
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

I think you're going to see this played out one of two ways:
1) GM chooses which boons they get (particularly in scenarios where you get either boon a or b, depending on certain outcomes)
2) GM gets the same boons the players got, which could potentially "punish" the GM for "negative" boons
I agree with Christian and abide by option 1 when I GM.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

2) GM gets the same boons the players got, which could potentially "punish" the GM for "negative" boons
.
I don't think that they'll EVER do this. It gives the GM a MASSIVE incentive to cheat (or, if you prefer, to subconsciously alter things).
It was (I believe) NEVER done in PFS1 for exactly that reason

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Zach Armstrong wrote:
2) GM gets the same boons the players got, which could potentially "punish" the GM for "negative" boons
.I don't think that they'll EVER do this. It gives the GM a MASSIVE incentive to cheat (or, if you prefer, to subconsciously alter things).
It was (I believe) NEVER done in PFS1 for exactly that reason
I agree. Even if the party gets TPKd, you still get full gold, xp, & PP and choice of boon (if relevant) for GMing.

![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() |

Zach Armstrong wrote:
2) GM gets the same boons the players got, which could potentially "punish" the GM for "negative" boons
.I don't think that they'll EVER do this. It gives the GM a MASSIVE incentive to cheat (or, if you prefer, to subconsciously alter things).
It was (I believe) NEVER done in PFS1 for exactly that reason
For sure -- you wouldn't want players to ever miss anything in cases like that.