Magic Missile and Mirror Image


Rules Questions

1 to 50 of 99 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.

Hey all. I have been reading the description of Mirror Image. It seems to be saying that magic missile with multiple missiles at different figments won't work like in the old days. (1st, 2nd, and all the 3rd editions)of D&D. Since magic missile is not a roll-to-hit spell... Can someone please clarify whether magic missile can still be used to get rid of multiple figments? Thanx


...I guess, the question is is Each of these figments considered a "Creature", or if targeting the Creature will automatically hit the original... correct?

Edit: Sorry... Amateur response, but it seems like Magic Missile will strike them no matter what, as long as the original does not have total concealment/cover. And Mirror Image doesn't grant that. And I don't know if the images can Fool the Spell itself into thinking there are multiple creatures.

In other words, if the caster tried... They'd all hit the original.

Confirmations, anyone?


That's correct. Spells that don't require an attack roll are resolved the same way they'd be if mirror image wasn't up.

RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8

Lord Orion wrote:
Hey all. I have been reading the description of Mirror Image. It seems to be saying that magic missile with multiple missiles at different figments won't work like in the old days. (1st, 2nd, and all the 3rd editions)of D&D. Since magic missile is not a roll-to-hit spell... Can someone please clarify whether magic missile can still be used to get rid of multiple figments? Thanx

In Pathfinder, magic missiles automatically hit the real wizard, and do not have a chance of hitting the images.

Here is the relevant section from the description of the mirror image spell:

"Spells and effects that do not require an attack roll affect you normally and do not destroy any of your figments."


Bane Wraith wrote:

...I guess, the question is is Each of these figments considered a "Creature", or if targeting the Creature will automatically hit the original... correct?

Edit: Sorry... Amateur response, but it seems like Magic Missile will strike them no matter what, as long as the original does not have total concealment/cover. And Mirror Image doesn't grant that. And I don't know if the images can Fool the Spell itself into thinking there are multiple creatures.

In other words, if the caster tried... They'd all hit the original.

Confirmations, anyone?

Reading the text of both spell descriptions, what they both seem to say is, you can hit the "real" creature with as many missiles as you like, but you can't affect any of the figments. Or...a hit on a figment won't make it disappear, and will be wasted...that is likely how my current gm will play it. I wish the rules would have given a specific reference to these 2 spells effects on each other...


Lord Orion wrote:
Bane Wraith wrote:

...I guess, the question is is Each of these figments considered a "Creature", or if targeting the Creature will automatically hit the original... correct?

Edit: Sorry... Amateur response, but it seems like Magic Missile will strike them no matter what, as long as the original does not have total concealment/cover. And Mirror Image doesn't grant that. And I don't know if the images can Fool the Spell itself into thinking there are multiple creatures.

In other words, if the caster tried... They'd all hit the original.

Confirmations, anyone?

Reading the text of both spell descriptions, what they both seem to say is, you can hit the "real" creature with as many missiles as you like, but you can't affect any of the figments. Or...a hit on a figment won't make it disappear, and will be wasted...that is likely how my current gm will play it. I wish the rules would have given a specific reference to these 2 spells effects on each other...

Heh...U and I came to the same conclusion about 38 seconds apart. :-p Thanks to all who responded.


I think it's a bit of a gray area, in the description of magic missle it states that the caster must designate a target but if there are say 5 indentical images (one being real) then the caster could pick the wrong target.
Because if the caster could just select the mage who casted mirror image then casting the spell is pointless
As the spell is almost usless as it would mean that a second lvl spell could be bypassed by a first lvl spell


Magic missile requires you to target the creature. There are many images, but only one creature so you can't really hit an image. This is also supported by the need for an attack roll as quoted above. An image is not a caster. Each image is a target for though as far as attacks rolls go which is why attacks rolls are foiled by them. If they wanted it to foil spells also then they would not have made a limitation on attack rolls to be the only way to get rid of them.


Magic Missile hits automatically.

That doesn't mean the spell is "almost useless", even if it is "bypassed" by a 1st-level spell.

It's like saying stone skin is useless because magic missile can bypass it.

Mirror image is not meant to defend against magic. It's meant to defend against some brute hitting you with a claw or sword or other physical form of attack. It fulfils that purpose most admiringly.


I agree that in melee it works fine i think the thing that is bothering me is could a caster use magic missle to pick out the real target amonst the fakes?
so could a party barbarian run up to an evil spell caster who has cast mirror image and then wait for his own mage to cast magic missle then just clobber the one that gets hit by the spell?

Liberty's Edge

The Saltmarsh 6 wrote:

I agree that in melee it works fine i think the thing that is bothering me is could a caster use magic missle to pick out the real target amonst the fakes?

so could a party barbarian run up to an evil spell caster who has cast mirror image and then wait for his own mage to cast magic missle then just clobber the one that gets hit by the spell?

No.

It works just like Fireball - the Magic Missiles seem to strike all of the images and the original.
-Kle.

RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8

KaeYoss wrote:

Magic Missile hits automatically.

That doesn't mean the spell is "almost useless", even if it is "bypassed" by a 1st-level spell.

It's like saying stone skin is useless because magic missile can bypass it.

Mirror image is not meant to defend against magic. It's meant to defend against some brute hitting you with a claw or sword or other physical form of attack. It fulfils that purpose most admiringly.

Unless the brute thug has the feat 'Great Cleave'


moon glum wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:

Magic Missile hits automatically.

That doesn't mean the spell is "almost useless", even if it is "bypassed" by a 1st-level spell.

It's like saying stone skin is useless because magic missile can bypass it.

Mirror image is not meant to defend against magic. It's meant to defend against some brute hitting you with a claw or sword or other physical form of attack. It fulfils that purpose most admiringly.

Unless the brute thug has the feat 'Great Cleave'

Still means you'll only be hit once. Without that, the guy would probably hit you at least twice.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Cleave won't work. Regardless of how many images there are, there's still only one foe.
Mirror Image doesn't present you with multiple "targets" to attack. Just like with Magic Missile, there's only one target, the caster. All Mirror Image does is add a miss chance.


The Saltmarsh 6 wrote:

I agree that in melee it works fine i think the thing that is bothering me is could a caster use magic missle to pick out the real target amonst the fakes?

so could a party barbarian run up to an evil spell caster who has cast mirror image and then wait for his own mage to cast magic missle then just clobber the one that gets hit by the spell?

No.

Mirror Images flicker in and out of the real mage and it is assumed the real mage isn't standing stock still in a fight. Even if the Barbarian "Readied" an action to attack the "image" struck by the Magic Missile, I would still not allow it.

EDIT: And as said by someone else, all the images appear to have been affected by the spell, but in the case of magic missile, because there are foreign objects flying into the cluster of images, I can see how you might want to argue you can pick out the actual mage. Regardless though, it is still a No ;) The only way to figure out the real mage is to get rid of the images ;)


Does anyone let the target of magic missile make a reflex roll? What about fireball and lighting? Just curious

Dark Archive

So, I can add Mirror Image to the list of "spells that don't work the way I thought they did".


That's rubbish. Magic Missile was always a good spell to use against Mirror Image as you could aim an individual missile at each image taking out the images. Saying it ignores the images and goes straight to the real wizard sucks big time. How can the caster know which "image" to cast the spell at? She would have to aim it at one specific image not in the general vicinity.


Curse the Halfling wrote:
How can the caster know which "image" to cast the spell at?

I hate to say it (because it is the actual answer), but: Frikking Magic!


KaeYoss wrote:
I hate to say it (because it is the actual answer), but: Frikking Magic!

On that basis you don't need to do anything as a caster except wave your hands in the general direction of "away from yourself" and any spell you cast will hit what you want "by magic". Reminds me of the dum dum bullets in Roger Rabbit.

The Exchange

I can remember the arguments back many years (1st addition) when the Wizard learned that MM would miss and POP images. He would point to the write up and say "Always hits! NO MISS CHANCE! what the heck are you rolling to see "what image was hit"!" ... so this is kind of funny to me. Sorry.


ern2112 wrote:
Does anyone let the target of magic missile make a reflex roll? What about fireball and lighting? Just curious

I run by the rules. Magic missile is an autohit, while the other spells only require a reflex saves if they mention one.


Curse the Halfling wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
I hate to say it (because it is the actual answer), but: Frikking Magic!
On that basis you don't need to do anything as a caster except wave your hands in the general direction of "away from yourself" and any spell you cast will hit what you want "by magic". Reminds me of the dum dum bullets in Roger Rabbit.

Not "any spell", just the ones that don't call for an attack roll and fit within how the rules work for the current situation.


Agreed that magic missle is auto hit but the caster still has to pick a target and that means he has to make a choise as he does not know which one is real.
So i would say that the missles hit what ever he noninates as the target which could be one of the images because yes they are auto hit but they hit what the caster picks as a target and if he picks wrong then they miss


Curse the Halfling wrote:
That's rubbish. Magic Missile was always a good spell to use against Mirror Image as you could aim an individual missile at each image taking out the images. Saying it ignores the images and goes straight to the real wizard sucks big time. How can the caster know which "image" to cast the spell at? She would have to aim it at one specific image not in the general vicinity.

So according to you, Mirror Image, a 2nd-level spell, could negate Flesh to Stone, a 6th-level spell, just because the caster of Flesh to Stone targeted one of the images instead of the real wizard. That would make Mirror Image the ultimate protection against save or die spells, and that would be real rubbish IMO.


The Saltmarsh 6 wrote:

Agreed that magic missle is auto hit but the caster still has to pick a target and that means he has to make a choise as he does not know which one is real.

So i would say that the missles hit what ever he noninates as the target which could be one of the images because yes they are auto hit but they hit what the caster picks as a target and if he picks wrong then they miss

That's a nice house rule, but it doesn't work that way according to the RAW.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

Magic missile can't hit the figments because magic missile only affects creatures, which figments are not.


Abraham spalding wrote:
Magic missile can't hit the figments because magic missile only affects creatures, which figments are not.

Yep, Abraham is right. It's not because it worked in a certain way in the old Black Ilse isometric D&D computer games that it should work the same way in Pathfinder. ;)


Curse the Halfling wrote:
KaeYoss wrote:
I hate to say it (because it is the actual answer), but: Frikking Magic!
On that basis you don't need to do anything as a caster except wave your hands in the general direction of "away from yourself" and any spell you cast will hit what you want "by magic". Reminds me of the dum dum bullets in Roger Rabbit.

Have you read the magic missile spell?


The Saltmarsh 6 wrote:

Agreed that magic missle is auto hit but the caster still has to pick a target and that means he has to make a choise as he does not know which one is real.

So i would say that the missles hit what ever he noninates as the target which could be one of the images because yes they are auto hit but they hit what the caster picks as a target and if he picks wrong then they miss

Screw that. I'll just use burning hands. Or fireball. By your logic, that instantly pops all the images since an area spell affects all targets in its area, and those images are all in the same space as the caster.

Is the way the rules work totally logical? Not necessarily. But we're talking about a game that simulates magic. Logic will not always have a place there. And, as I just proved, this can go both ways. Think it's bad that the spell doesn't protect you from magic missiles? That's nothing compared to the case where every area spell will not just fry you, but do away with all your mirror images, so better pray that no spellcaster you ever meet has even the slightest preference for evocation.

RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8

Quantum Steve wrote:

Cleave won't work. Regardless of how many images there are, there's still only one foe.

Mirror Image doesn't present you with multiple "targets" to attack. Just like with Magic Missile, there's only one target, the caster. All Mirror Image does is add a miss chance.

I disagree.

Here is the relevant passage from the spell mirror image:

Whenever you are attacked or are the target of a spell that requires an attack roll, there is a possibility that the attack targets one of your images instead. If the attack is a hit, roll randomly to see whether the selected target is real or a figment. If it is a figment, the figment is destroyed.

So, the great cleave attack would possibly target an image. If it hits and destroys the image, the brute gets to attack an adjacent target. They target you, but roll an image instead (dang those shifting images!). They hit and destroy the image. So they get to target an adjacent foe. They would like to target you, but frustratingly target an image instead...

Dark Archive

moon glum wrote:
Quantum Steve wrote:

Cleave won't work. Regardless of how many images there are, there's still only one foe.

Mirror Image doesn't present you with multiple "targets" to attack. Just like with Magic Missile, there's only one target, the caster. All Mirror Image does is add a miss chance.

I disagree.

Here is the relevant passage from the spell mirror image:

Whenever you are attacked or are the target of a spell that requires an attack roll, there is a possibility that the attack targets one of your images instead. If the attack is a hit, roll randomly to see whether the selected target is real or a figment. If it is a figment, the figment is destroyed.

So, the great cleave attack would possibly target an image. If it hits and destroys the image, the brute gets to attack an adjacent target. They target you, but roll an image instead (dang those shifting images!). They hit and destroy the image. So they get to target an adjacent foe. They would like to target you, but frustratingly target an image instead...

Great cleave would not work.

per the feat:

Quote:
Benefit: As a standard action, you can make a single attack at your full base attack bonus against a foe within reach. If you hit, you deal damage normally and can make an additional attack (using your full base attack bonus) against a foe that is adjacent to the previous foe and also within reach. If you hit, you can continue to make attacks against foes adjacent to the previous foe, so long as they are within your reach. You cannot attack an individual foe more than once during this attack action. When you use this feat, you take a –2 penalty to your Armor Class until your next turn.

The wizard and his images are not different foes. You are only targeting the wizard.

RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8

Happler wrote:
moon glum wrote:
Quantum Steve wrote:

Cleave won't work. Regardless of how many images there are, there's still only one foe.

Mirror Image doesn't present you with multiple "targets" to attack. Just like with Magic Missile, there's only one target, the caster. All Mirror Image does is add a miss chance.

I disagree.

Here is the relevant passage from the spell mirror image:

Whenever you are attacked or are the target of a spell that requires an attack roll, there is a possibility that the attack targets one of your images instead. If the attack is a hit, roll randomly to see whether the selected target is real or a figment. If it is a figment, the figment is destroyed.

So, the great cleave attack would possibly target an image. If it hits and destroys the image, the brute gets to attack an adjacent target. They target you, but roll an image instead (dang those shifting images!). They hit and destroy the image. So they get to target an adjacent foe. They would like to target you, but frustratingly target an image instead...

Great cleave would not work.

per the feat:

Quote:
Benefit: As a standard action, you can make a single attack at your full base attack bonus against a foe within reach. If you hit, you deal damage normally and can make an additional attack (using your full base attack bonus) against a foe that is adjacent to the previous foe and also within reach. If you hit, you can continue to make attacks against foes adjacent to the previous foe, so long as they are within your reach. You cannot attack an individual foe more than once during this attack action. When you use this feat, you take a –2 penalty to your Armor Class until your next turn.
The wizard and his images are not different foes. You are only targeting the wizard.

Ah, but you are wrong when you say that the user of the feat 'Great Cleave' is only targeting the wizard. The spell 'mirror image' clearly states, 'Whenever you are attacked or are the target of a spell that requires an attack roll, there is a possibility that the attack targets one of your images instead.' So, if the user of great cleave rolls that they target one of your images instead, they are not, obviously, targeting the wizard.

Sovereign Court

moon glum wrote:
Happler wrote:
moon glum wrote:
Quantum Steve wrote:

Cleave won't work. Regardless of how many images there are, there's still only one foe.

Mirror Image doesn't present you with multiple "targets" to attack. Just like with Magic Missile, there's only one target, the caster. All Mirror Image does is add a miss chance.

I disagree.

Here is the relevant passage from the spell mirror image:

Whenever you are attacked or are the target of a spell that requires an attack roll, there is a possibility that the attack targets one of your images instead. If the attack is a hit, roll randomly to see whether the selected target is real or a figment. If it is a figment, the figment is destroyed.

So, the great cleave attack would possibly target an image. If it hits and destroys the image, the brute gets to attack an adjacent target. They target you, but roll an image instead (dang those shifting images!). They hit and destroy the image. So they get to target an adjacent foe. They would like to target you, but frustratingly target an image instead...

Great cleave would not work.

per the feat:

Quote:
Benefit: As a standard action, you can make a single attack at your full base attack bonus against a foe within reach. If you hit, you deal damage normally and can make an additional attack (using your full base attack bonus) against a foe that is adjacent to the previous foe and also within reach. If you hit, you can continue to make attacks against foes adjacent to the previous foe, so long as they are within your reach. You cannot attack an individual foe more than once during this attack action. When you use this feat, you take a –2 penalty to your Armor Class until your next turn.
The wizard and his images are not different foes. You are only targeting the wizard.
Ah, but you are wrong when you say that the user of the feat 'Great Cleave' is only targeting the wizard. The spell 'mirror image' clearly states, 'Whenever you are attacked or are the...

Ah but you're missing the point that all the figments and the caster all share the same space and thus are not adjacent to each other. Cleave and Great Cleave require seperate creatures in seperate adjacent spaces. You cannot Cleave mirror image.

--Vrocking Grasp

RPG Superstar 2015 Top 8

1 person marked this as FAQ candidate.
King of Vrock wrote:
moon glum wrote:
Happler wrote:
moon glum wrote:
Quantum Steve wrote:

Cleave won't work. Regardless of how many images there are, there's still only one foe.

Mirror Image doesn't present you with multiple "targets" to attack. Just like with Magic Missile, there's only one target, the caster. All Mirror Image does is add a miss chance.

I disagree.

Here is the relevant passage from the spell mirror image:

Whenever you are attacked or are the target of a spell that requires an attack roll, there is a possibility that the attack targets one of your images instead. If the attack is a hit, roll randomly to see whether the selected target is real or a figment. If it is a figment, the figment is destroyed.

So, the great cleave attack would possibly target an image. If it hits and destroys the image, the brute gets to attack an adjacent target. They target you, but roll an image instead (dang those shifting images!). They hit and destroy the image. So they get to target an adjacent foe. They would like to target you, but frustratingly target an image instead...

Great cleave would not work.

per the feat:

Quote:
Benefit: As a standard action, you can make a single attack at your full base attack bonus against a foe within reach. If you hit, you deal damage normally and can make an additional attack (using your full base attack bonus) against a foe that is adjacent to the previous foe and also within reach. If you hit, you can continue to make attacks against foes adjacent to the previous foe, so long as they are within your reach. You cannot attack an individual foe more than once during this attack action. When you use this feat, you take a –2 penalty to your Armor Class until your next turn.
The wizard and his images are not different foes. You are only targeting the wizard.
Ah, but you are wrong when you say that the user of the feat 'Great Cleave' is only targeting the wizard. The spell 'mirror image' clearly states, 'Whenever you are
...

That is possibly a good argument. It all depends on whether the images are considered adjacent to each other. If multiple morlocks, or tiny fey occupy the same space, are they adjacent to one another? Its an interesting point, and I can't find a strict rule one way or another. It seems to me though, that the spirit of the rule for great cleave would let you attack different targets in the same space in the same way that it would let you attack adjacent foes that occupy separate spaces. After all, it would be easier to cleave from one image (or morlock, or pixie) to another one in the same space, than it would be to cleave into targets in separate but adjacent spaces.

Liberty's Edge

1 person marked this as a favorite.
Curse the Halfling wrote:
That's rubbish. Magic Missile was always a good spell to use against Mirror Image as you could aim an individual missile at each image taking out the images. Saying it ignores the images and goes straight to the real wizard sucks big time. How can the caster know which "image" to cast the spell at? She would have to aim it at one specific image not in the general vicinity.

Magic Missile is not aimed, since it does not require an attack roll. The caster identifies the target "that wizard with the Mirror Image up", and the missiles hit that wizard.

If the wizard takes damage it's his own fault for being a moron and not having Shield up.
-Kle.


Magic missle automatically hits the wizard as the only viable target of the spell. If you are really that worried about 1d4+1 cast shield.

Edit - I dont think ive seen a mage past level 4 that hasnt had Mage armor , Blur , Shield and Mirror image up constantly ( The last 3 used with a meta magic rod of lesser extend )

Edit 2 - linking spells

Mirror Image
School illusion (figment); Level bard 2, sorcerer/wizard 2
Casting Time 1 standard action
Components V, S
Range personal
Target you
Duration 1 min./level

This spell creates a number of illusory doubles of you that inhabit your square. These doubles make it difficult for enemies to precisely locate and attack you.

When mirror image is cast, 1d4 images plus one image per three caster levels (maximum eight images total) are created. These images remain in your space and move with you, mimicking your movements, sounds, and actions exactly.Whenever you are attacked or are the target of a spell that requires an attack roll, there is a possibility that the attack targets one of your images instead.If the attack is a hit, roll randomly to see whether the selected target is real or a figment. If it is a figment, the figment is destroyed. If the attack misses by 5 or less, one of your figments is destroyed by the near miss. Area spells affect you normally and do not destroy any of your figments. Spells and effects that do not require an attack roll affect you normally and do not destroy any of your figments. Spells that require a touch attack are harmlessly discharged if used to destroy a figment.

An attacker must be able to see the figments to be fooled. If you are invisible or the attacker is blind, the spell has no effect (although the normal miss chances still apply).

and

Magic Missile
School evocation [force]; Level sorcerer/wizard 1
Casting Time 1 standard action
Components V, S
Range medium (100 ft. + 10 ft./level)
Targets up to five creatures, no two of which can be more than 15 ft. apart
Duration instantaneous
Saving Throw none; Spell Resistance yes

A missile of magical energy darts forth from your fingertip and strikes its target, dealing 1d4+1 points of force damage.

The missile strikes unerringly, even if the target is in melee combat, so long as it has less than total cover or total concealment. Specific parts of a creature can't be singled out. Objects are not damaged by the spell.

For every two caster levels beyond 1st, you gain an additional missile—two at 3rd level, three at 5th, four at 7th, and the maximum of five missiles at 9th level or higher. If you shoot multiple missiles, you can have them strike a single creature or several creatures. A single missile can strike only one creature. You must designate targets before you check for spell resistance or roll damage.

Magic missle doesnt have an attack roll. Mirror image only triggers on attack rolls. /thread

The Exchange

1 person marked this as a favorite.

This is one reason why wizards are overpowered. Simple and very easy to read spells are misinterpreted. The more complicated spells don't have a chance.

RPG Superstar 2008 Top 32

I removed a post. Let's be civil, please, even if the topic has been brought up before.


I'd rule that Great Cleave wouldn't work because ultimately, you are still attacking the same foe as the attack that destroyed one of the images. Mirror Images don't count as a separate foe because they themselves can not be targeted.


As far as the cleave debate, I have never considered "hitting" an image hitting your target... if you hit an image, in my mind you have missed your target. Cleave requires a hit, and while hit is used in both descriptions, my view of RAI is unless you hit the caster himself, it is a miss when considering feats and abilities (rend for instance)


KCWM wrote:
I'd rule that Great Cleave wouldn't work because ultimately, you are still attacking the same foe as the attack that destroyed one of the images. Mirror Images don't count as a separate foe because they themselves can not be targeted.

Great Cleave (Combat)

You can strike many adjacent foes with a single blow.
Prerequisites: Str 13, Cleave, Power Attack, base attack bonus +4.

Benefit: As a standard action, you can make a single attack at your full base attack bonus against a foe within reach. If you hit, you deal damage normally and can make an additional attack (using your full base attack bonus) against a foe that is adjacent to the previous foe and also within reach. If you hit, you can continue to make attacks against foes adjacent to the previous foe, so long as they are within your reach. You cannot attack an individual foe more than once during this attack action. When you use this feat, you take a –2 penalty to your Armor Class until your next turn.

The mirror images are in your square not adjacent to you. Great cleave will not work.


Tagion wrote:
KCWM wrote:
I'd rule that Great Cleave wouldn't work because ultimately, you are still attacking the same foe as the attack that destroyed one of the images. Mirror Images don't count as a separate foe because they themselves can not be targeted.

Great Cleave (Combat)

You can strike many adjacent foes with a single blow.
Prerequisites: Str 13, Cleave, Power Attack, base attack bonus +4.

Benefit: As a standard action, you can make a single attack at your full base attack bonus against a foe within reach. If you hit, you deal damage normally and can make an additional attack (using your full base attack bonus) against a foe that is adjacent to the previous foe and also within reach. If you hit, you can continue to make attacks against foes adjacent to the previous foe, so long as they are within your reach. You cannot attack an individual foe more than once during this attack action. When you use this feat, you take a –2 penalty to your Armor Class until your next turn.

The mirror images are in your square not adjacent to you. Great cleave will not work.

I wasn't arguing that point. I was offering more of an explanation in the event someone tried to be clever with their interpretation of adjacent, especially if the group didn't use miniatures.


The Saltmarsh 6 wrote:

I think it's a bit of a gray area, in the description of magic missle it states that the caster must designate a target but if there are say 5 indentical images (one being real) then the caster could pick the wrong target.

Because if the caster could just select the mage who casted mirror image then casting the spell is pointless
As the spell is almost usless as it would mean that a second lvl spell could be bypassed by a first lvl spell

I have to quote this for being the silliest thing I've read in quite some time.

To anyone with a decent concept of priorities, which of the two scenarios is more preferable?

Scenario 1) You cast Mirror Image. The enemy mage casts Magic Missile and destroys all of your images, but doesn't hurt you. Then, the Orc Barbarian proceeds to multi-attack you with his greataxe.

Scenario 2) You cast Mirror Image. The enemy mage casts Magic Missile and hits you (but not the images) for 5d4+5 damage. Lets assume he maximized this damage even, so you take 25 damage. Then, the Orc Barbarian proceeds to multi-attack you with his greataxe, but he only manages to decapitate your images.

I'm pretty sure the orc with the axe would have hit you for a lot more than 25 damage. 25 is all a maximized Magic Missile can do to you, and that's assuming 9th caster level for effing sake. And if he actually had to roll damage, it would likely be much lower. The point being: I'd rather be hit by the mage, wouldn't you?


you clearly have missed the point that I'm trying to make.
That in my oppion there is room for debate on this subject and I'm belive that it's not so black and white as other believe


There is only room for debate if you completely ignore what is actually in the text of each ability or spell in question.


The Saltmarsh 6 wrote:

you clearly have missed the point that I'm trying to make.

That in my oppion there is room for debate on this subject and I'm belive that it's not so black and white as other believe

Magic Missile states that the missiles ignore all miss chances, and strike the target unerringly, without making any attack rolls.

Mirror Image states that it only applies to effects that require attack rolls.

Where is the room for debate? Both spells clearly agree that Magic Missile is immune to this. Just because you want it to work differently doesn't qualify it as a debatable issue.

Selecting a target is different from "picking an image." When the orc barbarian swings his greataxe at you, he's still selecting you as his target. When a wizard decides he wants to Magic Missile you, he's still selecting you as his target. He isn't picking out an image, he's picking you. This process is irrelevant to the way Mirror Image functions. Once his target is selected, he then must obey the given rules for the spells in question. And the rule, rather simply, is: did you make an attack roll? No? Then my spell doesn't affect you.

To explain it a different way, Magic Missile is a spell that is specifically designed to ignore BS. Think of it like a heat-seeking missile. The heat-seeker doesn't give a crap how many of you there appear to be. It only responds to the heat signature the one true one gives off. Magic Missile isn't a heat-seeker per se, but rather more of a "reality-seeker" in this case.


This is becoming one of those 'teach the controversy' things isn't it?

Dark Archive

The Saltmarsh 6 wrote:

you clearly have missed the point that I'm trying to make.

That in my oppion there is room for debate on this subject and I'm belive that it's not so black and white as other believe

It is as debatable as saying that you are timing your spells to hit the wizard who has blink up. In both cases, you have to obey the rules of the spell. And since Mirror image states that all spells that do not require an attack roll do not pop images, then magic missile (which does not require an attack roll) does not pop an image.

1 to 50 of 99 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Magic Missile and Mirror Image All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.