j b 200 |
So I downloaded my new copy of Ultimate Combat today and i was super excited!!! Wow do monks get lots of love in this book!! I am in a game right now where I play a monk who is a grapple specialist and I was really excited about the Tetori Archetype. It seems perfect with my character concept. I was going to retcon my guy into a tetori and see if my DM would allow it.
Then I went to write it up and found out that 3 out of the 4 new feats the class gets don't exist.
Fantastic.
Dreaming Psion |
1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. |
Perhaps the feats were renamed in a late draft but the reference snuck through editing. There is no "Choke Hold", but there is a Chokehold feat. And there is no backbreaker feat but there is a bonebreaker feat. Likewise, there is a Crushing Blow rather than a Crushing Embrace. Dunno what the Twin Lock woulda renamed to though.
Helaman |
1 person marked this as FAQ candidate. |
Perhaps the feats were renamed in a late draft but the reference snuck through editing. There is no "Choke Hold", but there is a Chokehold feat. And there is no backbreaker feat but there is a bonebreaker feat. Likewise, there is a Crushing Blow rather than a Crushing Embrace. Dunno what the Twin Lock woulda renamed to though.
Not happy so far with Paizo's editing and quality checking for UC.
Gorbacz |
Helaman wrote:
Not happy so far with Paizo's editing and quality checking for UC.Its about on par with Ultimate Magic.
Oh wait.
No, it's not.
There's exactly one archetype which needs errata. That's about the error level of APG, which out of the box required errata with one feat (Selective Spell), or the Core Rulebook (Paladin smite). Please, don't let your nerdrage lead you to misinformation.
Cartigan |
You seem to forget that the complainers are all straight-A students that do not get their essays back with loads of red marks of spelling and grammar errors.
That's why people who publish stuff as an industry have people they pay to edit their work before it goes out for sale. Who should catch things, like references that don't actually exist.
cfalcon |
While I get frustrated by a lot of the typoes, I think Paizo is best in industry here. I mean, look at how many errors would get through back when WotC did equivalently complex books in 3.5- but much more importantly, note how much more of each of the Paizo books is dedicated to rules that actually had to be tested, instead of just "here's the beginnings of an adventure" that most of the Complete's had.