original AD&D and I would suggest it for a house rule.

Finally, can a Paladin consort with an evil adventurer? Not unless they are on a clearly defined path of redemption no. Also if that character is of a class with divine powers then I would say it is a straight no. The Paladin SHOULD be on a mission to spread Law and Goodness, they cannot be seen to tolerate Evil and Chaos in some and not others.


Schiffer wrote:

If paladins are suppose to be super good guys and act as paragons of the lawful and good gods, can they accept tribute, bounties, rewards of any sort? Or do they just have to smile and say all in a days work.

On top of this can they have any affiliation with Evil other than killing them? can they team up with them or make peace with them in anyway?

Yes and no.

They can receive rewards, titles, lands, whatever. The money and property is used to pay for arms and armor, upkeep for their mount, wages for their minions, public works projects, given as aid to good causes, and so forth and so on. Whatever isn't needed for day to day operations gets stuffed into the War Chest or turned over to the church or an appropriate body.

Which isn't to say that Paladins don't have stuff, or even that Paladins don't have nice stuff. They do! But the stuff they have is rarely anything they've bought for themselves. It's usually gifts from the people they've helped out over the years. Things that were made with love and given out of honest gratitude and genuine good will.

Paladins don't have to live in poverty, but they also don't have much need or interest in material wealth. They are immanently empowered by their god - They know exactly where they're going in the afterlife and that frankly takes a lot of the anxiety out of your day to day routine. A lot of the desire to accumulate is motivated by uncertainty about life and death - Paladins just straight up don't have that. Their faith can literally move mountains. Or smite mountains, if they happen to come across an evil mountain.

So TLDR; Yes, but they'll probably use whatever they need for day to day operations and then either give the rest to their church for find ways to put it to work doing good things.


Schiffer wrote:
If paladins are suppose to be super good guys and act as paragons of the lawful and good gods, can they accept tribute, bounties, rewards of any sort? Or do they just have to smile and say all in a days work.

Joseph, Paladin of Abadar, reminds you that tithes to the Abadarian Order help keep the peace of the realm.


Quote:
Note that angels are working alongside demons and devils to protect dead souls from daemons on a daily basis. And Sarenrae and Asmodeus did team up along with almost every other god to take down Rovagug.

This would make a heck of a plotline if you get good RPers in your group. Imagine if the gods call together champions to stand against Rovagug once more ... and a paladin of Iomedae is forced to work alongside a champion of Asmodeus. I imagine Asmodeus's champion could have a lot of fun for this ... pretending to seek redemption, that sort of thing. I imagine it similar to Garak working with Worf or Odo on DS9.


Brisco. County.

Junior.

'Nuff said. :)

Liberty's Edge

My Paladin of Erastil in RotRL is a scion of an old family of Chelish aristocracy. He expects his due, in both respect and reward. He will not tolerate disrespect nor tax evasion. He will however be a just ruler to his subjects and a constant promoter of Erastil's values.

Also refusing an honest reward is insulting to the giver (and thus dishonorable).


In seriousness, I think a lot of it depends on the flavor of the paladin. If the paladin's taken an oath of poverty, then he shouldn't accept an award of 1 million gold pieces unless he donates it to a charity for dragon victims or something.

On the other hand, as The black raven points out, for some paladins it would be impolite and/or dishonorable to refuse a reward.

Within those parameters, I also expect practicality and goodness comes into play. If the duke of a wealthy realm bestows on the paladin a platinum medallion and his weight in gold in exchange for rescuing a dragon from a princess, then the paladin might do well to accept the reward. On the other hand, if the mayor of a frontier village pools all the savings its poor inhabitants can muster ... then the Three Amigos route would be appropriate.

I could also see a paladin accepting a garland of daisies from a grateful child with the same gravity that he would accept a silver medallion from a wealthy duke.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Lost Omens Campaign Setting / General Discussion / Can paladins accept money and bounties? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.
Recent threads in General Discussion