Gimble

ka3yo5s's page

14 posts. Alias of KaeYoss.


RSS


Kryzbyn wrote:
I don't want to rain on anyone's parade, but I think it maybe slightly against forum rules to create an alias for the express purpose of mocking a specific poster. Just maybe.

You think?


Mairkurion {tm} wrote:
TriOmegaZero wrote:
pres man wrote:
I'm not sure why it is such an insult to say that PF is not 3.5.
Why does saying PF IS 3.5 cause you to "grind teeth in forced smile"? If it's not an insult to say it is not 3.5, is it an insult to say it is?
Because he's a bitter little gnome.

Can we not talk bad about gnomes, please? Just because our personalities are nothing like you humans' doesn't mean we don't have feelings!


I think I'll make a monk like this and call him Fourth Edition!

Or "Wizards of the Coast"

It would be ironic, because they killed a goddess that way (well, almost - apparently it's possible to do magic where everyone forgets you name, and if nobody remembers the god, the god dies.).


I'm soooo obsolete.


Somebody set up us the bomb.


I support this message boards because it supports long, convoluted posts and gnomes!


joela wrote:


Twilight and its sequels took the first five spots? Argh! Small Favors by Jim Butcher (#124) is way, way better!

I know you think I'm a hate-filled playa hater or something for not liking 4e with all my body, and I should not voice my opinions of 4e as they can be considered hatemongering, but boy, I just cannot refuse this opportunity!

You first list 4e PHB2 as higher in the list as 3.5e PHB, probably implying its better and getting a nice warm feeling for that, and then you say that the #124 book is better than the #1 book? T

he logical conclusion of this: That #28 spot is meaningless, since the #1 isn't better than #124.

Or maybe this: 4ePHB2 is #28, 4ePHB is #47, 3.5ePHB is #5s; since #124 is way better than #1, #57 must be better than #47 and a good deal better tahn #28.

So there. Feel free to call me a hateful person for using logic. :P

Robert Hawkshaw wrote:
D&D selling well is good news for everybody who likes RPGs.

Not for me. I want it to fail. I want everyone responsible for 4e to lose their jobs and houses and loved ones and live under a bridge in misery only to die a lonely, painful death without anyone taking notice! Or something like that, only worse, like them being forced to sell themselves by watching Uwe Boll movies or Star Wars Episode 3 for money!

Spoiler:
Well, not really, but I have a reputation to defend.


RiseFlynnsterRise wrote:


Tsk,tsk,tsk Mr Jacobs...haven't you caught on to the fact that apparently, ROLE PLAYING is no longer part of the game?

Nah, they filter these guys out with 4e.

I hated 4e for a long time, but I realised that 4e is to RPGs as CounterStrike is to team-based FPS games: The filter. Just as CS gets all those who want to write using more numbers than letters ("ph34r my 1337 5cr1p7") so you can play other games in peace, 4e gets those who are in it for the "WoW Blackout Edition" experience, so we can roleplayin peace using PF

;-P


Paul Watson wrote:


Neither of those tests was open. By opening this one out to the general community rather than inviting particular individuals, they are following the same route as Paizo's open playtest rather than their earlier, closed playtests. I doubt they're actually copying Paizo, however.

I doubt that, too. They might attempt to (and I'm not even sure about that), but they won't succeed.

bugleyman wrote:

"4ron."

Didn't know that one yet. I knew about 4e-diots, but 4ron's not bad, either.


Oh yes.


primemover003 wrote:
ka3yo5s wrote:
Anyone guess my favourite D&D edition?

gnOmeD&D???

Gno, but close.


Anyone guess my favourite D&D edition?


DudeMonkey wrote:
You're going to like what they do with Giants in 4th edition, then. They talk about exactly what you're saying here, that giants should be ... well ... giant.

I won't abandon my edition because of the size of giants.


No