Roy Greenhilt

Fromper's page

**** Pathfinder Society GM. 8,017 posts (9,672 including aliases). 4 reviews. No lists. No wishlists. 36 Organized Play characters. 5 aliases.


1 to 50 of 1,428 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | next > last >>
Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Fromper wrote:

Honestly, I'm kinda disappointed that the directors are so out of the loop, and their plan is so mundane. Sure, destroying the world sounds sinister, but we already have the gods ready to do that before the Snarl gets loose if the last Gate falls.

This adds another side to the conflict, by getting Nale back into it (however they manage to send him back to the land of the living), but the reason behind it is pretty weak.

Ok, I stand corrected. They're trying to outmaneuver the gods, after all.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Andostre wrote:
John Woodford wrote:
(Also, the Directors apparently didn't dig very far.)
Are you referring to the fact that they said the OotS planet is only the second planet the gods created? I wonder where they learned even that.

Ironically, they learned it from Sabine, who learned it from Nale, who learned it from Lord Shojo in Azure City while impersonating Elan.

Pages 378-380, if you want to look it up.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The oracle said LONG ago that Belkar would be dying permanently by the end of the year. That may have been 10+ years ago in real time, but in OOTS time, it's only been a few months, so they're still in the same year.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm trying to remember if Roy remembers the oracle's offhand remark about Belkar not surviving until the end of the year. That was when Roy was watching as a spirit, right? So he remembers all of that?

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I just love Elan being the only one smiling in the final panel. He's proud of Roy for getting this right.

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.

The GM describes gurgling sounds coming from an approaching steam elemental. Knowing that elementals are often neutral, we try to talk to it instead of just fighting.

"Is it gurgling menacingly?"

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Fromper wrote:

My group is REALLY slow. After taking 5 years to get through Rise of the Runelords, we're now only at level 11 in Kingmaker after almost 5 years. The odd part is that we meet 3-4 times per month, but we just play slowly, and spend a lot of time chatting outside of actual play. We rarely do 2 combats in the same session, just because some people are so slow while we're in combat.

But we're still having fun with it, which is what matters.

And a year later, we're now at level 13. We just took down the major "boss" enemies (as far as we know) of the current book. Given how much our GM tied one of them into the back story of a PC, I'm kind of curious as to how much he customized vs how much is in the original published adventure path, but it'll probably be another 2 years before we finish and I can ask.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

The real question: Will Serini be surprised by Bloodfeast, since she slept through that part of their planning meeting?

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I'm disappointed that the final joke wasn't a callback to Roy throwing small, harmless animals early in his career.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Time for Bloodfeast to wander into Sunny's line of sight to set up some lizard-on-lizard action?

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

My first thought was that this is a great call back to the prequel books, that people who have only read the comic online won't get.

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.
Quibblesmurf wrote:

*trying for a long time to explain caster level vs. spell level vs. character level to a Pathfinder new player*

"The problem is that Pathfinder uses 'level' the way Smurfs use 'Smurf'."

Insert obligatory Order of the Stick reference here:

Up a level, down a level

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

So this is going to sound ridiculous, but my nephew has got it in his head that he wants to make a character with a goose theme. His first thought was a druid who can wild shape into a goose, but it was unclear how to do that in the rules. A goose as an animal companion or familiar might work for him, though. I haven't looked at the summoner class in 2e - can an eidolon look like a goose?

Any recommendations for a geese themed PC? This is for PFS, so RAW only.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Bardrick wrote:

Question: Got the bundle & all the files have gone to my acct...except for the Foundry VTT/Abomination Vaults file it appears. Am I overlooking something or will this be a reach out to customer service moment?

You have to redeem that on Foundry's web site. IIRC, there should be a link with your redemption code.

Note that it's not usable unless you buy the Foundry software for $50 first. So you may want to hold off redeeming that if you don't plan on buying that right away. Maybe someone else you know will buy the Foundry software at some point, and you can pass the redemption code to them later.

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.

My group is REALLY slow. After taking 5 years to get through Rise of the Runelords, we're now only at level 11 in Kingmaker after almost 5 years. The odd part is that we meet 3-4 times per month, but we just play slowly, and spend a lot of time chatting outside of actual play. We rarely do 2 combats in the same session, just because some people are so slow while we're in combat.

But we're still having fun with it, which is what matters.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
The Raven Black wrote:
Phillip Gastone wrote:
The remark about dwarves having a civil war is so Eugene
Where is this ? I cannot find it.

Roy talks to him after the Godsmoot, and Eugene thinks it's fine if the gods destroy the world. Roy, among other things, expresses concern for the dwarves who will die dishonorably, and Eugene suggests a civil war as a way for them to all die in battle before the world ends.

Silver Crusade

3 people marked this as a favorite.

Been playing first edition Pathfinder for over a decade now. Still doing a home campaign with friends, but stopped playing PFS in public when the pandemic started. Before that, I bought the 2e Core Rulebook and played enough to get my first 2e PFS character up to level 4 or 5 (I forget now), but I was still doing 1e more than 2e, so never picked up any additional books or made a second PC.

I'm hoping to get back into PFS in the near future, especially since I just bought my first Gen Con badge since the pandemic started. I know most of the rules are on the Archives of Nethys home page. But in Society play, you have to own the books in order to use character options on your PC. So what would everyone consider the most important/best books to buy, given that most focus is on character building, not GMing?

And before you ask, no I don't know what type of character I want to make. I'm the type who looks through the rulebooks and finds options that make me want to create a character that uses that cool thing I just read about. But after decades of D&D/Pathfinder 1e, there was nothing that exciting and new in the 2e Core Rulebook, other than finally being able to make a goblin PC, which I think may be part of why I was slow to embrace the new version.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

After GM describes the forest we're searching as getting weirdly colorful, as we seem to be getting closer to a wild magic portal that we knew we were looking for.
Cleric player: Either we're getting close to the portal or Willy Wonka's factory.
Rogue player: Starts singing Oompa Loompa song
Me: Willy Wonka's big secret: Oompa Loompas are actually Pathfinder gnomes.

Rogue player: *singing* Do you see what I see?
Cleric player: *very matter of factly* No I don't. My perception is lower.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Chekhov's Gun has been loaded with 6 bullets. Time for some Russian Roulette.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Nobody on Team Evil has a Sense Motive to speak of. Except maybe Monster-San, who seems to finally be growing an int score.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

"Normally, yes, carelessness would be the most probable explanation for this. Or literally anything that happens to, near, or because of us."

LOL

Red Cloak proves beyond a shadow of a doubt that he has the highest wisdom on team evil.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Mental Block

That might just be the greatest "last panel" gag Rich has ever included.

Yet, oddly, the more I think about it, the more I think Roy is wrong to be upset.

Spoiler:
The bad guys just split the party, by letting Xykon out by himself. This is the perfect time for the ambush Roy was hoping to execute.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

We were talking about a minor detail in the campaign that two of us didn't remember from an earlier session.

Human player: "You must have been drunk at the time."

Me (elf player): "I guess us elves and half-elves just can't hold our liquor."

Half-elf player: "We were black out drunk, I guess. We woke up and lost a few hours."

Me: "It's that elven constitution penalty. But what's the use of being immune to sleep if we can still get drunk and black out?"

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Gritty Realism
Elan helped. :)

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

So Roy and Durkon realized that they've treated the goblins badly, and never really thought to question why Redcloak and the goblins were doing what they're doing. And this has brought me to a major realization, too.

Belkar was right.

I mean WAY back. At the first mention of a plot back in OOTS #13:
Plot, Ahoy!

"I just figured we'd wander around, kill some sentient beings because they have green skin and fangs and we don't, and then take their stuff."

Apparently, he was right.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Concerning Thoughts

So we already knew that Durkon was more lawful than Thor. Now it turns out, he might be more good, as well.

Silver Crusade

5 people marked this as a favorite.

Still, that was the most Durkon possible thing to say.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

"Words are just pretty hat we put on ugly truths."

Greyview is STILL the best character in the comic.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Andostre wrote:
The comic continues with predictable (but still fun) results.

That doesn't make a whole lot of sense, to be honest.

Spoiler:
Why does Minrah have good enough stealth to pull that off? Why is Implosion taking so long to kill him, when it should be instantaneous?

Maybe I'm over-analyzing, but this was kinda disappointing.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Thomas Seitz wrote:

All I know is Redcloak could have just cast Miracle and asked his god what he thought. :P

But that's just me.

If he has that spell prepared. Remember, he's adventuring every night behind those doors, so having a spell that can "save or die" up to 4 targets with a saving throw based on being a level 9 spell is a pretty good prepped spell for him.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Compromised

Spoiler:
I looked up the spell, since I wasn't familiar with it. It's a level 9 fort save or die.

I see two possibilities:

1. Durkon has to make the saving throw or die.
2. This is exactly what Thor wanted. Red Cloak just gave him the energy of a 9th level spell from the Dark One, just like Thor asked for. That might not be what Red Cloak intended, but if Thor can step in to save Durkon and take that energy, then it's a win.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Phillip Gastone wrote:
Durkon is no doubt ready for a sudden but inevitable betrayal.

I'm guessing that's where Minrah comes in.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Roy ordered him not to use Sending.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Thomas Seitz wrote:

Our favorite half orc ninja! :)

Also I thought what was on Third.

No, What's on second.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Helpful for counting, though
I love how the pets are full on members of the team. Even the cat. I'm convinced he's a full on animal companion these days, and he'll be truly useful in battle when the time comes.

And I'm still waiting for the day that V casts Dispel Magic on the lizard to turn it back into a t-rex.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Not Yet Seasoned
Once again, Belkar is trying something new.

Silver Crusade

4 people marked this as a favorite.

Another thing I'm realizing is that he's going more into the details of secondary team members than I would expect. It's almost as if he's setting up Minrah, Bandana, etc to be OOTS: The Next Generation when the current story ends.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Spiritual Counseling

Given the title, I was expecting it to focus on Julia (somewhat posing as a spirit) giving Roy advice. This was interesting in a completely different way.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Andostre wrote:
baron arem heshvaun wrote:
Thomas Seitz wrote:

Dragon,

I doubt it. Also while Julia is TN, I don't see her HELPING Team evil JUST yet.

Team Demon on the other hand...maybe.

-

I don’t think that other invisible party was helping Team Evil as well.

Agreed, I think they're new players, or characters we haven't seen in a really long time.

I still think one of them is the halfling from the original party that discovered the Snarl decades ago.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Did we ever determine whose eye this was? I've lost track. But my guess is that Serini is both the green eye scry and the green voice.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Belkar... caring about the plot. The end really is nigh.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

Expendable Resources

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Thomas Seitz wrote:
As for Durkon, I'm sure playing with his kid takes up some time too.

Yup. The entire point of this interlude is that the rest of the team are killing time while waiting for the team clerics (note the plural) to say their goodbyes and gather their stuff.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Durkon's busy elsewhere, and I can't imagine V getting drunk.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I haven't read all 500+ posts in this thread to see if this has been addressed yet, but I have to ask: Why are these books so expensive?

136 pages for $37 (or $35 in the case of the next one, Lost Omen Character Guide) is nearly twice the price per page of what Paizo used to charge for hardcovers in 1st edition. Compare to 256 page books like Ultimate Combat or Advanced Race Guide, which are only $45 hardcover today, and I swear I remember them being only $40 when they were new.

And adventure paths used to be 100 pages for $20. I can understand that they need to raise prices once in a while, thus the 2e AP is now $25 per book, but it's still almost as many pages as this thing that sells for $37.

Whatever happened to monthly softcovers that were only $13-20? I don't have unlimited money to spend, so I pick and choose which books to buy based on content. I'm still on the fence about 2e, having only bought the Core Rulebook so far. But if every monthly book is going to be this stupidly expensive for so little content, then the books I pick and choose to buy aren't going to be from Paizo ever again.

Silver Crusade

3 people marked this as a favorite.

No. The GM was a toydarian, so he was immune.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.

I didn't realize Minrah was a multi-class fighter. I thought she was just a low level cleric.

Silver Crusade

2 people marked this as a favorite.
Saros Palanthios wrote:
What part of "carry someone off the battlefield" is not clear? Who is naked on the battlefield...?

Here's the exact quote from the book:

Core Rulebook, page 272 wrote:
You might need to know the Bulk of a creature, especially if you need to carry someone off the battlefield. The table that follows lists the typical Bulk of a creature based on its size, but the GM might adjust this number.

It doesn't say that's the bulk of a creature and its gear. Just the bulk of the creature. The chart that follows has small creatures listed as 3 bulk. How can someone wearing 4 bulk full plate, a 1 bulk heavy shield, sheathed weapons that might add another 1 or 2 bulk, and a 2 bulk adventurer's kit in their backpack be only 3 bulk?

As for who's naked on the battlefield, how about an ogre in a loincloth (once it drops its club), or a dragon, or any wild animal, or any of various other monsters that don't typically wear armor or carry much gear?

Saros Palanthios wrote:
Ask yourself, what's more likely: that Paizo's whole team of professional designers, writers, and editors are a bunch of incompetent fools who created a system that makes no sense... or that you made a mistake in your reading?

You haven't been playing Pathfinder long, have you? I'm not saying that Paizo's staff are incompetent. But mistakes happen. Sometimes major ones. Nobody's perfect.

When Starfinder first came out, the entire spaceship combat system just plain didn't work at high levels, because they got the math wrong, so an errata was necessary. When coming out with a 640 page rulebook for a whole new version of Pathfinder, something like doing the math on a small creature riding a medium mount to make sure the encumbrance works is a relatively trivial detail that I could certainly see them overlooking.

Saros Palanthios wrote:

The table on pg 272 lists the "typical" bulk of a creature, then qualifies it with "but the GM might adjust this number". Both of your examples are obvious cases where the GM should apply an adjustment for atypical circumstances.

You're grasping for a hard-and-fast, one-size-fits-all rule, but that's not how this game works. The whole PF2 system is built around the twin ideas that
1)it's pointless to try to predict and make rules for every possible corner case or combination of circumstances, but
2)most GMs and players are reasonable and can be trusted to apply the rules in a way that makes sense in the context of their narrative.

Except that "GM discretion" has always been a code word in Pathfinder for "this doesn't apply to Pathfinder Society". In PFS, the table GM is just a judge for that particular session. Whenever a Pathfinder book says "Your GM might allow this", the GM for the entire campaign is the one who has to make those calls, and for PFS, that campaign GM is the Paizo employee who manages the entire organized play campaign.

Silver Crusade 4/5

2 people marked this as a favorite.

Just tossing in my 2 copper's worth to say that I agree with the last three posts.

Silver Crusade

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Saros Palanthios wrote:
Fromper wrote:
Exactly. Plus, some of us play PFS, which is RAW only. If the rules say something doesn't work, we can't just hand wave it away in PFS. And as far as I can tell, the rules say that small creatures riding medium mounts don't work in 2e.

The Gleeful Grognard already answered your original question about small creatures riding medium mounts-- as he said, the "Bulk of Creatures" table on pg 272 of the CRB gives the typical bulk for various size creatures, and the table is clearly referring to fully armed and armored creatures, since it's introduced with a line about being especially useful "if you need to carry someone off the battlefield".

Except it's not clear that it includes the bulk of their gear. That's just the bulk of their body. Maybe. That's the ruling we need from Paizo.

And until we get that ruling, anyone playing a small character on a medium mount in PFS is going to get screwed at some of their tables by GMs who don't agree with your interpretation of the rules. That's why I won't risk it. I'll save that build idea for when I'm 100% sure it'll work at every table.

1 to 50 of 160 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | next > last >>