Alastir Wade

Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law's page

121 posts. Alias of Aberzombie.


RSS

1 to 50 of 121 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>

You are freaking out....man.


Patrick Curtin wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Id Vicious wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
I felt a rapport with the lawyer
That's never a good sign...
Well, considering I'm going to have to work with them , I had better learn. When in the Atlantic, swim like a shark.
We in the legal profession prefer to be compared to Remora.

I believe the lawyers are the sharks

The paralegals are the remoras

Clearly, you haven't met some of the lawyers I associate with......
I don't usually hang with the Awful Good crowd ;)

Why do you hate THE LAW?!?


Patrick Curtin wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Id Vicious wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
I felt a rapport with the lawyer
That's never a good sign...
Well, considering I'm going to have to work with them , I had better learn. When in the Atlantic, swim like a shark.
We in the legal profession prefer to be compared to Remora.

I believe the lawyers are the sharks

The paralegals are the remoras

Clearly, you haven't met some of the lawyers I associate with......


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Patrick Curtin wrote:
Id Vicious wrote:
Patrick Curtin wrote:
I felt a rapport with the lawyer
That's never a good sign...
Well, considering I'm going to have to work with them , I had better learn. When in the Atlantic, swim like a shark.

We in the legal profession prefer to be compared to Remora.


Thomas Seitz wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:
Thomas Seitz wrote:

A-Zombie,

Honestly I don't much care for Popeye's chicken. To me, real chicken is basted, covered in tangy cream sauce and served on rice.

That's ok. Not everyone has good taste. Except, of course, for when The Horde Devours you.

adds a new name to the List of People to Devour First During the Zombiepocalypse

Hey! I just happen to like Tandorai style over American style. Sue me. :p

Hmmmmm.....I'll have to consult with my client about potential legal proceedings.


Back away from him, Madame! Lest you bring down the wrath of the LAW!!


SMITE EVIL!


SMITE EVIL!!!


zylphryx wrote:
Time for a good old fashioned zombie culling. No offense, Aberzombie. ;)

Allow me to introduce myself: I'm Mr. Aberzombie's legal counsel......


Ragnarok Aeon wrote:
Well I in particular don't really care that much, but I suppose with a horde of mindless zombies you could accomplish something great... or terrible.

Good evening, Sir. Allow me to introduce myself: I am Sir Spitsalot, Paladin-at-Law, duly appointed legal representative of those members of the Heart Beat Challenged (hereafter called the Plaintiffs), you so despicably referred to as "mindless zombies". On behlaf of my clients, I hereby name you as Defendant in this cease and desist order regarding the impuning of the Plaintiffs intellectual capacities. Hatred of those who are different is no laughing matter, good sir. My clients were deeply offended by your callous attack, yet wish nothing more than for you to refrain from further insulting comments. Thank you and good night.

Sincerely,

Sir Spitsalot, Paladin-at-Law

As an aside, please be aware that I talked the Plaintiffs out of convening a trial so they could find you guilty and eat you.


The Monday Monster wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:

MoMo the Monday Monster... good morning. As a duly designated legal representative of the Poodle Lords Thread and the Paizo Messageboards, I order you to cease any and all supernatural activity and return forthwith to your place of origin or to the nearest convenient parallel dimension.

hands MoMo a legal banishment document

What did I do wrong? I have the Asmodeus given right to skin and torment Poodles. *gives Sir Spitsalot a valid copy of his poodle skinning license*

Yes, but only on Monday. Your appearance here on Tuesday, and subsequent attack on these poodles, constitutes a breach of contract, and may also place your attack under the definition of assault.

You could very well face prosecution by a jury of your peers, and since only the poodles are legal residents of this thread, they would make up said jury.


MoMo the Monday Monster... good morning. As a duly designated legal representative of the Poodle Lords Thread and the Paizo Messageboards, I order you to cease any and all supernatural activity and return forthwith to your place of origin or to the nearest convenient parallel dimension.

hands MoMo a legal banishment document


Crimson Jester wrote:
Oh I thought this was about those videos leaked on the internet from Vegas involving a Pony.

No. That was a different case for my client, Mr. Ford. It involved a younger man by the name of Mr. Round.


Crimson Jester wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Crimson Jester wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Crimson Jester wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Crimson Jester wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:
Sgt. Curtin wrote:

Welcome back. Mind the rots, they've made a mess of things here.

Tosses an M4 over to the goggle-eyed kid

"Watch your six. Them rots are quick and nasty. Skull shots only."

I hope you're not advocating violence against the heartbeat challenged!
Advocating, how about expecting.
Pardon me, good sir. I am legal counsel for Mr. Aberzombie. I'm here to inform you that, on his behalf, I intend to file a restraining order with the courts barring you from approaching within 2000 yards of my client. I intend to show your comments here as evidence that you represent a sincere and dangerous threat to my client's well-being. Good day, sir.
I thought that was clear and present danger?
No, you're thinking of my other client, Mr. Ford.
Oh, the pilot.
Indeed. I'm representing him in a case against an old friend of his. A Mr. C. Wookie.
Oh I am sure that is nothing that a little grooming won't fix.

Well, there's something in the case files about Mr. Wookie losing, and something he did with an arm. I don't recall the details at the moment.


Crimson Jester wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Crimson Jester wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Crimson Jester wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:
Sgt. Curtin wrote:

Welcome back. Mind the rots, they've made a mess of things here.

Tosses an M4 over to the goggle-eyed kid

"Watch your six. Them rots are quick and nasty. Skull shots only."

I hope you're not advocating violence against the heartbeat challenged!
Advocating, how about expecting.
Pardon me, good sir. I am legal counsel for Mr. Aberzombie. I'm here to inform you that, on his behalf, I intend to file a restraining order with the courts barring you from approaching within 2000 yards of my client. I intend to show your comments here as evidence that you represent a sincere and dangerous threat to my client's well-being. Good day, sir.
I thought that was clear and present danger?
No, you're thinking of my other client, Mr. Ford.
Oh, the pilot.

Indeed. I'm representing him in a case against an old friend of his. A Mr. C. Wookie.


Crimson Jester wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Crimson Jester wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:
Sgt. Curtin wrote:

Welcome back. Mind the rots, they've made a mess of things here.

Tosses an M4 over to the goggle-eyed kid

"Watch your six. Them rots are quick and nasty. Skull shots only."

I hope you're not advocating violence against the heartbeat challenged!
Advocating, how about expecting.
Pardon me, good sir. I am legal counsel for Mr. Aberzombie. I'm here to inform you that, on his behalf, I intend to file a restraining order with the courts barring you from approaching within 2000 yards of my client. I intend to show your comments here as evidence that you represent a sincere and dangerous threat to my client's well-being. Good day, sir.
I thought that was clear and present danger?

No, you're thinking of my other client, Mr. Ford.


Crimson Jester wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:
Sgt. Curtin wrote:

Welcome back. Mind the rots, they've made a mess of things here.

Tosses an M4 over to the goggle-eyed kid

"Watch your six. Them rots are quick and nasty. Skull shots only."

I hope you're not advocating violence against the heartbeat challenged!
Advocating, how about expecting.

Pardon me, good sir. I am legal counsel for Mr. Aberzombie. I'm here to inform you that, on his behalf, I intend to file a restraining order with the courts barring you from approaching within 2000 yards of my client. I intend to show your comments here as evidence that you represent a sincere and dangerous threat to my client's well-being. Good day, sir.


Only if it obeys THE LAW!!!


Did someone call for me?


taig wrote:

I noticed that Ross or Gary moved a lot of "evil?" threads into off-topic discussions. I think this means the aura went from faint to moderate.

I guess we just need a paladin to come in and smite threads to find out for sure. It's the only way.

Did someone say they needed a smite?


Crimson Jester wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Crimson Jester wrote:

"Want to see what happens to a skeleton when it is struck by lightning, the same thing as everything else."

~ZAP~

As legal counsel for the flesh challenged, I'd like to inform you of our intent to seek to bring charges of assault against you.

Charges, you want charges!!!

~ZAP~

How was that?!?!
~ZAP~

Sir!!! I AM an officer of the courts!! Duly appointed to carry out my duties in the name of the LAW!!!

Don't make me Smite you!


Crimson Jester wrote:

"Want to see what happens to a skeleton when it is struck by lightning, the same thing as everything else."

~ZAP~

As legal counsel for the flesh challenged, I'd like to inform you of our intent to seek to bring charges of assault against you.


Big Juicy Brain wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:
Solnes wrote:
Solnes wrote:
Hilarious! Heh..heh..hahahaha!
RUN ABERZOMBIE!! RUUUUUUUUUUUUN!
I may have to bring some kind of class action lawsuit against them.
Calling Sir Spits-a-lot!

I have reviewed the facts of the case, and I believe my client and his fellow heart beat challenged have a case for a nice civil suit, and perhaps even a criminal one. Oh yes, CDC, I've got your number now, you undead hate promoting bastards!

PREPARE TO FEEL THE WRATH OF THE LAW!!!


On behalf of my client, a Mr. Aberzombie, and all other heart beat challenged, I hereby bring notice that we shall be seeking recompense in civil court for you libelous accusations against my client. Although my client is indeed one of the heart beat challenged henceforth known as a zombie, he would like to state for the record that he does not hate America, nor do many of his associate zombies. We shall see you in court. Good day sir.


Leafar the Lost wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
Public indecency now? Is there no end to your lawbreaking and flouting of all the common decency of a civilized society?

I can't break the law, Sir Spitsalot, because...

I AM THE LAW!!!!

Ah, I see - so we're going for the whole insanity defense?

signals the men in white coats


TriOmegaZero wrote:
Something has to exist to be flouted.

Are you suggesting the people of the Paizo messagboards are indecent, sir? That they somehow do not conform to the rules of proper etiquette?

Preposterous! All here know that the internet is a place of strict adherence to the rules of good behavio......

......crap! Never mind.


Leafar the Lost wrote:
*takes down the new 'Mission Accomplised' banner, uses it for toilet paper, then puts it back up*

Public indecency now? Is there no end to your lawbreaking and flouting of all the common decency of a civilized society?


Leafar the Lost wrote:
*takes down 'Mission Accomplished' banner and tears it up into little pieces and then burns those little pieces and then throws the ashes in the river*

I'm afraid you'll now have to be cited for littering, pollution, and unauthorized fire, young man.


Leafar the Lost wrote:

To Celestial Hippeh Lawyer and Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law, you both have no case and I demand a jury trial! I want Erik Mona to be the judge! You will lose the trial and (more importantly) collect no fees!

I don't collect fees. All my work is Pro Bono. And a trial with Erik as Judge? Hang on, we're about to tee off here at the driving range. I'll ask him if he's available.....


Celestial Hippeh Lawyer wrote:
Leafar the Lost wrote:

You have no rights, Aberzombie. I cite Zombie v. Denier, 3011. In the trial a Zombie, who shall remaine nameless, died and then was made into an undead creature a week later. However, during that time his castle was taken from him by Lord Denier. He sued, and the trial was heard by the Highest Court. The 13 Justices ruled that since the Zombie was dead, and had no heir, he lost whatever rights he had when he was alive. The fact that he was a walking corpse with memories of his former life was immaterial to the case.

The Zombie was then immeaditely destroyed by a paladin. You see, Aberzombie, you have no legal legs to stand on. You are dead. Just because you can talk, stumble around and eat people's brains doesn't make you a person. Sorry (not really) but you work for me now. Go and lead my undead legions to victory!!!

Hmmm, Hate Speech and Hate Crimes against the heartbeat-challenged. {scribbles notes, sees actual dollar signs in front of his eyes}

Also, you appear to have cited Faerunian case law. Unfortunately, all those records (and Deneir) were destroyed in the $ellPlague, so your precedents are moot.

I very much agree my learned colleague. This gentleman seems to be attempting to cite legal precedence from some foreign power. Such things have no basis under the law in these parts.

And yes, his hate speech is very distrubing. Methinks this young man needs some sensitivity training.


Leafar the Lost wrote:
Aberzombie wrote:

Ah, so now you insult us? Libel us? Disparage our intelligence? I'll have you know, sir, that when I'm not devouring the brainnnnnsss of various humanoids, I'm conducting my chosen profession of engineer! Hardly a mark for lack of intelligence.

I've got a good mind to contact my legal counsel and bring a lawsuit against you for slandering the good name of, and threatening with violence, the heart beat challenged.

You can't file a lawsuit against me, because you are dead! You have no legal or Constitutional rights. Your civil rights begin at birth and end at death. You are a talking piece of meat. You may be an engineer at some Chinese techno-death firm, but you are no lawyer...

As duly appointed legal arbiter of all things that occur on the Paizo Messagebaords, I must inform you of your error. My clients legal status has been well documented in numerous proceedings. I cite Zombie Horde v Cosmo, Zombie Pizza Delivery Girl v Mairkurion, and Aberzombie v Sebastian as just a handful of cases. He does indeed have a right to bring legal proceedings against you, on behalf of himself and all the Hear Beat Challenged. In fact, many would argue it is not just his right, but his duty!

You may expect our paperwork to be filed with the courts, and on your own counsels desk, within the next 3-5 days.


Leafar the Lost wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:

Ah, yes, I finally see what is going on here.

places a phone call to the court-appointed psychiatrist

"Hello?"

"Yes, this is Sir Spitsalot! Is this the court-appointed psychiatrist?"
"Yes, it is! How can I help you?"
"I am afraid that there is a certain person who may be insane and I want you to examine him."
"What sort of insane things is he doing?"
"First of all, he created a thread on the Paizo web site, but he didn't want anyone else to post on it."
"Why did he do that?"
"We don't know; he said it was for [i]personal & private/i] reasons."
"I see...yes, I saw that thread, but I respected the OP's wishes and didn't post on it. Why did you post on it?"
"Well...you see...it was just a joke...it was just so stupid...he must be a Troll or something!"
"Maybe he is and maybe he isn't, but the question you should be asking yourself is this: why did you post on his thread when he asked you not to?"
"I don't know..."

Why yes, doctor, he does appear to be hearing voices.


Leafar the Lost wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
With all due mockery, the laws set forth in the Book of Paizo govern the entire messageboard, and it is to those rules that I have pledged my entire legal knowledge. Your paltry claim of authority over a single thread is nothing when compared to that.
The Book of Paizo has absolutely no authority on that happens in this thread. You are basing your entire legal knowledge on that which you know nothing about! The fact that this thread still exists means that the Higher Powers that govern this web site have chosen to give me absolute authority over this thread! I have made it very clear that no one is to reply to this thread, and it is against THE LAW! You are all guilty before the trial even begins...

Ah, yes, I finally see what is going on here.

places a phone call to the court-appointed psychiatrist


Leafar the Lost wrote:
Quote:
Unpossible sir! You are no duly authorized agent of the courts! Therefore, anything you say can and will be mocked by us, or otherwise ignored.

With all due respect, Sir Spitsalot...

I AM THE LAW ON THIS THREAD! I AM THE COURT ON THIS THREAD! I...AM...THE...THREAD!!!

I will see you in court...

With all due mockery, the laws set forth in the Book of Paizo govern the entire messageboard, and it is to those rules that I have pledged my entire legal knowledge. Your paltry claim of authority over a single thread is nothing when compared to that.


Leafar the Lost wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:

As duly appointed legal counsel of the Paizo Messageboard Off Topic Section, it is my duty to inform you all that no legal actions will actually be taken against you for posting in this thread. Paragraph 2, Section 7, Subsection A, Subparagrpah 3.14159 clearly states that "any and all efforts by people who make interwebz demands shall be met with extreme lunacy, sarcasm, and general annoyance". So, you're all in the clear.

Except for that Sebastian guy, since we all know that somehow, someway, this is all his fault.

There is an old saying at the courthouse, "How can you tell if a prisoner is guilty? Sir Spitsalot is defending him."

How many men have you personally walked to the Executioner? You have probably lost count by now. Your ignorance of The Law is staggering. You failed to finish the subparagraph! Allow me to finish it for you:

Paragraph 2, Section 7, Subsection A, Subparagraph 3.14159 clearly states that, "Any and all efforts by people who make interwebz demands shall be met with extreme lunacy, sarcasm, and general annoyance. However, any laws that the OP of any given thread creates must be followed, no matter how irrational they may seem."

Therefore, according to THE LAW, by posting on a thread that I, the OP, created you are automatically under any laws that I choose to create. As such, my arrests are legal and binding, and there is nothing that any fake president and incompetent lawyer can do about it! Good day to you, sirruh!

Unpossible sir! You are no duly authorized agent of the courts! Therefore, anything you say can and will be mocked by us, or otherwise ignored.


As duly appointed legal counsel of the Paizo Messageboard Off Topic Section, it is my duty to inform you all that no legal actions will actually be taken against you for posting in this thread. Paragraph 2, Section 7, Subsection A, Subparagrpah 3.14159 clearly states that "any and all efforts by people who make interwebz demands shall be met with extreme lunacy, sarcasm, and general annoyance". So, you're all in the clear.

Except for that Sebastian guy, since we all know that somehow, someway, this is all his fault.


Moff Rimmer wrote:
Sebastian wrote:
I think Moff stole my moxie...

And you ain't never getting it back.

Then you admit to the theft? Well then, sir, the firm of Pony & Paladin may just have a thing or 50 to say about that. Prepare to face the full wrath of the LAW!!


Kirth Gersen wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
My fee in this case would be a George Clooney Bobble Head, a six pack of Dogfish Head 60 Minute IPA, and Jessica Simpson's autograph.
Alas, obtaining the latter item would cause me personal disgust to such a degree that I would be unable to appear in court.

As legal counsel, I am open to negotiation. Perhaps the autograph of Dolly Parton instead?


Kirth Gersen wrote:
Our definitions of "respect" evidently differ substantially. When evaluating a lack of respect, I weigh "failing to pretend to talk nice" into it far less than things like making false assertions, moving goalposts, ignoring points, and so on. By my personal definition, I was treated with a pervasive and near-total lack of respect. By your definition, apparently so were you.

Sir, as a legal representative of the Paizo boards, I could be persuaded to take on your case and develop an official Paizo definition of the term "respect". My fee in this case would be a George Clooney Bobble Head, a six pack of Dogfish Head 60 Minute IPA, and Jessica Simpson's autograph.


Sebastian wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:


I was acting as your proxy while you were....er...otherwise engaged with...well...you know.....

Oh yeah...thanks for standing in.

No problem. We should probably think about starting a firm: Pony and Paladin?


houstonderek wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
bugleyman wrote:
In hindsight, I probably should have stayed out of it.

Especially since you've now been found guilty of violating the Shtick Law. I'm afraid you're going to have to make reparations to The Plaintiff. The minimum pumishment for this infraction is 12 Jolly Ranchers, a pound of cooked bacon (Oscar Mayer Center Cut only), and a case of The Plaintiff's favorite beer.

Attorney's fees can be summed up in three words: Hookers and Blow.

Um, hookers and blow are my niche, too. From way back...

Perhaps, but we are dealing with the legal system here on these boards. As such, the poster with the most time, and who used the term "hookers and blow" for the first time here on Paizo, is Sebastian. As his duly appointed proxy in Paizo legal matters, I am therefore allowed to use the term with impunity.


bugleyman wrote:
In hindsight, I probably should have stayed out of it.

Especially since you've now been found guilty of violating the Shtick Law. I'm afraid you're going to have to make reparations to The Plaintiff. The minimum pumishment for this infraction is 12 Jolly Ranchers, a pound of cooked bacon (Oscar Mayer Center Cut only), and a case of The Plaintiff's favorite beer.

Attorney's fees can be summed up in three words: Hookers and Blow.


Sebastian wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:

Very well, as a duly appointed representative of a fictious legal system, and complete figment of someone's imagination who nevertheless receives responses as if he were a real person, I have determined that, according to the aforementioned fictious legal system, Houstonderek, henceforth referred to as The Plaintiff, has a legitimate beef against bugleyman, heretofore referred to as The Violator.

It is The Plaintiff's assertion that The Violator knowingly and willing infringed upon The Plaintiff's Shtick, described as the niche wherein The Plaintiff gets to tell people to STFD & STFU. The Violator has reversed asserted that the Shtick is actually his.

We find for the Plaintiff, primarily due to a made up legal whim, but also due to the unconfirmed rumor that the Violator enjoys watching Dora the Explorer and smells like 3 day old cabbage.

Hey! Pretending to be a lawyer is my shtick!

I was acting as your proxy while you were....er...otherwise engaged with...well...you know.....


Very well, as a duly appointed representative of a fictious legal system, and complete figment of someone's imagination who nevertheless receives responses as if he were a real person, I have determined that, according to the aforementioned fictious legal system, Houstonderek, henceforth referred to as The Plaintiff, has a legitimate beef against bugleyman, heretofore referred to as The Violator.

It is The Plaintiff's assertion that The Violator knowingly and willing infringed upon The Plaintiff's Shtick, described as the niche wherein The Plaintiff gets to tell people to STFD & STFU. The Violator has reversed asserted that the Shtick is actually his.

We find for the Plaintiff, primarily due to a made up legal whim, but also due to the unconfirmed rumor that the Violator enjoys watching Dora the Explorer and smells like 3 day old cabbage.


houstonderek wrote:
Sir Spitsalot: Paladin-at-Law wrote:
houstonderek wrote:
Wait, I thought that was my shtick. I want some niche protection here, dammit!
Hmmm, I could look into the legality of this for you, sir.
Do you take bagels as a retainer? I seem to have left my wallet in my other pants...

Only if they're whole wheat - doctor's orders.


houstonderek wrote:
Wait, I thought that was my shtick. I want some niche protection here, dammit!

Hmmm, I could look into the legality of this for you, sir.


If this weren't so damn funny, I'd smite you all.


LilithsThrall wrote:

See?

That's what I'm talking about. People keep posting in this forum without knowing what they are talking about.
Of the base classes, the Sorcerer is the only class which doesn't memorize it's spells for the day. Of the base classes, it is the only class which casts based on Charisma. Of the base classes, it is the only class which can attach metamagic feats to its spells on the fly.

Um, aren't my paladin spells are based on Charisma? Same as the Bard.


I AM THE LAW!


Salutations on this fine morning to all posters on these messageboards.

I am legal counsel representing an organization known as the Lollipop Guild, and they have requested that you all cease and desist using the word "munchkin", hereafter referred to as The Term. Use of The Term often denotes negative connotations and has greatly damaged my clients reputation and ability to find employment.

Any further use of The Term may consitute grounds for increasingly severe legal actions.

Thank you, and have an excellent day.

1 to 50 of 121 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>