
Alexander Augunas Contributor |

Got myself a PDF copy of it and am finding it very interesting. A nice upgrade on the mechanics from the old 3.5 Binder.
so in all selfishness I must ask
How long till Volume 2
and 3
I finished writing the bare-bones draft of Volume 2 last Thursday. I'm hoping we'll see it ready to go for Christmas at the absolute latest.
Dario and I haven't talked much about Volume 3, though I have no shortage of ideas for a third book! (or fourth, or fifth ...)

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

Unboxing and overview of contents on YouTube!
Hey! You said my last name right! *high fives*
If you're still on the fence about whether or not you want this, definitely check out Twin Dragon's review. I'm looking forward to his in-depth review in two weeks as well!

giltharian |

I've had the book for a bit now and I can say my love of binding is in-tact. I miss some of the old spirits (the Crow, *sigh*) and those that made the cut aren't quite as powerful as I remember, but since the spirits are adding to the power of existing classes the balance is there...if that sort of thing is important to you... :)
I'm definitely looking forward to the next volume with archetypes for the other classes, spirits to balance out the constellation choices and more feats (hopefully one that encourages multi-classing like Practiced Binder or something).

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

I've had the book for a bit now and I can say my love of binding is in-tact. I miss some of the old spirits (the Crow, *sigh*) and those that made the cut aren't quite as powerful as I remember, but since the spirits are adding to the power of existing classes the balance is there...if that sort of thing is important to you... :)
I'm definitely looking forward to the next volume with archetypes for the other classes, spirits to balance out the constellation choices and more feats (hopefully one that encourages multi-classing like Practiced Binder or something).
Dario and I hear you on the subject of favorite spirits that didn't make it into Volume One; we're working on it! Volume 2 is set to double the number of spirits you have access to; Volume 2 brings the total to 63. (Which is actually 1 spirit off of being perfectly double. Drats!)
This is certainly true about class balance. The spirits are designed to allow the Core Classes to be more versatile and to allow the Occultist to specialize in specific aspects of the game by combining the powers of multiple spirits together. And anyone who was with us in the Playtest Month will assure you that class balance is incredibly important to me; when you're a 3PP, you strive for balance because there are people who won't bother with your product if you eschew balance. Its better to create a product that is flavorful and well-balanced. Fortunately that was VERY easy to do with Pact Magic!
Volume Two doesn't have a whole lot of multiclassing options because Pact Magic as a whole is very supportive of Multiclassing (see the multiclassing section of Chapter Three). Future pact magic prestige classes will either A) involve new organizations to help GMs place pact magic in their world or B) help to define a binder's role in the game. So you'll see Prestige Classes that make the binder better at surviving blows and compelling hostility towards themselves or making a binder a better healer, but you're not going to see "mystic theurge" type classes.
Glad you're enjoying the product so far! I'm hoping to get some reviews in the (near) future.

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

I'm definitely looking forward to the next volume with archetypes for the other classes, spirits to balance out the constellation choices and more feats (hopefully one that encourages multi-classing like Practiced Binder or something).
Just went through my notes of what I'm sending to Dario today to function as the manuscript for Pact Magic Unbound, Vol. 2. I did update the Practiced Binder feat, so looks like I was wrong earlier! Sometimes its hard to keep track of all the stuff you've written. :-P

Yasha |

Here is a question, any suggestions (save the obvious, like vestigal companion and such) on converting the ToM vestiges to the scaling used for the vestiges in this book? I could just fly by night, but I'm curious if anyone has already done conversions, aside from one or two by Master Arminas?
More vestiges just expands options, IMO.

Grollub |

Here is a question, any suggestions (save the obvious, like vestigal companion and such) on converting the ToM vestiges to the scaling used for the vestiges in this book? I could just fly by night, but I'm curious if anyone has already done conversions, aside from one or two by Master Arminas?
More vestiges just expands options, IMO.
Couldn't you just use the Vestiges as written from ToM?? or do you think they are too powerful compared to the ones in this book??
On a side note, has anyone come up with any good builds for an Occulist ( from this book )??

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

Here is a question, any suggestions (save the obvious, like vestigal companion and such) on converting the ToM vestiges to the scaling used for the vestiges in this book? I could just fly by night, but I'm curious if anyone has already done conversions, aside from one or two by Master Arminas?
More vestiges just expands options, IMO.
Its not too bad to convert ToM vestiges into spirits; here are some pointers:
1) We (PMU,v1) use a 9-level progression for our spirits. ToM uses an 8-level. You need to go through the spirits and re-allocate them to their appropriate levels. The reason we went with a 9-level system was so that we could line up spirits next to Clerics, Wizards, and the other full casters. As a general rule of thumb:
- If the spirit mimics a scaling class feature (i.e. Sneak Attack), it progresses as a character of 1/2 that class's level. See Vandrae and Gulguthriana for examples.
- Spirits NEVER get access to a spell before a wizard or cleric does; this is an excellent way to judge a spirit's power. As an exception to the rule, a spirit CAN gain early access to such an ability if the ability has contingencies built into it. (For example, I just recently wrote a 1st spirit that forces you to reincarnate when you die, but you have to come back as a Child gillman and you become permanently addicted to that spirit.)
- Typically speaking, a spirit's abilities uses [TIME UNITE] per day, where the unit can be rounds, minutes, or hours; based on the ability. Typically we use the same unit that the spell uses; for example haste lasts for rounds/day so a haste ability on a 3rd level spirit would be usable for rounds/day. These units typically have to be spent in a full-unit (for example, if you can use an ability for minutes per day, you must spent uses of the ability in 1 minute increments) but you do not need to spend the units consecutively. There are a LOT of spirits I could point to for this.
- Abilities that are personal can typically last for 24 hours.
- With one exception, polymorph effects have very specific bonuses they provide. See Dagon as an example; Fey Barradu is the exception.
2) We can (and often do) power up some spells and abilities. For example, bumping up the time unit (rounds to minutes or minutes to hours) is the most common. You can typically get away by bumping up the spirit level to equal the spell's level +1.
3) When making new abilities, we tend to heavily follow the guidelines for creating new spells that you see in Ultimate Magic. Why? Because most of our granted abilities are balanced around the power of a spell.
4) We give all spirits one major granted ability and four minor granted abilities to balance them out. Unless the spirit itself is skill-focused, we typically make sure to have at least one Minor Granted ability to have a skill-bonus or similar small-time effect. For example, a constant Endure Elements effect granted by a 2nd-level spirit is not game-ending.
5) Sometimes we will take away from the utility of a spell in order to lower the level of a spirit. For example, Water Breating is a 3rd level spell, but it becomes noticeably less useful if your spirit only provides water breathing for yourself (even if its constant).
I'll be more than happy to comment on specific abilities if you have questions, but those are some things I'd keep in mind when converting the Tome of Magic spirits.

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

Yasha wrote:Here is a question, any suggestions (save the obvious, like vestigal companion and such) on converting the ToM vestiges to the scaling used for the vestiges in this book? I could just fly by night, but I'm curious if anyone has already done conversions, aside from one or two by Master Arminas?
More vestiges just expands options, IMO.
Couldn't you just use the Vestiges as written from ToM?? or do you think they are too powerful compared to the ones in this book??
On a side note, has anyone come up with any good builds for an Occulist ( from this book )??
It gets kinda tricky the higher-leveled you go since our system caps out one level higher than ToM's binder class. It means that some spirits are going to be skewed all over the place; too strong at some levels and definitely too weak at others since all of our our spirits scale with your binder level.
We had a couple players who had a few good builds for an occultist in our Playtest Thread in the 3PP Threads on this site, but as far as I've seen there hasn't been a whole lot of occultist theorycraft. Don't know if it'll need some time or just some more buzz to get to that point. Might want to try opening your own thread somewhere on the forums and see what happens!

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

Thanks for the response. There are a few ToM vestiges and such that I really like, so was hoping they could be ported forward. Most notably: Zceryll, "The Star Spawn" , and Naberius ( my two favs )
From a mechanical standpoint, Naberius is very similar to Lady Jarah. If you were willing to change the fluff in your game, its not a very hard sell at all.
I don't know where Zceryll is; I don't see him in my ToM book. Is he from another source?

Yasha |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

That is entirely my intent Ericthecleric.
Here is the thread I just started today.
Tome of Magic Vestige Conversions
If I recall correctly, Alexander, Zceryll was from a web article on Vestiges in the Forgotten Realms or something of the sort.
Overall, I'm not sure which Vestiges I'll be starting with, but I think I might be starting with some of the more esoteric ones from the various Dragon magazine and Dungeon articles. I don't think a lot of folks who never subscribes to the magazines ever saw or even heard of them, so I'll be trying some of those first to give folks those options as well.
And anyone who wants to jump on the thread and convert a vestige or two, go right ahead.
Master Arminas already did a few rewrites (though only updates to PFRPG not necessarily to PMUv1 rules) on the Binder thread I linked in my new thread. I'll ask to port those over as well.

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

I think it's very doubtful that Radiance House could use TOM vestiges, as that is all WotC's IP. However, someone could probably post their own conversions elsewhere.
100% correct. We could never publish something like that, though there are several spirits that are something like "spiritual successors" to several of my favorite ToM spirits. Marat, from Volume 2, is one such spirit.
I'll pop into your thread from time to time and help out as I am able, Yasha. Give some advice and my opinions and whatnot. I probably won't build too many spirits myself, though; I have about 40 more to finish for Volume 3 still ....

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

Special thanks to Caedwyr and Yasha for reviewing Pact Magic Unbound, Volume 1! Hooray!
Now, to answer some of your concerns, Yasha: (By the way, don't edit your review because of my responses.)
- I *think* I decided on making Soul Guardian a Binder Secret in Volume 2. I'll double check to make sure. If I didn't Dario tells me that we have some extra space I need to fill; if there's room, I'll get it in.
- Honestly, I'm not super experienced with the 3rd Edition epic rules. I'm okay with letting more savvy players update the Occultist to epic as they see fit. I'm waiting for Mythic Rules and I'll definitely make some Occult stuff to match it.
- You're 100% correct. The ability to bind more than one Spirit at a time is completely unique to the Occultist and requires Occultist levels. As you point out, its a separate class feature and not part of the bind spirits ability. Check under the Multiclass Binders section of Page 40; "Binder levels from multiple class levels stack; however, a character's binder level does not grant him or her benefits such as new class abilities (such as the occultist's additional spirits ability or the wizard's reweave granted ability), bonuses to base attack bonuses or saving throws, or an increase to spells per day and spells known."
- One of the downsides of having to split up the conversion of two massive books into several smaller ones is that sometimes the stories don't all line up. Think of those references as teasers for Volume 2 and 3 at worse and promises that there will be more books at beast! Now, looking at the section, Ethaniel is in Volume 2, Pavatu and Kaiya will be in Volume 3. Dario will be thrilled that people are enjoying his fiction, however! I'm also going to see if I can write some legends for the newer spirits in Volume 3 (maybe 2, maybe. I REALLY want to write a legend for Al'kra, the Operated ....)
- Its funny, because everyone thinks there aren't enough spirits that do what they love best! For example, one of the big comments in the Playtest was that there aren't enough "magical" spirits, as in spirits that let you pretend you're a sorcerer a bit better. We hit many more spots and roles with the spirits in Volume 2 and I'm trying to make sure we do the same in Volume 3. Attacks are much easier to make interesting than defenses, sad to say, but you will see some very good defensive spirits in Volume 2. Marat, Guardian of Shields and Humble Ohbai, Servant of the Elements come directly to my mind when I think about defense.
Thanks so much to both of you for your kind words and Dario and I both hope that everyone is enjoying Pact Magic just as much as we both do! We're both working hard to make sure that you guys get Pact Magic Unbound, Volume 2 before the holidays! As I have more information, I'll bring it to Paizo.

Yasha |

The fact you already addressed my issues in a post only a short while later is awesome. Just being able to talk to the developer of this kind of product is one of things I've always loved about Paizo and I am glad that Radiance House is taking some cues in that fashion.
Besides, I think everyone knows that writing is one heck of a process. Overall you guys did an amazing job (are there just the two of you?). Considering I don't typically buy much in the way of 3PP products, but I bought yours without much real agonizing should say something.

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

The fact you already addressed my issues in a post only a short while later is awesome. Just being able to talk to the developer of this kind of product is one of things I've always loved about Paizo and I am glad that Radiance House is taking some cues in that fashion.
Well shucks, that's what I'm here for! Its something that I've valued too from game developers that I've played; Paizo and Blizzard are the big two from whom I get you work ethic, I suppose you could say.
Besides, I think everyone knows that writing is one heck of a process. Overall you guys did an amazing job (are there just the two of you?). Considering I don't typically buy much in the way of 3PP products, but I bought yours without much real agonizing should say something.
In the Pact Magic line, its just Dario and me. As I mentioned earlier, he writes and formats the Radiance RPG line basically by himself, and he's just brought on a third fellow that we're trying out for a new project we're starting for the future. That project's not related to me, but it is loosely related to the Pact Magic line, so stay tuned.
We also commission artists and editors and the like as we need them, but they're not really affiliated with Radiance House. When it comes to the Pact Magic line, being the face is the least I can do since Dario does so much already for both this line and for his own game, Radiance RPG.
Observing with curiosity. Might go for buying this, I loved the Binder back in 3.5e
Welcome aboard! We've got a couple reviews now, so hopefully they'll sway you into diving into the Pact Magic madness with us!

Grollub |

Grollub wrote:Thanks for the response. There are a few ToM vestiges and such that I really like, so was hoping they could be ported forward. Most notably: Zceryll, "The Star Spawn" , and Naberius ( my two favs )From a mechanical standpoint, Naberius is very similar to Lady Jarah. If you were willing to change the fluff in your game, its not a very hard sell at all.
I don't know where Zceryll is; I don't see him in my ToM book. Is he from another source?
Thanks for the Lady Jorah suggestion she seems to do alot that Naberius could do..
As for Zceryll..

Yasha |

I should probably do this!
Tome of Magic Vestige conversion thread
Wow, I linkified that on my kindle!
One difficulty of doing Zceryll will be the lack of an OGL template similar to the Pseudonatural.

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

Ericthecleric originally sent me his impressions of Pact Magic Unbound, Volume 1 as a PM. I asked him to post it as a review because I feel that critical reviews are just as important as glowing ones because it helps curious customers make up their mind to see both positive and negative feedback. So far all three of our reviewers have done a great job with that and I deeply thank each of you!
I had originally commented on a bunch of Eric's points because playing the Face is half my job when it comes to the Pact Magic line. He asked if I would post those comments here too, so here you go!
1) I agree on the Feat Table and the Index. I don't think we'll be able to add an Index to Volume 1 now that its already out, but I'll see if I can't get it in there for Volume 2. It was kind of an oversight on our part that we didn't have one; indexes are fun and useful!
Maybe I'll see if I can get a quickie one made up as a downloadable PDF that you can print. I'll talk to Dario about it.
2) In regards to the Spirit Table, I'm not quite sure why I decided to not put a summary of the spirits' powers in Book One. I don't know if I am going to have room to make something like this happen for Volume Two. (Believe me when I say that Volume Two is HUGE; I think its 40 pages larger than Volume One!) Volume Three is going to be our last installment in the Occult Spirits line, and one of things I wanted to have was a massive Appendix in the back telling you where you could find all the spirits, their powers, etc. So I feel you on that one, but the table would have been unwieldy and we had to be a little conservative for our first Pathfinder book.
3) Not that this is a particularly good excuse, but this is both Dario and my first time working with the publisher that we got for PMU,v1. Neither of us knew that there would be four blank pages in the back! I don't really like it either and hopefully we'll be a little bit closer to our mark next time! (Though admittedly it made a REALLY good place for me to write a letter to my grandmother when I gave her a copy, hahaha!)
4) I can't speak for Dario, but to me, the idea that "Normal people hate and fear you" is a staple for the direction that we chose to go with Pact Magic. Admittedly, its an extremely safe theme, and we hint a LOT in the book that the gods don't really have much control over the Occult, which is why they don't particularly like it. As such their servants don't like it in the future.
I will say that I've learned my lesson from the paladin; people want options for everything. Admitted, if I had known this I still would have made the choice to make Paladins completely anti-pact magic; it fits better with how we're presenting occult spirits. I will say that in Volume 2, both archetypes that have a "We hate Pact Magic!" option also have a "We love Pact Magic!" option. Furthermore, I'm planing some Paladin love Prestige Class wise in Volume 3 and a book after Volume 3 will introduce Pact Magic that isn't occult in nature, which is where the Paladin will get some more much-needed love.
5) That's a good list of favorites! As of this writing, mine are Al'kra, the Operated; Vishgurv, Aberrant of Time Eternal, and Marat, Guardian of Shields. And yes, its completely not-fair that NONE of these spirits are in Volume One! I'm glad you like Serapith; that's one of the three all-new spirits that I designed specifically for this book. Most of the spirits come from Dario's work and while he lets me be as liberal as I choose, I try to stay fairly close to his original designs when I can.
Maybe someday we'll do something like a "Pact Magic in the World" bit with some suggestions on how we can alter things for your own games. I would certainly like to do something like that, but I wouldn't expect it before Volume 3. I also plan to have all 117 Occult spirits published by Volume 3; I want to move onto topics like Bestiaries, Living Spirits, and Nature Spirits after that.

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

If you are a Facebook user, Dario and I have a Pact Magic group page that you might be interested in joining. I've been doing previews of the new book, Pact Magic Unbound, Volume 2 every day for about a month or so and today I just posted a big document about where I envision the Pact Magic Unbound series going over the next year or so. Anyone can view it, but I recommend requesting permission to join the group if only because I take the feedback gathered from Facebook very seriously!

TheDisgaean |
This is good stuff. The spirits are unique and I like how they have their own story to tell (I especially enjoyed Istago's.).
There are somethings I don't quite get though. Other than aspect options and the occasional feat, does a spirit's constellation have any influence on binding? Let's say you can bind three spirits at once, each with a different constellation. Spirit A has a constellation that is opposed to spirit B's, but spirit C's is an ally to A's. Would that affect the DC of the binding check if you tried to bind all those spirits? I'm guessing not, since I've yet to find anything that says otherwise, but didn't want to assume.

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

This is good stuff. The spirits are unique and I like how they have their own story to tell (I especially enjoyed Istago's.).
There are somethings I don't quite get though. Other than aspect options and the occasional feat, does a spirit's constellation have any influence on binding? Let's say you can bind three spirits at once, each with a different constellation. Spirit A has a constellation that is opposed to spirit B's, but spirit C's is an ally to A's. Would that affect the DC of the binding check if you tried to bind all those spirits? I'm guessing not, since I've yet to find anything that says otherwise, but didn't want to assume.
Wow! I totally missed this comment. Sorry for being, like, two months late to responding to you. 0_0
Regardless, the answer is no. A spirit's constellation has absolutely no impact on binding spirits in the core rules. It does, however, impact many class features and feats, which in turn go on to influence binding. The main reason for this is twofold; A) it allowed us to restrict or benefit individual classes on a base-by-base level; it was another knob to turn when balancing archetypes against their core classes. B) it allowed us to keep rules relevant to specific classes in those classes' entries instead of hiding everything within a giant seal of text at the start of Chapter 3.
Your question about multiple spirits will be more prudent in Volume 2, however, when we start getting occultist archetypes who align with constellations and bar others.

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

Since I'm already necro-ing this thread to answer questions, apparently, this seems like a good opportunity to mention that we're now on the d20 Pathfinder System Reference Document!
In addition to what I've linked here, you can find basically all of our rules information through this web resource; look under Barbarian stuff for the Totemic Sage archetype, Fighter stuff for the Warshade archetype, and so forth.
Thanks for being awesome fans, and we hope to have some new stuff for you soon. :)

![]() |

@Alexander: When directing normal users to the site can you be sure to use the d20pfsrd.com url? So that link above would instead be:
http://www.d20pfsrd.com/classes/3rd-party-classes/radiance-house
The sites.google.com url should only (generally) be used by site editors or for people who can't access the d20pfsrd.com url for some reason. When accessing the site via the sites.google.com path the user experience might not always be as nice as when using the d20pfsrd.com url.
No biggie either way though.
Edit Corrected Alecander --> Alexander :D

Kcinlive |

Dario and I are sending it to the editor before the end of the week. Beyond that, who can say? A lot can go wrong when it comes to getting stuff printed. But I'm trying to stay optimistic, and it would please me to no end if we could get it out by PaizoCon.
Great! I look forward to it.

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

Reviewed first and fully linkified on Endzeitgeist.com (if you want the old books as well), then submitted to NErdtrek and GMS magazine and posted here and on d20pfsrd.com. Couldn't post it on OBS, since I bought it here.
Oh man, I got a kick out of this review! I really wish we had made Mare Loviatha's title, "Psychotic Elven Princess" now!
Thanks for the excellent review, Endzeitgeist!
To give some insight on the lack of expanded legends in Pact Magic Unbound, Vol. 1 (and probably subsequent volumes), when we planned out the book we originally wanted to have all of Dario's fiction in the book. The problem was that doing so was threatening to drastically increase the cost of the book for the consumer, and while we were confident that Pact Magic Unbound was going to do relatively well, we were afraid that an even higher price from a 3PP that most people had never heard of or had forgotten about would dissuade people from taking a risk on us. Pathfinder was (and still is) new waters for us. At the end of production, it came down to cutting a spirit per level or adding more legends, and we ultimately went with more crunch over more flavor. Was it the right choice? That's up to the consumer.
Coincidentally, one of the ideas Dario and I threw around at the start was a spirit anthology that had the fiction from all of his spirits, plus some of the newer ones written by yours truly, but that was another case of, "Would anyone actually be interested in this?"

Endzeitgeist |

You're welcome! took me long enough! Btw.: LOVE that you got rid of the alignment-changes and how many of the abilities have been streamlined when compared to 3.X!
Well...not sure if that's feasible on a monetary side, but you know what would make me bump this immediately up to 5 + seal? A web-enhancement with the missing pieces of fiction for the other spirits. Just a thought - I know that my players absolutely LOVE discovering these background stories!

Alexander Augunas Contributor |

You're welcome! took me long enough! Btw.: LOVE that you got rid of the alignment-changes and how many of the abilities have been streamlined when compared to 3.X!
Well...not sure if that's feasible on a monetary side, but you know what would make me bump this immediately up to 5 + seal? A web-enhancement with the missing pieces of fiction for the other spirits. Just a thought - I know that my players absolutely LOVE discovering these background stories!
Yeah, the removal of a lot of the restrictions was mostly my doing; totems were created in order to keep that feeling that the spirits noticed you and things as simple as your race, your gender, what kind of family you were born into, and so on were all things that the spirits noticed and may take into account when deciding your fate. However, we knew Volume 1 wasn't going to have room for all of Dario's spirits in a single volume, let alone any new spirits I wanted to write myself. So the readjustment of "requirements" into "totems" happened largely in part of that limitation in our product line.
As a secondary reason, I hadn't forgotten how overjoyed I was when Paizo removed the race restrictions from the Arcane Archer and the Stalwart Defender, which was a big clue-in to me personally that players don't really care for racially-restricted options unless it really makes sense; the option I always point to when I mention this is the Drow Sniper fighter archetype from the Advanced Race Guide. A racial archetype that builds on the race's innate powers? I can get behind that. But an option that you could easily see a member of any race discovering? That's a little frustrating to me, personally.
Anyway, ranting aside I'll pass along your note to Dario. Its honestly something we want to do anyway, but the big question is "When can we make it happen?" because the work would have to be 99% on Dario's end. There's only so much I could do when working with his babies, after all!