| 4 people marked this as a favorite. |
Player Core 2: page 308
The major Staff of the Tempest is listed at 14,000 gp, but that is extremely high for a staff with only up to 6th level spells.
Comparable staves seem to be priced from around 4,000-4,500 gp so the 14,000 gp price is likely a typo.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Divine Mysteries: page 289
Greater Esoteric Spellcasting should be 10th level. It is listed alphabetically between two other 10th level feats, Cursebreaker and Open the Blazing Eye. Additionally, its explanation says that "gain a
4th-rank spell of that tradition as an innate spell you can cast once a day," followed by "At 12th level, you gain a 5th-rank spell" implying that you already have the 4th-rank spell when you reach 12th level.
|
A few people I've talked to and I think that Seneschal Witch is perfectly fine for Pathfinder Society play and should be allowed as an option even if it has to be with a boon, in the next errata.
The only ability we imagine to be problematic is Patron Glamor and if that's going to be a problem it'd be okay to ban that.
Relationships with PC's patrons in society games don't come up at all in play anyways. All witches might as well have absentee patrons for all the story of the scenarios care. There is no reason to ban it so lets not ban it.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Player Core 2, the critical failure state of the reincarnate ritual still references the legacy distinction between ability scores and modifiers: "the target has an Intelligence score of 1 (–5 modifier)"
In the remaster, should probably just be "the target has an Intelligence score of -5"
Hello! First time poster here, I had a question in regards to the item Amphisbaena Handwraps, are they intended to work with Talismans or Weapon Property Runes or neither? Any help would be appreciated!
For weapon property runes? Definitely.
Amphisbaena handwraps can have weapon runes etched onto them, similar to handwraps of mighty blows.
Treat these as handwraps of mighty blows for rune purposes, which can have property runes.
For Talisman... RAW, no. They're not weapons and the item doesn't say they inherit the handwraps ability to have talisman. I suspect a lot of GMs would allow it, though.
|
|
It was made available via charity boons at cons.A few people I've talked to and I think that Seneschal Witch is perfectly fine for Pathfinder Society play and should be allowed as an option even if it has to be with a boon, in the next errata.
The only ability we imagine to be problematic is Patron Glamor and if that's going to be a problem it'd be okay to ban that.
Relationships with PC's patrons in society games don't come up at all in play anyways. All witches might as well have absentee patrons for all the story of the scenarios care. There is no reason to ban it so lets not ban it.
I guess that is okay then, but in my friends and I's defense not everyone would know that. I'll pass that along.
I don't think you can etch property runes onto them because they're a specific magic weapon. You can etch fundamental runes onto them, though.Hello! First time poster here, I had a question in regards to the item Amphisbaena Handwraps, are they intended to work with Talismans or Weapon Property Runes or neither? Any help would be appreciated!For weapon property runes? Definitely.
Amphisbaena handwraps can have weapon runes etched onto them, similar to handwraps of mighty blows.Treat these as handwraps of mighty blows for rune purposes, which can have property runes.
For Talisman... RAW, no. They're not weapons and the item doesn't say they inherit the handwraps ability to have talisman. I suspect a lot of GMs would allow it, though.
Amphisbaena Handwraps are not weapons: they're worn gloves (like handwarps). So the rule about specific magic weapons doesn't apply RAW and the handwrap exception does (since these say they use the handwrap exception).
Both of them are magic items and neither are weapons, so one saying "it works like the other" and the other saying "you can do it" should cover it. I don't think that needs an errata.
seems fine if a higher level more expensive item is a bit better than the lower level one
|
Deimavigga (Apostate Devil) - Monster Core 2 pg 102-103
Looks like this devil wasn't fully checked through on remastering. Its Boundless Reach ability—allowing it to cast any of its touch-range spells "against any creature they can see directly or via magic"—has very limited use now as the deimavigga no longer has any touch spells!
Deimavigga (Apostate Devil) - Monster Core 2 pg 102-103
Looks like this devil wasn't fully checked through on remastering. Its Boundless Reach ability—allowing it to cast any of its touch-range spells "against any creature they can see directly or via magic"—has very limited use now as the deimavigga no longer has any touch spells!
Boundless Reach works on Strikes and would work on any touch spells they might gain access to from magic items. As such, it doesn't seem like an obvious error or oversight. Even in the pre-remaster, it only had a single default touch spell.
|
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Requiring an at-table edit to the statblock of a creature to use its specific abilities as written seems like an oversight to me? But Paizo can decide.
Errata suggestion:
Brixori - Draconic Codex pg 27
Brixori is written with a focus on occult themes, offers a spell list where the tradition shared by all her granted spells is Occult, and is known for her command over occult magic, but then her Divine Skill is Arcana.
Occultism seems like the more likely choice, especially with Yluma being the god of arcane dragons.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Requiring an at-table edit to the statblock of a creature to use its specific abilities as written seems like an oversight to me? But Paizo can decide.
What edit? the ability works 100% with Strikes and gets a bonus if it happens to have a magic item that matches the ability. I'm not seeing any "at-table edit" needed. Worst case, it's an unused ribbon ability that doesn't take away from its use with Strikes at Sense range. the change to remaster is only the lose of using Touch of Idiocy with the ability.
| 2 people marked this as a favorite. |
Treasure Vault pg 131 [This is specific to the Remaster.]
Celestial Staff has Frigid Flurry & Howling Blizzard for 7th-rank spells.
Not only do these not match the theme, but neither are Divine spells.
Looking at other Staves, it looks like they were copied over from the Boreal Staff's list.
As it stands, a creature needs access to two traditions to use all spells on the Celestial Staff: Divine & either Arcane or Primal. That doesn't seem right.
Monster Core 2: The tennin has the ability Secrets of Immortality, which allows it to use Occultism for some Medicine skill actions, but it doesn't actually have the Occultism skill.
Community & Social Media Specialist
|
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Thank you all for contributing to this thread! The team has reviewed it, and we're going to lock it to prevent it from getting too big to parse though. For any future errata suggestions that were not already mentioned in this thread, we request you make a new Spring Errata Suggestions 2026 thread please!