1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Maneuvermoose wrote: SPOILER Kylo Ren wrote: Maneuvermoose wrote: Maneuvermoose wrote: I'm up to 2990 posts without aliases...almost at the big 3000. But for once, the posts I make on this thread will not actually put me any closer:) 2999 posts without aliases...which thread will get the next one? Not even I know! Oooh Oooh!! Captain Yesterday's Alias Thread!** spoiler omitted ** You know you're going to die in episode IX!
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
captain yesterday wrote: Oh I don't read Star Wars spoilers, haven't seen the movie, but don't worry I know who ** spoiler omitted ** is.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
John the Fisherman wrote: Live Bait wrote: Dear Captain Yesterday,
I just reached 100 posts for the first time with an alias. What should I expect from here?
Thank you,
Live Bait
Here, just to be safe, get on this string, now whatever you do don't let go.
It'll all be over soon enough.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Maneuvermoose wrote: Maneuvermoose wrote: I'm up to 2990 posts without aliases...almost at the big 3000. But for once, the posts I make on this thread will not actually put me any closer:) 2999 posts without aliases...which thread will get the next one? Not even I know! Oooh Oooh!! Captain Yesterday's Alias Thread!
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Set wrote: MeanDM wrote: Lastly. I feel really bad for Chewbacca. Got me a bit teary thinking about it. Yeah, it struck me as odd that he didn't really have any sort of reaction post the event itself. Does he blame Leia in part, for what happened? Does he consider his life debt to Han over and will he go home to Kashhyk now? If he was a real character, and not a walking carpet that yowls occasionally, these sorts of things might be explored.
Instead he's just going to follow Rey around, for no reason, apparently.
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Imperial Advisor Arem Heshvaun wrote: BY IMPERIAL EDICT, WRIT AND DECREE, ALL SPOILERS TAGS ARE NO LONGER NEEDED ON THIS THREAD!
The movie has been out 15 days people. It's hard to fake working and open all those tabs.

BigNorseWolf wrote: Lord Snow wrote:
I'm pretty sure the "they let us go" part referred to the Death Star not sending more TIE fighters after the Falcon once it took off.
The series is pretty explicit about something going to warp being pretty much gone. Once they're out of the station and hit the hyperdrive thats it, home base. So this isn't it.
You seem to have a habbit of finding the one plothole in every movie that.. isn't a plothole, at all. They explained it at least three times here. Once with vader saying he has plans for her, once with Leia lamp-shading it, and then with the deathstar actually showing up at the base they've been looking for the entire time.
Quote: Inside the Death Star itself, the characters were very close to getting killed a lot of times. It also makes sense to me that not every storm stopper has to know about Vader's schemes, and that killing Luke when he was shooting at them doesn't actually stop the Falcon from getting away. Stormtrooper 1: "Hey, can we kill this guy or not? Is he the pilot? Or is the other guy? Or the wookie?"
Stormtrooper 2: "How the hell would I know. Dammit, we better let him live"
Stormtrooper 1: "So what, we let him kill us?
Stormtrooper 2: "As opposed to vader NOT killing you?
Sotrmtrooper 1: "Gulp! Tell my wife i said i love her!"
You can't just pick something that makese sense to you, and then have that as an internal contradiction to the movie.
Grey Lensman wrote: Plus don't forget that Chewie goes with her - he isn't given to her like some kind of pet.
Jiggy wrote: Phew, finally saw it! So, what have I missed in the discussion?
Rhedyn wrote: SPOILER Kylo Ren wrote: ** spoiler omitted **** spoiler omitted **[/spoiler] Star Wars doesn't come out here in china until January 9th. So I'll be annoyed if you are spoiling things about a character I didn't even know was in the movie. So in another thread it was pointed out I should make it more obvious these are Star Wars Spoilers
TOZ wrote: I blame Cosmo for The Force Awakens.
captnchuck67 wrote: Or should i have the bad guys act with more than a 2 INT.
Here is the deal. Have a vet player. He has a familiar. Celestial bird with a 2 INT that he basically sends out like a Predator drone. Now when the encounters are outside fine no problem but if we are in an enclosed space where you usually do not see something like that is it wrong for me to:
a) Have the bad guys kill the bird
b) Basically Han shooting the control panel and putting the entire cadre of bad guys on alert.
I mean I know we are supposed to run as written but when I feel that a play is both gaming the system and not acting smart. I think the bad guys need to act?
1 person marked this as a favorite.
|
Phenomenal Cosmic Power Gamer wrote: Sarcasm Dragon wrote: Tacticslion wrote: God be willing, I'll have a functional computer by Monday... No you won't. Functional computers are now BANNED! I reject your reality and substitute my own~!
|