Honestly, why do we have to put up with this stuff?


Website Feedback


link to the..."Serious: I can't believe I just read this" thread

Xpltvdeleted wrote:

Penélope Cruz and Javier Bardem Are Having an Anchor Baby

At least Fox News can now openly admit their racism...

That seems pretty openly inflammatory to me. Not only that, we have been recently reminded, by Liz, of the thread at the top of the OTD subforum...

"Please Play Nice in the Political Threads" thread.

In it...

Joshua J. Frost wrote:


<snip>
Consider this a blanket warning: threads started with incendiary titles for the specific purpose of starting a flame war will earn the poster a temp ban, no warning, from now on. Paizo's messageboards are not the place for you to air your grievances against those you disagree with. Play nice.

-Josh

Although, technically, the "title" isn't incendiary, the actual content of the OP is. I don't see that as being a worthy distiction. So, although I feel it inappropriate to make inquiries regarding the starter of the thread, why would such a thread be allowed to exist after we have just recently been remined about the stickied thread?

Grand Lodge

Always remember the easiest thing ... flag it and move on.


Andrew Betts wrote:
Always remember the easiest thing ... flag it and move on.

Oh, I remember it.

But, if such is not taken care of with flags, then what is the purpose of the stickied thread and referring posters to it?

Scarab Sages

The Thing from Beyond the Edge wrote:
Andrew Betts wrote:
Always remember the easiest thing ... flag it and move on.

Oh, I remember it.

But, if such is not taken care of with flags, then what is the purpose of the stickied thread and referring posters to it?

It is the weekend when, I believe, technically, the Paizo crew has off. Give it another day for flagging to work.


Wicht wrote:
The Thing from Beyond the Edge wrote:
Andrew Betts wrote:
Always remember the easiest thing ... flag it and move on.

Oh, I remember it.

But, if such is not taken care of with flags, then what is the purpose of the stickied thread and referring posters to it?

It is the weekend when, I believe, technically, the Paizo crew has off. Give it another day for flagging to work.

The thread was posted at 11:34 AM Pacific time on Friday.


Given comical aspect of the issue, I'd say that some nice Paizonian employee gave the thread once over and then continued on her/his way.

Seriously, taking offense at such an inane post is rather strange - what are the kind posters going to rage about next? Lady Gaga's lack of new undies? Inflammatory BBC footage of latest chicken leg serving modes?

In short, this is your life. Don't waste it on trivial stuff like that. [1]

Regards,
Ruemere

[1] Of course, there are folks out there, who just need to discuss everything. Or who need to preach to the crowd about every little grievance they perceive. However, through their insistence on doing that, they also admit that there have nothing better to do.
With all due respect to street preachers, there are great hobbies out there... roleplaying, jogging, playing computer games or swimming. If you're into more traditional past times (or more practically minded fellow), you can always woo girls^H^H^H^H^H opposite sex^H^H^H^H^H^H^H potential partners or get together for a party and/or beer.

Sovereign Court

I have read the thread and , in my opinion, there are two reasons not to close it.
1: There is a case for saying that the OP is right, not saying that I agree with him but there is a point worthy of discussion.
2: It's turned into a pretty neat discussion about migration.


Between the insult trading and odd humorous post I can see that there is something resembling debate going on, but someone godwinned the thread on page one (possibly defaming an organization in the process). Consequently I've been flagging it and avoiding posting.

Grand Lodge

Ever the reasonable type Charles. :)


Having read through the other thread I can kind of see what you mean in that if I was part of the discussion I might have gone off on a rant by now but the important thing is that they all seem to be playing fairly well together. As a socialist living in the UK I found the joke about American Liberal = Canadian Conservative and Canadian liberal = European Conservative pretty funny. At the end of the day it's an off topic political thread and I think debate is what those are all about just as long as everybody behaves. The second they don't Paizo will shut it down.


I did consider making an attempt to smurf the thread into oblivion, but given the possible need for post removal thought it best to leave Paizo to sort things out. Darn it, why is it that these things always seem to blow up at weekends when the Paizo staff are occasionally out of the office? (If they're in one of those rare periods when they're actually on schedule that is....)

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

My two C-bills,

1) We don't 'have to put up with this stuff', just ignore it. I try to*

2) The boards aren't apolitical, because we aren't and neither are our hosts. Those people who have Sean and myself both of Facebook will definately see a wide gap of opinion on topics not related to gaming, just to use an example.** Were they my boards, topics would be disappearing with alarming regularity. The flag system just allows our tyrants to be more benevolent.

*

Spoiler:
Note: I didn't say I always succeed.

**
Spoiler:
Sure he's wrong on most things, but I'll still listen to his opinion :P

Grand Lodge

Matthew Morris wrote:
Those people who have Sean and myself both of Facebook will definately see a wide gap of opinion on topics not related to gaming

Understatement if I ever saw one. :)

Sczarni

TriOmegaZero wrote:
Matthew Morris wrote:
Those people who have Sean and myself both of Facebook will definately see a wide gap of opinion on topics not related to gaming
Understatement if I ever saw one. :)

QFT

Silver Crusade

Pathfinder Adventure Path Subscriber

I actually find it astonishing that facebook can contain both Sean's and Matthew's profiles without imploding and creating a black hole. There's hope for humankind, perhaps ?


Gorbacz wrote:
I actually find it astonishing that facebook can contain both Sean's and Matthew's profiles without imploding and creating a black hole. There's hope for humankind, perhaps ?

It is when you see me on Facebook that you will know the apocalypse is upon us.


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber
Freehold DM wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
I actually find it astonishing that facebook can contain both Sean's and Matthew's profiles without imploding and creating a black hole. There's hope for humankind, perhaps ?
It is when you see me on Facebook that you will know the apocalypse is upon us.

But you do have a Facebook page. Freehold DM


As I refuse to sign up to facebook I can't comment on the example but I think everybody has this in their real world lives. We can all sit around discussing things with our friends who don't agree with us and it's fine because we respect each other. The problem is that people seem to forget they're not talking to their friends when using a forum. So while I often tell my friends that not only are they wrong but a grotesquely ugly freak that is not the correct way to behave towards strangers. Subjects such as immigration are massively complicated issues with huge regional variation in what the dynamic on the ground actually is. Hopefully the other thread will maintain civility and everyone involved can learn how it impacts different communities around the world.


Justin Franklin wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
I actually find it astonishing that facebook can contain both Sean's and Matthew's profiles without imploding and creating a black hole. There's hope for humankind, perhaps ?
It is when you see me on Facebook that you will know the apocalypse is upon us.
But you do have a Facebook page. Freehold DM

You see, my wife and I were looking for that page for AGES the other day. I will have to check that link out later.


Troubled_child wrote:
As I refuse to sign up to facebook I can't comment on the example but I think everybody has this in their real world lives. We can all sit around discussing things with our friends who don't agree with us and it's fine because we respect each other. The problem is that people seem to forget they're not talking to their friends when using a forum. So while I often tell my friends that not only are they wrong but a grotesquely ugly freak that is not the correct way to behave towards strangers. Subjects such as immigration are massively complicated issues with huge regional variation in what the dynamic on the ground actually is. Hopefully the other thread will maintain civility and everyone involved can learn how it impacts different communities around the world.

See! It's NOT just me! TC, what are your reasons for refusing to sign up for Facebook?


Freehold DM wrote:
See! It's NOT just me! TC, what are your reasons for refusing to sign up for Facebook?

I'll give you the same answer I give everyone else that asks.....I have real friends :)


Troubled_child wrote:
Freehold DM wrote:
See! It's NOT just me! TC, what are your reasons for refusing to sign up for Facebook?
I'll give you the same answer I give everyone else that asks.....I have real friends :)

Fair enough.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

Not to turn this into a pro/con facebook argument* but I don't find the 'I have real friends' comment that useful. Snark aside, I actually do use it for networking (helping friends connect with each other when they have mututal business interests) education (my goddaughter wanted to know more about CGI in movies and games, I put her in touch with a college classmate who works on CRPGs) and to keep tabs on my far flung family (sister lives in the boonies, another sister lives in MN, parents are in FL. That doesnt' count cousins, uncles, aunts etc spread across the world). Yeah I rant myself now and again on various issues, but it works for that too.

It's not just for farmville, castle age, etc etc that everyone keeps trying to get me to play. :P

*

Spoiler:
And I thought it worked as a good example. I like and respect Sean, and we do agree on occasion, but you can be opposed to someone and civil.

Contributor

Matthew Morris wrote:

Not to turn this into a pro/con facebook argument* but I don't find the 'I have real friends' comment that useful. Snark aside, I actually do use it for networking (helping friends connect with each other when they have mututal business interests) education (my goddaughter wanted to know more about CGI in movies and games, I put her in touch with a college classmate who works on CRPGs) and to keep tabs on my far flung family (sister lives in the boonies, another sister lives in MN, parents are in FL. That doesnt' count cousins, uncles, aunts etc spread across the world). Yeah I rant myself now and again on various issues, but it works for that too.

It's not just for farmville, castle age, etc etc that everyone keeps trying to get me to play. :P

I totally agree.

I interact with some of my high school friends, college friends, and former co-workers now via Facebook than I did when I actually went to school or worked with them. FB is a powerful tool for staying in contact with people in a modern world where addresses change, emails change, phone numbers change.

Sovereign Court RPG Superstar 2009 Top 32, 2010 Top 8

Look, we agreed! Does that mean the end of the world or something? ;-)


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game, Starfinder Society Subscriber
Matthew Morris wrote:
Look, we agreed! Does that mean the end of the world or something? ;-)

Nope just a minor natural disaster somewhere. :)


Just to be clear that was meant as a joke. For many people I can see why Facebook is a useful tool. When I was away at uni I used instant messengers in a similar way. It just really annoys me when a: companies and organisations say if you want to keep up to date with what we're doing check us out on Facebook. As a system which requires you to have an account to view content they are in fact denying me access because I don't to use it. By far the worst thing though is
b: when I meet people on a night out and they ask me for my Facebook details. When you live in the same city and go to the same places (as a goth there aren't many places in my city to go) I think its important to try and maintain face to face relationships in this crazy modern age.

Also I have lost so much of my life to RTS games, civilisation, role play and wargaming that a line has to be drawn somewhere. Unfortunately Facebook does appear to have outflanked and encircled me so who knows maybe soon I'll be there complaining that there is no option for communal farming in farmville.


Just to be clear that was meant as a joke. For many people I can see why Facebook is a useful tool. When I was away at uni I used instant messengers in a similar way. It just really annoys me when a: companies and organisations say if you want to keep up to date with what we're doing check us out on Facebook. As a system which requires you to have an account to view content they are in fact denying me access because I don't to use it. By far the worst thing though is
b: when I meet people on a night out and they ask me for my Facebook details. When you live in the same city and go to the same places (as a goth there aren't many places in my city to go) I think its important to try and maintain face to face relationships in this crazy modern age.

Also I have lost so much of my life to RTS games, civilisation, role play and wargaming that a line has to be drawn somewhere. Unfortunately Facebook does appear to have outflanked and encircled me so who knows maybe soon I'll be there complaining that there is no option for communal farming in farmville.

Scarab Sages

Thankfully facebook allows you to block farmville requests and ads.


ruemere wrote:

Given comical aspect of the issue, I'd say that some nice Paizonian employee gave the thread once over and then continued on her/his way.

Seriously, taking offense at such an inane post is rather strange - what are the kind posters going to rage about next? Lady Gaga's lack of new undies? Inflammatory BBC footage of latest chicken leg serving modes?

In short, this is your life. Don't waste it on trivial stuff like that. [1]

Regards,
Ruemere

[1] Of course, there are folks out there, who just need to discuss everything. Or who need to preach to the crowd about every little grievance they perceive. However, through their insistence on doing that, they also admit that there have nothing better to do.
With all due respect to street preachers, there are great hobbies out there... roleplaying, jogging, playing computer games or swimming. If you're into more traditional past times (or more practically minded fellow), you can always woo girls^H^H^H^H^H opposite sex^H^H^H^H^H^H^H potential partners or get together for a party and/or beer.

There is a comical aspect to the linked article but not to the OP.

The poster of the OP repeatedly (intentionally and in a trolling manner) resorts to calling just about everything racism in an inflammatory manner and continually trashes Fox News (in this case calling them racists) in order to belittle and insult anyone who may take a view different than his if it is aired on Fox.


GeraintElberion wrote:

I have read the thread and , in my opinion, there are two reasons not to close it.

1: There is a case for saying that the OP is right, not saying that I agree with him but there is a point worthy of discussion.
2: It's turned into a pretty neat discussion about migration.

Then a thread about migration in that aspect can be started and the one spawned form the inflammatory OP can be locked. And, IMO, there is no point worthy of discussion regarding the OP. It is absurd.


Charles Evans 25 wrote:

Between the insult trading and odd humorous post I can see that there is something resembling debate going on, but someone godwinned the thread on page one (possibly defaming an organization in the process). Consequently I've been flagging it and avoiding posting.

The Godwinning/defaming of an organization was not merely early on. It was the premise of the OP.


Matthew Morris wrote:

My two C-bills,

1) We don't 'have to put up with this stuff', just ignore it. I try to*

2) The boards aren't apolitical, because we aren't and neither are our hosts. Those people who have Sean and myself both of Facebook will definately see a wide gap of opinion on topics not related to gaming, just to use an example.** Were they my boards, topics would be disappearing with alarming regularity. The flag system just allows our tyrants to be more benevolent.

*** spoiler omitted **
**** spoiler omitted **

1. Really, I didn't know that I didn't have to look at every thread /snarky response] The point is not only that such things make the boards less enjoyable for those continually being insulted but that this particular OP exceeds the poarameters defined in the sticky to the top of the subforum. I don't think it too much to ask to not have to deal with threads that exceed the parameters of the subforum in their degree of being inflammatory.

2. I know the boards are not apolitical and did not request that they be. I am merely asking that the inflammatory nature of such threads actually be limited in a way that matches the sticky with rules limiting the inflammatory nature of such threads. I do not think that is asking too much by any stretch.

Liberty's Edge

Freehold DM wrote:
Gorbacz wrote:
I actually find it astonishing that facebook can contain both Sean's and Matthew's profiles without imploding and creating a black hole. There's hope for humankind, perhaps ?
It is when you see me on Facebook that you will know the apocalypse is upon us.

You better get one soon, Luddite. I've wanted to send you some personal messages for a while now, and nothing related to anything on these boards.

;-)

Liberty's Edge

Sean K Reynolds wrote:
Matthew Morris wrote:

Not to turn this into a pro/con facebook argument* but I don't find the 'I have real friends' comment that useful. Snark aside, I actually do use it for networking (helping friends connect with each other when they have mututal business interests) education (my goddaughter wanted to know more about CGI in movies and games, I put her in touch with a college classmate who works on CRPGs) and to keep tabs on my far flung family (sister lives in the boonies, another sister lives in MN, parents are in FL. That doesnt' count cousins, uncles, aunts etc spread across the world). Yeah I rant myself now and again on various issues, but it works for that too.

It's not just for farmville, castle age, etc etc that everyone keeps trying to get me to play. :P

I totally agree.

I interact with some of my high school friends, college friends, and former co-workers now via Facebook than I did when I actually went to school or worked with them. FB is a powerful tool for staying in contact with people in a modern world where addresses change, emails change, phone numbers change.

Yep. I've gotten in touch with family and friends I had lost touch with long ago. Were it not for FB, I'd still be wondering what they're up to rather than knowing what they're up to.

FB can be annoying at times, but it is a wonderful (and free) way to find people you haven't seen or heard from in a long time.


The Thing from Beyond the Edge wrote:

[...]

There is a comical aspect to the linked article but not to the OP.

The poster of the OP repeatedly (intentionally and in a trolling manner) resorts to calling just about everything racism in an inflammatory manner and continually trashes Fox News (in this case calling them racists) in order to belittle and insult anyone who may take a view different than his if it is aired on Fox.

(post monster ate my post so here is a abbreviated version)

Freedom of speech: his opinion.
Censorship: your appeal.
This is Paizo board - flag the posts, use customer service mail.

Oh, and be glad you've not participated in Usenet flamewar.

Regards,
Ruemere

PS. There is delicious irony in a funny trollish posts being protected by freedom of speech from self-righteous umbrage of would be-censors. Last time I've so much fun at this forum, was reading about Man in Black's indignation on mechanical benefits for sacred prostitutes.


ruemere wrote:
The Thing from Beyond the Edge wrote:

[...]

There is a comical aspect to the linked article but not to the OP.

The poster of the OP repeatedly (intentionally and in a trolling manner) resorts to calling just about everything racism in an inflammatory manner and continually trashes Fox News (in this case calling them racists) in order to belittle and insult anyone who may take a view different than his if it is aired on Fox.

(post monster ate my post so here is a abbreviated version)

Freedom of speech: his opinion.
Censorship: your appeal.
This is Paizo board - flag the posts, use customer service mail.

Oh, and be glad you've not participated in Usenet flamewar.

Regards,
Ruemere

PS. There is delicious irony in a funny trollish posts being protected by freedom of speech from self-righteous umbrage of would be-censors. Last time I've so much fun at this forum, was reading about Man in Black's indignation on mechanical benefits for sacred prostitutes.

There is no freedom of speech on a Paizo board, it is their decision.

Censorship is not exactly my appeal. I would like the opportunity to really say my feelings on the matter. :P

I know this is a Paizo board. This was not placed here as a community conversation piece, but because it is the place for web-site feedback to the company. I chose this method of notification instead of email. Because of this choice, it has become a community conversation piece, but I have not complained that others (such as yourself) have commented in my thread.

Offices are always swamped when coming in on Mondays. So, I haven't been bothered by a lack of response so far by the employees of Paizo.

By the way, there is no funny trollish post being protected by freedom of speech. It is currently protected because Paizo has either chosen not to exercise their power to remove it or because they have not gotten around to looking at it fully. But, what bothers me regarding the responses is that no one has bothered to address that the OP is in conflict with the rules lain out by the sticky.

My point regarding why do we have to put up with this is that it seems that Paizo's standards for behavior are being allowed to be exceeded in this case and I want to know why from the staff.

Liberty's Edge

I guess that's settled then.


The Off Topic area is full of trash and good for a laugh.

If you don't like it, and are of the belief you want to give 'feedback' then stick to the 'feedback' related threads.

Paizo Employee Chief Technical Officer

The Thing from Beyond the Edge wrote:
There is no freedom of speech on a Paizo board, it is their decision... ...it seems that Paizo's standards for behavior are being allowed to be exceeded in this case and I want to know why from the staff.

It *is* our decision... and we don't have to explain it.

We have a system for giving us feedback. Opening this thread is, at best, an attempt to bypass that system, and not surprisingly, that sort of thing actually ends up making the problem worse by drawing more attention and further debate.

Locked.

Community / Forums / Paizo / Website Feedback / Honestly, why do we have to put up with this stuff? All Messageboards
Recent threads in Website Feedback