
SilvercatMoonpaw |
Something to consider: all the other ancestries have their names written singular (it's "human" for example, not "humans"), so there's no reason to assume these would be any different.
I have honestly never paid attention to humans.
Also kind of wouldn't help with Sekmin, as they aren't playable.

![]() |
1 person marked this as a favorite. |

Bizzare Beasts Boozer wrote:Something to consider: all the other ancestries have their names written singular (it's "human" for example, not "humans"), so there's no reason to assume these would be any different.I have honestly never paid attention to humans.
Also kind of wouldn't help with Sekmin, as they aren't playable.
Yet! :D

Morhek |

If you want a playable snake ancestry, the Nagaji already exist and don't have the burden of being slumbering horrors waiting to reclaim their surface domains, and their canonical lack of empathy or care for humanoid life. I feel like letting Serpentfolk be playable makes them redeemable, which downplays their threat since they're supposed to be such irredeemably and unrelenting monsters that the Azlanti, who were themselves no altruists, had to step in and exterminate them and even they couldn't do it completely. At best, I would say that maybe the Nagaji were originally degenerate serpentfolk uplifted by Nalinivati - tied them distantly together, but still keep them separate.
As for plurals, I might suggest Sekmini and Aapophi for their degenerated descendants, Anada, and Iruxui. And for a bonus, I've always liked to think that the plural of Aasimar is Aasimiri.