Lust Phantom Banned?


Pathfinder Society

101 to 104 of 104 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
3/5 **** Venture-Agent, Massachusetts—Boston Metro

2 people marked this as a favorite.
GM_Beernorg wrote:


@ Kallindlara Likely sexuality is not the main reason for the ban (given the other material that is ok still), though chances are, we shall never know.

Could just be an accident like some of the other bans that have occurred.

EDIT:
Or it could be boon material like some of the other banned stuff.

5/5 5/55/55/5

8 people marked this as a favorite.

Its kind of funny that most torturers would need to pass off that sort of equipment as being "for entertainment purposes only" while in cheliax the kind of equipment the paracountess uses for entertainment has to be passed off as being for actual torture.

Silver Crusade 1/5 Contributor

MadScientistWorking wrote:
GM_Beernorg wrote:


@ Kallindlara Likely sexuality is not the main reason for the ban (given the other material that is ok still), though chances are, we shall never know.

Could just be an accident like some of the other bans that have occurred.

EDIT:
Or it could be boon material like some of the other banned stuff.

These are also possible. I'd lean towards the latter - that would explain why Mr. Compton might be so quiet on the issue.

Thank you for the reminders. ^_^

Grand Lodge 4/5 5/55/55/55/5 **** Venture-Captain, Minnesota

5 people marked this as a favorite.

I'm hoping that it's the latter. Because I really don't want to start a thread titled, "We need more lust in the society!"

Actually, now that I typed that, I really do.

Will Save: 1d20 - 1 ⇒ (18) - 1 = 17

Yes! Even with my modifiers, I made the DC!

Hmm

101 to 104 of 104 << first < prev | 1 | 2 | 3 | next > last >>
Community / Forums / Organized Play / Pathfinder Society / Lust Phantom Banned? All Messageboards

Want to post a reply? Sign in.