| mrspaghetti |
Resistances and shield block are applicable here, just remember not to reduce the damage to zero as a result of penalties. Per the Errata:
Page 451: Following the formulas for calculating damage
rolls, add the sentence “If the combined penalties on an
attack would reduce the damage to 0 or below, you still
deal 1 damage.”
| Draco18s |
Resistances and shield block are applicable here, just remember not to reduce the damage to zero as a result of penalties. Per the Errata:
Page 451: Following the formulas for calculating damage
rolls, add the sentence “If the combined penalties on an
attack would reduce the damage to 0 or below, you still
deal 1 damage.”
"Penalties" is a specific step, its the "1dX+Y" step where if Y is a negative, that's a penalty. 1d6-2 can never roll less than 1, it does not apply at the resistances and shield blocking step.
| mrspaghetti |
mrspaghetti wrote:"Penalties" is a specific step, its the "1dX+Y" step where if Y is a negative, that's a penalty. 1d6-2 can never roll less than 1, it does not apply at the resistances and shield blocking step.Resistances and shield block are applicable here, just remember not to reduce the damage to zero as a result of penalties. Per the Errata:
Page 451: Following the formulas for calculating damage
rolls, add the sentence “If the combined penalties on an
attack would reduce the damage to 0 or below, you still
deal 1 damage.”
Yeah, like I exactly stated.
| mrspaghetti |
mrspaghetti wrote:Yeah, like I exactly stated.And unhelpful:
Quote:An attacke like Goliath Spider would apply its venom if i reduce it to 0 damge? (VIA RESISTANCES / BLOCK / ETC)
Note the "ETC" at the end. That stands for "etcetera":
adverb
adverb: etcetera
used at the end of a list to indicate that further, similar items are included.
| Castilliano |
I agree damage has to be done to deliver an injury poison, and with spiders I'd generally rule that way. Except technically the poison could be a contact poison. And then there's whether it contacted or not!
Apologies for muddying the waters for humor, as rules-idolators might actually run with that argument. I think it's fairly clear that unless the description emphasizes the poison is deadly to the touch, the Strike has to injure.