Search Posts
Pathfinder Society FAQ; UPDATED How can clerics, druids and wizards learn spells from sources outside the Core Rulebook? wrote:
"Guide > Player Basics > Spells"; important section wrote: Spells from outside the Core Rulebook must be learned using the learn a spell activity before they can be used by prepared casters, even by clerics and druids. Currently, if we accept the FAQ entry as overriding the written rules, we still have the Witch and Magus being left with the guide restriction on prepared casters. Is the FAQ entry intended to lift the Guide restriction on prepared casters entirely?
I was looking at GM Reference section... Is the Treasure Table really supposed to be;
Or should it reflect the Guides list;
For levels: 3 | 4 | 5 | 6; respectfully... ~ The scenario list is off by;
At their respective levels, that is and extra 2.5 days of successful earn income for level 3, and a lose of 3.333 days of successful earn income for level 4.
Looking for an official answer to this question... ISM wrote: Winter witches must choose a familiar that is native to the frozen north, even when they themselves operate in other regions. Traditionally, this limits winter witch familiar choices to bat, cat, fox, hawk, owl, rat, raven, or weasel. A winter witch who gains the Improved Familiar feat can select any familiar she desires, save for familiars with the fire subtype This would seem to state that the allowable familiar options are limited to those that meet either of the following; 1.) Environment: Cold
Is this correct? ~ Before the inevitable call to just use the list... The rule is, if the option states 'at GM discretion'. This does not state a requirement of 'GM discretion' just states a requirement and a supplemental list. ~ The list is odd for the 'native of the frozen North' requirement... Bat - Temperate and hot forests and deserts
This is why I list it as a supplement, it violates that listed rule. For those who might need a real world example of the environments... Cold - Siberia/Alaskan bush/the Arctic
~ If we take the first sentence as the formation of the clause(/rule subject). Then the second sentence can only be an addendum(/addition) to the stated clause. The last sentence forms a method for exclusion from the clause. This is the reasoning I used to form my position as stated above. ~ If we take the first sentence a flavor and not a rule we are left with the list. The second sentence forms a list that is in opposition to the flavor of the first sentence. (If we ignore the first sentence there is no opposition.) The last sentence forms a method for exclusion from the list. This is unsound reasoning as it requires the removal of the first sentence to make sense. ~ Hopefully we get an official answer soon. Please hit the FAQ request button, thanks.
Since we have had almost 2 years since I brought this up last... and a recent thread asking the question got 'deleted'... I bring it back Quote: At 1st level, 2nd level, and every four levels thereafter, a master of many styles may select a bonus style feat or the Elemental Fist feat. He does not have to meet the prerequisites of that feat, except the Elemental Fist feat. Alternatively, a master of many styles may choose a feat in that style’s feat path (such as Earth Child Topple) as one of these bonus feats if he already has the appropriate style feat (such as Earth Child Style). The master of many styles does not need to meet any other prerequisite of the feat in the style’s feat path. The wording allows for two possible interpretations; 1). You ignore the prerequisites of style feats. But must meet the requirements for Elemental Fist. 2). You ignore the prerequisites of style feats and Elemental Fist, except that you must meet the prerequisite of having Elemental Fist for those feats that require it. - Please hit the FAQ button on this post. - This issue has been argued to death but to no outcome. It is ambiguous, both readings of the class feature could have been written clearer. So there is no way to determine intent. It requires one to make an assumption to allow Early Access to Elemental Fist or allow Early Access to feats that modify Elemental Fist.
Given the fairly recent legalizing of Harrow options... I have two real questions... Ultimate Equipment lists "Cards" at 1sp - 100gp... I assume that it is a 54 card deck. For PFS do we have a standardized cost for decks, or is the full cost range usable? The Harrow Handbook makes a comment about a minimum cost of 100gp for a Harrow deck, do we have a firm cost in any other book?
I have looked through various threads when I searched for it, but just like the wording, it was vague... What is the official answer to the wording...
Spoiler:
At 1st level, 2nd level, and every four levels thereafter, a master of many styles may select a bonus style feat or the Elemental Fist feat. He does not have to meet the prerequisites of that feat, except the Elemental Fist feat. Alternatively, a master of many styles may choose a feat in that style’s feat path (such as Earth Child Topple) as one of these bonus feats if he already has the appropriate style feat (such as Earth Child Style). The master of many styles does not need to meet any other prerequisite of the feat in the style’s feat path. The main problem I see is that either side requires a change in the wording... To limit access to Elemental Fist the wording should be...
Spoiler:
He does not have to meet the prerequisites of that feat, except for the Elemental Fist feat. To grant access to Elemental Fist the wording should be...
Spoiler:
He does not have to meet the prerequisites of that feat, except for having the Elemental Fist feat. Both are reasonable, but both modifiy the RAW. |