|
Given that GM Cody just ran a recruitment for AoA and had eleven applicants, I don't think you'll have any trouble at all. Would you be restricting class choices to the eight in the Remastered Core, or allowing other classes with the caveat that they may have to be rebuilt after further books come out?
ETA: GM Cody used the free archetype rule. Would you also consider that?
Depending on the specifics, as touched upon by the previous poster, I might also be interested.
I likely would be intrested!
Def interested.
I like Free Archtype, but I am probably more a fan of Ancestry Paragon
Interested.
I'd also be interested.
Interested.
Interested!
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I do enjoy a good PF2E game, and have had a recent character concept spring to mind which is far removed from my typical barbarian, champion, fighter submission ... so I would be happy to submit a character for review.
I'd certainly be interested. I'm definitely a fan of both free archetype and ancestral paragon (I typically allow both in my games), I would imagine by using Remaster, you'd be referring to the updated spells, feats, and items then? For example stuff for the cleric listed in Player Core, but not the Core Rulebook?
|
I'm VERY interested! I got a character all written up (from GM Cody's recruitment) and ready to go!
I don't have any preferences regarding rules like Ancestral Paragon and Free Archetype per se, but GM Cody's recruitment used Free Archetype, so if it isn't available in this one my character would need some adjustments.
interested
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Although I won’t be applying for this, I will say that I am a fan of both Free Archetype and Ancestral Paragon.
Free archetype helps to broaden character concepts, while Ancestral Paragon in my opinion actually lets your character…be their ancestry. I find PF2 incredibly feat starved, and the ancestries are fairly anaemic from the start - Ancestral Paragon goes a long way to ameliorate that.
That's exactly why I run both Ocean. Ancestral Paragon allows for the ancestries to be more viable than restricted. Some kinda get hurt by it, like kitsune for instance because the amount of feats are limited, but you go with a core race, and it's whatever you want lol. Through in a versatile heritage and it just opens every thing practically. And then Free Archetype just helps allow some flexibility in what people can do so that they don't have to feel so limited and restricted.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I find Ancestral Paragon, terribly boring, but then again Paizo hasn't been great with Heritage or Ancestry feats ... when running I actually prefer to give my players Free Archetype & Gradual Ability boost.
I tend to play Humans, I just can't wrap my mind set around the more obtuse races, and Ancestry Paragon actually encourages uncommon heritages etc to get the most benefit from it.
If my fellow applicants prefer, I'm on board. But since I will likely be going human, just means more general feats for me, lol.
I've never tried Ancestral Paragon (I only played one short 2nd Edition adventure, and it was with a 0-level character), but I don't mind giving it a go!
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
I'm VERY interested! I got a character all written up (from GM Cody's recruitment) and ready to go!
I don't have any preferences regarding rules like Ancestral Paragon and Free Archetype per se, but GM Cody's recruitment used Free Archetype, so if it isn't available in this one my character would need some adjustments.
I would like to put it for a tiefling rogue, one that didn't make the cut with some of the other people present. If that's okay since the character wasn't picked. I'm interested in how the new aps run, since they moved away from complete AP paths really
I'm also a fan of Ancestral Paragon, for the reasons that Ocean stated above. I would also agree that I'd like to see a lot more Ancestry feats for many Ancestries, and I hope that is on Paizo's drawing board.
I also like Free Archetype, though I do think, from what I've seen, people tend to be conservative with it and not explore a lot of the very interesting archetypes that Paizo has come up with.
I tend to go for complicated build paths, I have a fighter (for an upcoming VTT game), that is going Champion (Reactive Strike & Shield Block will have dedicated Reactions by 8th & 10th respectively), for Retributive Strike. Then Human Multitalented for Rogue, and Shove Down (which pairs with Aggressive Block & Flinging Shove to turn a Block into an off-turn knockdown), and then Cleric later on for Emblazon Armament (Shield) & Raise Symbol. Sometimes the Multiclass dedications just fit so well together for a singular concept ...
However, in that same game, I am seeing the power of the Thaumaturge & the Pathfinder Society Dedication for some insane recall knowledge synergies.
I'll have to admit I haven't actually played Remastered Pathfinder yet, and I hope that wouldn't be a problem in a full recruitment for this, but who doesn't like free stuff?...especially in character creation. ;)
I'm interested to try it out.
| 1 person marked this as a favorite. |
Helping out at Lamond's Lament while visiting a [redacted] friend in Breachill , Jakub Thorn easily finds himself most comfortable in a soup kitchen, of all places, the organization of which reminds him of the strange (to "animal" sensibilities) Silent Consensus by which his own family and people conduct themselves in a domestic economy - he, like the other volunteers, instinctively and without (or with very few) words coming to know his niche in instrumental concert with the busy comings and goings of the facility itself. His own proclivity for solar nourishment, thus unneeding of a share himself, adding a slight leveraged value to his donated labor, such that his meagre request for simple sleeping quarters is granted without question. To boot? The people here are nice. And he can feel something in the air...
Naturally, even dangerously curious, with an inquisitive mind, long memory, and easy-flowing personality, our floral hero finds himself donning a poncho and grabbing his recently-remastered hunting crossbow and answering the Call for Heroes!
⬤⬤⬤⬤⬤
Here's my application, a hag-blooded Sorceress who would go Runescarred for FA, and is intended to be a support type caster.
PM Sent as well!
@Delta Arena: do you have a deadline in mind for submissions?
PM sent as well!
I will have something for you later tonight Delta-A
PM sent!
Thanks for running!
I would be willing to reconsider my submission, although, today is Easter, so I wouldn't have anything until possibly tomorrow....
Here is a big, dumb fighter. (Will archetype into wrestler).
GM,
Kindly, you do realize that requesting that we make private submissions while also asking that we consider reducing submission redundancy is setting us up for failure!=)
Point taken, I honestly didn't think about that at first. I was thinking more in the lines of someone wanting to share elements of their character that they didn't want other party members to know from the beginning.
GM,
Kindly, you do realize that requesting that we make private submissions while also asking that we consider reducing submission redundancy is setting us up for failure!=)
Point taken, I honestly didn't think about that at first. I was thinking more in the lines of someone wanting to share elements of their character that they didn't want other party members to know from the beginning.
Truth be told, there are some super amazing players & gms in this list so far, I am sure they will mangage to conceal/spoiler and/or share directly anything that should be GM/Player only.
That said, it is generally helpful in a recruitment to know who's submitting what, either to avoid stepping on toes OR to be totally open about competing for the "best magus submission" (out of 3).
Just my take though ....
Submitting an Aiuvarin Elf Aerokineticicst (Out-of-Towner) shortly
|
|
GM,
Kindly, you do realize that requesting that we make private submissions while also asking that we consider reducing submission redundancy is setting us up for failure!=)
Point taken, I honestly didn't think about that at first. I was thinking more in the lines of someone wanting to share elements of their character that they didn't want other party members to know from the beginning.
Apologies in advance if you already know this, but magi especially will vary a lot depending on their hybrid field of study even before they pick their free archetype.
One question, btw: do you want to know in advance if any of us have played/run any of AoA before?
I wouldn't mind know who has played/run the AP before. But as long as those players don't spoil things for the rest, I don't really mind either way.
Full disclosure, my weekly home group has completed AoA. I had also been involved in a PbP AoA, although that ended prior to finishing Book 1.
I enjoyed this AP. I played The Healer in my home game. A Fighter in the PbP.
I am definitely able to forget...huh....what was we talk'n bout....
Never played AoA.
Currently playing through it elsewhere. Am able to keep my mouth shut.
I've never played AoA before. It'll be a brand new experience for me.
Never played either. I'm excited because it's one of the rare 2e to make it from lvl1 to high levels, like how they used to be back when they made proper Aps. I so look forward if I make, as for the emancipation background, I'm totally okay knowing the other person.