Wall of Stone - when can you use it?


Rules Questions


2 people marked this as FAQ candidate.
Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

The wording of Wall of Stone leaves me with some questions. Here is the specific part I am unsure about:

"The wall created need not be vertical, nor rest upon any firm foundation; however, it must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone."

So, does that mean I cannot conjure a WoS on an open grass plain, because the ground is normal earth? How about on a beach? Or on a metal floor?


magnuskn wrote:

The wording of Wall of Stone leaves me with some questions. Here is the specific part I am unsure about:

"The wall created need not be vertical, nor rest upon any firm foundation; however, it must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone."

So, does that mean I cannot conjure a WoS on an open grass plain, because the ground is normal earth? How about on a beach? Or on a metal floor?

If I'm reading it right, it means that the wall of stone must be "attached" to an existing body of stone (hence "merge with"), and in such a way that it won't just break off from gravity ("solidly supported"). So you could use it to make a bridge from one stony cliff face to another (hence not vertical or resting upon any foundation). You could not rig it (by, say, attaching the entire wall horizontally to a 5ft column) such that it would break off and fall on whatever was below it.


In the case of the grassland or beach, I'd rule that you can create a wall of stone from the earth beneath the sand and the soil, however on a metal surface, I would rule that possibility out.


So can you create a flat horizontally wall of stone on the ground.... to start of with.
.
Kind of wondering if you could use Wall of stone, to make roads, buildings, aqueduct, fences, etc ???
.
What about Wall of Stone + Stone Shape??
.
Anyway would like more info on this spell as well.


Oliver McShade wrote:


Kind of wondering if you could use Wall of stone, to make roads, buildings, aqueduct, fences, etc ???

I think the Sage, in his/her various mortal incarnations, has ruled that raw materials created by "wall of ..." spells are low grade, fundamentally flawed, and all around unsuitable for raw building materials (hence the fabricate spell).

Also, I'm going completely off the cuff here, as I'm being to lazy to go into the other room and crack open my various PHBs & DMGs of various editions, but I think that, going back to the 1st edition, worked and unworked stone were considered to be one of the main components of dungeon walls/floors/ceilings, so this is a spell that probably had waaay more utility when most adventures were taking place in the Temple of the Frog or Lost Caves of Tsojcanth, and much less utility when we left the dungeon in search of greater verisimilitude.


Fabricate is wizard only.
.
Looking for a Priest way to build.
.
Also this spell say it can be used to build crenellations, or battlements buy reducing the area.
.
The spell let you create the wall of stone in almost any shape you desire.
.
For a 5th level spell, with an instantaneous effect. I would think that while the stone would not be worth anything for resale...all i really am looking for is a floor, 4 walls, and a roof of rock to live in.
.
Any other priest ideas??

Shadow Lodge

I think most GMs ignore the bit about wall of stone being fastened to stone. I know mine did. By a strict reading you need stone to attack it to.


Oliver McShade wrote:

Fabricate is wizard only.

.
Looking for a Priest way to build.
.
Also this spell say it can be used to build crenellations, or battlements buy reducing the area.
.
The spell let you create the wall of stone in almost any shape you desire.
.
For a 5th level spell, with an instantaneous effect. I would think that while the stone would not be worth anything for resale...all i really am looking for is a floor, 4 walls, and a roof of rock to live in.
.
Any other priest ideas??

Offer to build a castle for the local lord. Tell him to order the furniture, you'll settle the masonry. =D

Or single-handedly solve the local housing problem (bring along a druid to use wood shape to make the doors and windows).

Now we know how those BBEGs in fantasy worlds get their bad-ass castles. Between wall of stone and stone shape, who needs dwarven masonry? XD


=QUOTE= Offer to build a castle for the local lord. Tell him to order the furniture, you'll settle the masonry. =D =QUOTE=

_____________________________________________________

Thinking about NG Deity: Garth the Gardener. Domains: Good, community, Plants, Earth, and Sun.

Cleric with Domains: Earth & Plant.

Earth Spells: Soft earth and stone, Stone shape, and Wall of Stone = Used for gardens, garden walls, simple aqueducts (like they did in peru) Stone houses (for basic shelter), and stone roads.

Plant spells: Plant growth ( for increased harvests).

(note: ya i choose plant domain just for the one spell= But the idea was that Garth was a god of Gardens, parks, Fruit Trees, farming and Agriculture. At least that is how he started off. Then i added Earth, since plants grow in the earth, and sun since plants get there energy from the sun (( fire domain was just to destructive )). Good is required ( based on how the other gods are set up ), and Community.... since i was going for an old Welch/Irish type priest & to tie this god down to the people of the land and not the land itself (( Think Gardener not Nature Tree-huger )).
.
Not looking to make money, but serve the community by helping farmer/ gardener, with Food/Shelter/and Magic.
.


Oliver McShade wrote:
Offer to build a castle for the local lord. Tell him to order the furniture, you'll settle the masonry. =D

Thinking about NG Deity: Garth the Gardener. Domains: Good, community, Plants, Earth, and Sun.

Cleric with Domains: Earth & Plant.

Earth Spells: Soft earth and stone, Stone shape, and Wall of Stone = Used for gardens, garden walls, simple aqueducts (like they did in peru) Stone houses (for basic shelter), and stone roads.

Plant spells: Plant growth ( for increased harvests).

(note: ya i choose plant domain just for the one spell= But the idea was that Garth was a god of Gardens, parks, Fruit Trees, farming and Agriculture. At least that is how he started off. Then i added Earth, since plants grow in the earth, and sun since plants get there energy from the sun (( fire domain was just to destructive )). Good is required ( based on how the other gods are set up ), and Community.... since i was going for an old Welch/Irish type priest & to tie this god down to the people of the land and not the land itself (( Think Gardener not Nature Tree-huger )).
.
Not looking to make money, but serve the community by helping farmer/ gardener, with Food/Shelter/and Magic.
.

So go make houses for the local populance! If you have the plant domain, you could probably handle the woodwork for the doors and windows too, all by yourself!


Alas: the Plant Domain does not wood shape as an available spell.

BUT

This does not bother me as the idea of building house out of stone, was to avoid them being build out of wood in the first place.


@Oliver McShade just remember the the greatest source of wealth before the industrial revolution was agriculture.

For example what happens if your city grows to the size where you have to have some one cast plant growth just to feed the existing population. And then a BBEG comes along and kills those clerics :)


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

So, the answer to my original question is: "Mmmmmaybe?" :p

And answers from the Sage don't apply to Pathfinder. They are for the 3.5 version of the game. The spell itself doesn't talk about the quality of the stone, but it does talk about it being possible to make crenellations. The statistics are for normal stone, so mechanically you can build anything which is allowed by the spell.


Rite Publishing wrote:

@Oliver McShade just remember the the greatest source of wealth before the industrial revolution was agriculture.

For example what happens if your city grows to the size where you have to have some one cast plant growth just to feed the existing population. And then a BBEG comes along and kills those clerics :)

And your point is??

Players have magic spells. Player want to use those magic spells to do stuff. Also: Some DM want to use those magic spells to create a Magical World.

I guess i just miss the people who use to think.... Wall of stone to build a castle, Levitate + Permanency to make it Float, Wall of Fog + Permanency; to hide it in the clouds.

If players wanted to make a flying castle for themselves, COOL. Take X number of days to cast Y number of spells, so if 2 player work together it would take z number of weeks to make.

Once the castle was made, if they players want to sale it for cash... DM would just say NO. Your stuck with a flying castle. Oh, and an small army of hawk-men are at your door saying "" Get out, were taking over !!""

Whats the point in having magic... if no one is allowed to use it (( other than just blowing people up in 1-6 man battles )).


Pathfinder Roleplaying Game Superscriber; Pathfinder Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber

There are very few places where you wouldn't be able to cast this spell.

If you are underground, you are likely surrounded by stone. If you are outside, then you can attach it to the stone foundations within the earth. Only when you are inside steel towers and such might it become a problem.


Ravingdork wrote:

There are very few places where you wouldn't be able to cast this spell.

If you are underground, you are likely surrounded by stone. If you are outside, then you can attach it to the stone foundations within the earth. Only when you are inside steel towers and such might it become a problem.

Keep in mind that if you are the only primary caster in the party, single-handedly raising a fortified base of operations for your team nets you all sorts of awesome points. In this at least, the intrepid caster will always find a use for this spell (and of course, stone shape).


Pathfinder Adventure Path, Lost Omens, Rulebook, Starfinder Adventure Path, Starfinder Roleplaying Game Subscriber
Ravingdork wrote:

There are very few places where you wouldn't be able to cast this spell.

If you are underground, you are likely surrounded by stone. If you are outside, then you can attach it to the stone foundations within the earth. Only when you are inside steel towers and such might it become a problem.

Underwater, too, but I see what you mean. :)


Ravingdork wrote:

There are very few places where you wouldn't be able to cast this spell.

If you are underground, you are likely surrounded by stone. If you are outside, then you can attach it to the stone foundations within the earth. Only when you are inside steel towers and such might it become a problem.

Technically speaking, there has to be exposed stone for wall of stone to function. You cannot make an object appear inside of another object with a conjuration spell, so you can't "dig down" to base the wall of stone on the rock under the soil.

Realistically speaking, everyone ignores that line of the spell.


Zurai wrote:
Ravingdork wrote:

There are very few places where you wouldn't be able to cast this spell.

If you are underground, you are likely surrounded by stone. If you are outside, then you can attach it to the stone foundations within the earth. Only when you are inside steel towers and such might it become a problem.

Technically speaking, there has to be exposed stone for wall of stone to function. You cannot make an object appear inside of another object with a conjuration spell, so you can't "dig down" to base the wall of stone on the rock under the soil.

Realistically speaking, everyone ignores that line of the spell.

I just consider soil, sand, and similar substances stone. They are, after all, just very fine stones. There would need to be enough stone to support the structure built, so you couldn't use your sleep spell component for it, but that is not too big a deal.

To others: there is not a clause in wall of stone that says it is poor material to work, so you can use it to build buildings or create material which you can perform other crafts with. Wall of Iron specically says it is poor iron, which is probably what you are thinking of.


No action on this in awhile but it came up in our campaign. It seems that most people feel that you need exposed stone to cast the spell.

There is never any mention of the spell failing if there is no native stone structure in the ground.

"This spell creates a wall of rock that merges into adjoining rock surfaces." So if there is rock there it merges but says nothing about being necessary.

"The wall created need not be vertical, nor rest upon any firm foundation; however, it must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone."
This can be viewed in several ways. A wall of force (cannot move) is magic and stays in its orientation because it's magic. Same for a wall of fire (immobile), wall of iron (inserts itself into surroundings) etc.
The wall of stone is somewhat unique in that it is not held in place by magic and so if it is not attached it is affected by normal physical forces. It also does not dissipate or end. This quote, as I read it, is referring to specific instances in which the use of the wall is:
1) not vertical. Meaning that if it is vertical (balanced) then the same needs might not apply.
2) Does not have a firm foundation. Isn't rock a firm foundation so if it needs rock then this wouldn't make sense? Which would seem to make this a different instance.
The instance is non-vertical and no firm foundation, i.e. that you can't cast the wall of stone and have it float in the air. If you want to complete a bridge (that won't slide off when you stand on it) then it merges into existing stone. If you want to have a cantilevered platform then it must be anchored. Otherwise normal physics (if they work in your world) apply.
Without this the wall of stone is useless unless you are in a dungeon or mountain climbing.
Example: I cast horizontal wall of stone over my enemies so the wall will pancake them. They get their reflex save the same as if I was trying to enclose them.
Example: I cast wall of stone vertical on the beach. It digs into the sand somewhat from its weight and then falls over, or has some decent chance of falling over.
Example: I make a cube of rock over the water (or in the water) and it falls into the water and sinks.
This certainly makes the spell more useful and I think is more how people typically play it.


Carry a long flat 10# stone brick with you. Put it down. Cast wall of stone with one corner on your 'cornerstone'. Existing Stone + Wall of Stone = House.

I still want to know what happens when you drop a group of enemies into a summoned pit, then wall of stone over the top, then dismiss the pit.

The Exchange Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

"however, it must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone."

...

I don't see where this phrase is ambiguous at all. MUST is a pretty strong word.

I can understand dropping the requirement for merging with an existing stone surface, but the spell is obviously worded in such a way as to preclude dropping it on someone. Contrast it with Wall of Iron which explicitly allows tipping it on someone.

As for being useless everywhere but dungeons or mountain climbing... the vast majority of in game structures are either predominantly made of stone, or at least have stone floors or walls. So suggesting it needs to be tweaked because it's 'useless' is a non-starter.


Dennis Baker wrote:

"however, it must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone."

...

I don't see where this phrase is ambiguous at all. MUST is a pretty strong word.

I can understand dropping the requirement for merging with an existing stone surface, but the spell is obviously worded in such a way as to preclude dropping it on someone. Contrast it with Wall of Iron which explicitly allows tipping it on someone.

As for being useless everywhere but dungeons or mountain climbing... the vast majority of in game structures are either predominantly made of stone, or at least have stone floors or walls. So suggesting it needs to be tweaked because it's 'useless' is a non-starter.

The MUST as I said is in reference to s specific situation. To use it in a stationary way it needs to merge or it falls. Why does it specifically say that it does NOT require a firm foundation? Existing stone would be a firm foundation would it not? For example, if you are not right handed and not ambidextrous then you MUST hold the pen in your left hand. This doesn't mean that you must hold the pen in your left hand, it means that given the other two conditions that you must.

The dropping was just an idea. There are many things you can do with a spell that aren't listed specifically. Given how many of the other wall spells are worded I could see that as an attempt to prevent squashing people since wall of stone is not held magically in place. It actually makes a lot of sense that was what they were attempting to do.

Most of the campaign I've been in has not readily had stone available. Currently in a swamp. Might be interesting to play it that the granite block component has to be in the place where the wall is created.

Purplefixer wrote:

Carry a long flat 10# stone brick with you. Put it down. Cast wall of stone with one corner on your 'cornerstone'. Existing Stone + Wall of Stone = House.

I still want to know what happens when you drop a group of enemies into a summoned pit, then wall of stone over the top, then dismiss the pit.

I like the idea, but I would have to assume that the pit would "fill back in" from the existing sides and push them out, like the end of the rope trick spell. Not sure if the wall would be heavy enough to do any real damage. Might be good for a swarm if you could get them in the trap.

Grand Lodge

You just need two hirelings in stoneplate. Wall of stone wherever you want.

Dark Archive

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Wall of Stone + Stone to Flesh = Feed a village?

The Exchange Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

Banzai wrote:
The MUST as I said is in reference to s specific situation. To use it in a stationary way it needs to merge or it falls. Why does it specifically say that it does NOT require a firm foundation? Existing stone would be a firm foundation would it not? For example, if you are not right handed and not ambidextrous then you MUST hold the pen in your left hand. This doesn't mean that you must hold the pen in your left hand, it means that given the other two conditions that you must.
Quote:
The wall created need not be vertical, nor rest upon any firm foundation; however, it must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone.

If you make a wall of stone hanging from the ceiling is it 'resting on a firm foundation'?

Basically it's saying you can make any shape you want so long as it's solidly supported by existing stone.

The Exchange

Now that's an interesting line:

The wall created need not be vertical, nor rest upon any firm foundation; however, it must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone.

Seriously, who would write a line that, in effect, reads "The wall need not rest upon any firm foundation but must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone."

That boggles the mind and is painfully confusing.

I rule that there must be existing stone somewhere around that this wall can at least merge with in some way, like a stone pillar, road, etc. As such, the question above about creating a wall of stone in a field of grass wouldn't fly with me (merge with the stone and rock under the ground, really now, that's stretching quite a bit). My general feeling is that if you adjudicate this spell properly as written , it's no longer the incredibly useful spell Treantmonk treats it as in his guide (though still awesome in the proper environment!).


Happler wrote:
Wall of Stone + Stone to Flesh = Feed a village?

Lol...

Tastes like chicken?

Ultradan


Dennis Baker wrote:


If you make a wall of stone hanging from the ceiling is it 'resting on a firm foundation'?

Basically it's saying you can make any shape you want so long as it's solidly supported by existing stone.

Good point, I had not considered the ceiling. Technically it wouldn't be 'resting'. I have to reluctantly agree. I think it greatly curtails the usefulness of the spell.

A rewording like:

The wall created need not be vertical, nor rest upon any firm foundation; however, it must be solidly supported and some stone be present where the wall will form.

More similar to a wall of ice. That would prevent the pancake affect but give it back some of the versatility that made it a must have.

Ultradan wrote:
Happler wrote:
Wall of Stone + Stone to Flesh = Feed a village?

Lol...

Tastes like chicken?

Ultradan

Maybe more like rock lobster?


My two cents: I would interpret it as saying that either it has to be vertical and on a firm foundation or it has to merge with existing stone. As noted above, clearly the intent is that you can't drop it on someone.


The key clue to interpretation is that the statement was originally specifically comparing the spell's action to the spell wall of iron. A wall of iron in all editions must be vertical, and must either be inserted into surrounding materials or created with its edge resting on a flat surface. Unlike the wall of iron, the wall of stone does not have to be vertical, and it can have parts that span air gaps — but the wall as a whole must always be merged with adjoining stone.

Comparative wordings:

AD&D 1st edition -

"This spell creates a wall of rock that merges into adjoining rock surfaces if the area is sufficient to allow it. [ . . . ] The wall created need not be vertical nor rest upon any firm foundation (cf. wall of iron); however, it must merge with an existing stone formation."

AD&D 2nd edition -

"This spell creates a wall of rock that merges into adjoining rock surfaces. [ . . . ] The wall created need not be vertical nor rest upon any firm foundation (see the wall of iron spell); however, it must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone."

D&D 3rd, D&D 3.5, and Pathfinder -

"This spell creates a wall of rock that merges into adjoining rock surfaces. [ . . . ] The wall created need not be vertical, nor rest upon any firm foundation; however, it must merge with and be solidly supported by existing stone."


I think it's better to alter the things you don't like for your game but to deal with the technical wording of the spell, why couldn't I use 4 small stone blocks as feet and cast the spell to merge with them and be supported by them. This would allow it to be cast without native stone outcroppings.

I really like this spell and hate to give up the environments that I can use it in. So a bit of rule lawyering..

The Exchange

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Banzai wrote:

I think it's better to alter the things you don't like for your game but to deal with the technical wording of the spell, why couldn't I use 4 small stone blocks as feet and cast the spell to merge with them and be supported by them. This would allow it to be cast without native stone outcroppings.

I really like this spell and hate to give up the environments that I can use it in. So a bit of rule lawyering..

While I understand the point you're making, your statement here simplistically glosses over points made earlier, seemingly because you just like the spell and want to use it wherever you like.

The spell is worded in such a way for a reason, not as a technicality, and ignoring this as you are results in an already excellent spell in certain circumstances becoming excellent in a staggering number of situations.

Instead of pretending the wording doesn't mean what it does, think of alternatives to create barriers in situations where stone isn't available (and to be sure, were a player of mine to spend a few actions throwing small stone blocks around the battlefield and then try wall of stone, I'd have to ask how a few small bricks are going to "solidly support" a massive stone wall).

To be fair, if that player instead threw a bead of 'dust of dryness' that had sucked up 100 gallons of water into a battle on a grassy field, then used 'transmute mud to rock', I'd let it adversely affect everyone in the area and then let the player go nuts with wall of stone, and probably throw him or her a bonus as well for being awesome.


I don't feel I'm pretending about the wording but trying to clarify and throwing down stones is a means of satisfying the requirements. People have offered opinions about their interpretation which have been helpful. I believe the intent in the language is to make the spell so you can't cast it in the air and pancake people, and this discussion convinced me of that. I do not, as of yet, believe that there needs to be some native natural stone structure to attach it to.

One of the initial suggestions was throwing down some rock which seems to be a reasonable idea to pursue. The question is, what is 'supported'.

Verse wrote:


(and to be sure, were a player of mine to spend a few actions throwing small stone blocks around the battlefield and then try wall of stone, I'd have to ask how a few small bricks are going to "solidly support" a massive stone wall).

The wall is not massive. It only creates 5'x5'x1" per level, 2 cubic feet of stone which is not all that heavy. It would depend much more on the surface that it was on. But given at higher level the wall does get larger how much stone is required to support it?

Verse wrote:


To be fair, if that player instead threw a bead of 'dust of dryness' that had sucked up 100 gallons of water into a battle on a grassy field, then used 'transmute mud to rock', I'd let it adversely affect everyone in the area and then let the player go nuts with wall of stone, and probably throw him or her a bonus as well for being awesome.

I don't have or get 5th level spells so this wouldn't work for me. I had considered stone call but what happens when the stone called disappears?

The other one I had considered is obsidian flow, although it refers to the material as molten glass which might not be considered stone, but if it is obsidian then that should be.

The Exchange Contributor, RPG Superstar 2010 Top 16

hogarth wrote:
My two cents: I would interpret it as saying that either it has to be vertical and on a firm foundation or it has to merge with existing stone. As noted above, clearly the intent is that you can't drop it on someone.

I think this is the most common way people run it.

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Wall of Stone - when can you use it? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.