I notice some comments from members of the Accord that indicate our two power blocks might end up being enemies.
If that is still the case, Golgotha and Aeternum would be more than happy to remove ambassador status from your diplomats.
This is not a threat, it is purely diplomatic clarity. There is little reason to talk diplomacy if the Accord is considering us enemies.
I would be careful about speaking for Golgotha- the precedent that any officer in Pax can speak for any division of Pax has aggravated the confusion over the issue.
My statement was meant to illustrate that anyone that wishes to end diplomatic talks can contact the appropriate representative (for Golgotha or Aeternum).
Keep in mind that we're not Goonsquad. I'm not in a leadership position but I've never seen any indication that we want to dominate The River Kingdoms. I've never seen a discussion on "how will we take someone's settlement away from them".
We want to have an nation/empire but it's not a "join us or die" scenario. We will expand to get the resources we need, not just because we can.
I'm speaking for a lot of people and I shouldn't be but my impression over the last year with Pax is that we'll have a lot more fun with trading and diplomacy than we will with conquering.
The settlement alignment restrictions is what drove us to split into three guilds. We needed a place for every member to play whatever alignment they wanted. It wasn't a strategic move. One massive Pax Aeturnum would have been more of a threat than what we have now.
That is incorrect. Golgotha existed before they joined Pax, we did not create them to fill a LE desire.
Fidelis does fit that definition, which is why they will be citizens of Callambea for the foreseeable future.
Sorry if my quote seemed more than what it actually is. Just responding to Rawn's image of The God Emperor Leto II and generally being a Dune nerd. :)
Uhm, me too... that's the opening line of the movie, spoken by Princess Irulan. Except it looks like I mangled it a bit, since it should have been "A beginning is a very delicate time."
Ah. Mah Bad.
I shuddered a bit at "movie" though. The original make as well as the Syfy remake were great. Still, the books man, the books are awesome :)
Whoa! Whoa! Calling Bluddwolf a queen is a bit much...
He is a princess at best :p
You can't even comprehend how difficult it is to resist the urge to open Photoshop right now and channel the thing that is "princess Bluddwolf" in my head into it.
Thanks for the kudos! We realized that being company-focused was the completely wrong approach. It's about sharing our idea and working that out, there are SO MANY unknowns about once we are in-game, that having a pre-packaged idea could be too rigid that it'll break on entry into the actual game.
So having a settlement forum and 'crowdforging' the high concept we have seems the best way to go, then everyone has some ownership.
Which by the way, Fidelis & FMS are so synergistic it's crazy. So excited to see how this plays out!
We are, it should be interesting.
Fidelis was created post land rush two, and by members that wanted to cooperate with Aeternum but eventually drift at least to NG. Since we had not anchored an alliance with a LG settlement at the time we decided to flush one out internally, but they will operate from Callambea for quite some time.
*Edit, the hopeful drift is to NG. They will not be supporting the chaotic alignment grid*
I think any group, alliance, or accord has the ability to survive as long as it can spring back from defeat. It is the one thing none of us are immune to.
As long as the commitment is there, I think you guys will be fine.
While Aeternum is a ways away from your power block, your goals are not something we are against by any means. It is a good goal with added mutual interest, I wish you guys the best.
Additionally Good Pax, Bad Pax, Indifferent Pax, and Naughty Pax are not accurate ways to look at it.
Fidelis is a lawful good organization made partially from former Aeternum members and members from our other games migrating over. Because of this they are not voting for their own spot and will likely be hoping to get one much later in the game. To do otherwise would be unfair and unwise.
Aeternum is a Lawful Neutral entity that centers around trade in support of their settlement Callambea. We generally pride ourselves in honest deals, contracts, etc.
Golgotha is a Lawful Evil and is concentrated on military prowess and heavy pvp. They were an entity that existed prior to joining the meta community and have changed in roster very little since joining.
The question of conflict between entities can be and should be asked irrespective of who they are inside of a meta community. Nations that join from outside the Pax community will be faced with the same questions, and we hope to be able to assuage those concerns. We can not hope to sustain a nation for very long with just one social group, meta or otherwise.
@Sextant, first a disclaimer, I'm not the official go-to guy but we've talked about the interactions between Fidelis and Golgotha quite a bit before so I may be able to give some insight into how Pax plans to play that one out.
As in the Pathfinder Tabletop game, just because someone's alignment is evil doesn't mean the "good guys" can go and kill that person. If your paladin runs around casting detect evil on random townspeople, some of them may show up as evil; that doesn't give the paladin free reign to attack those people, or he will be arrested and probably lose his paladin powers for decidedly non-lawful actions. So although the people of Fidelis are aware that the Golgothans are up to no good, they aren't exactly going to start a revolt and start killing people.
The people of Fidelis will of course (in a strictly RP sense) be worried and sorry for their neighbors whose activities behind those walls start rumors of brutality and horror; however, the Fidelans (Fidelians? I dunno...) are more committed to reforming their friends through example, guidance, and reforms to empire law, rather than tearing apart their homes in a decidedly non-good manner. These are our countrymen and neighbors, not our enemies.
I personally look forward to roleplaying the interactions between Fidelans and Golgothans.
Well, the OP indicates that Golgotha is interested in conquest. When Golgotha marches its armies and starts to attack other settlements in overt acts of aggression, it probably won't take a detect alignment spell to realize that Golgatha is evil. I don't think that every good aligned settlement will necessarily rally to the defense of every settlement every time its attacked (but maybe they will, I don't know). But I'm more curious if good-aligned Pax groups will have a blind spot when evil-aligned Pax groups act in obviously evil ways.
In other words, if good Pax would normally act against an evil group in some given situation, would they still take...
There are two separate acts of aggression. One is all out, all hands on deck war. The other is smaller skirmishes, feuds, and facton conflict. Full out war requires votes on a settlement council to inact, and whomever represents a settlement vote can vote against agressions Gogoltha might want to initiate.
Smaller scale aggression is initiated by the individual settlement's council. There are exceptions to this related to shared blue lists and issues of diplomatic repercussions. As long as there is no conflict Golgotha has the right to conduct feuds as a separate entity. Any other settlement would have the exact same rights and expectations.
Most of our good group leadership are not adverse to the idea of aggression, or have aversions to cooperating with a lawful evil settlement. This generally revolves around separating what would normally be RP reservations.
Ok, maybe that was a little negative, but no more so then the dissolution of the Pax UNC contract. At least our separation was amicable and in accordance with the terms of the contract.
For clarity, Aeternum and Golgotha have no wish to jump into a drama contest. Bludd's opinions are not ours.
I read it that Golgotha is allied with Pax Aeternum the same way TSV and TEO are allied.
If that is the case, then I totally agree that Golgotha is in the free and clear. But I thought that Golgotha was mainly Pax members who want a LE settlement?
Nihimon has the right of it.
GW has contacted us about this issue. I promise everyone we are moving truthfully in our answers and will abide by any solution they wish.
What that solution is I can not say until that discussion is done.
Thanks for the clarification. I though that Golgatha and Aeternum were in the same chain of decision-making and shared the same community and overall leadership.
No problem
Aeternum and Golgotha have separate leadership councils which only join together on nation level matters where each settlement retains one vote. That is the same deal we offer for non Pax entities that want a seat on the council as well.
TLDR: We vote independently on matters of our own future settlements.
Deacon is the lead of Golgotha, his voting council consists of Morbis, Cyneric, and Phyllian.
I'm beginning to think it might be possible after all to build up Phaeros as a University Town of sorts, where we forego some of the other major Settlement structures in order to provide additional Training facilities for a wide range of class roles. I think if this turns out to be viable, it will be very appealing to our members.
I agree, if the mechanics allow it is a pretty solid tactic. I could see it theoretically bringing in a larger range of folks that are dependent on the settlement's success.
So instead of paying 35$ back in February, I need to have my members pay 100$ now in order to vote for our settlement.
If I understand the published order of forces properly, your members should not be voting for a settlement at all.
It is possible that I grossly misunderstand what the guild affiliation of "your members" is.
You might. I made our intent post on another thread. Here is what Golgotha is as well as how we are moving forward.
Pax Charlie George wrote:
Pax has made our statements to the respective Golgotha-Aeternum membership on how we wish to move forward.
In an effort for full disclosure, those statements are HERE as well as reiterated HERE and are readable at the visitor level.
Golgotha will be voting in the new land rush, but will do so via their own membership. What votes were lost via confused cross voting before this statement was issued is to be considered a permanent "loss".
Golgotha was it's own separate entity of merged CC's before we began alliance talks. They still exist as that separate entity as Pax Gaming members, they just have the ability to join us in our other games while this one is still prelaunch.
Pax Gaming takes developer EULA's and requests very seriously. I, Deacon Wulf, or Rawn (the lead chair of the Pax Community) as always available for developer discussions of violations of rules or the spirit of rules / requests.
The above is also pre Lee's clarification on entities bargaining for votes.
Thanks for the warm welcome everyone, especially to those who came and visited us personally. :) Please hit me up with any questions. And just think very soon it'll be our very first birthday.
We greatly enjoyed the conversation, and look forward to more :)
Here's another question: do we have to belong to a registered guild to vote?
Plenty of us wont be trying to own land, but will still clearly have a vested stake in those who do.
If you have an EE account you can apply to join any guild you want and help them get a settlement. Maybe trade your vote for promise of future favors in game? You won't get to choose settlements directly, the guild administrator does that, but you can affect what guilds get to choose. You don't have to join that settlement once the game starts; this isn't a binding contract.
This seems in conflict with earlier information, can we be relatively assured that this is indeed the case?
Six months into beta are we going to stop and check to make sure everyone is in the settlement they are supposed to be in based on this vote? No, we're not going to do that. People get mad at each other, things change, stuff happens.
I am Zodd. I have extremely high hopes for PFO. I ran a mercenary guild in Shadowbane, a sandbox MMO that came out back in 2003. I have played a lot of MMOs before and since, but have yet to capture the joy and thrill that I found in the sandbox type of game. Open PvP and player built cities that could be besieged by enemy guilds made for an amazing and challenging gaming experience.
I am unaffiliated for now, I am so used to being a guild leader in any MMO I play that the prospect of joining a guild ran by someone else is strange.
I look forward to getting to know everyone here and I will attempt to contribute whatever I can to help.
Here's another question: do we have to belong to a registered guild to vote?
Plenty of us wont be trying to own land, but will still clearly have a vested stake in those who do.
If you have an EE account you can apply to join any guild you want and help them get a settlement. Maybe trade your vote for promise of future favors in game? You won't get to choose settlements directly, the guild administrator does that, but you can affect what guilds get to choose. You don't have to join that settlement once the game starts; this isn't a binding contract.
This seems in conflict with earlier information, can we be relatively assured that this is indeed the case?
Pax has made our statements to the respective Golgotha-Aeternum membership on how we wish to move forward.
In an effort for full disclosure, those statements are HERE as well as reiterated HERE and are readable at the visitor level.
Golgotha will be voting in the new land rush, but will do so via their own membership. What votes were lost via confused cross voting before this statement was issued is to be considered a permanent "loss".
Golgotha was it's own separate entity of merged CC's before we began alliance talks. They still exist as that separate entity as Pax Gaming members, they just have the ability to join us in our other games while this one is still prelaunch.
Pax Gaming takes developer EULA's and requests very seriously. I, Deacon Wulf, or Rawn (the lead chair of the Pax Community) as always available for developer discussions of violations of rules or the spirit of rules / requests.
One point of clarification to make sure I'm complying. I am part of one of the Three. I purchased a Guild Forger account back during the KS with the intent of recruiting my friends to the game once it got close to going forward as they aren't the Paizo fans that I am. So, after the LR 1 vote, I recruited them over the last couple of days to take the slots.
Can they form a Chartered Company separate from my current Guild and apply for a LR settlement?
Could I quit my current Guild and join them, even though I don't vote?
Could we do that knowing that one day we'd hope to be allied with said Big Three guild, but knowing that it won't matter for a while considering the distance?
What can they do with their votes if they decide to join the Big Three Guild instead? Just sit on them?
Thanks for the help. This is actually tougher on the Good guilds as they feel guilty twisting the rules to their advantage while the Lawful guilds figure that anything that meets the rules is fair game (I jest, I jest...)
I think it is just a mutual realization that alliances, for hire services, and things of the like are sure to be fluid as the game progresses over time.
I was just basing the pronunciation on what dictionary.com was telling me. :P
Dictionary.com is my preferred source as well, and yes, the first pronunciation there captures the essence of it :)
Since my handle is a work nickname I picked up, it pretty much follows rules that are beyond my control (you don't get to pick your nick name, after all).
Pax has a community requirement that is locked regardless what game you are applying for. While we can add more hurdles for recruitment, we can not take a requirement away.
That is essentially a two week recruitment process on our boards, and afterwards a vote.
I would love for example to know how the big guilds of PFO, are considering the religion aspect of things.
Roleplay is something Pax does and allows. That said it is not a central focus.
I expect people will be able to promote their own religions as they see fit. I don't expect to see temples for the Rough Beast, but otherwise I don't think we will have restrictions on who one can follow.
Now if there are mechanical benefits and hindrances to specific types of temples we might have a different story.
I am interested in your organization but was a bit confused about where Aeternum fitted in, probably because its name re-emerged in the new structure.
I take it Fidelis and Aeternum are both going to try to get their own settlement in the second landrush (since Golgotha seems to have been established)?
Your chart is correct, but it was Aeternum / Callambea that became established. Golgotha will be trying to get their own settlement in the second landrush.
We will not be also pushing for Fidelis to have a settlement from this next landrush unless something on the diplomatic or recruitment end changes.
Thanks for the carefully thought replies! I was just commenting on how it is tough to understand from the outside looking in, please don't think I was making a demand.
And congrats!
We enjoyed the opportunity to explain ourselves :)
Hi, I won't push a sale really. Callambea is a LN settlement hoping to compete as a top merchant stop for the River Kingdoms. We are currently allied with Golgotha, the largest evil presence currently announced. We have plans in the building stages for a good presence as well, and hope to tie things together along the Lawful axis at the nation level.
If that is something you are interested in, feel free to drop by paxgaming.com.
@Ryan - just curious as to those with Destiny's Twin or multiple accounts? If I have two characters, one good and one evil, would it not reason that I should be able to vote for two settlements since they won't be able to both train at the original settlement I voted for?
I know that is a slippery slope as it could very easily turn into pay to win, but I had to ask.
0
Stabalize
Detect Magic: Detects spells and magic items within 60 ft.
Guidance: +1 on one attack roll, saving throw, or skill check.
Purify Food and Drink: Purifies 1 cu. ft./level of food or water.
1st level
Command: [verbal only!!!] One subject obeys selected command for 1 round. Will DC 14
Obscuring Mist: Fog surrounds you.
X Sanctuary: Opponents can't attack you, and you can't attack.
Remove Fear
Domain: Bless: Allies gain +1 on attack rolls and saves against fear. 50 foot burst, 5 minutes, morale bonus, no save.
2nd level
3 lesser restoration: heal 1d4 ability
Aid: +1 on attack rolls and saves against fear, 1d8 temporary hp +1/level (max +10). Morale bonus.
Spiritual Weapon: Magic weapon attacks on its own.
Hold Person: Paralyzes one humanoid for 1 round/level.
Domain: cure moderate wounds 2d8+6
3rd Level
SEARING LIGHT: Focusing divine power like a ray of the sun, you project a blast of light from your open palm. You must succeed on a ranged touch attack to strike your target. A creature struck by this ray of light takes 1d8 points of damage per two caster levels (maximum 5d8). An undead creature takes 1d6 points of damage per caster level (maximum 10d6)
Loarin is average in size for a human. Though when not in his full plate you may see his true heritage. His body is speckled with silver as if dusted with it, his stark blonde hair makes tight curls that flop around on his head when he moves, one such curl always pops out of his helmet. Most of the time he is in his breastplate armor and doing his best to not fall behind his group. His average dimensions of 5’2” and 120 pounds shows him to be of the mind and tongue type of person. His skin is of a light olive hue which he got from his mother and his sparkling emerald colored eyes speak volumes of his eagerness to explore the world.
His holy symbol is always on his neck and bound around his hand holding his shield. A light mace and dagger at his side more for show than any true use. He typically has a backpack with a few essentials never filled very often.
Gear:
10,500
+1 breastplate armor 1350, 30 lbs
+1 mithril heavy shield, 2020, 5 lbs
MW scimitar, 315, 4 lbs
+1 Cloak of resist, 1000, 1 lbs
Headband of Charisma, 4000, -
Wand of cure light 1d8+1 (40/50), 750, -
Wand of protection from evil (45/50), 750, -
adventuring gear (40)
On person: potion of cure light, weapon cord, belt pouch (1/2), signal whistle, healing kit(1), silver holy symbol(1), wooden holy symbol, coins (1/2). Total weight: 3
MW backpack(4): bedroll (5), cleric's vestments(6), belt pouch (chalk)(1/2), 1 1/2 rations (1 1/2), waterskin(4), small steel mirror (1/2), mess kit (1), dagger(1). Total: 24
When carrying his backpack he is encumbered. 15 feet movement and additional -3 ACP.
Coins: 7 pp, 8gp, 5 sp, 10cp
Donkey, Bobert - bit and bridal (2 lbs), feed for 8 days (80 lbs), saddlebags ( lbs 4), riding saddle (30 lbs)
Loarin has always been fond of helping others but found out early in life that it does not always work that way. With his parents and mentors watching over him as he grew up his exposure to the outside world was limited. Once he became initiated into the order he found a whole flock to tend to their faith and body. Sarenrae lets her brilliance wash over all and Loarin spread the healing touch he was blessed with.
Though he himself cannot eliminate dangerous monsters he hopes to aid heroes as much as possible to limit the threats to any community of believers and innocent. Though he hopes to win the hearts of those he meets and will bring Sarenrae's brilliance where ever he may travel.
His naivety got him in trouble, and the heroes he thought were helping were actually just mercenaries collecting aasimars for a necromancer, the third night out with the group of three he got sapped in his sleep and a hood for the next three days and some nice new bracelets. He has channels and his spells, but that is about it. Lucky for him his marks work as a divine focus, but he would just have to wait and hope Sarenrae would send someone anyone to rescue him or at least get him out.
Goblin Squad Member
