Thalin |
Let's take a monk who switched out flurry of blows for another feature, but wants to use two-weapon fighting with both unarmed strikes. Is this RAW (IE: PFS) legal? It states that unarmed strike counts as a light weapon for the purposes of unarmed strike, but can it count as both the "off" hand and the "on" hand?
Kazaan |
Also, keep in mind that, while Monk unarmed strikes get full Str to damage even as off-hand attacks, Monk Weapons only get that property when used in FoB. So if your Monk has a Kama in each hand, the off-hand Kama still gets reduced strength if you're just using traditional TWF and you can't use the same weapon for both main and off-hand attacks.
Thalin |
Yeah, it's a Manuever Master; I combine flurry of manuevers and two-weapon fighting to get my attacks up (which I know I don't get the flurry bonuses for and take the -2, but those attacks are still fairly effective, given that the opponent is usually on the ground).
But then I started to worry since Unarmed attacks weren't technically in ANY hand if they could be "Two Weaponed". Probably just overthinking it :).
Kazaan |
Yeah, it was ruled that "unarmed strike" is a completely abstract weapon that isn't required to use any particular part of the body. So it isn't a matter of "left fist, right fist" or "left foot, headbutt" but just "unarmed strike, unarmed strike" with the special caveat that it can be used for both main-hand attacks as well as off-hand attacks in the same round. Moreover, it still can be associated with a particular body part such as with Magus's Spell Combat which requires a hand-associated light or 1-h weapon (which disqualifies boot blades and tail swipes), but they said that an Unarmed Strike still has the capacity to be a specific appendage (ie. hand) if it benefits you.