Could a Player take Flyby Attack, and would they provoke AoOs?


Rules Questions


Does a Dragon Mystery Oracle with the Dragon Wings revelation qualify for Flyby attack? If she does and a DM allows it, does this form of attacking and moving provoke Aoos?

I should ask here to, but what about Claws of the Dragon and Multiattack, if I have a bite attack from my oracle curse and the claws from my mystery, do i qualify for multiattack?


Mako Senako wrote:
Does a Dragon Mystery Oracle with the Dragon Wings revelation qualify for Flyby attack? If she does and a DM allows it, does this form of attacking and moving provoke Aoos?

Ride By Attack specifically says that you and your mount do not provoke an AO when you move-attack-move, and Fly By Attack is basically the same thing but no verbage stating that an AO is or isn't provoked. Tbh, this could go either way; I'm a big fan of "it says what it does and it does what it says" so if the rule doesn't say it, then it doesn't happen. That being said, if I were your DM, I'd make it the same as Ride-by Attack insofar as that you don't provoke an AO.

Mako Senako wrote:
I should ask here to, but what about Claws of the Dragon and Multiattack, if I have a bite attack from my oracle curse and the claws from my mystery, do i qualify for multiattack?

The only prerequisite for multiattack is 3+ natural attacks, and the claws in the Dragon Mystery are considered natural attacks, so yes :)


Yes you can qualify, but you need GM permission since it is a monster feat. And yes you provoke AoO with the movement and standard action just like you would if you were not flying.

So if you fly through threatened squares (creatures threaten within their reach in all directions, including up) you'll provoke AoO with movement. If your standard action would provoke an AoO then wherever you choose to perform that standard action you'll provide it. So for instance if you decide to attempt a Flyby Disarm and you don't have Improved Disarm you'll provide 2 separate AoO to the creature you are attempting to disarm.

And again with Multiattack, yes but you need GM permission. Monster feats weren't created with players in mind so the GM is perfectly within his rights to deny them to players. These two feats aren't particularly outrageous but if the GM has a certain idea of how he does or doesn't want the game to go allowing them may not be a good fit for the game.

Especially multiattack since there are quite a few ways to exploit natural attacks.


Meirril wrote:

And yes you provoke AoO with the movement and standard action just like you would if you were not flying.

Why would there be an AO with Fly-by Attack and no AO with Ride-by Attack though? It makes me wonder what the purpose of the feat even is other than just moving past your opponent? Seems like a waste to me.


Ryze Kuja wrote:
Why would there be an AO with Fly-by Attack and no AO with Ride-by Attack though? It makes me wonder what the purpose of the feat even is other than just moving past your opponent? Seems like a waste to me.

Unlike ride by attack, flyby attack lets you take a standard action during any part of your movement. This could be used to cast a touch spell, vital strike, hex, and so on before flying away.

Ride by attack is just a charge.


fly by allow aoo unlike ride by because balance.
if the party lack any ranged worth while a flyby attacker is untouchable (except if some are smart enough to ready attacks). ride by is still walking of sort so can be reached and or maneuvered to circle around an catch.

also as a gm i would allow players to pick monster feat, unless they make their own race. on the ground that their race(even human elf and the like) IS in the monster manual and thus count as such.


Okay, that does make sense.

Sovereign Court

Multiattack would not be that useful as all it does is reduce secondary natural weapon penalty to -2 instead of -5, but your bite and claws (unless the way they are given differ) are both primary natural attacks.

I suppose if you plan on using a manufactured weapon and lose one of the claw attacks then it might be useful then, but as stated should not have any effect on your attacks.


Ellias Aubec wrote:

Multiattack would not be that useful as all it does is reduce secondary natural weapon penalty to -2 instead of -5, but your bite and claws (unless the way they are given differ) are both primary natural attacks.

I suppose if you plan on using a manufactured weapon and lose one of the claw attacks then it might be useful then, but as stated should not have any effect on your attacks.

Well the problem is is that the Hunger curse that grants the bite attack, states that you're sickened until you manage to successfully bite someone in the present combat. If I remember correctly you have a -2 to attack rolls, weapon damage rolls, and saves and skill checks, ability checks while sickened.. also the bite is specifically stated to be a 2ndary attack.. thats a -7 to hit on a class with medium BAB and likely a measely 14 str. Lessening that -7 to minus -4 is still pretty helpful.


Going from 3* -5 to 3* -2 is a huge difference (effectively +9 to attack rolls). The sickened condition does make things harder, so it's good to boost to hit with the bite.

Also just to make sure, feat tags (Monster, Combat, Item Creation, etc.) are an organization method. Their purpose is to make it easier to split feats into smaller more manageable groups. It also allows for abilities to target a specific set of feats. For example: A fighter's bonus feats can only be Combat feats; And, a wizard's bonus feats can only be Metamagic, Item Creation, or Spell Mastery.

In the case of Monster feats, those are feats that are used mainly by monsters or that has a monster race as a pre-req. Examples of Monster feats used by PCs a lot: Craft Construct, Awesome Blow (Brawler), Improved Natural Attack, etc. Notice how none of them list a race or "must be a monster" as a pre-req.


Flyby attack might not avoid the aoo as well, because when charging with ride by attack you are choosing to do so, where is flyby attack, you might not have the fly skill high neough to do things like hover out of reach, or move less thn half your speed... it lets you make your attacks at anypoint of your move without those pesky fly checks, which yes, are usually not that hard for flying creatures, but some have abysmal fly skills, which can be quite worsened with the correct skills and spells.


Remember that the acrobatics skill and spell-based means of avoiding AoOs (probably grace for an oracle) should still work when you're flying.


Mako Senako wrote:
Well the problem is is that the Hunger curse that grants the bite attack, states that you're sickened until you manage to successfully bite someone in the present combat. If I remember correctly you have a -2 to attack rolls, weapon damage rolls, and saves and skill checks, ability checks while sickened.. also the bite is specifically stated to be a 2ndary attack.. thats a -7 to hit on a class with medium BAB and likely a measely 14 str. Lessening that -7 to minus -4 is still pretty helpful.

You are not forced to use your non-bite attacks. If you just bite them, without the other attacks, the bite becomes primary.

So bite them, then go to the full on melee stuff.

Scarab Sages

Evilserran wrote:
Flyby attack might not avoid the aoo as well, because when charging with ride by attack you are choosing to do so, where is flyby attack, you might not have the fly skill high neough to do things like hover out of reach, or move less thn half your speed... it lets you make your attacks at anypoint of your move without those pesky fly checks, which yes, are usually not that hard for flying creatures, but some have abysmal fly skills, which can be quite worsened with the correct skills and spells.

This.

While the fly rules are often ignored, they are set up so that a typical mundane flying creature has to move more than half its speed on its turn to avoid having to make a fly check. Even for some PCs with the fly spell, a fly check to hover (DC15) or move less than half speed (DC10) isn't guaranteed. The fly spell grants good maneuverability, which is a +4. Now if the character is wearing full plate armor, they take a -6 armor check penalty. If it's a 5th level caster (like from a potion), and if they have no dex modifier and no ranks in fly, they're making the check at +0. Which means 45% of the time they'll fail the check to move less than half speed.

That same logic extends to creatures. They'll generally have a better fly skill, but take a Griffon, for example. Their fly skill is only +6 with average maneuverability. It's a small chance, but there's a 15% chance a Griffon will fail a fly check to move half speed. There's a 45% chance they'll fail to hover. Add barding into the mix, and those chances become greater.

Fly-by Attack would let them move farther and still attack without having to make the check.


The fly spell also gives a bonus on fly skill checks equal to the caster level. -6 + 4 + 5 = +3, or a 30% chance of failing a DC 10 check with zero investment. Bad, but not quite as bad as you suggest Ferious.

Scarab Sages

avr wrote:
The fly spell also gives a bonus on fly skill checks equal to the caster level. -6 + 4 + 5 = +3, or a 30% chance of failing a DC 10 check with zero investment. Bad, but not quite as bad as you suggest Ferious.

Equal to half caster level. I counted that in my calculation. It’s +2, not +5, which brings it to +0.

fly skill wrote:
The subject gains a bonus on Fly skill checks equal to 1/2 your caster level.

Unless that’s been errata’d and the update didn’t make it to d20pfsrd.


No, my bad, sorry.

Scarab Sages

No worries.


If you are the one casting fly, you qualify to put ranks in the fly skill. So the skill goes to +4 just with 1 rank.

Also if you have multiple attacks a Secondary attack cannot become a Primary attack if use alone. At least that's how I understood the rule.


You also have the Strix specific Fighter archetype that allows you to take Fly By Attack and Hover as Fighter bonus feats.

However, Fly By Attack does not in any way grant the ability to move or make the standard action attack without suffering AoO for the movement and/or the action/attack...

Some feats/abilities negate these AoO, Fly By Attack does not for very specific balance reasons.

In fact, the Strix Fighter archetype actually allows Fly checks instead of Acrobatics checks to move through threatened squares in order to focus on the Fly skill instead of Acrobatics. Exactly because of how these skills work. Giving up Climb to have Fly as a class skill.

Normally, Flying is extremely difficult to actually use. Every movement has a required check, to hover is checked even if you have flight.

Fly By Attack is easily accessible to Playable Characters because it is also balanced by opening AoO to and from...


I think its more of a case that Ride By was intended for players, and Fly By was intended for monsters. The last monster I delt with that had Fly By was a dragon. The dragon has Fly 200. Just how unfair would that be if it didn't provoke AoO? Most flying PCs can't catch up to the dragon if it decides to position itself 100 away at the end of each run. Leaving in the AoO makes things more fair for players, and since this is a feat that will be commonly assigned to monsters its made that way.


Meirril wrote:
I think its more of a case that Ride By was intended for players, and Fly By was intended for monsters. The last monster I delt with that had Fly By was a dragon. The dragon has Fly 200. Just how unfair would that be if it didn't provoke AoO? Most flying PCs can't catch up to the dragon if it decides to position itself 100 away at the end of each run. Leaving in the AoO makes things more fair for players, and since this is a feat that will be commonly assigned to monsters its made that way.

Also note that many flying creatures are also larger than medium size, thus likely have reach as well. Consider the dragon in your example, fly 100 feet with a 10 foot reach (staying outside of AOO range of a PC) make the attack and fly away for another 100 feet. I have never used this combination of abilities against my PCs, nope, not me, never...

Community / Forums / Pathfinder / Pathfinder First Edition / Rules Questions / Could a Player take Flyby Attack, and would they provoke AoOs? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.