Gauss |
Blind target = loss of dexterity (amongst other things)
Feint = loss of dexterity
Thus, feinting a truly blind target is pointless as Jackalope stated.
Blindsense = denied dexterity bonus
Tremorsense = no such statement (although I thought it worked like blindsense I cannot find the text to support this)
Blindsight = full alternate sight
Feinting against blindsense = pointless but against blindsight or tremorsense it has a purpose.
- Gauss
Munkir |
Blind target = loss of dexterity (amongst other things)
Feint = loss of dexterityThus, feinting a truly blind target is pointless as Jackalope stated.
Blindsense = denied dexterity bonus
Tremorsense = no such statement (although I thought it worked like blindsense I cannot find the text to support this)
Blindsight = full alternate sightFeinting against blindsense = pointless but against blindsight or tremorsense it has a purpose.
- Gauss
Thank you I will attempt to point this out to my GM. Is there a place in a book I can reference to.
This is how it's currently being played out creature is blind but has blindsense you don't get sneak unless flanked or flat-footed. Never thought that because it is blind it would automatically be denied its dexterity bonus. Also blindsight and tremorsense was not allowing me to use my Feint. GM is under the impresstion thhat common vision is the key factor in Feint attempts.
Gauss |
Anytime something is denied its dexterity bonus it is subject to a sneak attack. This is one of the major methods for sneak attacks.
Page298 of the bestiary states that creatures using blindsense still have total concealment penalties against anyone it is attacking thus a 50% miss chance. Additionally it also states that a creature using blindsense loses its dexterity vs creatures it cannot see.
Example: A bat has both blindsense and sight. In darkness though it cannot see so uses blindsense. However, that still means it is blind vs creatures because while it can identify the square the target is in it cannot actually see the target.
- Gauss