Fall Errata Suggestions 2025


Pathfinder Second Edition General Discussion

51 to 57 of 57 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>

Shining Kingdoms pg. 53
The Radiant Globe spell could do with clarification of whether the spell negates a ranged Strike with the appropriate ammunition.


Treasure Vault pg. 15
The Immortal Bastion armor refers to an armor's deflect melee trait, when it should refer to the entrench melee trait.


Treasure Vault pg. 19
Wolfjaw Armor has a mild mistake where it still has two mentions of the winter wolf: one in the last sentence of the first paragraph, and one in the Craft Requirements, which also still references the Bestiary.


1 person marked this as a favorite.

From Treasure Vault Remastered:

The Gauntlet Bow, the Rotary Bow, the Sukgung and the Taw Launcher are described as Crossbows, but the table on page 30 lists their weapon group as Bow.

The Crescent Cross and the Lancer are described as being a combination of a weapon and one or more crossbows, but the table on page 31 lists the weapon group of the ranged portion as Bow.

Given that the Remaster rules introduced the Crossbow weapon group, I'm positive these instances are a mistake and all of these weapons should be in the Crossbow group, not Bow.


Treasure Vault Remastered Edition pg. 20
For the Shield's Inscribed trait, the last sentence should instead direct to page 8, instead of page 219, because the Index will just direct to page 8 anyway in the Remastered version.


Tumble Through: Get rid of it since it is just a stride action that doesn't really require you do anything like Tumble Through.

Or make it clear that Tumble Through is an action that requires you actually Tumble Through an enemy.

Clears up confusion with the Liturgist Practice where it has been interpreted that Tumble Through is just a stride that for some reason required a different name.

Be nice to have a more clear ruling that Tumble Through is a separate action requiring you to Tumble Through, so I don't have to argue with people about a rule that used to be clear but apparently hast lost clarity for some reason.

Clear rules make the game easier to run.


1 person marked this as a favorite.
Deriven Firelion wrote:

Tumble Through: Get rid of it since it is just a stride action that doesn't really require you do anything like Tumble Through.

Or make it clear that Tumble Through is an action that requires you actually Tumble Through an enemy.

Clears up confusion with the Liturgist Practice where it has been interpreted that Tumble Through is just a stride that for some reason required a different name.

Be nice to have a more clear ruling that Tumble Through is a separate action requiring you to Tumble Through, so I don't have to argue with people about a rule that used to be clear but apparently hast lost clarity for some reason.

Clear rules make the game easier to run.

FWIW, while I agree with you regarding the action in general, Sayre is on record stating the Liturgist interaction with Tumble Through is completely intended (but it was on Discord, so I can't link to it directly). You can find transcribed quotes here and here

51 to 57 of 57 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder Second Edition / General Discussion / Fall Errata Suggestions 2025 All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.