|Paizo Pathfinder® Paizo Games|
|About Paizo Messageboards News Paizo Blog Help/FAQ|
Updates and reports of any errors with the Additional Resources will go here.
What can I report here?
What shouldn't I report here?
Any comments posted that don't adhere to the above will be removed.
Louis IX wrote:
To shed some light on this: when we see threads that are older that have recent posts and immediately those posts begin a back and forth debate (including personal insults), it's a red flag to us that the discussion is likely not best served by staying open. I did notice going back to the thread that there were posts that were missed, and those have been removed as well.
When anyone posts to our forums, we expect some adherence to the Community Guidelines we have in place. In those guidelines we've indicated that posts may be removed if they don't follow them. Moderation is also situational and largely a judgement call.
If you think any moderator has acted in a way that seems amiss, you can contact us via the Website Feedback forum (as I've moved this thread to) or our email@example.com address.
Mine all mine...don't touch wrote:
If you I'll up the other RPG /pathfinder computable half the items say unavailable and the ones that are are not half off. So I'm a bit confused. Was looking at tome of horrors four which comes up under the sale but says none available?
Matthew Morris wrote:
Thank you Chris, likewiwse I was confused on the ToH non mint being only about 25% less and some Freeport products listed on sale but not available. did they sell out that quickly?
It looks like there was some miscommunication over the verbiage in our blog. This sale covers all Paizo product, not the compatible section originally indicated in that section of our store. I sincerely apologize for the mixup and all of our links to the sale have been corrected to point at the correct batch of products. I'm currently triple-checking those sections for accuracy and if you have any further questions/notice issues, let us know!
captain yesterday wrote:
Here you go, under non-mint it has 19.99 crossed out and 9.99 instead, no big deal just something i noticed.
$19.99 is the MSRP we have stored for the product, so that's is the price that this promotion goes off of (this is why we indicate "the retail price" above). I totally understand the mixup, since it could totally be read as "we marked these products to 50% off of their previously discounted price." I'll work out how we can clarify that better in the blog above now.
captain yesterday wrote:
Not to pick nits, its a lovely sale, the prices for Adventure Paths like Serpent's Skull before the sale for non-mint now says 19.99 where before it was 14.99
I'm not able to locate where this is displaying. Can you point me at what product is showing this? Is this happening when it's added to your cart? I'm thinking it might have been some sort of caching problem on our end maybe?
How can I tell what edition I will get for a non-mint copy of the core rules or ACG?
I've gone down to our warehouse to confirm, and our non-mint copies are comprised of a combination of different printings. Unfortunately, we don't have a way of ensuring which edition will be placed into a specific non-mint order.
Please refer to: http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/advancedPlayersGuide/baseClasses/witch.h tml. As indicated above, we've shifted some directories around, and are working to get the older pages moved out/set up with redirects as we are able.
The assumption that "cis" (shortened for "cisgender") is a derogatory term is an issue here—we do not consider it to be an insult on our forums. However, the term "cis scum" is absolutely not appropriate for use on our site in reference to another individual/community member. The premise of this thread has flaws because of the suggestion that both of these terms have the same connotation. Additionally, tacking on "but not *all* of these people" doesn't absolve an argument that is inherently defaming of multiple groups. A more fruitful discussion (and one in the spirit of learning more about other groups), may be narrowing down specific instances you can think of to discuss, or discussing specific terms and their connotations (framed in a way like "what does this mean to you?" or "how do you feel about this?" or "hey, does anyone know the history behind this?"). After reviewing this thread, we've made the decision to lock it for now.
IIRC the spell index also improved considerably. That said, the filter by school lacks universal. Is there a projection for the next update?
I'd love to see us finish the update before Halloween. *knocks on wood*
That said, we've made a decent amount of progress internally to see the PRD updates churn out more regularly, but you never know what might come up.
Removed some posts and locking. It's absolutely fine to start a discussion about how you feel a group is being discriminated against and start a dialog about what that group faces. However, the premise here is very broad, pits different kinds of groups against each other to determine who's got it "worse," and doesn't have a clear direction. It may be more appropriate to hone in on specific aspects of the original topic if you're after a more productive discussion.
I've put through another update to correct some directory renaming issues.
Garrett Guillotte wrote:
It looks like the unclosed strong tag on the fortification Universal Monster Rule that Peet reported is still an issue. Persists when clearing my browser cache and still appears when pulling the raw HTML outside of a browser.
Reference: http://paizo.com/pathfinderRPG/prd/bestiary/universalMonsterRules.html. We renamed this directory and I'll see what we can do to set up some rewrite rules to correct this. Our search engine/links within the PRD should be updating/have been updated.
At least since the new Bestiary Index (since I don't look at this spell very often), the links from the Summon Monster spell description get a golem screen saying "The requested URL was not found on this server, or you do not have permission to access this area." This happened with dire rat, viper, etc.
This has been fixed :)
I've just pushed through fixes for the issues above, except for:
Garrett Guillotte wrote:
In the new Bestiary index, if I filter by size and uncheck all sizes, the clockwork mage (Medium), tojanida (Medium), xanthos (Huge), and human zombie and fast human zombie (all sizes) still show up. If I filter by creature type and uncheck all types, the tojanida (outsider) still shows up, and the vegepygmy's russet mold (a hazard) shows up.
September 30, 2015 Update
This update included the latest content from the second printing of the Advanced Class Guide. We've also corrected all bugs indicated up to this post. You'll also find that our Bestiary Index has gotten much more robust (thanks, Liz!), and we'll have more details on that soon. Our next update should include both Unchained and Occult Adventures.
Sarcasm Dragon wrote:
No, no, no! You can't admit you were wrong on Paizo.com, it's against the forum rules. You must continue to post about how anyone who disagreed with your opening post is a crybaby out to undermine you and destroy the hobby.
Woah there, sarcasm slinger. We know that sort of stuff happens (unfortunately), but this rhetoric isn't particularly funny or helpful.
On topic: We recently had a question come through our Tumblr box about a similar situation a player had that I'm reminded of. Trying to balance play styles within a group of people will inevitably, at some point in time, result in some form of interpersonal conflict. Rather than utilizing your character to "get back at" or "stick it to" someone you disagree with, it's always going to be a better option to handle to issue out of game. While it might feel good to gain some sort of "revenge", deception is only going to result in further table conflict. Best of luck with your group :)